Slaying The Dragon

Posted by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32.

To my cousins in England from an American Orange Man, the deep history of your manhood you feel needs this perspective to guide your actions.  I offer my body as your Sovereign to be sacrificed by you my people if you will but take heed and follow this lead.

Feudalism arises from JudeoChristanity’s prohibition of a “commoner” challenging a “noble” to single combat to the death – the ancient appeal of last resort in dispute processing going back 600 million years to the inception of masculine aggression’s Cambrian explosion. This is because, in so doing, it ensures a perpetual state of war preparedness: individual masculine aggression is abjured to the noble so that war mobilization may commence at a moment’s notice. Initially, this takes the form of clan warfare with clan chiefs acting as nobles: Feuds. Then as “civilization” develops, it increasingly becomes an organic relationship between nobles and commoners in which the commoners are entitled to their homesteads – with the Malthusian rents extracted in group rather than individual combat, ie: war.

A problem arises when you get intermediates between the sovereign and the commoners – who I’ve called “mesopredators” – who don’t have the ultimate responsibility for maintaining the war-making machine in good order. They begin to feed on the foundation of the machine at the expense of the Sovereign – the locus of masculine agency that supplants individual sovereignty of 600M years. That’s when you get a conflict between the barons of Henry VII’s era and the Sovereign and that’s when the Sovereign must become the Apex Predator eating the substance of the mere mesopredators. The problem, then, is how the Apex Predator deals with the base of the food chain. In natural systems, this is of no concern to the Apex Predator but in artificial selection regimes that aspire to the war-making readiness of the hive, it is what distinguishes an “Arthur” from a tyrant.

In Militia Money this is solved by a fiat money backed by “property rights” held by mesopredators aka barons. The mesopredators pay the rents from those “property rights” to “The Sovereign” but rather than going into the hands of one individual sovereign (and his “managerial class”), they go as “retainers” to the “commoners” who then give up any notion of one man one vote and, instead, vote with their retainer fees in the capitalist market.

This, of course, pisses off Mammon Worshipers including not just the mesopredators, but the preachers of just about every “church” (including media and academia) who, ultimately, serve not God but the mesopredators that donate or “patronize” them.

This is the critical failure of those who identify as “libertarians” with their ersatz “individual sovereignty” – as is most egregiously on display in the network effect monopolies that have become the instrument of tyranny.

With this background of the “feu” in mind, here’s the critical passage from Leyburn’s “The Scotch Irish: A Social History”:

Feu Fees 1

Feu Fees 2

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by Al Ross on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:04 | #

Interesting. Thanks JB.  Some historical context is understandably missing , however.

The Scots who settled in ( mainly ) Ulster were permitted to do so because the London govt felt surrounded by potential enemies .  Catholic France to the East ,  Catholic Ireland to the West and until 1707 ,  a recently uncertain loyal Scotland to the North , so the pacification of Ireland was militarily and politically ”  the art of the possible” writ large.

Ulster’s Scots were mainly Lowlanders ( Highlanders were sometimes recalcitrantly Catholic) and avowed Presbyterians and featured heroically and historically in that wonderful book about so - called ” White Trash Hillbillies ” , ‘Born Fighting’ .

I read it years ago but have forgotten the author’s name.


2

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 19:15 | #

#1 “Born Fighting:  How the Scots-Irish Shaped America” by James Webb

There is a 2 part Smithsonian series on that book by Webb:

Part 1

Part 2

Senator Webb delivered the Democrat Party’s response to George W. Bush’s sixth State of the Union address.

He ran for President on the Democratic ticket in 2016 but was shut out by the Democrat leadership because he didn’t support anti-whiteism.

Here is his WSJ op ed on the election of Donald Trump:

Op-Eds by Jim
WSJ: The Promise of President Trump – Jim Webb
By Jim Webb

Jan. 19, 2017 6:23 p.m. ET WSJ

By virtue of Mr. Trump’s electoral base and genuine status as a political outsider, he is positioned to bring two much-needed adjustments to our governing process.


First, his administration should break the damaging “turnstile” that has given an unelected elite far too much power, particularly in foreign policy. What can one say of an establishment whose members repeatedly swap slots in law firms and think tanks for titles in various presidential administrations but rarely come up with fresh, independent advice? How can one set of “Republican” advisers persuade George W. Bush to make the strategic blunder of invading Iraq, and then a new set of “Democratic” advisers lure Barack Obama into the debacle of the Libyan intervention? It was no accident that many Republican mandarins endorsed Hillary Clinton last year. The new administration should bid them all goodbye. Rex Tillerson’s selection as secretary of state is a welcome signal to that end.

The second opportunity is to reset the national discussion, as well as government policies, on race. Few would dispute the original purpose of affirmative action, which was to help African-Americans remove the “badges of slavery.” But after the 1965 Immigration Reform Act, the ethnic makeup of the country dramatically changed. Affirmative action expanded into broader diversity programs, often discriminating against poorer blacks and Americans who happened to be white. Working whites have been hit particularly hard, since white America is not a monolith but a composite of cultures widely stratified in terms of education and income. The disparate impact of diversity programs on different white cultures is not apparent using broad statistics based on race. In addition, more frequent racial intermarriage has blurred the data further, and will continue to do so.

In short, the discussion is mired in the biracial dialogue of the 1960s, while our challenges have become multicultural and mixed with reverse discrimination. Many people who want to remedy this voted for Mr. Trump. One can hope his administration will seek policies to reduce racial tensions and increase fairness for all Americans.

His candidacy has been memoryholed.

If you can stomach it, CNN carried a Presidential debate in which one can see him defy the Democrat Party’s betrayal of what in UK is called “Labor”.

 


3

Posted by Thorn on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 19:58 | #

“But after the 1965 Immigration Reform Act, the ethnic makeup of the country dramatically changed.”

If I recall correctly the 2020 US Census data revealed that Whites in the 18 and under group comprised only 47%. Today, five years later, it’s safe to assume that that 47% dropped down to 42%.

When I cite such stats to your average white person, they either become disoriented or evasive. It’s almost like they want to run from the truth even though reality is all around them staring them straight in the face. I suppose their conditioning has them believing whites are the racial majority on the planet and everyone else is a minority and it will always remain that way. 


4

Posted by Al Ross on Thu, 08 Aug 2024 04:31 | #

#2 ,  That’s our guy .  James Webb .

  Thank you for the links , much appreciated.


5

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:44 | #

Civil War Comes to the West

David Betz - King’s College London, Department of War Studies

An interview by Louise Perry

Software to convert John Derbyshire’s HTML transcript to the aforelinked sound file available on request.


6

Posted by Thorn on Wed, 02 Apr 2025 23:12 | #

I did listen to the entire interview, but it appears to me that the globalists intend fund the comfortable lifestyle of native Europeans until they reach a point where they cannot (because of their minority status) effectively defend against the plan for their extinction. Hence no civil war will commence. That’s what the Western Leaders have in store for us. Obviously.


7

Posted by Thorn on Wed, 02 Apr 2025 23:22 | #

In the Jewish mind, if white homogeneity is left unaltered then a repeat of the Holocaust is inevitable. Is that the basis of why we are under attack? (Rhetorical question.)


8

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00 | #

British leadership has absolutely gone insane. Weirdos to the MAX!!! 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/toddler-kicked-out-of-nursery-school-for-being-transphobic-this-is-totalitarian-insanity/ar-AA1C1qam?ocid=BingNewsSerp


9

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:12 | #

I agree with Thorn @ 6 more than Betz.  On the question of Jewish activism, the explanatory factor is Judaism-as-sociobiology.  The root is there, not in the history of the Third Reich.


10

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 12:35 | #

“On the question of Jewish activism, the explanatory factor is Judaism-as-sociobiology.”

At least one in four Jews identify as atheists; they do not adhere to the beliefs of Judaism. Therefore, a more accurate explanation of Jewish activism is the influence of Holocaust studies on their sociobiology.


11

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 14:55 | #

Keep moving along the logic-line.  How did Judaism come into being?  What does it express?  How does the the racial history influence the genes influence the religious drive?


12

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:41 | #

@11

Good points, GW. Understood and I firmly agree.

I was thinking along the lines that anti-European Jewish activism has existed for at least since the Roman times but it has moved into overdrive since the Holocaust.


13

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:17 | #

Perhaps an evolutionary survival strategy which turns the selection of traits for fitness inside out so it re-appears as shaping the Other to select traits for non-fitness ... nationalism and particularism for me but universalism and sameness for thee ... G-d’s chosen-ness for mine but Christ’s love and compassion for thine ... perhaps such a strategy will not be weakened or reformed by the Other’s newly determined claim on life.  On the contrary, perhaps it will be extremetised, maximised, driven into an all-or-nothing gambit.


14

Posted by Manc on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:25 | #

Why this US [ neurotic, Jewish ] historian is leaving Trump’s America…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noJ4rMMYvdo

Just because you’re paranoid, it doesn’t mean they are not out to get you…


15

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 03 Apr 2025 21:50 | #

A great loss, Manc, I’m shore.


16

Posted by Thorn on Sat, 05 Apr 2025 23:09 | #

“G-d’s chosen-ness for mine but Christ’s love and compassion for thine”

When push comes to shove, Christians aren’t all that compassionate for thine. Recent history demonstrates otherwise. Example: The Highway of Death https://www.amusingplanet.com/2016/05/the-highway-of-death.html


17

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 06 Apr 2025 21:40 | #

@6 The salient aspects of the situation are that

1) While we may not rely on “civil war” (really a rhyme with the Thirty Years War) to free us from the culture of fraud’s continuation of war by “other means” (such as “politics”), Betz does allow for as low as a mere 4% chance per year of a serious outbreak.  Viewing that 4% as a rational compromise with “reality”, however you see it, gives rise to a rational question:  How much do you pay for car insurance each month?

2) Judaism-as-sociobiology ala KMac is optimistic in one sense but pessimistic in another more salient sense given present circumstances.  KMac never adopted my take on the evolution of Jewish virulence, which is more pessimistic than is KMac’s notion of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy.  It is one thing for a group to have intense awareness that it is in a mortal group conflict with other cultures and, worse still, to have relentlessly infiltrated those other cultures.  It is quite another thing for that group to be subject to relentless evolution of virulence via take-the-money-and-run epidemic rampages through other cultures that progressively selects for ever-greater such virulent pandemic behavior

But I have on multiple occasions here, going back to my predictions of 9/11/2001 that their strategy is now entering its terminal phase and the “questions of survival” article, was going to result in something like Trumpism—something which I also predicted as early as 1982 would result from the advent of the Internet in analogy to the Gutenberg Press (thence Thirty Years War) as, indeed, it has.

While one may not rely on Trumpism to be our salvation, I have also been saying for some time now that any loosening of the thumbscrews may activate Machiavelli’s Rule, which I’ve also repeatedly discussed here.  That is not something for which our bad zookeepers have been adequately evolved to handle given their recent realization they’d better learn to sleep in the bed they’ve made.


18

Posted by Thorn on Mon, 07 Apr 2025 12:13 | #

@17

In recent days, I have had to reassess the likelihood of a breakdown in law and order in the USA. I can foresee Trump’s tariffs leading to a substantial decrease in the standard of living for the lower classes. The middle class will suddenly drop a few notches, and those already at or near the poverty line will experience real hardship. This will inevitably engender a great deal of resentment, anger, and desperation, potentially giving rise to both organized, unorganized and revolutionary groups leading to civil unrest and riots. Looting, robbery, and home invasions will be out of control and widespread. The have-nots taking from the haves. This is the type of civil war I can imagine. Significant swaths of America may face a civilizational collapse comparable to the current situation in Haiti. Most major cities in the USA are already primed for such conditions.

I hope I’m wrong.


19

Posted by Thorn on Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:21 | #

Civil War 2.0 Weather Report: Just How Close Are We?

https://wilderwealthywise.com/civil-war-2-0-weather-report-just-how-close-are-we/


20

Posted by Thorn on Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:27 | #



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time
Previous entry: The legacy of Southport

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:21. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:18. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Sun, 27 Apr 2025 23:54. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Sun, 27 Apr 2025 22:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:04. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Another dramatic degradation of Russia's combat capacity' on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 23:18. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 10:49. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:04. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:30. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:21. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:06. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sun, 20 Apr 2025 23:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sun, 20 Apr 2025 11:10. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sat, 19 Apr 2025 14:00. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:35. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:13. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:20. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:03. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:58. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:12. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:33. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Thu, 17 Apr 2025 23:30. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:23. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:03. (View)

affection-tone