Discourse Analysis of The (Dave) “Rubin Report” discussion with the Weinstein Brothers, Bret & Eric. I watched this for the first time yesterday, and certain things in this conversation jumped out at me; though presented (((typically))) of course, in a taken for granted manner by the Weinsteins and Rubin as benign and wholly salutary, this discussion raised red flags for me regarding their positions and at certain points; and should also raise red flags for anybody who cares about European peoples. As these are fairly clever men, presented as cutting edge academic authorities, this conversation is a good place to expose the deception, egregious bias and the kind of language games that put forth their agenda as taken for granted. I’ll be adding remarks as time permits. Critical commentary is forthcoming and should add up pretty quickly. Comments:2
Posted by Rubin announces the Weinsteins on Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:18 | #
3
Posted by Kosher Afro on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:55 | #
Pinch us, we can hardly wait to be liberated from the stifling thought control (that their tribe has enforced upon the population for decades and centuries) while these “maverick thought leaders” pretend to be the ones who will lead us out and guide us in our interests, as opposed to (((theirs))). Rubin briefly notes the Jew-Fro hair that both brothers have inherited… 4
Posted by Eric Weinstein on Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:05 | # 4:00 Eric tells a story about how he and his brother had a history of learning disabilities, a family story which he somehow verbally migrates into “this group of people”, apparently the “idea revolutionaries” that Rubin was referring to, who naturally come to find themselves as outsiders (“natural rebels”), growing up “outside of standard channels of communication.”
5
Posted by The Weinsteins on Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:35 | #
Brett (8:18): Speaks of their grandfather, Harry, who took them seriously, even as children, answered their questions and so on.. (which is commendable)...“it was like having a personal intellectual tutor ..... sort of picked-up where school left off (for our learning disabilities)...ended up being a sort of jumping off point to places that are hard to get to through the standard model.
8:18 Brett: we had a grandfather who took children seriously, answered questions and so on.. (that’s good)
6
Posted by The mysterious, invisible who... on Sat, 21 Dec 2019 04:19 | #
The mysterious, invisible international Who? and the [ blank ] hand of right wing/liberal opportunists who go along with the mystery? 7
Posted by Problem, Reaction and Who? on Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:28 | # From what we gather so far, we can anticipate the structuring of classic Problem - Reaction - Solution. Problem reaction solution. The problem wasn’t their people’s socially/genetically destructive, exaggerated, distorted and internationalized advocacy that had intersected with them in its anti-Whiteness for their crypsis (blend with and appearance as White); including its intersecting with academic and media blackouts… No, the problem is mysterious in origin, but roughly this “Left” character that came out of unnatural nowhere, oblivious to truth, reality and science. How it looks at this point (i.e., I don’t know how involved the Weinsteins were in neo reaction and dark enlightenment, or whether the “the dark web” was an entirely different thing, but I doubt it is unrelated, so how it looks is.. Thus, these types were perfect to lead the counter controlled opposition, flattering the STEM types - particularly White STEMers who had a head start in expressing reaction, as they were first in facility with the internet - thus flattered with a “Dark Enlightenment, Neo Reaction to “modernity” as the problem, the Dark Web as opposed to the controlled opposition that had culminated before the advent of the internet, notably the controlled opposition to what I call “red capes” - misdirections, distortions, over compenstions, misrepresentations of post modern ideas ...ideas that are the bread and butter of the humanities and group advocacy. They poison concepts like anti modernity, making it look like a ridiculous dodge of the JQ. What is happening now is that they are weaponizing reactionary (neo reactionary) They flatter the bureaucratic instincts of right wing reactionary STEM nerds like Matt Parrott this way. Related at Majorityrights: Brett Stevens: Not just a Government Issue Patriotard, but a Full-Blown ZOG Disinformation Agent majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/brett_stevens_not_just_a_government_issue_patriotard_but_a_full_blown_zog_d 8
Posted by Borders & bounds are not social engineering on Sun, 22 Dec 2019 07:06 | # JF Gariepy demonstrates his intellectual inadequacy once again. While Gariepy does manage to seize upon an absurd argument (25:49) made by Eric Weinstein, in which Weinstein asks incredulously “why don’t people want immigration?”... ...Gariepy’s overall argument in this discussion with Millennial Woes is for determination and prediction as such (despite dire prediction), apparently for his valuation of science, viz, his commitment to warrant his own authority as a scientist by means of strict determinism and prediction. To maintain this position requires strawmanning: He says that “social engineering” is doomed to fail. Ok, well, I am not going to argue on behalf of social engineering. However, IF he were to say that it is “social engineering” to control borders and boundaries, in the sense that people are necessarily being overly controlled, rigidly compartmentalized and determined to fail as an evolutionary project as such and cannot be intervened with and re-directed in a positive direction, he is simply wrong: controlling borders and bounds is not being overly controlling of evolution, individual liberty, nor even their well rounded functional autonomy. It is particularly foolish to go with Gariepy’s view of group advocacy as “social engineering” when you realize that the social engineering he rails against comes from Jewry and reactionaries. It is no more “the reality” of group defense than any of the Jewish misrepresented post modern terms and concepts of social advocacy. 9
Posted by Eric Weinstream on Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:33 | #
Analysis:
Dangerous to whom? No, you can’t make a cosmology or epistemology out of oppression by itself, but it can and should be an integral concern in the corrective, ergo homeostatic epistemology of praxis.
He’s taking us out of praxis (which IS in fact corrective in a way that “natural systems” are not) and into a story that social hypotheses don’t deal with reality and not that they don’t deal with reality in Jewish hands as they confront White resistance. See, to begin he is talking about getting to fundamentals below praxis, but by the end, he is going to assure himself a place atop a holistic praxis, once the danger do Jewish injustice has been sufficiently smothered. He’s not going to mention who and how they are behind the misrepresentation of left actvism within praxis.. and it is of course, Jewry that has launched an attack on White praxis.
Sounds like a parasite looking for a new host, doesn’t it? Changing dance partners. Replace Whites now that they are complaining about oppression? He’s going to look to the international left…
He is not going to ask “who” misrepresented the left and weaponized it, so that this praxis of social capacity for hypotheses and advocacy “cannot not deal with reality”, is now strictly against Whites (and “most dangerously” of all, intersecting with Jewish crypsis) and forcing, through this didactic distortion, misrepresentation of advocacy of praxis, anti White belligerence, forcing Whites to identify as right wing reactionaries, whether above or below the accountability, correctability, i.e., homeostasis of praxis. But be assured, the brothers will come down to present themselves as THE left in the end, mimicking what in essence, if it were ethnonational, would be the correct outlook, the most moral, accountable, corrective, best warranted and most powerful for group advocacy, social stability or directed revolution. But what of a White ethnonational left…we shall see… til then, they will direct White identity into the non corrective runaway, into no-account disasters of right wing reaction. ..holding up red capes to them, which are actually distortions and abuses of advocacy against Whites, but as Whites chase against the abstract concept, they attack the very concept of social organization and advocacy that they need. 10
Posted by Eric on Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:12 | # Eric (37:00): The whole point of this thinquisition concept was to analogize the left with Spain and the right with Turkey and the expulsion of the Jews… 11
Posted by Weinsteins on Sun, 02 Feb 2020 13:38 | #
Like the dangerous period of intersectionality of Jewish interests following decades of relentless leftist group activism in anti-White/anti Elite PC coalition and the 2008 bail-out….when the right might take them in. 12
Posted by Weinstain B on Sun, 02 Feb 2020 14:17 | #
13
Posted by Brett Weinstein on Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:00 | #
14
Posted by Erik Weinbaum on Sat, 16 May 2020 13:30 | #
Something is wrong with the immigration policy, which we can vaguely intuit. lol.
Weinstein is becoming concerned that Americans will become more articulate about patterns, patterns of immigration and patterns of those responsible for immigration policy.
The DNA Nations / sortocracy concept is not a necessary corollary to violence.
Whites being able to defend their kinds is a terrible idea.
Don’t even let them think about it.
But if coordinated blood and soil separatism is the way to head-off large scale violence and other disasters - e.g. to carrying capacity? We should’t allow this conversation, Eric? 15
Posted by A Jew Jewing on Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:35 | # I don’t have to analyze this, the absurdity speaks for itself. Obscene. Eric Weinstein, a Jew Jewing: talk about chutzpah: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfAumoTIeik Lynching, Police Brutality, BLM and Defunding the Police: a Contrarian Reality Check. Post a comment:
Next entry: WINTER SOLSTICE AND STONEHENGE
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 03 May 2024 23:04. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 04:26. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 03:35. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 03:12. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) |
Posted by firstly on Mon, 16 Dec 2019 06:02 | #
three of them