Home About Archives Contact Forums Search Wiki

Dutch to ban the burqa.

The Dutch government agreed today on:-

a total ban on the wearing of burqas and other Muslim face veils in public, justifying the move on security grounds.

Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk will now draw up legislation which will result in the Netherlands, once one of Europe’s most easy-going nations, imposing some of the continent’s toughest laws against concealing the face.

“The cabinet finds it undesirable that garments covering the face—including the burqa—should be worn in public in view of public order, (and) the security and protection of fellow citizens,” the Dutch Justice Ministry said in a statement.

Well, is this a step towards saving Holland or sealing its fate?

The answer varies according to which you place uppermost: Dutch national interest or Dutch ethnic interest.  Those who like the novelty of forcing Moslems to stay on Dutch terms or go wear their burqas someplace else should listen closely to the Mayor of Amsterdam:-

Job Cohen, the Labour mayor of Amsterdam, said he opposed burqas in schools and public buildings, and said women wearing one who failed to get a job should not expect welfare benefits.

“From the perspective of integration and communication, it is obviously very bad because you can’t see each other so the fewer the better,” he told foreign journalists.  “But actually hardly anybody wears one ...  The fuss is much bigger than the number of people concerned.”

It’s easy to be tough about a palliative.  Dutch national interest is the interest of the polital and cultural elite.  They want a successful integration.  They do NOT want - and will not get - a tented city of defeated burqa-wearers at the Algerian Airlines check-in.  But they will get the support of all those Dutch indigenes who believe Geert Wilders to be a “far-right politician”, and wouldn’t know their ethnic interest from a well fattened goat.

A burqa ban is a politically shrewd strategy from a mainstream liberal perspective.

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 06:05 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (4) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on November 18, 2006, 09:32 AM | #

Emigration statistics for the Netherlands:
2004: 110.000
2005: 121.000

Source the Flemish quality newspaper De Standaard (in Dutch): http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail.aspx?artikelId=GMUO4DD9&word=nederland+statistiek

2

Posted by Steven Palese on November 18, 2006, 06:58 PM | #

“A burqa ban is a politically shrewd strategy from a mainstream liberal perspective.”

It’s also risky.

In the UK such a move would increase support for RESPECT (British Muslim political party). Besides bleeding Labour of votes, RESPECT’s PR value is a pro-white propagandist’s dream. Can you improve on openly ethnocentric Muslim colonists agitating for greater privileges over native whites? They also provide pro-whites with a legitimizing context, as in, “if they can, why can’t we?”

In France they had a similar anti-burqa craze a few years ago and last I heard they’re a spark away from more banlieu riots. The anti-burqa episode intensified the climate of alienation among Muslims and helped them reach the tipping point.

There’s many unpredictable ways for this move to backfire.

Yet notwithstanding the risks, throughout Western Europe the left has to abandon the increasingly discredited multiculturalist model and resurrect integrationism before it winds up holding the can. The next wave of riots or terror attacks will wipe out any remaining pockets of multicultural delusion.

3

Posted by Desmond Jones on November 18, 2006, 10:41 PM | #

GW is quite correct. It also shows up the weakness of a BNP strategy that is progressively populist versus nationalist. If de Tocqueville’s “immense and tutelary power” hanging over us, invading our minds and everyday life, is able to defang Islam by stripping it of is public displays of solidarity, shaping it like plasticene into an animated secular version of its eastern mysticism, what then of the BNP.

An ideological assault will fail whilst EGI, the genetic uniqueness of the English and the laws of evolution will forever remain. In fact a mass colonisation of England by emollient Afro-caribbeans, Sikhs, Hindus, Chinese or even eastern Euros threatens the English as much as the violent, expansive weltanschauung of Islam.

4

Posted by dchamil on November 19, 2006, 10:20 AM | #

There are some good reasons for not permitting Muslim-style face coverings in demonstrations. The resulting anonymity permits the wearer to avoid punishment for beatings, lighting fires, and so on.

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.
 @ 
link
Close Tags

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)


Next entry: Cultural Learnings of Kazakhstan for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Scotland

Previous entry: The Big E tells God: Thou shalt not love Thy children in the BNP
image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

Rusty commented in entry 'Will someone arrest, and prosecute, this fine lady?' on 02/08/12, 12:40 AM. (go) (view)

maniladsouza commented in entry 'What be da brothas and sistas up to?' on 02/07/12, 11:55 PM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/07/12, 11:41 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/07/12, 11:16 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/07/12, 11:03 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/07/12, 10:58 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/07/12, 10:53 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 10:52 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 10:17 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 10:12 PM. (go) (view)

anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 09:49 PM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/07/12, 09:15 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 08:59 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/07/12, 08:59 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 07:32 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 06:54 PM. (go) (view)

Marlowe's Ghost commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view)

Hulya Yadsan-Appleby commented in entry 'A reply to Peter Hitchens' on 02/07/12, 06:42 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 06:30 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 06:20 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 06:14 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 06:11 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view)

Marlowe's Ghost commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 05:47 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 05:33 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 05:31 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 04:50 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 04:41 PM. (go) (view)

dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 04:30 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 04:20 PM. (go) (view)

Marlowe's Ghost commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 04:00 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/07/12, 03:39 PM. (go) (view)

Franklin Ryckaert commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/07/12, 03:13 PM. (go) (view)

Recent Posts

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa