|
The national revolution in Iran cannot be stopped Friday 9th January Mahyad Tousi, an Iranian–American film-maker, scriptwriter, producer and director lives in London and runs TousiTV, claimed to be the most watched political channel in the UK. As one would expect he is following the people’s revolution in his homeland with amazement and joy. What he showing us now makes it very unlikely that the Khamenei regime can survive. For a flavour of the electric excitement on the streets here is his latest show: ... and this is the TousiTV broadcast:- ... and then the IRGC began its slaughter of somewhere between 6,000 and 30,000 protesters on the streets of Iran’s cities. The process came to a halt. But now ... February 28th - Khamenie dead, IRGC leaders dead, US strikes on-going. The people are celebrating already. There are calls for Pahlavi to return. A gun battle is being waged to free political prisoners in Tehran (which could be important, because there is no revolutionary leadership among the people at large). We wait for news. Comments:2
Posted by Manc on Sun, 11 Jan 2026 11:33 | # An interview with Iranian activist in America Goldie Gamari…. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja8B51afADo&t=549s It’s what she says towards the end of the interview that might answer your question “who will sweep that away?” The median age in Iran is 34 years with 42.4% of the population being aged under 25. To me, the age demographic suggests that the post regime future of Iran is a blank page waiting to be filled in. 3
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 11 Jan 2026 13:05 | # @2 “It’s what she says towards the end of the interview” For one thing, she said “These people are criminals.” This aligns with my view that most so-called Islamic dictators are essentially criminal sociopaths who commit crimes while hiding behind the banner of Islam. They use radical Islamism (the ideological form of Islam) as a tool/weapon to gain and keep power and control. 4
Posted by Manc on Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:58 | # @3 The main findings of the Jenkins, Farr Review into the Muslim Brotherhood of 2015. Worthwhile revisiting ten years later. 5
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:29 | # Thanks for the info. My main takeaway is that the report reinforces the reality that Islam and Western civilization cannot coexist. By the way, did you know that for years Netanyahu supported Hamas as a tactic to block any serious negotiations that would lead toward a two-state solution? Google this article from The Times of Israel (MR‘s spam filter is blocking the link): For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces 7
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 12 Jan 2026 18:14 | # Actually, Netanyahu’s support of Hamas should be seen as both cunning and rational, that is if the ultimate goal—which it is—is the Greater Israel Project. Naturally, a two-state solution would be a major obstacle to that objective. 8
Posted by Manc on Mon, 12 Jan 2026 19:25 | # Then the cunning plan has worked out as well as the US support for Saddam Hussein and the equally cunning plan to depose Hussein and install US military bases in Iraq. 9
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:26 | # So, you don’t think the Netanyahu regime used the Oct 7 Hamas terrorist attack as an opportunity to “ethnically cleanse” Gaza of Palestinians? Even Charlie Kirk recognized what Bibi was up to within the first two week after Oct. 7, 2023 attack. The fact is, even after the so-called ceasefire of Oct. 11. 2025, the IDF has killed more than 400 Gazan citizens and destroyed over 1,500 buildings. Some ceasefire, huh? More accurately, it’s a genocide in progress. 10
Posted by Manc on Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:41 | # Save that for someone who might actually care about Palestinians. 11
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:37 | # Half of Gaza’s population is made up of children under 18 years old. But thanks for acknowledging your moral bankruptcy. 12
Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 28 Feb 2026 23:07 | # It might be Israel’s war, and the dumb Americans are being used again. But the people of Iran don’t look at it that way. They just need to be free of the Islamic Republic regime, and this time they might be. Netanyahu and Trump will not be hated for that. 13
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 01 Mar 2026 13:22 | # @12 Yes, the people of Iran will be relieved if events ultimately settle into a stable and just outcome—though that remains to be seen. However, it should be clear that this unprovoked attack is being undertaken for the purpose of making the region safe for Israel. 14
Posted by sprague on Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:34 | # https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/07/an-interview-with-general-otto-ernst-remer/
15
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:42 | # At least it punctures the BRICS balloon. Putin and “the second most powerful military force in the world” have turned out to be a far cry from the projected image. Here is the excellent Caolin Robertson on Iran and Russia now that Trump has pulled the trigger: 16
Posted by sprague on Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:53 | # Remer’s reply here echoes themes that used to be propounded here by excellent old commenters like wintermute, CaptainChaos, ben tillman, James Bowery, et al. In their absence, GW’s Anglo tendency to accommodate oneself to Jewish extended phenotypics has come to the fore at MR with his recent spate of posts in which he more or less throws in his lot with Jewish hegemony. This tendency was always latent, but had been kept in check in the past by those old commenters. This is meant with no disrespect or malice to GW, who I believe has good intentions. Part of it I suspect is due to GW’s persistent desire to distance himself from things too German or NS, out of Anglo/British pride. 17
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:14 | # “At least it punctures the BRICS balloon.” Indeed!
Read more: https://discernreport.com/the-real-reason-america-attacked-iran-and-took-down-nicolas-maduro/ 18
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:01 | # Hi Sprague, You are most welcome. I agree that the old days were bracing. A few observations on your comment. Obviously, Islam is co-evolutionary with Talmudism. Notwithstanding the fact that universalism is internalised in Islam and externalised in Talmudism, there is much shared DNA. Thus Islam is aggressively expansionist, eschatological, millenarian, supremacist and denying of the human worth of the Other. On this basis alone one would expect anti-Talmudists (aka WNs) to reject it. But then Judaism and Islam also share principal ideological elements with National Socialism (for example, the Thousand Year Reich, Aryan supremacism, the Fuhrer principle), and perhaps that complicates the situation. Of course, there is a fundamentalist conservatism in Islam that was missing from National Socialism, that latter being a modernist and progressive ideology. But it isn’t a conservatism which seeks stability in the life of peoples as a basis from which their interests may emerge into the political. Instead, it seeks stability as a basis for absolutism regardless of the people’s nature or wishes. It protects its ideological power and purity, not the people; and advances itself, not the people. That is invariably how ideological imposts act in history, including in Iran, which is the reason that younger Iranians are so determined to change things, and the reason, too, why the absolutist force which is the Islamic Republic crushed them without the slightest compassion. It is worth noting that National Socialism also crushed down on dissent, using the guillotine more intensively even than the French revolutionaries. Ideological absolutism is the absolute enemy, so to speak, of emergent forms of social organisation. To my mind, Abrahamism is the parent of ideological absolutism, whether the system is religious in form or secularised (ie, liberalism). The only alternative is emergence; and the source of that is Nature, Being, the tribe, nativism, and the nationalism of ethnicity. As nationalists we are, or ought to be, engaged upon breathing life not into some impost but into what abides in us, what is permanent and not acquired, and what we express most freely when we act with authenticity. Understanding this distinction is key to understanding the direction of this site. I don’t believe for a moment that it is somehow infected with an “Anglo-Jewish” standpoint, whatever that is, and I also don’t believe it can be understood from the (truly Judaised) ideological standpoint of National Socialism. 19
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:14 | # Very interesting information, Thorn. It needs to be factored in that AI is of consuming interest to the globalist structure. Soaking up the greater part of the planetary wage bill is the prize. The Trump administration probably has to protect the position of corporate America. But it has not solved the human problem, and is probably cleaving (as I do) to the boundless creativity of Man, mostly European Man. 20
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:08 | # All this because Trump let Netanyahu dog-walk him straight into a war with Iran. Tucker on the Devastating Cost of War and What It Means for American Politics With Saagar Enjeti 21
Posted by Thorn on Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:41 | #
Opening grafs:
RTWT 22
Posted by Manc on Sat, 07 Mar 2026 16:04 | # Morgoth would often cite GW as being his mentor. So, GW, what the fuck went wrong? 23
Posted by Manc on Sat, 07 Mar 2026 17:39 | # @ 18. You take English politeness and manners to the extreme, GW. In your reply to the American Neo-Nazi cosplayer “Sprague” , you failed to mention Martin Heidegger, who, to the best of my knowledge, was German and basically what you are all about. 24
Posted by Thorn on Sun, 08 Mar 2026 00:38 | # But it has not solved the human problem, and is probably cleaving (as I do) to the boundless creativity of Man, mostly European Man. Agree in the strongest of terms! Here is some of the creativity of European Man covered by European women: https://youtu.be/ZPdk5GaIDjo Excellent work, ladies. 25
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 08 Mar 2026 22:58 | # Manc, for the most part I don’t think Morgoth is too wayward with his Retard article, given that he hasn’t thought about China and energy and so goes for Israel. My own posting on Iran has been rather less sensationally couched but arrives at the same conclusion that the British government must not get sucked in:
26
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 08 Mar 2026 23:01 | # As for Sprague, we have never excluded old school WNs, and never been sympathetic to the German-American narrative. Was not my comment at 18 clear enough? I thought it was a sound argument, and he hasn’t returned with a response. 27
Posted by Thorn on Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:07 | # Do you think the Netanyahu regime is fanatical enough to launch a nuclear strike on Iran? I believe they are. At any rate, this is an on-point and well written piece.
RTWT https://xrpmanchester.substack.com/p/chabads-doomsday-puppet-show-the
28
Posted by Manc on Mon, 09 Mar 2026 17:47 | # @ 25. It is not possible for Britain to be sucked into any conflict abroad as our military capacity is at rock bottom ( although that hasn’t stopped Starmer from committing to British boots on the ground in Ukraine).All the Trump administration was asking for from us was the use of airbases and given how dependent we, and Europe, are on the US for our own defense, a simple yes from Starmer would have been suffice. That is not to say that Britain is not already “sucked in” because we already are, given the hundreds of millions invested by the regime in Tehran in the UK, with the IRGC and the Muslim Brotherhood allowed to operate with impunity within our sceptered isle. How many terror attacks ( according to MI5 , Tehran backed terror plots) in the UK have been foiled since 2023 ? . The answer is 20, within three years. How could the majority of Iranians achieve the expression of their own free will without outside (American and Israeli} help? A rhetorical question, of course, because without it, they couldn’t. Starmer, the Human Rights lawyer, is doing the expedient thing for the Labour party and the Muslim vote. Nothing more than that. Yin and Yang. The “Asiatic mind” at play. Yin the feminine, yielding, force is forever moving in to Yang, the masculine pro-active in the Dao( the way of nature). eventually Yang will give way to Yin. There is no resistance to this cycle because it is simply the way of nature - the Tao of life. We are currently in a Yang (masculine cycle) and eventually Yin will prevail for a time but the Yin- Yang cycle never ends. It is eternal. And this is the most philosophical comment you are likely to get from me. We are in a time of Yang. Get used to it.
29
Posted by Manc on Mon, 09 Mar 2026 18:25 | # @27, Just a word of advice, Keep water of any type well away from good scotch, even Speyside , which is supermarket level of g-ds gift to humanity. Cheers. 30
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 10 Mar 2026 21:31 | # @29 Thanks for the advice, Manc. But just for the record, scotch is a no-go for me. Even the smell of it makes me feel sick. I’m a whiskey, beer, and wine kind of guy. Post a comment:
Next entry: Southport, migrant hotels, the national flag, and Amelia
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 11 Jan 2026 06:48 | #
The one word you will not hear from the Iranian protesters is philosophy. There is a reason for that.
There are two basic forms of revolution. Epochal revolutions are philosophical first, and aim to create an entirely new world in which certain revealed, fundamental principles exercise a new and creative role. The implicit understanding is that the current ills in life issue from deep historical and historiographical sources, and it is at the level of those sources at which revolution must actually take place.
On the other hand reactive revolutions, such as the current marvelous uprising in Iran, aim to sweep away some intolerable offense to the people but rather assume that good and truth will then mechanically prevail. Both types of revolution can be valid. But, obviously, the success of the reactive revolution depends upon the current national life sustaining sufficient good and truth. If it doesn’t ... if the national life is informed by bad philosophy, then the default characteristics of that philosophy, its DNA, will carry over to confound, limit, frustrate, outlast, and swallow all the forces of reaction. In time, all that was before reaction will be after it.
The Iranians, of course, are undertaking a reactive revolution in which change is understood to be confined to the intolerable elements in their national life. Therefore the question for them and for all of us is:
Does the existing formative system of national life ... liberalism in our case ... rest on good and true principles? Is its model of Man a faithful representation of the human reality, or does it press upon the people falsehoods and evils they cannot expunge but, in the manner of all deep cultural artifacts, effortlessly internalise and communicate to their children, such that they cannot freely express in their lived life their native good, their native truth but become mere hosts for alien ideas?
My own conclusion is very much that the latter is the case with us, and that something deeper than the action we are witnessing in Iran will be required in our national life. As for the Iranians, the default is Islam; and who will sweep that away?