“My Fellow Gods, Lend Me Your Ears!”

by The Narrator

It is a trying time for we residents of modern Olympus, the White Gods.  The mortals cry out to us in their trials yet curse us in their comfort.

Some claim our time is past. Others claim we never existed to begin with.  There is much talk of change ...

It is interesting to hear the insistence of the lords of liberaldom that Whites everywhere must accept racial equality and view all others as our equals, regardless that it betrays our inner thoughts and feelings on the matter.  Whites (peoples indigenous to Europe) make up no more than 12 or 13 percent of the world’s population, yet 100% of the direction the tolerance industry pushes is against the natural instincts and interests of Whites.  It is we who must see non-Whites as equal, not the other way around.

Just look at immigration.

To throw open the borders of Western Civilization to the third-world in the name of humanitarian concern is to rather loudly and unapologetically assert that, on their own, third world peoples (non-Whites) are incapable of building, managing or sustaining a society capable of the most basic of organizational functions.  In the 18th and 19th Century the idea was to bring Civilization to the savages.  That didn’t work out, so the 20th and 21st Century approach has been to bring the savages to Civilization.

However you turn it, White elites of the most liberal of stripes, operate on and encourage a national policy view that non-Whites are inferior to Whites.

And this manifests in other ways as well.

White liberals define White movement around the globe as “Colonialism”.  Non-White movements, on the other hand, are referred to as “Migration”.

When Whites move in, it’s an insidious plot called “Imperialism”.  When non-Whites move in, they’re simply “Looking For a Better Life”.

When Whites are forced to flee their cities due to encroaching violence and social depredation brought about by another ethnic group, Whites are accused of being prejudiced and their fleeing for their lives is labeled “White Flight”.  When non-Whites are forced to flee from their cities due to encroaching violence and social depredation brought about by another ethnic group, they are called victims and their plight is labeled Ethnic Cleansing.

And almost everywhere you look you’ll notice a belief that the problems of the world are due either to White actions or White inactions.  From the environment to regional conflicts to the outbreak of diseases or the continuing of poverty, Whites are either doing too much or not doing enough.

In other words, as comical as it may be, Whites have become the Olympian Gods of the modern era.  We are either devilishly interfering in the lives of non-Whites for our own amusement or we are callously turning a blind eye to their suffering.

Yes, it seems an absurd concept at first, but the more you think about it the more you realize that Whites are held to an exceptionally high standard, matched only in the past, by the gods.  We are expected to heal the sorrows of the world, protect the defenceless and feed the hungry. At the same time we are blamed for everything bad, ranging from mudslides and floods to hurt feelings and tummy aches.

And the percentages have no effect on that perception.  Right now Whites are less than 50% of California and Texas, yet are still blamed for the poor performance of non-Whites in the workforce, schools, etc.

And if it gets to the point that Whites are only 1% of Earth’s population, that 1% will still be expected heal all wounds, mend what is broken and cure all of societies ailments, while simultaneously still being accused of holding the other 99% of the population back and/or oppressing them.

Of course, like all gods we must also deal with those who, after blaming us for all the problems in the universe, turn around and deny our existence (the ‘White race is a social construct’, crowd).

With them we often see assaults on the historical nature of our existence with attacks on certain groups within once accepted historical contexts.  Naturally a certain amount of obtuse logic is employed, but as the mere mortals are ‘moment-centered’, context is an alien concept for them anyway.  For example we often see the claim that “white” is an artificially constructed social category due to the fact that at one time southern Europeans and even Irish and German immigrants weren’t considered White in America.  A premise, by the way, that pre-supposes America to be the center of the universe.

Now this (that Germans and Irish were once considered non-White) is a claim that I have come across a lot on the Internet, but one for which very little actual evidence exists to back it up.

The German source seems to stem from a comment made by Benjamin Franklin, while the Irish one mostly comes from political cartoons of the 19th century.  But then you can also find such newspaper drawings depicting the French as sinister and alien looking people as well.  And why not?  America was not only overwhelmingly White from her genesis (the British Colonies), but overwhelmingly British (thus English speaking) and Protestant as well.

But, just to point out the foolishness and bassakward thinking of modern liberal dogma ...

This claim that Italian, German, Irish and other Whites (again, that being people of indigenous European descent) were not at one time considered White, creates a few problems for the anti-White bigots.

After all it was the Portuguese, Spaniards and Italians who kick started modern European colonialism/imperialism, as well as being the largest purveyors of the slave trade, with around 95% of African slaves being carted off to Latin America by Spaniards and Portuguese traders (of course Jews played an overwhelming part in it, but that’s another topic and off point).

And it was mostly those (at the time) non-White German and Irishmen at whose feet most of the anti-black animosity in 18th and 19th century America can be laid, as it was they who came most into contact with blacks in the cities in which they had recently arrived.  (The majority of the British stock in America at that time - the English, Welsh and Scotch Irish - were residing in the almost exclusively White regions of New England, Appalachia and, later, the Mid-West.)

So, now you know.

It was, in fact, (according to scholars at universities and in the media across America) those (at the time considered to be) non-White Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, Irish and Germans who were behind most of the colonialism/slavery/racism shenanigans in the 18th and 19th centuries, and not us White-Gods!

Of course that sort of revelation into the logic of liberalism is quickly brushed aside, as Whites are needed to succour the ills of humanity while at the same time being a needed and visible scapegoat for said ills.  The “humble” scavengers needs the White icon to not only measure the standards of beauty and progress by, but to also rage and vent their frustrations upon for not being able to reach those standards. (The famous photo of Mrs. Obama jealously scowling at Carla Bruni is a good example)

And even in terms of crime, no matter how outrageous and out of control the non-White presence in our midst becomes, there is always a discussion about not being overly harsh with them by measuring their offences against our standards.

No, it’s not an easy thing being a god.  The same world that comes to us with outstretched arms and expressions of need, quickly turn and gather stones to throw with expressions of envy and malice.  They demand to be let into our temples (nations), yet once inside attempt to burn them down, or at the very least turn them into colorful and dynamic – read dilapidated, crime and disease riddled - barrios.

Now we know why Olympus is on a mountain and Asgard was walled!

Perhaps the most obvious example of how Whites are held to be gods is in the way so many Whites proudly assert, “I’m not prejudice against them.” Them, of course, being non-Whites. All non-Whites. COLLECTIVELY.  I highlight that point because in the open discussion of race, there are only two categories, White and non-White.  Many Whites love to proclaim aloud that they have a black/Hispanic/Asian/etc friend, as though it were representative of their ability to set aside their godhood and travel unnoticed amongst the mortals.

Another peak into the psychology of all this is the recent phenomena of having non-Whites portray characters in media that were historically White.  Whether it’s Friar Tuck in Robin Hood or a side character in one of the BBC’s historical dramas, there is a certain, how shall I put this, “Hey, I’m one of the gods now!” aura around it all.

Of course nothing represents this better than the election of the first President of the Banana Republic of North America. From the way he postures to his verbal annunciation (and the way White liberals brag about him as though he were the one out of their multitude of children who ‘made good’), he is the embodiment of the belief, held by all to be inherent, that the White race (and its culture) is THE standard, and that it is our duty to work to evolve the mere mortals up to the seemingly insurmountable summit atop the clouds - where we gods reside, of course.

To be clear (and for the slow witted), the above is not an actual advocacy of the view that Whites are in fact “God-like”, but is rather a comment on the fact that both Whites and non-Whites do in fact hold the White race to an extremely high standard (of conduct, ability, intelligence and morality) that non-Whites are never expected to be able to achieve.

And the people pushing this view the hardest are not White Racialists, but the White liberals who (in rhetoric at least) denounce White racialism the most.

So, in conclusion, perhaps instead of looking back at Jefferson or Martel in pursuing a solution to our various social predicaments, we should be asking ourselves, “What would Zeus do?”

Posted by Guest Blogger on Monday, September 28, 2009 at 06:17 PM in Oh Tempora, Oh Mores
Comments (12) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by Frank on September 28, 2009, 06:49 PM | #

As Franklin would have known, God’s an Anglo-Saxon not one of those swarthy continentals.

This is the first I’ve heard other than Franklin that Germans of all people aren’t white… They’re not at the top as CC thinks, Anglos hold that position, but they’re pretty close.

2

Posted by Frank on September 28, 2009, 06:54 PM | #

24. Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind.

3

Posted by Frank on September 28, 2009, 06:56 PM | #

Note: i’m only teasing CC…

4

Posted by Gorboduc on September 28, 2009, 07:39 PM | #

Here’s a fragment of that American Old White culture that in part goes back to Franklin’s time.
I’ve also put the URL on the most recent controversial thread : it’d be interesting to know what you think of this amazing music.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHUfHNEZDPc&feature=related

5

Posted by danielj on September 28, 2009, 08:27 PM | #

Another peak into the psychology of all this is the recent phenomena of having non-Whites portray characters in media that were historically White.  Whether it’s Friar Tuck in Robin Hood or a side character in one of the BBC’s historical dramas, there is a certain, how shall I put this, “Hey, I’m one of the gods now!” aura around it all.

Ol Blue Eyes

6

Posted by Don on September 28, 2009, 10:50 PM | #

Regarding the immigration portion of the posting, may I suggest that we need to have better arguments than we have now.  By allowing the focus of the debate to be on us, may I suggest that we re-frame the argument along two lines.

1) We should insist on reciprocity for Americans in Mexico similar to services provided to Mexicans in America.  This has to do with medical services, birthright citizenship, social services, public education, right to own land, and the right to English-language signage.

2) We should demand that America’s immigration system be reformed to the standards set by Mexican law and practice along Mexico’s southern border.  This would result in a step up in the direction of controlling border crossing, and a step down into outright brutality.  Might be a good idea, might be a good policy.

7

Posted by Captainchaos on September 29, 2009, 12:01 AM | #

Don, that’s a day late and a dollar short.  Our people are dying, and our actions in countering that need to be scaled accordingly.  We need a land of our own free of non-Whites and mongrels.

8

Posted by Guessedworker on September 29, 2009, 05:16 AM | #

CC,

Would you include the Injuns?

9

Posted by Captainchaos on September 29, 2009, 05:52 AM | #

Injuns GW?  They’ve got reservations.  It is important that our people know their place in this world, so fine an incite it should be shared with our Red friends.  Everyone needs a place to be.

10

Posted by Don on September 29, 2009, 12:14 PM | #

“Our people are dying, and our actions in countering that need to be scaled accordingly.  We need a land of our own free of non-Whites and mongrels.”

I can appreciate the purity and straightforwardness of these two sentences, but how will white activists ever learn how to lead our diverse white American peoples if they lack experience with effective arguments and actions about things like border control?

Perhaps the good Captain could tell us what he has personally put in place with his friends to accomplish this up-scaled set of actions.

11

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 09, 2009, 09:50 PM | #

Someone named Jack Spence tells why he writes:

The first reason that I write is for the well-being of my children, and, by extension, for the future well-being of their children.  This “well-being,” or “flourishing,” can only occur within a culture created to nourish, support, and protect Whites.  The culture that we presently have is not a good environment for the cultivating of children of European descent.  […] Indeed, “it’s like having a building with no foundation.” 

The foundation of our building, or, if you will, the roots that support the flourishing of White families have been intentionally dissolved; they have been poisoned by the noxious ideas endlessly streaming forth from the mouths and pens of those who have created the culture of critique, with the inevitable result that the plant above can no longer be supported by the roots below.  Thus, our plant withers and dies, and its place and resources are taken over by the invasive species that killed it. […]

Racial strength begins at the family level.  This is, in my opinion, the ground of battle.  If you lose here, you lose at the racial level.  All the books, articles, and pamphlets that you write will be useless.  In order for our race to survive, and flourish, White families need to survive, and flourish. 

In Christianity, you have a ready built engine to power the race forward, but this engine has been sabotaged by those who invented the acidic culture that we now have, that is, the “culture of critique.”

This is why many Jews, who ought to praise Christians for their shared morality, instead ruthlessly attack them for it (e.g., feminism; porn; Psychoanalysis; art; music; education; media; anti-authoritarianism; economics; destruction of moral norms; post-modernism; diversity; tolerance; etc.).  Jews rightly perceive this morality to be a threat to their dominance.  (They likewise are threatened by Christianity’s theology […].)

I also write because I think that my particular White culture (Protestant, Scots-Irish/English) is worthy to be protected. 

[…] I grew up thriving on the stories of the frontiersmen; mountain-men; cowboys; the heroes of the War of Independence; Andrew Jackson; and the heroes of the Confederacy.  I always knew that these folks were, if only distantly, my kin. […] I always knew who I was, and where I came from, and that we were, quintessentially (at least from our point of view), American.

I write to preserve pride in the White race and to be honest about our achievements, which are many.  I write to preserve my history, and the history of all those admirable men who fought and died for freedom, whether by the pen, or by the sword. 

I write because I am a man.  I am not a slave.  I am not going to bow [...]. 

I write because I believe in Truth (yes, “Truth” with a capital “T”).  Races exist.  Diversity does not work.  Some races are more intelligent than others.  Some races are more organized than others.  Some races are more violent than others.  Some races are more creative than others.  Jews have been the necessary but not the sufficient cause of our demise.  The sooner that we recognize these truths, the sooner things will get better for Whites. 

[…]I write because I want to maintain the way of life that Christian Europeans created in America.  I grew up in a small, overwhelmingly White town in the West.  Everybody had a basic understanding of the rules.  There was a great deal of trust within our society.  Most people were not pathological, or violent.  Most Whites wanted to own a home, settle down, and have a family. 

Additionally, we did not have to continually bend over backwards to prove that we were not racists, and then bend over forwards to be screwed by the Minorities’ double-standards. 

There was not the constant friction of an aggrieved group trying to get something from us by playing off our guilt.  The atmosphere was not permeated with the bitter acrimony that professional grievance massagers, like the Jews, generate wherever they go.

Some of my fondest memories come from Christmas, and from Christmas music.  I remember going caroling on cold, wintery nights with my Lutheran, Baptist, Methodist, and Pentecostal friends.  Truly, everyone was of good cheer.  No one turned us from their doors.  No neighborhood was “off-limits.”  No Jew gave us a nasty look and then showed us her Holocaust tattoo, reminding us that “We Wish You a Merry Christmas” led to the deaths of six million Jews.  Frankly, is there anything as heart-warming as “God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen,” or as moving as “Silent Night” (especially the German version)? 

I write because I love Western Civilization.  I love my kind.  I love what Whites have created.  I love their literature — everything from Homer to Sir Walter Scott.  I love their art; their music; their architecture; their engineering prowess; their genetically driven sense of awe, wonder, and curiosity.  I love their science; their energy; their yearning for political freedom; their dependence on logic; their warrior spirit; their sense of honor; their sense of beauty; their sense of justice.  [Scroob note:  I also love their looks and personalities, both of which are inborn — populations of Negroes, Chinamen, Subcons, or Mexicans can never acquire the looks or personalities of populations of Euros:  that other blood goes with other kinds of looks and personalities, not ours, and no one can do anything about that:  it can’t be changed.]

Does anyone honestly believe that these virtues will continue in the forms that Whites have created/molded them when Whites are out of the picture? 

Does anyone seriously doubt that Whites (especially White Christians) will be severely persecuted when they become a minority?  [Scroob note:  there is zero doubt about it, and furthermore, Jews will be white Christians’ most diabolical persecutors]  Is it not highly likely that this persecution will be directed by those self-righteous haters, the Jews?  [I spoke too soon:  the writer is in agreement with my thoughts exactly.]  Have not Jews already demonstrated what they are capable of once they have gained power over a hated Christian majority (e.g., Russia, the Ukraine)?  [Precisely.  Good point.  In fact, they’re already doing it.  The Jews genocided the Kulaks via the starvation weapon; they’re genociding us via the immigration weapon.  They’re already embarked on wiping us out.]

In summary, I write in the hope that in some small way I can provide a defense against the toxins that are killing our roots.  I write for the love of family.  I write for the love of God.  I write for the love of my culture.  I write for the love of my way of life.  I write in the aspiration that some day there can be White towns again filled with White people who trust each other, who work for the common good, who practice their religion freely, and who create societies where the cultivation of their children is of the utmost importance.  In other words, I write for us. 

[ http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Spence-WhyIWrite.html ]

Amen.  Godspeed and blessings on thy way, where’er thou goest, comrade!

12

Posted by the Narrator... on October 10, 2009, 03:17 AM | #

You know, the ‘Why I Write’ thing could be a powerful form of protest. Thousands of these impassioned letters (written by our people from every walk of life) gathered together and then sent “raining down” across The West could be a powerful message to our people still held in the matrix that our motivation is love for our own and our culture, not “hate” of others as our opponents attempt to spin it.

Done right it could be a propaganda coup.
....

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)


Next entry: ‘Allo, ‘allo, what’s all this then?

Previous entry: Alexa Traffic Comparisons

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view)

Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view)

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view)

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view)

Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view)

RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view)

Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view)

anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view)

Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view)

jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view)

marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view)

dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view)

Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view)

MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa