Blagging the political: the opening paras of the fourth and final part of the activism paper
So, the political is the ideational store of everything that has currency and, therefore, political potential. As our people’s existential concerns may expressly not be talked about in party-politics, then they can have neither. They are not political in this key and unavoidable sense. They are, instead” “hate”, “racism”, “xenophobia, etc; and no amount of nationalist discourse and nationalist activism can make them otherwise. For we nationalists do not control that process and neither, manifestly, do our people. The groups who, by participation, do control that process are listed from (i) to (vi) above.
To become political our people’s existential concerns must be introduced to the political by people who are connected to those groups. For them, the gates to the citadel are unguarded, and they may carry in any ideas they like. At first they will be rebuffed by some, certainly. But if the action is undertaken by others again and again, if shibboleths are challenged and injustices exposed, if fairness and justice and freedom are appealed to, if logic and commonsense is displayed, resistance will break down.
Well, it does not matter who carries our ideas into the chalk circle. It only matters that political correctness and anti-racism are ignored and are seen to be ignored, that our people’s existential concerns gain political currency and, in time, become not just a commonplace of the public discourse but an unavoidable reality for it, that the political is electrified thereby as we would willingly electrify it ourselves, and the way is prepared for our people’s cause to be championed by nationalists electorally and in every other way.
The question for us today, then, becomes: How can we influence such an outcome? What will it take to establish a group working covertly and daily on specified projects, each targeting the soft edges of the (at a rough estimate) fifteen to twenty thousand people in this country who alone possess anything like the power of free political speech?
... And at that point discretion must prevail. The paper will be presented to its first recipient(s) this weekend.
Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:37 | #
Although I am not an admirer of Jordan Peterson , he does encourage his fans to differentiate between disgust and hate , although when it comes to Poles in a free , post EU , Britain, I am prepared to admit that this may be , as the philosopher noted , a distinction without a difference.