|
|
What be da brothas and sistas up to?Question: What do you think the African-American ladies and African-American gentlemen are doing in the picture shown below?
Answer: Taking advantage of the devastation wrought by hurricane Katrina…by looting a grocery store! The story:
Check out the following screen captures of a video shot by a TV cameraman, which show the looting to be a family affair; the black children learning how to be a model citizen from their elders:
See the video by clicking here; the video clearly shows what the report above omits, namely that the looters are black. Pathetic Negroes! They can’t even restrain themselves when tragedy strikes. It is not that American Negroes are starving; visit any Winn-Dixie store in the Southern U.S. and you will see a huge number of grotesquely obese Negroes such as the examples below, and these Negroes pay for their shopping cart—overflowing with bacon, fried chicken, etc.—with food stamps to boot!
Now, how does one explain widespread looting of a grocery store by [American] blacks who typically have plenty to eat and are often overfed, especially how they can do something like this without any concern that they will be adding to the devastating damage/losses caused by hurricane Katrina? Updates (Aug 31): Negroes taking as much loot as they can:
Negroes, disproportionately afraid of water and unable to swim, take to water like a duck to loot as much as possible:
Of course, a Negro couldn’t give up an opportunity to stack up with malt liquor for free:
Negroes driving away with a precious loot of cases of beer in what appears to be a stolen car:
Excerpts from AP writer Allen G. Breed:
What is a stronger word than chutzpah?
New Orleans a sophisticated city? Denise, are you insane? New Orleans is at least two-thirds black!
No doubt jubilant, thanks to all the looting opportunities. And, what are whites doing?
More disturbing news:
Sick! Further updates (Sep 1): When I first posted this news item, it was premature for Negroes to be looting food, although given the eventual flooding of most of the city, it would make sense for people to resort to stealing food and water for survival, as some apologists for black behavior in New Orleans have started to point out, but it would be interesting to have these apologists try to explain looted items such as alcoholic beverages, clothing, jewelry, shoes, sporting goods, guns, electronic equipment, DVDs and anything else the Negroes could get their hands on, in addition to wanton destruction of property while looting, looting of nursing homes and hospitals, and all this to such a large extent that it prompted city officials to make quelling the anarchy the top priority instead of rescuing people. The apologists also need to explain the following.
Well, Rev. Clark, the Negroes are behaving like wild animals, and their wild behavior is hampering rescue efforts, as is additionally evident from the following statements from the same MSNBC report above.
There is also this interesting statement from a Seattle Times report concerning the wild behavior of New Orleans’ Negroes:
Indeed, hurricane Katrina has also wreaked havoc in Mandeville, Louisiana, knocking out electricity and phone service, but there is hardly any looting or crime there…Mandeville is 96% white. Civilized people will steal food and water for survival if there is no other option, but Negroes are a different matter. Miscellaneous updates: Negro cops looting:
One of several examples of Negro incompetence is shown below. New Orleans’ Negro Mayor Nagin not only issued an evacuation order—before the hurricane struck—after pressure from the federal government, but for all of Nagin’s complaining about the alleged delayed federal response, it did not occur to Nagin to use city buses to evacuate New Orleans’ residents lacking transport; the buses subsequently were partly submerged in the flooding: Posted by J Richards on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 at 09:32 AM in Law & Order, Media, Race realism, World Affairs Comments:2
Posted by Svigor on August 30, 2005, 03:08 PM | # Wanna blow the “economic” explanations of black crime out of the water? Just cite the rape statistics. Of course, it doesn’t take a genius to correct the black crime stats for SES, it took me a few hours: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=138888 There’s also a debunking of my favorite racial crime myth (whites as serial killers) stuck in there somewhere. 3
Posted by Phil on August 30, 2005, 03:18 PM | # All the footage of Katrina I have seen suggests that blacks were the worst affected. Perhaps in their desire to grab some loot, they forgot about the hurricane….... 4
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 30, 2005, 03:39 PM | # “Wanna blow the ‘economic’ explanations of black crime out of the water? Just cite the rape statistics.” (—Svigor) That’s a excellent point I’d never thought of before. Svigor is right: rape statistics all by themselves blow the “economic” explanation of black crime completely out of the water. 5
Posted by Amon on August 30, 2005, 03:50 PM | # I live in an area that was hit by Katrina, and during the calm of the storm, Negroes came around my neighborhood knocking on peoples’ doors, claiming to be the electric company. When people opened the door, the Negroes came in, told the house owners to stand still, stole stuff from the house, and ran out. My local newspaper didn’t even report this—partly because robberies happen so often, and partly because what they stole wasn’t very valuable, but also because the culprits were Negroes. 6
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 30, 2005, 04:47 PM | # This situation candidly demonstrates the dangers of the Negroes (and other tribes) in our midst. —- —- —- To the respectable conservatives I privately speak with I pose this question: Imagine what will happen when the blacks and hispanics gain ascendency via the Democratic franchise. Look what they’ve done to their niegborhoods, look what they have done to their homelands. ——————- To those awakened: please arm yourselves and prepare - and help save other Euro-Americans. 7
Posted by Svigor on August 30, 2005, 05:30 PM | # Scroob, don’t worry, Leftists have an answer (do they ever lack for one?). They just fall back on the mentally destabilizing effects of massive poverty and urban blight. In other words, being poor and black in a white-majority society drives ‘em nuts. They also like to fall back on psychobabble to explain why poverty drives blacks to crime in far greater numbers than whites; they say that the white poor are largely rural and so don’t have to deal with urban density. That is, blacks are all crammed together into cities and poor and so go crazy. (I guess they forget their Deliverance-style slurs at this point) They have an answer for everything I tell ya. 8
Posted by Svigor on August 30, 2005, 05:35 PM | # LOL, sorry to go off-topic, but I can’t resist this one. Check it out: :D 9
Posted by Professor Polinsky on August 30, 2005, 05:41 PM | #
Are you some type of racist? How dare you blame people for their own problems! 10
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 30, 2005, 05:44 PM | # > How dare you blame people for their own problems! A truly radical idea! 11
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 30, 2005, 05:47 PM | # Read this quote by Margaret Mitchell, referencing the collapse of order after the ‘War of Northern Aggression’ (1860-65):
12
Posted by Svigor on August 30, 2005, 05:53 PM | # I was just explaining that to a friend the other night Geoff. It wasn’t like dressing in masks and riding at night for vigilantism was anybody’s druthers after all. 13
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 30, 2005, 06:07 PM | # There will I think be another lesson to draw from this, when the final picture becomes clear. Louisiana’s governor is a dopey female Democrat, who’s doing very little about looting, whereas Mississippi’s Gov. Haley Barbour, a proper (non-Bushie) Republican is taking it seriously. Stats on the relative amount of looting in the two equally affected states will be VERY interesting. So it may end up being a useful wake-up call against political correctness and the left. 14
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 30, 2005, 06:15 PM | # Martin, What mitigates against your observation, Martin, is the location of the looting, New Orleans - which is 60% black. Biloxi is 50 or so miles east of New Orleans, and is mostly white. In fact, many Whites from New Orleans left for Biloxi long ago. I doubt pervasive looting would occur in Biloxi, regardless of who is governor. In fact Metaire, Louisiana, which is a white suburban county, directly connected to New Orleans, has no looting - but has the same governor as New Orleans. The difference is race. No, there is a more primitive explanation than who is the governor. 15
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 30, 2005, 06:25 PM | # Yes, Geoff, but the state of Mississippi is about 40% black. Plenty of potential looters there if they had a wimpy governor. 16
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 30, 2005, 06:28 PM | # Martin, have you spent much time in that area? I have. I spent 4 years attending school in Louisiana. New Orleans is a savage and dangerous place. The density of Blacks in New Orleans is overwhelming. The gulf shore of Mississippi is very White. No looting there. And again… In fact Metaire, Louisiana, which is a white suburban county, directly connected to New Orleans, has no looting - but has the same governor as New Orleans. The difference is race. 17
Posted by James Bowery on August 30, 2005, 07:44 PM | # Looked to me like it was a meeting of GNXPers to discuss Salter’s latest work. 18
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 30, 2005, 08:10 PM | # Geoff, I defer to your local knowledge. One October vacation 25 years ago, with a very engrossing girlfriend, with 3 hours in Biloxi and 48 in New Orleans probably doesn’t make me an expert 20
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 30, 2005, 09:14 PM | # “Leftists [...] say that the white poor are largely rural and so don’t have to deal with urban density. That is, blacks are all crammed together into cities and poor and so go crazy [and that’s why they commit so much crime]” (—Svigor, 9:30 PM) But first of all, why do able-bodied young Negro men all stay poor and “crammed together” in urban areas that are so blighted they surpass belief? Why do they remain to collect welfare in areas that make 1945 Dresden and Hiroshima look inviting by comparison, instead of traveling to where the work is, out of state if necessary, as whites do? Here in Vermont there’s always at least some movement of a fraction of the young men back and forth between here and North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, California, sometimes Florida, sometimes Connecticut, Rhode Island, and so on, following the availability of work. How come Negroes don’t do that—follow the work—instead remaining planted in one hell-hole forever drawing welfare in neverending hopelessness, crime, violence, and degenerateness? Why? Why don’t they get off their butt? If there’s no work for them in Harlem, go find it elsewhere! There are illiterate Mexican peasants, ten, twenty, forty million of them, literally risking death traveling two thousand miles and more, much of it on foot, to come to the U.S. and find menial jobs because there’s no work in the home village! U.S. Negroes can’t take a bus to the next state to get work for themselves??? The person who first showed me this way of looking at the concentrations of able-bodied Negro men all on welfare just hanging around day after day, year after year, without doing anything, in Harlem and Bedford-Stuyvesant, NYC, instead of leaving those hell holes and going where the work was—“Why are they there? What are they doing there when there’s nothing for them to do?,” was a female Negro student at the New England Ivy League college where I was doing graduate work in the early ‘80s. She was from Jacksonville, Florida, and had visited New York City for the first time in her life when she’d come up north to attend university, and while in NY she wanted to see Harlem. She told me the biggest impression she came away with was, “Why are they all there [all the jobless young men]? If they’re on welfare why do they stay, instead of leaving and going where there’s work? What’s wrong with them?” She was baffled by it. That was point number one. Point number two: the white immigrants arriving in U.S. northeastern seaports from the 1880s to the early 1920s were poor and were crammed into cities and didn’t go crazy. Ninety percent of the well-to-do Jews in the U.S. today, for example, are the offspring or descendants of dirt-poor immigrant forebears who arrived in places like NYC without a cent to their names—not a cent. They looked for work the instant they stepped off the boat from Lithuania, Ruthenia, Galicia, Silesia, Russia, or wherever it was, to buy a crust or an apple for their next day’s meal and that was how they started in the New World. They found work and worked hard, never stopping. They worked like dogs their whole lives in sweatshops to raise their children and pay for their kids’ educations, and so on. Were they or their dirt-poor kids out in the streets “going crazy, robbing, raping, and killing”? No answer is needed to that, I trust. Neither were the other white immigrant groups that were penniless and literally wretched, wearing rags, when they first arrived, and who lived as the Jews did, in crowded tenements. You didn’t see the thousandth—not the millionth—not the billionth—of the crime you see with Negroes in U.S. cities. You didn’t see crime. period! It was non-existent among the poor, crowded-together whites of those days. Do you think anyone was afraid to walk down the street at night in a Jewish, German, Italian, or Chinese neighborhood in New York City in those days where the poverty was grinding and people worked sixteen-hour days in sweatshops just to put their family’s next day’s meal on the table? Try walking down the street at night in a Negro neighborhood in New York City today, where the inhabitants have a level of financial security and material benefits those poor white immigrants of 80 and 100 years ago couldn’t even dream of. Try it. You’ll be lucky if you walk out alive. “Imagine what will happen when the blacks and hispanics gain ascendency via the Democratic franchise.” That’s easy. What will happen is whites will be treated exactly as they’re being treated right now in Rhodesia and South Africa. That’s the ones who stay. All the leftists who are now pushing race-replacement on us will have long since fled the country by that time. 21
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 30, 2005, 09:37 PM | # “You seem quite a lady’s man.” I got right in in the nick of time with my long comment, otherwise Martin might have had to reply to that. You owe me one, Martin. 24
Posted by James Bowery on August 30, 2005, 10:57 PM | # Obviously the cameramen are racists to be taking all these pictures of non-whites. 25
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 30, 2005, 11:04 PM | # Only “doing jobs Americans won’t do,” as President Bush says. 26
Posted by Matra on August 30, 2005, 11:07 PM | # Have you noticed the colour of those doing all the rescuing? 28
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 30, 2005, 11:18 PM | # That’s a lot of flooding for a hurricane. That much flooding must be from broken levees, no? I heard the New Orleans levees broke in a couple of places. Also, completely apart from this hurricane, isn’t New Orleans sinking the way Venice is? At least a few times a year the St. Mark’s Square in Venice floods unreasonably from heavy rain. Somehow that looks like a lot of water just from a hurricane—one would think something else is going on. The other thing is, in every single photo I’ve seen, the hurricane victims stranded, rescued, or wading through water have been non-white. In this photo above, yes, that’s certainly a Mexican. All the others photos I’ve seen have been of Negroes. What’s up with that? 30
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 30, 2005, 11:25 PM | # Fred, New Orleans is ground zero for blacks. Earlier I quoted the population of N.O. as 60% black, I read in another news report it was 67%. I lived in Louisiana for four years. Scenes above are very very typical. 32
Posted by Andrew L on August 31, 2005, 12:38 AM | # You would have thought the National Guard would be called in and commissioned with state police to protect Individual and property rights. 33
Posted by AD on August 31, 2005, 03:45 AM | # Does anyone here know if the damage has hit near Mr Duke’s headquarters? 34
Posted by Steve Edwards on August 31, 2005, 06:06 AM | # What is going on here? Surely the blacks couldn’t have been so prone to commit crime 50 years ago, right? What has changed? 35
Posted by AD on August 31, 2005, 06:46 AM | # What is going on here? Surely the blacks couldn’t have been so prone to commit crime 50 years ago, right? What has changed? The same thing that has changed in the ‘new’ South Africa. 36
Posted by Stuka on August 31, 2005, 08:50 AM | # What else can we say? These people, these beings, these animals, these things, are utter savages. It’s multiculturalism in action. Let’s go out & broadcast these images; let’s put the complete savagery of the Negro on display for the world. More, please. 37
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 31, 2005, 09:14 AM | # The flooding’s not because of the hurricane. When Katrina was approaching, they were worried that it would produce 20 foot surges, overwhelming the 17 foot levies. That didn’t happen; the surges topped at 15 feet because the hurricane changed course. Instead, unexpectedly, the levies broke. That’s a result (Geoff, who’s lived there, won’t be surprised by this) of graft in the Louisiana public sector tender process. It is a classic example of the public sector doing things to the most appalling quality standards and, in this case, wrecking a city and most likely killing thousands of people by this. No doubt the responsible officials are all retired or dead, but sequestering their families’ inheritances and bankrupting the construction companies involved would still seem appropriate. Won’t happen. The solution is smaller government. Not something we’re likely to get from the Bush adnministration. 38
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 09:18 AM | # Martin, I agree. If the Washington tyranny allowed states the liberty, which the constitution specifies, a natural order would evolve among people and classes; a natural order conducive to good business, strong culture, and civility. But I have no hope of a restoration of the constitution. 39
Posted by seelow heights on August 31, 2005, 09:21 AM | # All the blacks in the pictures look to be of unmixed negroid ancestry-no Hale Berrys! 40
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 09:33 AM | # Thousands of bodies have been discovered throughout Mississippi in Gulf Port, Waveland,Hancock County,Bay of St.Louis. says one eye witness report 41
Posted by leo felton on August 31, 2005, 09:37 AM | # Don’t you white irrationalists watch the news? Footage of whites looting, on FOX. Happy now? BTW, crime rates in Irish Catholic neighborhoods in the 1800s were astronomical. Police trucks were called Paddy wagons because they were full of Paddies. 42
Posted by James Bowery on August 31, 2005, 09:57 AM | # Don’t you white irrationalists watch the news? Footage of whites looting, on FOX. Happy now? Ah, good, so you can go back to ignoring stuff like: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=138888 FOX to the rescue of your world-view! 43
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 10:03 AM | # Felton: Here is the data: http://www.amren.com/color.pdf Sure I know Whites that are low-life scum. For sure. But compare the pandemic anarchy in Africa to that of white areas of North America and Europe. Well, if you are honest, and trust your eyes and not the propaganda… Thanks for stopping by. 44
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 31, 2005, 10:05 AM | # Is the white looting in Louisiana or Mississippi? Any substantial difference between the two makes a different point, the need for strong, non-PC government and public discipline. 45
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 10:16 AM | # Martin, I certainly agree with you about having “strong, non-PC government and public discipline”. But why not concede - given the reality of power today - that we “can’t get there from here”? I instead advocate secession. I really think secession is far more feasible and doable than a restoration of good government, public order, and etc… within the rotten existing system. Neither path is easy, though. 46
Posted by AD on August 31, 2005, 10:20 AM | # BTW, crime rates in Irish Catholic neighborhoods in the 1800s were astronomical. So because there is a theory that the Irish were overrepresented in crime stats two centuries ago…..we must forever close our eyes to the realities of contemporary racial relations/crime stats etc. One day,the non-whites will join the ‘mainstream’ en masse like the Irish did right?Until then,we’ll just shut up,ignore the violence/degeneration and think of ‘paddy wagons’. You’ve won me over.I was indeed a white ‘irrationalist’ before,but now i’m a realist like you. 47
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 31, 2005, 10:23 AM | # Geoff, it’s only 20 years since both Britain and the US had decent governments at the national level. I agree the Bush administration—and the fact he was eleceted as a Republican—tends to lead one towards secession or armed uprising, but he won’t last forever. Meanwhile, at a state level the contrast between Barbour and Blanco is HUGE, and needs to be pointed out to all and sundry. If GWB was Governor of Louisiana, the levies would have broken and looting would have happened, just as it is doing. If Reagan or (I think, though am not entirely sure*) Barbour were Gov. of Louisiana, the levies would have been done right and looters would be rounded up into chain gangs. *Strong evidence that Barbour is really a Bushie sleazeball would cause me to retract, but he doesn’t appear to be. 48
Posted by stari_momak on August 31, 2005, 10:39 AM | # You guys will like this from Yahoo news. A police officer said there were dozens of carjackings overnight, carried out by desperate survivors seeking to get out of town or obtain supplies [emph. added] We’ve seen how those supplies are obtained. 49
Posted by friedrich braun on August 31, 2005, 11:06 AM | # The analogy with the Irish is flawed at many levels. Some of the reasons: Negroes have higher testosterone levels, smaller and less dense brains, and require constant and instant gratification, i.e. the difference is racial and genetic and no amount of socialization can turn a basically violent man-ape hybrid into an Irishman. 50
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 11:07 AM | # Looting a hospital. Should be shot on sight for that. 51
Posted by James Bowery on August 31, 2005, 11:34 AM | # Negroes have higher testosterone levels, smaller and less dense brains, and require constant and instant gratification, i.e. the difference is racial and genetic and no amount of socialization can turn a basically violent man-ape hybrid into an Irishman. Don’t you need to provide the link to the genetic evidence for this? Do negroes have more alleles in common with other great apes than do Irishmen? Just trying to be fair here. 52
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 31, 2005, 11:44 AM | # The 19th Centruy British view was that both Irishmen and Negroes were sub-human. I think we need to give adverse cultural factors (persistent Fenian and Black Marxist agitation against the existing order of society) much more blame here than any real or imagined genetic factors. 53
Posted by h-man on August 31, 2005, 12:08 PM | # “Studies show that black college students and military veterans have 3% to 19% more testosterone than their white counterparts” Found in 9th paragraph at this link (Rushton article 54
Posted by James Bowery on August 31, 2005, 12:28 PM | # Someone let me know when the follow data is posted on GNXP by their baboons there. From a private mailing list: This is a bit technical, but I take it to mean that both blacks and chimpanzees have the APOH*4 allele while whites have the APOH*1 allele, thereby demonstrating that blacks are more closely related to chimpanzees than are whites. This is from (Google cache entry). Using thin-layer polyacrylamide isoelectric focusing gels and immunologic identification, Kamboh et al. (1988) demonstrated genetically determined polymorphism of apolipoprotein H. Three common alleles were identified in U.S. whites and blacks. A fourth allele was observed in black individuals. Family data confirmed autosomal codominant inheritance of 4 alleles at a single APOH locus. Richter and Cleve (1988) demonstrated genetic variations by means of isoelectric focusing. Sepehrnia et al. (1988) provided data on the distribution of apolipoprotein polymorphisms in Nigeria, including polymorphism of APOH. The observations supported the conclusion that the APOH*4 is a marker allele unique to blacks and one that may be widely distributed among African populations, whereas the APOH*1 allele may be a unique Caucasian allele that was introduced into the black population of the U.S. by admixture.”
55
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2005, 01:24 PM | # “If the Washington tyranny allowed states the liberty, which the constitution specifies, a natural order would evolve among people and classes; a natural order conducive to good business, strong culture, and civility.” (—Geoff, 1:18 pm) “I [...] advocate secession.” (2:16 pm) Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! Right! ... The federal government does not like whites. The federal government wants to kill whites, or at any rate does not give one single solitary god-damn if whites are killed by high-violent-crime groups it fully intends to keep forcing into white communities. The federal government wants to commit genocide against whites. Whites have to get away from the federal government. There are some things whites have to start talking seriously about in terms of their own self-defense. One of them is secession or a greater degree of local autonomy for white regions, such as has been granted to Catalonia in Spain I think it was and to certain regions in other countries. If the federal government insists on filling the country with non-white groups it will have to deal with organized whites who do not want to be submerged in a sea of non-whites with all that goes along with that. If whites can’t obtain sufficient autonomy within the framework of the United States they have to start planning on secession. D.C. is going to have to come second, behind whites’ racial/national self-preservation. D.C. may have to be jettisoned altogether, exactly as the Old Soviet Union was in 1991. If and when the day comes when that happens, D.C. will have brought it entirely on itself and will have only itself to blame: reasonable people have been begging it for years, decades, to change course, and have been greeted with a deaf ear along with the most outrageous slanders. 56
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2005, 01:40 PM | # “Looting a hospital. Should be shot on sight for that.” (—Lurker) Exactly right. The order to the National Guard should be all adult looters shot on sight, which won’t happen of course, but if outlaw gangs of drug-addicted, AIDs-infected criminals trying to break down the locked doors of a children’s hospital in which a hundred children are being treated, in order to pillage the place, can’t be immediately shot on sight without any questions asked, there’s absolutely an extremely grave problem of deep societal breakdown, closely comparable to what’s going on in places like South Africa and Rhodesia, and the fundamental problem is a racial one which D.C. sees, and more or less is determined to try to solve by getting rid of white people—or at least by changing them from a majority to a minority population in this country. That’s D.C.‘s planned “solution.” 57
Posted by James Bowery on August 31, 2005, 02:10 PM | # the fundamental problem is a racial one which D.C. sees, and more or less is determined to try to solve by getting rid of white people—or at least by changing them from a majority to a minority population in this country. That’s D.C.’s planned “solution.” I disagree with this wording. Their solution is to enslave white people. This is true even if the whites in question are descended from Quakers who fought slavery or Yeoman farmers whose sons worked their land rather than slaves—and were pushed out west by the slave-using plantation owners. They don’t care about “justisssssssssss” no matter how much they blither about it—if they did they’d be paying reparations to white heterosexual taxpayers who have been threatened by black and hispanic prison gang rape for the decades during which “civil rights” have been pushed to become a sexually sadistic reality. 58
Posted by J Richards on August 31, 2005, 02:46 PM | # Since James Bowery has attempted to address the issue of whether blacks or whites are closer to apes, it must be emphasized that the differences between blacks and whites are much smaller than the differences between either of these groups and apes. However, on several counts, either blacks or whites can be closer to apes. For instance, the greater body hairiness of whites is a more ape-like trait than the less hairiness of blacks. Similarly, the flatter backsides of whites are more ape-like than the more prominent backsides of blacks. On the other hand, take a good look at the facial features of the black teen shown in the picture above with the word “TEEN” on it and see if you can answer the question as to whether more pure-blooded Negroes or whites are closer to apes in regard to looks. However, what is relevant to this discussion is civil behavior, and in regard to behaving in a civilized manner in human society, let alone producing a civilization in the first place, blacks are unambiguously more closer to apes than whites are. For instance, before testosterone can affect gene expression, it needs to bind to the androgen receptor (AR). The fewer the number of CAG repeats in the AR gene, the more sensitive to testosterone one is. The number of CAG repeats is lower in apes than humans (Djian et al., 1996) and lower in blacks than whites (Bennett et al., 2002; O’Brien et al., 2004; Panz et al., 2001; Pettaway, 1999; Platz et al., 2000; Sartor et al., 1999). Therefore, even if blacks and whites have the same level of testosterone, the bodies of blacks, on average, will behave as if they have higher testosterone levels. On the other hand, by now the average find summed over a number of studies is that black males up to the age of 35 have higher testosterone levels than white males in the same age range, with the difference tending to disappear or possibly reverse somewhat later on (see reviews in: Gapstur et al., 2002; Pettaway, 1999; Winters et al., 2001). Additionally, studies have consistently shown that blacks have more sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) than whites (see reviews in: Abdelrahaman et al., 2005; Sutton-Tyrrell et al., 2005); SHBG activates the androgen receptor. Therefore, even if one finds white and black males with the same levels of androgens such as testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, higher SHBG levels in blacks implies that their bodies, on average, function as if they have higher testosterone levels (Mohler et al., 2004). Also, many studies have shown elevated androgens in black women compared to white women, i.e., blacks are exposed to higher testosterone levels than most white populations in the womb (Driscoll, 2003; Huppert et al., 2004; Kumar et al., 2005; Potischman et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005). See this report for a massive literature review that blacks have an innately lower IQ and smaller brains than whites, including the frontal lobe, which is significantly involved in inhibition and restraint. A population with absolutely/effectively elevated androgen levels and lower IQ is also bound to behave in a less civil manner. On a more global basis, it has been shown that the diversity of neutral sites in nuclear DNA (where almost all of our genes reside) is about 50% greater in chimpanzees (the ape closest to humans) than humans overall but only 13% greater in chimpanzees compared to blacks (Yu et al., 2003), i.e., blacks are unambiguously the most primitive people around and closer to apes than other human populations are on this count. This is the tip of the iceberg; there is a lot more to this stuff, and someday I am going to post it. See the next comment for the citations. 59
Posted by J Richards on August 31, 2005, 02:47 PM | # Citations for the previous comment: Bennett, C. L., Price, D. K., Kim, S., Liu, D., Jovanovic, B. D., Nathan, D., et al. (2002). Racial variation in cag repeat lengths within the androgen receptor gene among prostate cancer patients of lower socioeconomic status. J Clin Oncol, 20(17), 3599-3604. Djian, P., Hancock, J. M., & Chana, H. S. (1996). Codon repeats in genes associated with human diseases: Fewer repeats in the genes of nonhuman primates and nucleotide substitutions concentrated at the sites of reiteration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 93(1), 417-421. Driscoll, D. A. (2003). Polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescence. Semin Reprod Med, 21(3), 301-307. Gapstur, S. M., Gann, P. H., Kopp, P., Colangelo, L., Longcope, C., & Liu, K. (2002). Serum androgen concentrations in young men: A longitudinal analysis of associations with age, obesity, and race. The cardia male hormone study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 11(10 Pt 1), 1041-1047. Huppert, J., Chiodi, M., & Hillard, P. J. (2004). Clinical and metabolic findings in adolescent females with hyperandrogenism. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 17(2), 103-108. Kumar, A., Woods, K. S., Bartolucci, A. A., & Azziz, R. (2005). Prevalence of adrenal androgen excess in patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome (pcos). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 62(6), 644-649. Mohler, J. L., Gaston, K. E., Moore, D. T., Schell, M. J., Cohen, B. L., Weaver, C., et al. (2004). Racial differences in prostate androgen levels in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol, 171(6 Pt 1), 2277-2280. O’Brien, T. G., Guo, Y., Visvanathan, K., Sciulli, J., McLaine, M., Helzlsouer, K. J., et al. (2004). Differences in ornithine decarboxylase and androgen receptor allele frequencies among ethnic groups. Mol Carcinog, 41(2), 120-123. Panz, V. R., Joffe, B. I., Spitz, I., Lindenberg, T., Farkas, A., & Haffejee, M. (2001). Tandem cag repeats of the androgen receptor gene and prostate cancer risk in black and white men. Endocrine, 15(2), 213-216. Pettaway, C. A. (1999). Racial differences in the androgen/androgen receptor pathway in prostate cancer. J Natl Med Assoc, 91(12), 653-660. Platz, E. A., Rimm, E. B., Willett, W. C., Kantoff, P. W., & Giovannucci, E. (2000). Racial variation in prostate cancer incidence and in hormonal system markers among male health professionals. J Natl Cancer Inst, 92(24), 2009-2017. Potischman, N., Troisi, R., Thadhani, R., Hoover, R. N., Dodd, K., Davis, W. W., et al. (2005). Pregnancy hormone concentrations across ethnic groups: Implications for later cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14(6), 1514-1520. Sartor, O., Zheng, Q., & Eastham, J. A. (1999). Androgen receptor gene cag repeat length varies in a race-specific fashion in men without prostate cancer. Urology, 53(2), 378-380. Sutton-Tyrrell, K., Wildman, R. P., Matthews, K. A., Chae, C., Lasley, B. L., Brockwell, S., et al. (2005). Sex hormone-binding globulin and the free androgen index are related to cardiovascular risk factors in multiethnic premenopausal and perimenopausal women enrolled in the study of women across the nation (swan). Circulation, 111(10), 1242-1249. Winters, S. J., Brufsky, A., Weissfeld, J., Trump, D. L., Dyky, M. A., & Hadeed, V. (2001). Testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, and body composition in young adult african american and caucasian men. Metabolism, 50(10), 1242-1247. Yu, N., Jensen-Seaman, M. I., Chemnick, L., Kidd, J. R., Deinard, A. S., Ryder, O., et al. (2003). Low nucleotide diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Genetics, 164(4), 1511-1518. Zhang, Y., Graubard, B. I., Klebanoff, M. A., Ronckers, C., Stanczyk, F. Z., Longnecker, M. P., et al. (2005). Maternal hormone levels among populations at high and low risk of testicular germ cell cancer. Br J Cancer, 92(9), 1787-1793. 60
Posted by J Richards on August 31, 2005, 03:11 PM | # Regarding the comment by Leo Felton above, I usually don’t bother getting my news from TV because of the mainstream media bias. Even a right-leaning network like FOX news wouldn’t dare portray blacks as they truly are. The only picture of looters that I could find at the FOX news website showed them all to be black. This is not to say that none of the looters are white. However, whites wouldn’t come anywhere close to blacks with respect to the proportion per capita involved in looting, and are almost certainly absent among those participating in the sicker forms of looting such as attempting to loot a children’s hospital or going beyond simple looting by trashing/damaging property with abandon. 61
Posted by Phil on August 31, 2005, 03:49 PM | # J Richards, One can ignore characters like Felton for the purposes of rational discourse. The Irish analogy is nonsense for the following reason - even at their worst, the Irish never approached the crime levels of blacks we witness in South Africa, the US and Brazil (to take some examples). The Irish thing is rubbish as an analogy to blacks. 62
Posted by leo felton on August 31, 2005, 04:11 PM | # “This would be a grand land if only every Irishman would kill a Negro, and be hanged for it. I find this sentiment generally approved - sometimes with the qualification that they want Irish and Negroes for servants, not being able to get any other.” 63
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 04:25 PM | # Geoff, I think the Constitution and the Framers get too much credit. They knew damned well what they were doing, and I think they chose not to explicitly enshrine decentralization because they didn’t want decentralization. 64
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 04:35 PM | # Leo, I know this will come as a shock to you, but 21st century race-realism is in no way coterminous with 19th century race-sentiment. Welcome to the year 2005. I know you’ll be sad to leave your 19th century strawmen behind, but you have to grow up sometime; try using the big-boy voice when addressing adults. 65
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 04:58 PM | # > Constitution & Centralization I disagree. It must be remembered many states at the consitutional convention (1787) explicitly noted their right to seceede from the pact. Futhermore, one cannot read the 10th Amendment, and then note the very few consitutionally defined powers of the federal gov’t and understand the very limited nature of the pact ( not as limited as the original “Articles of Confederation” though). Futhermore vestiges of the limited powers of the union lasted well into the 20th century, for example plessy vs. furgeson. Do you remember that case? Yes, it is a flawed document, and those flaws surfaced over the decades. Yes, there were always power mad centralizers like A. Hamilton, but there was opposite forces like A. Jackson and Jefferson Davis. 66
Posted by friedrich braun on August 31, 2005, 05:14 PM | # Holy Mother of God! We have found the missing link!
There are more photos and news article in this thread: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=262974&page=1&pp=20 67
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 05:22 PM | # Mr. Hutchinson, The fact is that races have substantially different behavioral means which contribute to racial tension in myriad ways. The implications of this have been gone over time and again here. For example, northeast Asians are less prone to a variety of social pathologies (violent crime, divorce, STDs like AIDS, etc.,) than Europeans. Once yellows constitute a large portion of the American population, who’s to say they won’t start feeling about whites (to say nothing of blacks, who they generally regard as little more than talking apes) the way many whites feel about blacks? Who’s to say that a yellow guilt (equivalent to the false white guilt crippling Europeans today) will miraculously emerge to prevent yellows from doing precisely the sorts of things to non-yellows that everyone accuses WNs of wanting to do to non-whites? Multiracial societies are just asking for trouble. Yeah, sure, blacks can be oppressed into being more civilized than they would be if left to their own devices. Sure, whites might become more likeable to yellows in a yellow-dominated society where yellows oppressed whites. Why court all this trouble? Why not recognize that blacks have a right to live according to their own natures, to be free of the white or yellow man’s definition of civilization? After all, black failure is only black failure viewed through a non-black lens. Why not recognize the same right for all groups? If your point is just that environmental and cultural factors are important too then I agree, and if you pay attention you’ll notice that WNs in general agree. That said, nature and nuture are not equal. One cannot nurture a nature that is not there to begin with. All of this of course ignores the inherent goodness and rightness of a people preserving itself, securing a future for itself. All this also ignores the realities of Social Identity, which predicts racial strife even in the absence of differences in group behavioral means. 68
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 05:36 PM | # many states at the consitutional convention (1787) explicitly noted their right to seceede from the pact. The fact that they had to note this shows that the Constitution did not. Futhermore, one cannot read the 10th Amendment, and then note the very few consitutionally defined powers of the federal gov’t and understand the very limited nature of the pact ( not as limited as the original “Articles of Confederation” though). I understand that, but the failure to include specific mechanisms for secession leads me down certain paths Constitutionalists don’t like to tread. These men were smart enough to know that centralization is the goal of all government with the power to pursue it, and they did little to guard against it. Their supposed intentions don’t show up well in the Constitution. Futhermore vestiges of the limited powers of the union lasted well into the 20th century, for example plessy vs. furgeson. Do you remember that case? You’re only making my case. The “law” involved died with the sentiment supporting it. Yes, there were always power mad centralizers like A. Hamilton, but there was opposite forces like A. Jackson and Jefferson Davis. The fact that tension between the two sides is possible speaks volumes about how effective the Constitution is at warding off centralization. How hard would it have been to put in a few parachutes? 69
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 05:40 PM | # BLACK TESTOSTERONE MADNESS (very violent attack) http://media4.big-boys.com/content/ghettofight.wmv We must unite and protect ourselves. New Orleans has shown the cops won’t. 70
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 05:42 PM | # Svi, I read a lot of History, and have a BA in History, I stand by my interpretation. 71
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 05:48 PM | # I don’t read a lot of history, and I don’t have a degree in history. I can only point out that the word “interpretation” is a sign of the Constitution’s weakness. 72
Posted by friedrich braun on August 31, 2005, 05:55 PM | # What I find especially disturbing in that video is the beating and kicking of someone who was already down. 73
Posted by Mark Richardson on August 31, 2005, 06:01 PM | # Why not recognise that blacks have a right to live according to their natures, to be free of the white or yellow man’s definition of civilization? Svigor, I was reading D.H. Lawrence’s review of Fenimore Cooper’s literature last night. Lawrence writes, “In the actual flesh, it seems to me the white man and the red man cause a feeling of oppression, the one to the other, no matter what the good will. The red life flows in a different direction from the white life.” BTW, I think that the discussion some have conducted in this thread about blacks being “animals” or “apes”, no matter how scientifically discussed, are a massive overkill in terms of the arguments we need to make. We don’t need to prove any such thing, and an attempt to do so is likely to be counterproductive in terms of attracting a mainstream readership or advancing a nationalist politics. 74
Posted by dave on August 31, 2005, 06:09 PM | # J.Richards, Are not Australoids the most primitive extant race or were you excluding them because of their small numbers and lack of global presence? They seem less agressive than the Negro but significantly dumber. I think I remember a diagram in the book “Race” by John Baker showing the astonishing similarity of the Australoid’s brain to that of an orang-utan. 75
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2005, 06:14 PM | # What should be done about looters in hurricane zones? —They should be shot on sight by authorities. 61.68 % (2,562) —Arrest them for breaking the law. 15.41 % (640) —It’s bad, but scarce police resources should be used for rescue efforts. 8.06 % (335) —Warning shots should be fired to scare them away. 4.21 % (175) —I don’t know why they’re taking electronics, there’s no power. 3.32 % (138) —Nothing, many looters are hurricane victims who need items to survive. 2.94 % (122) —Leave them alone, God will judge them. 1.88 % (78) —Other. 1.81 % (75) —Issue a stern warning from the government. 0.51 % (21) —They’re victims suffering storm shock, and should be left alone. 0.19 % (8) TOTAL VOTES: 4,154 76
Posted by friedrich braun on August 31, 2005, 06:15 PM | # A factoid: Richard Lynn’s most recent research, published 2002 in the journal Population and Environment, is titled Skin color and intelligence in African Americans. Lynn purports to prove that African-Americans with lighter-colored skin have higher intelligence than those with darker skin. [1] (http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/publications.htm) 77
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 06:17 PM | # BTW, I think that the discussion some have conducted in this thread about blacks being “animals” or “apes”, no matter how scientifically discussed, are a massive overkill in terms of the arguments we need to make. We don’t need to prove any such thing, and an attempt to do so is likely to be counterproductive in terms of attracting a mainstream readership or advancing a nationalist politics. That was the point I was going to make, the point that led me to the post you quoted. Somewhere in there I forgot to make it. 78
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 06:23 PM | # Mark, > BTW, I think that the discussion some have conducted in this thread about blacks being “animals” or “apes”, no matter how scientifically discussed, are a massive overkill in terms of the arguments we need to make. The comment I read by Bowery made the point that all human phenotypes (if that is the correct word) share many features with apes. That is a fact. Yes? 79
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 06:27 PM | # Martin is quite right. I dont like that sort of talk and it wont change opinion from anyone else for the better. Getting back to N.O. LA, a British (Welsh they said) tourist stuck there was interviewed just now on TV. She has been sleeping on the street with about 20 other people (tourists also I presume)- what people? Australians, other Brits, Kiwis, Canadians. Does anybody see a pattern there? A lesson perhaps? When your back is to the wall… 80
Posted by friedrich braun on August 31, 2005, 06:37 PM | # Photo: A Negro New Orleans police officer walking away from looted store with a stack of DVD’s nessesary - ahem -for his survival.
Mike Perlstein and Brian Thevenot Law enforcement efforts to contain the emergency left by Katrina slipped into chaos in parts of New Orleans Tuesday with some police officers and firefighters joining looters in picking stores clean. At the Wal-Mart on Tchoupitoulas Street, an initial effort to hand out provisions to stranded citizens quickly disintegrated into mass looting. Authorities at the scene said bedlam erupted after the giveaway was announced over the radio. While many people carried out food and essential supplies, others cleared out jewelry racks and carted out computers, TVs and appliances on handtrucks. Some officers joined in taking whatever they could, including one New Orleans cop who loaded a shopping cart with a compact computer and a 27-inch flat screen television. Officers claimed there was nothing they could do to contain the anarchy, saying their radio communications have broken down and they had no direction from commanders. “We don’t have enough cops to stop it,” an officer said. “A mass riot would break out if you tried.” Inside the store, the scene alternated between celebration and frightening bedlam. A shirtless man straddled a broken jewelry case, yelling, “Free samples, free samples over here.” Another man rolled a mechanized pallet, stacked six feet high with cases of vodka and whiskey. Perched atop the stack was a bewildered toddler. Throughout the store and parking lot, looters pushed carts and loaded trucks and vans alongside officers. One man said police directed him to Wal-Mart from Robert’s Grocery, where a similar scene was taking place. A crowd in the electronics section said one officer broke the glass DVD case so people wouldn’t cut themselves. “The police got all the best stuff. They’re crookeder than us,” one man said. Most officers, though, simply stood by powerless against the tide of law breakers. One veteran officer said, “It’s like this everywhere in the city. This tiny number of cops can’t do anything about this. It’s wide open.” At least one officer tried futilely to control a looter through shame. “When they say take what you need, that doesn’t mean an f-ing TV,” the officer shouted to a looter. “This is a hurricane, not a free-for-all.” Sandra Smith of Baton Rouge walked through the parking lot with a 12-pack of Bud Light under each arm. “I came down here to get my daughters,” she said, “but I can’t find them.” The scene turned so chaotic at times that entrances were blocked by the press of people and shopping carts and traffic jams sprouted on surrounding streets. Some groups organized themselves into assembly lines to more efficiently cart off goods. Toni Williams, 25, packed her trunk with essential supplies, such as food and water, but said mass looting disgusted and frightened her. “I didn’t feel safe. Some people are going overboard,” she said. Inside the store, one woman was stocking up on make-up. She said she took comfort in watching police load up their own carts. “It must be legal,” she said. “The police are here taking stuff, too.” (Staff writers Doug MacCash and Keith Spera assisted in this story.) 81
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 06:47 PM | # Protect and Serve eh officers, well you are caught on camera now! 82
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 06:48 PM | # Lol Fried, that’s already memory-holed. If you saved the story I wouldn’t object if you emailed it to me. 83
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 06:50 PM | # I can’t wait until all the home videos and amateur photography starts filtering out of N.O. and onto the ‘Net. 84
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 06:54 PM | # Btw Fried, what was the original headline? I’m trying to find a Google cache of the article with no luck. 85
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 07:00 PM | # Svi, You may wish to listen to these lectures by the Southerner Donald Livingston, http://www.mises.org/media.aspx?action=showname&ID=9 The Thomas Wood’s lectures are very good, 87
Posted by James Bowery on August 31, 2005, 07:19 PM | # J Richards wrote: Since James Bowery has attempted to address the issue of whether blacks or whites are closer to apes, it must be emphasized that the differences between blacks and whites are much smaller than the differences between either of these groups and apes. However, on several counts, either blacks or whites can be closer to apes. Well to be more accurate I was addressing the issue of genetic via DNA similarity raised by an earlier poster who proclaimed that blacks were “basically violent man-ape hybrid”. That being said, the data is coming in and the political animals are gong to get squirrelier and squirrelier. 88
Posted by Svigor on August 31, 2005, 07:33 PM | # I did manage to find this: which highlights well the main difference between a blog and a newspaper: newspapers have editors (who all protect blacks in order to protect their own careers). 89
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 07:51 PM | # Don’t miss this looting video : http://www.wdsu.com/video/4918639/detail.html (The cart is so stuffed they can hardly push it!) 90
Posted by stari_momak on August 31, 2005, 08:07 PM | # The rocket scientist’s article is in formatted form below, with a nice photo . No additional text though 91
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 08:19 PM | # Check this out: http://www.nola.com/weblogs/nola/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_nolaview/archives/2005_08.html#075489 Loretta bleating about people of color and the very next entry find out what the peole of color are up to. Get real Loretta. 92
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 08:39 PM | # Sorry, should point out that Loretta’s (Hopkins) post is no longer at the top and will be shunted lower over time, catch it while its fresh. 93
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2005, 09:13 PM | # 6:34 p.m. Name: Gregory Burris Home: 817-274-8151 Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) Subject: My Hurricane Story—Medical Staff in Downtown Story: My name is Greg Burris and I am a resident of Metairie, LA. My Fiance, Dr. Jenny Lingamfelter and I own a house in Metairie. There is a major problem downtown and it is disorganization. I dropped Jenny off at University Hospital on Sunday morning at 5:00 a.m. and I evacuated with the shortly after. I am currently in Dallas and have had limited communication with Jenny. Currently she is still in University Hospital, but they are out of water and low on food. There is no power. Looters are in the hospital and it is an extremely dangerous situation. Where are the police? Well, if you watch the news you know that the State Police and New Orleans PD are in extreme disarray and they have little ability to handle this crisis. At any rate, it is extremely important to get these Doctors who stayed behind to help out of unusable hospitals and get them some to protection and facilities they can use. Despite the reports on the major networks, Charity, Tulane and University Hospitals have not been evacuated. When I last spoke to Jenny she thought it would be 4 to 5 days before they evacuated. They need water and supplies. Let’s band together as a community and get this done. If anyone needs our support, its the Doctors and Nurses risking there lives to help save the people that make up New Orleans. 94
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 09:22 PM | # Aw Fred, you missed Loretta’s, its grade A! Here it is: 5:45 p.m. Name: loretta hopkins Home: 209-610-6341 Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) Subject: My Hurricane Story—looting Story: I cannot believe the air time that is being placed on looting. It is obvious that these people are desperate. Who really cares if they take a pair of teenis shoes. It must be absolutely terrifying to be in New orleans or any of the other areas. It is just a shame that the govt. is not doing more to help the poor people. It is quite obvious that the people that are wondering around New Orleans are the less fortunate. It is mind boggling to me how all the news ever shows is people of color looting. Then again its not. I just like to fantasize that racism and economic inequalities do not exsist. I am calling out to all African Americans of color to step up to the plate. If you don’t who else will. Orah,diddy,Shaq lets help out the African Americans so next time cnn choses to cover them in there headline news they will only have a positive coverage It was posted immediately after the “HELPPP” post 95
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 09:25 PM | # Over at Daily Kos they are saying that the hospital looting is just a rumour. I dont know what think, hope they are right. 96
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2005, 09:32 PM | # I did see Loretta’s, Lurker, thanks to your post. But I wanted also to draw attention to the alarming reports of hospital looting. I knew anyone following the link I posted would also see Loretta’s, as it was right in among the ones I pasted here. No white American needs to ask, incidentally, what the race of the hospital looters is. 97
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 09:42 PM | # Ah Fred I didnt trust the public enough! Ive just been trying to look up “Baptist hospital” in NOLA, I assume someone there calling for help (in a hurry) would use the commonest local name, that would be understood by local police, medical staff etc. Even if it were not the official title. Not much info out there. Does it exist? 98
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 31, 2005, 09:51 PM | # Having lived in Louisiana, and being quite familiar with New Orleans, I find this quote from an AP report laughable: At one store, hordes of people from all ages, races and walks of life grabbed food and water. Some drove away with trunkloads of beer. Well, Whites in New Orleans belong to a very small enclave, they live in “Uptown” section near Tulane and Loyola universities - all have money. Furthermore, New Orleans is 67% black. So, these claims of a multicultural looting festival are rather hollow. 99
Posted by Lurker on August 31, 2005, 09:55 PM | # Speaking as a wimpy civilian here. That shot of the police squad ambling down the street. What image do they think that sends out? If they really are in a danger zone they look too bunched up and not covering all quarters (correct term?). If they are just there to fly the flag they should be marching properly, show they mean business, not just strutting around like gangstas. (All should be wearing the same headgear or none at all!) Rant over! 100
Posted by J Richards on August 31, 2005, 10:01 PM | # Mark Richardson:
Well, Mark, who has written about ‘blacks being “animals” or “apes”’? No one! At most, Friedrich Braun has called them “basically violent man-ape hybrids,” and it should be obvious that his statement is not to be taken literally but simply reflects his anger over the behavior of blacks in New Orleans. From a biological standpoint, both blacks and whites are animals. What James Bowery and I have briefly addressed are some traits where one group is closer to apes than the other group is, although I have emphasized that the differences between blacks and whites are much lower than that between either of these groups and apes. Note that I have identified at least two instances where whites are closer to apes than blacks are, namely with respect to body hairiness and prominence of buttocks. Please read more carefully. Dave, Some Australian aboriginal populations identified in recent history have had very low IQs, just as some black African populations have been recorded to have an average IQ somewhat less than 60; some Central African populations were specified as having an average IQ of 59 by Lynn and Vanhanen. On the other hand, when I called blacks the most primitive of all people, I specified that this was with respect to the diversity of neutral sites in nuclear DNA, which addresses the issue in a global manner rather than focusing on the genes associated with IQ, which appears to be your focus since you only mention the IQ issue. Once again, note that I have called whites more ape-like than blacks on two counts. 101
Posted by Matra on August 31, 2005, 10:08 PM | # In today’s National Review blog there were several references today to blacks and, given the situation in New Orleans, swimming. With that in mind I tried to go to Steve Sailer’s website (he brought up the subject a few months back) but it wouldn’t work. When I typed in isteve.com I was asked for a password! It’s been that way all day. Has anyone else had trouble accessing his site? 102
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2005, 10:17 PM | # Steve’s site just a couple of hours ago with no problem, but you’re right—trying it just now, I couldn’t get on: something’s wrong with it. 103
Posted by Matra on August 31, 2005, 11:37 PM | # Thanks Fred. BTW what’s happening in New Orleans and other recent events make the US look like a Third World country - and I’m not just talking about the racial composition of the people we’re seeing on TV. Item #1: Earlier today Fox News was able to put an entire crew with Sheppard Smith on some bridge full of refugees not far from the centre of the Gulf coast’s largest city. Yet six or seven hours after Fox had managed to put their crew there - and presumably they’ll remove them at nightfall - there was still no sign of rescue crews from either the state or federal government. At the very least one would expect a country with the resources of the US to have been able to drop some water bottles onto the bridge, but no. Item #2: Michael Hill of the League of the South points out in this month’s Chronicles last month virtually the whole federal government of the (supposedly) most powerful empire in world history suspended its work and many of its employees fled in panic after a small plane accidentally flew into restricted airspace in Washington D.C. Doesn’t that seem weird? During the mayhem of the L.A. riots some 12 or 13 years ago when the state seemed incapable of using its power in a crisis Samuel Francis compared the US to a ship without a commander that sooner or later would hit a reef and break apart. Watching the US state that is floundering in Iraq, failing to stop a foreign invasion, afraid to profile likely terrorists (ie Muslims), and now nowhere to be seen as New Orleans faces looting and a refugee crisis, it’s hard to disagree with Francis. Today the US bears a closer resemblance to Bin Laden’s paper tiger than to Krauthammer’s all-powerful empire. 104
Posted by Stuka on August 31, 2005, 11:56 PM | # BTW what’s happening in New Orleans and other recent events make the US look like a Third World country… Well, that’s because the US is a Third World country. 105
Posted by Andrew L on September 01, 2005, 12:19 AM | # Just hearing news reports that the looters are even shooting at the rescue Hellicopters, real Multi culti, The piolets must think they are back in Iraq. 106
Posted by Kubilai on September 01, 2005, 07:20 AM | # This Negro pilfering must have been accidently overlooked during news coverages in Europe. I guess there wasn’t enough time to squeeze that in while doing relentless “humanitarian” stories about the po Black plight thanks to Katrina. Aside from poor, relentlessly beaten Germany, it was nice to see countries where all the people were White. It was quite a refreshing and “rejuvinating” experience. It only amplified how abnormal the west is. 107
Posted by Stuka on September 01, 2005, 08:58 AM | # How New Orleans Was Lost Chalk up the city of New Orleans as a cost of Bush’s Iraq war. There were not enough helicopters to repair the breeched levees and rescue people trapped by rising water. Nor are there enough Louisiana National Guards available to help with rescue efforts and to patrol against looting. The situation is the same in Mississippi. The National Guard and helicopters are off on a fool’s mission in Iraq. The National Guard is in Iraq because fanatical neoconservatives in the Bush administration were determined to invade the Middle East and because the incompetent Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld refused to listen to the generals, who told him there were not enough regular troops available to do the job. After the invasion, the arrogant Rumsfeld found out that the generals were right. The National Guard was called up to fill in the gaping gaps. Now the Guardsmen, trapped in the Iraqi quagmire, are watching on TV the families they left behind trapped by rising waters and wondering if the floating bodies are family members. None know where their dislocated families are, but, shades of Fallujah, they do see their destroyed homes. The mayor of New Orleans was counting on helicopters to put in place massive sandbags to repair the levee. However, someone called the few helicopters away to rescue people from rooftops. The rising water overwhelmed the massive pumping stations, and New Orleans disappeared under deep water. What a terrible casualty of the Iraqi war—one of our oldest and most beautiful cities, a famous city, a historic city. The World Trade Towers count as little compared to the loss of New Orleans. 108
Posted by Geoff Beck on September 01, 2005, 09:08 AM | # Extended Version of Looting Video: 109
Posted by Geoff Beck on September 01, 2005, 09:16 AM | # > 09/01 at 03:37 AM Good points, Matra. Sums up the situation perfectly 110
Posted by JB on September 01, 2005, 10:45 AM | # another AP article: http://www.breitbart.com/news/na/D8CA8RA00.html Around the corner on Canal Street, the main thoroughfare in the central business district, people sloshed headlong through hip-deep water as looters ripped open the steel gates on the front of several clothing and jewelry stores. One man, who had about 10 pairs of jeans draped over his left arm, was asked if he was salvaging things from his store. “No,” the man shouted, “that’s EVERYBODY’S store.” Looters filled industrial-sized garbage cans with clothing and jewelry and floated them down the street on bits of plywood and insulation as National Guard lumbered by. Mike Franklin stood on the trolley tracks and watched the spectacle unfold. “To be honest with you, people who are oppressed all their lives, man, it’s an opportunity to get back at society,” he said. [Yeah Mike, just like when an oppressed afreakan rapes or kill a white] 111
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 01, 2005, 12:48 PM | # “Mike Franklin stood on the trolley tracks and watched the spectacle unfold. ‘To be honest with you, people who are oppressed all their lives, man, it’s an opportunity to get back at society,’ he said.” (—quoted by JB, above) What’s oppressing them, I’d like to know? They enjoy every advantage over white people today. That’s still not enough? Even with all that they still can’t make their way through life in normal fashion, but must loot a hurricane-and-flood-stricken city? The answer is nothing’s oppressing them—society is way more than fair toward them—and what’s going on is a war between different white factions in which Negroes are used by one side as a weapon to bludgeon the other. All the real action is taking place at the level of whites, not Negroes, as different white groups jockey for position and power. The Negroes are mere pawns with no power whatsoever who will be disposed of in whatever way suits the needs (or whims) of the white faction that wins. 112
Posted by Igor on September 01, 2005, 01:45 PM | # Footage of whites looting, on FOX Yes, right now FOX is showing a bunch of white looters, muggers and street gangs. Most of the black people I see are rescuers, medics, engineers… Oh, wait—this is FOX Movie Channel, not FOX News. My mistake. 114
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 01, 2005, 05:35 PM | # “Fox *Movie* Channel ...LOL” (—Stari) Yeah that was pretty funny, Igor—got a laugh out of me when I read it: sooooo, sooooo true! Good one! 115
Posted by Kubilai on September 01, 2005, 07:11 PM | # What’s oppressing them, I’d like to know? They enjoy every advantage over white people today. That’s still not enough? Even with all that they still can’t make their way through life in normal fashion, but must loot a hurricane-and-flood-stricken city? - Fred Their primitiveness is the “oppressing” factor. They are savages and barely humanoid, in my opinion. There are many people in several eastern bloc European countries who have less and live day to day and they do not act like these animals. If these Europeans had the “little” these Negroes currently enjoy, they’d be dancing in the streets. It is the genetics, culture, and mentality that is oppressing the Negro. Though I’m sure the media will find someone White to blame. Can someone say regression toward the mean? http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2005/09/looting_chaos_h.php 116
Posted by Svigor on September 01, 2005, 07:21 PM | # Yeah I was wondering if he’d been watching Spiderman. Ever seen that one, and its sequel? In that universe, every criminal in New York City - New York City! - is white. White! Of course, the Spiderman universe is the rule, not the exception. Comics have even provided us with the name for the media multiverse, Bizarro World, where everything is the twisted opposite of its real-world equivalent. Ever read the blurb at iSteve about Law & Order? Somebody thought to compare a season with the real numbers. See, for those who don’t know, L & O week in, week out features (mostly rich) white murder defendants. Well, it turns out that the number of murders committed by whites in NYC that year was very close to the number of white murderers featured on the show! In other words, basically it’s White Murderers in NYC, the Television Show. The only real difference of course is that they make them all rich too. I remember a few weeks ago I caught part of an episode with a black murder defendant. Of course, it was all a veiled allegory for that negro, whatshisname, the one shot 100 times by cops in NYC who turned out to be unarmed. The media relies pretty heavily on its monopoly, but, that monopoly no longer exists. 117
Posted by stari_momak on September 01, 2005, 08:35 PM | # BBC reporter Matt Frei weighs in I drove into the city just a few hours ago and it was one of the scarier journeys I have made. It looks like the set of a Hollywood disaster movie. The battle between nature and man is almost over, but the battle between man and man is just beginning. The scene here is more Africa than America. [my emphasis] 118
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 01, 2005, 09:18 PM | # I wonder what Matt Frei’s stand is on the excessive incompatible immigration that’s poured into Britain since 1948 and really accelerated to a galloping pace since fifteen or twenty years ago. Hey no big deal but ... you see these people who notice the ill effects of something, some unfortunate historical fact or event, some wrong-headed policy or some social experiment gone terribly wrong, disastrously wrong, somewhere in the world, and they rightly deplore it, then when the same thing’s being done to their own country they blithely applaud it and, in the case of wrongheaded racial policies and immigration policies, denounce any who question it as “racists.” Dollars to doughnuts Frei is one of those ... 119
Posted by Geoff Beck on September 01, 2005, 09:23 PM | # > Matt Frei, “The scene here is more Africa than America” Let’s see if he has a job when he gets back to cheery old England. 120
Posted by Svigor on September 01, 2005, 10:17 PM | # I’ve read Frei’s name before, and not in a positive context if memory serves. 121
Posted by stari_momak on September 01, 2005, 11:20 PM | # Didn’t mean to imply Frei was any sort of race realist—exactly the opposite, that even BBC reporters are blurting out some obvious truths. The quote was from the ‘reporters notebook’ section, probably posted without editing. 122
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 01, 2005, 11:47 PM | # “probably posted without editing.” (—Stari) Look for it to be deleted the instant some red-faced editor-hypocrite sees it. 123
Posted by Stuka on September 01, 2005, 11:57 PM | # Matt Frei: “The scene here is more Africa than America” Damned straight! The images of wild Negroes rampaging through the streets of New Orleans could have come straight out of events in Congo, Biafra, Rhodesia, Mozambique, South Africa, etc. Even the footage of convoys of burly white security forces reminds me of scenes in Rhodesia, Angola, and South West Africa. Pass the popcorn, chaps. This is getting interesting. Worse is better. 124
Posted by Phil on September 02, 2005, 02:49 AM | # Napoleon once referred to the Cossacks as a “stigma” on humanity. He had clearly never seen the Negro. 125
Posted by Camilla on January 21, 2006, 01:06 AM | # How can you call us negroes? what the hell is your problem? Half of the people that was looting had children to feed and sick people to look after. Try being in the same place we were in and let me know how you would have felt? 126
Posted by J Richards on January 21, 2006, 06:59 AM | # Camilla, Negroes are members of the Negroid race, which you apparently belong to. What is wrong with describing Negroes as Negroes? In your comments, you have ignored the following from above:
Stealing food for survival is understandable, but why the other forms of criminality, and widespread at that? 127
Posted by Rico West on March 06, 2006, 08:42 PM | # what a jack ass!!! you apparently have no life at all…i guess you try to make fun of blacks because you like the way we sway to music naturally, or they way that we can survive in under any circumstances or maybe it lies below the waist, i bet your wife wouldn’t mind getting some black dick besides that limp little screw driver you give her, believe that…lol…but your racism may be supported by the videos and pics but whites loot too and whites sniff glue, and shoot up schools, and bungie jump w/o cords, yall swim with flesh eating sharks, and do other STUPID shit!! you people are never satisfied with your bodies, yall stink when yall get wet, all your babies look the same, and you people are just overall junkie! i wouldn’t trade places with bill gates to be white…im glad im black and you seem mad that you aren’t, oh well, get over it and go loot some rogaine or some penis pills!!! LOL WHITE POWER!!!! you people are stupid (except for my white friends…yall cool) 128
Posted by J Richards on March 07, 2006, 04:31 AM | # Who is making fun of blacks? I am lamenting the fact that a blight on humanity that belongs in the jungles of Africa is living in our midst. Don’t kid yourself; I couldn’t care less about how you shake your booty to hip-hop filth. Negroes can survive under any circumstances?!!! Are you insane? You guys turned Rhodesia, an exporter of food, to Zimbabwe, a nation that needs massive food aid to avoid mass starvation deaths. In spite of whitey supplying millions of tons in food aid and billions in financial aid, your brothers in Africa periodically end up starving themselves. And, I hardly need to talk about AIDS. You Negroes are so deluded that you believe that white women want you. Except for some mentally ill white women, white women know that to have sex with Negroes is the equivalent of committing bestiality. Big deal that your penises are slightly longer than those of whites, on average; you guys can’t get it as hard and need the large and loose vaginal orifices of Negresses and prostitutes to have intercourse. Yes, some whites commit crimes, too, but Negroes are the all-time champions when it comes to criminality just as when it comes to stinking. Activities such as bungee jumping and swimming with sharks require daring and guts that hardly any Negro has. Our babies don’t all look the same; it is just your poor perception that cannot observe subtle differences. Of course you wouldn’t trade places with Bill Gates; after all, you are a dumb Negro who doesn’t know what is best for him. The most pathetic aspect of your kind is that you have every reason to be deeply ashamed of your race but have a higher opinion of yourselves compared to how other races rate themselves! Damn! 129
Posted by SIGH on March 31, 2006, 11:44 PM | # ALL of you are sick racists on your way to a burning hell. I pray that NONE of you claim to be Christians. Its bad enough that you have the disgusting ideals that you do. Its people like you who make this world the piece of crap that it is today. YOU’RE ALL DISGUSTING!!!! 130
Posted by Lurker on March 31, 2006, 11:56 PM | # SIGH - what would you suggest as a way of fixing the ills of society then? A genuine question. 131
Posted by Phil Peterson on April 01, 2006, 03:56 AM | # ALL of you are sick racists on your way to a burning hell. I pray that NONE of you claim to be Christians. Its bad enough that you have the disgusting ideals that you do. Its people like you who make this world the piece of crap that it is today. YOU’RE ALL DISGUSTING!!!! A very good comment on All Fool’s Day. 132
Posted by reuben on April 20, 2006, 02:16 PM | # Everyone is a theif. There is no difference between a ‘‘theif’’ and a “judge”. Everyone only cares about right and wrong, when it benefits, or doesn’t negatively effect, their interests. Everyone steals, lies, etc. Are commercials truthful? Are lawyers truthful? Are politicians truthful? Police are just soldiers. Does doctors care about preventative medicine? If a judge’s (or prosecuter’s son) son killed your daughter, would he (the judge, or prosecuter) give a damn about justice? It is only thru G-d’s mercy that He lets this world endure. Does the criminal justice system judge people fairly? Who really commits more theft, blacks or whites? If you hit my car, would you be truthful about it? Would your “lawyer” be interested in righteousness? Are are “laws” just? Does university professors really teach and grade fairly? JUST DO ONE THING FOR G-D (and me): IF WE HAD A RIGHTEOUS LEGAL SYSTEM, not controlled by politics, WE WOULD HAVE RIGHTEOUSNESS!!! Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) 133
Posted by Brittany on April 30, 2006, 12:19 AM | # to live ignorance and to be ignorant are so much easier than to open up a mind and acquire knowledge. i find this web page absolutely atrocious and appauling. i feel that you’ve failed to mention a great deal in regards to “negroes” (a term which has been out-dated for decades) and the appropriate demographics. all human beings have the same brain capacity, despite gender, race, or any other “problematic factors.” you’ve also failed to mention the low educational standards in these “negro” educational facilites, and the much needed reformation that needs to take place within these black communities. if everyone was provided the same education, the same resources, and the same opportunites as a whole, you wouldn’t have anything to talk about. filthy projects, staggering incarceration, lacking education and related resources are all ways in which to keep the black race as a whole oppressed. id like to ask anyone or all of you to do the appropriate research, and then attempt to argue your case in a sophisticated manner. god bless you 134
Posted by Al Ross on April 30, 2006, 01:16 AM | # Actually Brittany, it is the White taxpayer who is oppressed - by the horrendous cost of Black criminal behaviour, wasteful Welfare expenditure and the pointless expense of trying to educate the largely ineducable Black population. Having Blacks infest one’s country is a ruinously expensive business. 135
Posted by Phil Peterson on April 30, 2006, 10:18 AM | # Brittany, Learn some English. It might actually do you good. 136
Posted by J Richards on May 01, 2006, 09:23 PM | # Reuben, To call everyone a thief is to use some very liberal definition of thievery, but there is simply no beating blacks when it comes to criminality. Brittany, Have you been living in a cave? It has been conclusively proven that blacks have much lower intelligence than whites [it is genetic] and cannot be educated or civilized on par with whites in the absence of genetic engineering. Additionally, even if blacks and whites are matched for intelligence, blacks are still much more criminal:
137
Posted by Black Dick In Your White Mouth on May 09, 2006, 08:59 PM | # Is this a white supremacit site? All of you pink monkeys that are sitting up here posting pictures and your backwards simpleton way of thinking, please cease and decist. If you whores are so sure that you are the “better” race, then go and do something besides talk about others. That shows that you are not confident in yourselves. It’s very funny how I work with 99% of you pink bastards and none of these f’cking comments come out in person, but you get brave behind a keyboard. Eat a dick and screw yourself in the ass. 138
Posted by Guessedworker on May 10, 2006, 04:19 AM | # No, it’s not a white supremacist site - though you make an excellent, indeed irrefutable case for one. 139
Posted by Casey. Proud White Woman on May 19, 2006, 04:40 AM | # Knowledge is not what you think you know, but acknowledging what you do not. 140
Posted by jacob "The negro" on July 05, 2006, 10:26 PM | # I cannot believe it. What a day in age we’ve come to. Is segregation, slavery, and passed down hatred on our race not enough? Shamed on yourself to hate a race which you’ve bred by force, and placed into ghetto’s, and slums under force. How is it our fault that an executive boss to a company won’t hire you to a job because you are African American, so you can pay your way through college and raise their children so they won’t be the “Pathetic negroe!” person you expect them to be. How can you can you blame a race where barely any money and government capital is put in or invested to the ghettos and schools where they live. Especially schools and it’s just a big running paradox for the African American race because there is no education for them to learn. I can understand it’s kind of stupid to loot clothes, and plasma screen television sets. But in a place where they have no money and the only way to get money is a hard job, or something illegal you can’t blame them for the opportunity to obtain what they want. Whenever something goes down, it’s always the color of our skin they put to blame. But you never would say that white people are more frequently crazy or insane killers, Let me show you something 141
Posted by Desmond Jones on July 05, 2006, 11:43 PM | # Jacob, If you hate us so much, the cruellest creature on earth, why do you still want to live amongst us? Did you learn nothing from Marcus Garvey? Why do you want us crazy white killers, to employ, house, feed, educate and clothe you? Surely, like your African brothers and sisters in, say, Zimbabwe, you’d be much better off living separately from we wretched white folk! 142
Posted by Steven Palese on July 05, 2006, 11:54 PM | # First, what’s with that stupid-ass handle “Jacob the negro”? Second, are you even remotely aware of what’s really going down in American politics? Here’s a clue:
Third, are you aware whites are worth less than a third of a person when it comes to accessing the elite?
Fourth, what percentage of whites blames blacks and affirmative action for their being reduced to being worth less than a third of a person? I’ll tell you - 99% Fifth, now you tell me - how fun is it to be black and get ALL the blame and white resentment but NONE of the benefits of affirmative action (don’t tell me you think it’s actually working) while Jews get ALL the benefits but NONE of the blame? Sixth, do you know the meaning of the word “patsy”? Seventh, there’s been a transition from white imperialism to Judeo-imperialism. You were getting shafted before and you’re getting shafted now. Have you had enough yet? In case you have, may I suggest you check out: BlacksAndJews.com
143
Posted by The D.A. on July 06, 2006, 11:43 AM | # Jacob- The reason whites make better serial killers is that they’re more intelligent than blacks, and therefore elude arrest longer. 144
Posted by Svigor on July 06, 2006, 04:19 PM | # God only knows why Jacob thinks we’re going to accept someone’s Web page as evidence of anything; is it because the author knows HTML? Is that what makes him a credible authority? Here’s something a bit firmer, from the leftist mouthpiece of America, no less: RETRACING A TRAIL: THE SNIPER SUSPECTS; Serial Killing’s Squarest Pegs: Not Solo, White, Psychosexual or Picky
Blacks are 12% of the U.S. population. I’ll leave the reader to judge if 22% is best characterized as “slightly greater” than 12%, or if “much greater,” or perhaps “nearly double” is more accurate; I find “slightly greater” a more fitting description of the lower bounds of 13%. The D.A., stop accepting the media’s fantasy smear campaign as reality. Make people document their claims, and show that whites are a greater proportion of the serial killer population than they are the general population. Then, and only then, examine their definition of “white” to see if mestizos and Arabs are “white”. Btw, serial killers aren’t the evil geniuses Hollywood makes them out to be. They’re losers of middling intelligence, generally (and that’s only if you’re counting psychosexual serial killers, and leaving out typical serial killers like your local Tyrone eliminating his competition). 145
Posted by Svigor on July 06, 2006, 04:21 PM | #
Yes, this is like the unified field theory of American black grievance: whites flee blacks (“white flight”), blacks chase whites, whining about white oppression, hands extended, palms up. 146
Posted by Chris on January 01, 2007, 05:44 AM | # Let me just start off by saying that I’m white. A native of Ireland. All of you racist pieces of shit make me embarrassed to be white. These pictures are so biased it’s not even funny. White people are just as over weight and if Hurricane Katrina was in a “white” city, the same things would have happened. Grow the fuck up!!!! 147
Posted by ralph witkins on January 31, 2007, 08:38 PM | # crist. you guys are such tards. put your sheets back on the bed. ghettos are pits everywhere. i dont care if your a purple midget…. either your an ass or not. 148
Posted by sally on February 16, 2007, 07:20 PM | # First of all YES there were wrong for stealing things they didnt need. Abd YES they should have gotten things they only needed but dont try and put black people or should i say NEGROS down for what they did. White people did it to but of course no one put those pictures up because they dont want to give their people a bad name. They did it too and nothing in this world would make me believe that they didnt. I dont know why they took those extra things and they shouldnt have but dont sit there and act as if white people are all angles because their NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!! Blacks arent either and we never want to have people think that we are so before you try and put BLACK people down you need to go back and do some research on what YOUR people has done!!!!!!!!!!!! 149
Posted by shay on February 16, 2007, 09:26 PM | # ://www.anonym.to/? to gnxp.com 150
Posted by pissed on March 15, 2007, 02:15 PM | # U PEOPLE R DUMB AND RACIST WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH U THEY LOOTED BECAUSE THER BABIES NEEDED FOOD THEY NEEDED RUNNING WATER AND ETC U PEOPLE R RACIST AND I HOPE U GET FCKED OVER IN JAIL BY A BIG BLACK MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 151
Posted by Lurker on March 15, 2007, 07:19 PM | # Shay - “we cant better ourselves because YOU wont let us!!!!!!!!!! “ Well yes, you are still forced to live with us in the US. But what about Zimbabwe for example. We seem to be ‘letting you’ there and look how well thats going. 152
Posted by ben tillman on March 15, 2007, 10:18 PM | # I’m PROUD to be black and eventhough some black people have given all black people a bad name i still love being BLACK!!!!! I hope so, since you can’t change it. As long as you leave me alone, I hope you enjoy your life. 153
Posted by Kamil Mezalka on April 21, 2007, 12:17 AM | # ok. i have been reading this shit for 2 hours and im damn tired. but man o man some intresting shit. yes i think the black man is more closely related to an ape but we are all fucken apes in the end. the black man can be good to. they just must free of their black ways. we are all suckers and should stay together. i thought belive in a fucken revolution in this world to fuck all these shit goverments in the ass. please i would liek to join the kkk and any fucken shit liek that. im .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). i think we need to kill alot of people. and yes in america most of them are black. althought that doesnt mean every black man is bad. 99.99% are 154
Posted by Tom Shelly on April 28, 2007, 03:00 PM | # Great site and I absolutely agree. Nothing exhibits the true nature of nigger apes better than Katrina. And they are STILL crying about it, trying to get more money from whitey. Come and join our forum and site: http://niggermania.com 155
Posted by :D on April 28, 2007, 09:11 PM | # tom shelley is my kinda guy how come we gotta attach that thing to http://www.gnxp.com/ ? :O 156
Posted by Phara Souffrant on May 01, 2007, 07:42 PM | # What the hell is this? First of all we are not Negroes because obviously from judging from the language the article is in you are not Spanish. So this mean we are African American to you. Secondly what about the white looters. Some were white. Also judging from the photos the African Americans were trying to survive while the whites were spreading terror and brute force with their guns. Understand that by posting up this article you are a racist end of story and thus you are pathetic. 157
Posted by Guessedworker on May 02, 2007, 05:09 AM | # Phara, “Negro” derives from “Negroid”, which is an ethnic classification. The root is latin. It doesn’t seem unreasonable to me to use both words. Plainly, “nigger” should be construed as a slur ... and perhaps would be moreso but for the fact that it is habitually used by your people themselves. “African-American” has about it a demand for respect, which demand seems to be a commonplace among “negro” males regardless of whether it is earned or not (it isn’t on any but sporting measures). Personally, I prefer not to respond to demands of that manner. I am sure you understand. 158
Posted by kacie on May 09, 2007, 11:56 PM | # Reading this makes me so nautious. How can a people so “advanced” discriminate against others based on color? I am a white female with friends of every race, and they are all wonderful and unique in their own way. Their color means absolutely nothing. As far as the louters, think about this as you sit at your computer in your suberbian household- many of those MEN AND WOMEN (yes they are real people, not animals) just had their little existence homes destroyed. What little they had was taken away. People go to desperate measures during desperate times-its not like a lot of them have a bunch of money in the bank to lean back on when their home is destroyed. I’m not saying its right, but I’m saying don’t be so quick to judge. Also, this is the kind of thing that leads to genocide- the descriminating of a certain group. I think we would all agree that we don’t need another halocoust. 159
Posted by Friedrich Braun on May 10, 2007, 09:48 AM | # Either Kacie is a troll or very young and naive. Sometimes it’s hard to say. 160
Posted by Guessedworker on May 10, 2007, 09:59 AM | # Kacie, You are a prisoner of the times. Your emotional responses to the world around you are unnatural because in your short life you have encountered only leftist propaganda. You have proved utterly defenceless and clueless, and plainly lack the seriousness of mind to lift yourself out of this very sad and spiritually debilitating situation. From what you say I imagine you are in deep and miscegenate with black males because “they are all wonderful and unique in their own way”, and “their color means absolutely nothing”. It means something. It means that you are designed by Nature to love and respect your own kind, for they are closest to you and share your natural interests (of which, as I have said, you are supremely unaware). When I encounter sleepers like you I generally ask them to wake up. But do you have the intelligence and maturity to understand what that means? Or are you just going to be “nautious” (sic) in the required, Pavlovian manner ? Please try, at least, to think about race more deeply, rather than just react with shallow observation. Why are New Orleans blacks poor? Why was pre-Katrina NO a violent city? Why are black populations poor all over the world? Why are they violent? What is the simplest explanation for that? 161
Posted by Tommy G on May 10, 2007, 10:06 AM | # “Also, this is the kind of thing that leads to genocide- the descriminating of a certain group.”—kacie Yes indeed, that’s why affirmative action should be abolished in all it’s shapes and forms. In case you haven’t noticed, kacie, unbridled demonization and Government sanctioned discrimination against whites has been taking place since the early 1960’s. How do you FEEL about that? 162
Posted by Tommy G on May 10, 2007, 10:43 AM | # “Send her to the New & Improved Rhodesia, or the Even Newer and Way More Improved South Africa.” She need not be sent to Africa, Fred. She should be made to live with the Katrina brothas and sistas. Then she can see how “wonderful and unique in their own way” they really are! LMAO 163
Posted by Lurker on May 10, 2007, 01:58 PM | # Kacie - “How can a people so “advanced” discriminate against others based on color?” I dont think, in the end its about colour, its about behaviour. 164
Posted by Friedrich Braun on May 11, 2007, 09:01 AM | # Kacie is right, bruthas ans sistas are “wonderful and unique in their own way”, Exhibit A: http://youtube.com/watch?v=VAIN_w026aY&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b 165
Posted by Tommy G on May 11, 2007, 09:25 AM | # Friedrich Braun: If those evil racist white attorneys hadn’t provoked those poor black victims as they did, none of this would have happened! For shame, for shame!!! Btw—I really liked the fashion statement made by the fine gentleman with the stretch hat over his face. LOL 166
Posted by Friedrich Braun on May 11, 2007, 11:53 AM | # It’s just negroes acting like negroes. Such chimp outs are very common at negro depositions. When they get confused because they don’t understand what’s going on around them or you catch them lying they chimp out and start talking mumbo-jumbo: “The mental anxiety that you have caused me is unpredictable. I am fed up with how y’all has did me…” lol That’s all America is anymore is just plain and simple - Planet of The Apes - where negroids have supplanted humans and now control the destiny of mankind. 167
Posted by Friedrich Braun on May 11, 2007, 02:25 PM | # That is the smartest nigger I have ever seen. Smart enough to raise bofe paws. 168
Posted by Guessedworker on May 11, 2007, 03:04 PM | # She looks very like a traumatic brain damage case, Friedrich. I question the presumption that low IQ is the cause of her difficulty, and the taste in posting her video on YT. The first video - the one of the family - is another matter, of course. The son with the more-than-Zoro pretentions and the familiar inability to control his violent impulses deserved the fullest possible exposure. My compliments to the patient lawyers who had to deal with these people. I wonder if they are liberals. Don’t see how. 169
Posted by Friedrich Braun on May 11, 2007, 03:46 PM | # That’s a fair point, GW. Although with negroes it isn’t always an easy determination. You need to always keep in mind that they have a mean I.Q. that hovers at around 60 (for unmixed negroes). You’re just not accustomed to dealing with such people on a regular basis. Those who live surrounded by millions of these colourful specimens, know that there isn’t anything particularly extraordinary about her erratic behaviour. You could also make the same assumption that the fat female in the first video is “brain-damaged”, because she makes no sense whatsoever, right? Again, that assumption would be wrong. 170
Posted by Tommy G on May 11, 2007, 04:19 PM | # “You could also make the same assumption that the fat female in the first video is “brain-damaged”,” Well, Friedrich, maybe she’s brain damaged now after the masked hero slammed a heavy microphone stand into her head? The roids certainly are hilarious unless you have to live amongst—or even have to come in contact with them on a regular basis. 171
Posted by Friedrich Braun on May 11, 2007, 07:17 PM | # Just another day in multicult hell [true story] So I’m walking my little dog today in the park right by my house. I don’t like to keep him on a leash during our daily walks, I prefer to see him roam free and befriend other dogs. While we were walking, I saw a hysterical French woman running after me and shouting that my dog took a dump by the picnic table and that I must pick it up immediately! I turned around and asked her whether she was sure that it was indeed my little dog, she then motioned to her Black daughter and said that the two of them witnessed my dog do his business. I looked at her and said: “that tall ugly nigger on skates is your daughter?” That sure caught her off guard. After a minute of hesitation, she made the reply: “and you’re a right-wing extremist on top of it all!” I said: “my disapproval of bestiality has little to do with my politics” and walked away. 172
Posted by Jason on December 07, 2007, 02:27 AM | # THE PICTURES SPEAK A THOUSAND WORD ABOUT AFRO-AMERICAN PEOPLE. 173
Posted by user on January 03, 2008, 05:15 PM | # Barak obama is a negro and I am a democrat,but if he gets the nomination I will be voting for thE republican.NO NEGROES FOR PRESIDENT. 174
Posted by Me on January 21, 2008, 06:59 PM | # Everyone on thi page are ignornt including the person who came up with this ignorant site. Ignorant racists with no class. 175
Posted by kacie on January 23, 2008, 07:53 PM | # Well, its been 8 months since I last posted and I still haven’t changed my mind. Responding to some of the postings regarding myself : yes, I am young; no, I have never been in a sexual relationship with an African American but have no opposition to it; no, I have not only encountered “leftish propeganda.” Can you seriously tell me you have never encountered a single educated, refined, asset to society African American? If not, then, I’m sorry, but you’re just being blind, arrogant, and bigitrous. I will admit, statistically speaking, that more crime and poverty comes from African culture, but is it fair to lump an entire group together because of it? Lets up the stats - suppose 80% of all African Americans commit a felony at some point in their life. Would it be fair to discriminate the 2 out of 10 children who are born who actually want to make something of themselves? The mentality of the people who run this site is the thing that keeps it from happening - that keeps them from having a succesful life - because you say they are worthless. NEWSFLASH: YOU CAN’T AFFECT WHAT RACE OR FAMILY YOU ARE BORN INTO!!!!! Those who want to better themselves, why arn’t they given a chance? I implore you to stop harping on the youtube vidoes and the newsclippings you find of a single African giving a bad name to their race, and make an effort at relationship. I would have missed out on some amazing friendships if I had chosen to be racist. No, I’m not a “whigger” in the least, for I am about as white as the come. My friends don’t try to change me, and I don’t try to change them. Why don’t we all try that for a change? Punish the individuals who break the law, but don’t punish the race. I apologize that I am ranting, I’m just passionate about this. People are affected by what identity is spoken over them. If we continue to say “they’re worthless, they’re animals, etc. ” it only makes it that much harder for them to pull themselves out of the poverty they are living in. Try love for a change. ~Kacie 176
Posted by Guessedworker on January 23, 2008, 08:21 PM | # kacie, You miss the point. No one here wants to punish blacks. They want not to be punished by them. 177
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 23, 2008, 08:41 PM | # And they want not to be changed into them. 178
Posted by Desmond Jones on January 23, 2008, 08:59 PM | # NEWSFLASH: YOU CAN’T AFFECT WHAT RACE OR FAMILY YOU ARE BORN INTO!!!!! True, however can can affect what race or family you associate with? Why deny freedom of association in order to give some one else a chance? How is that fair? Try love for a change. Love has been tried. Forty plus years of civil rights legislation, affirmative action and quota programs and still little has changed. When can we finally say that love doesn’t work? How long must we keep on loving? Why can’t we agree to live apart? Should you be forced to date ugly, fat or stupid guys if you don’t want to? If you don’t are you a bigot if you don’t give them a chance? NEWSFLASH: YOU CAN"T AFFECT HOW UGLY OR STUPID YOU ARE BORN!!!! 179
Posted by AgainsTTheWall on January 24, 2008, 06:06 AM | # “Should you be forced to date ugly, fat or stupid guys if you don’t want to? If you don’t are you a bigot if you don’t give them a chance? NEWSFLASH: YOU CAN"T AFFECT HOW UGLY OR STUPID YOU ARE BORN!!!! “ Represents why Majority Rights is part of my daily blog crawl 180
Posted by Desmond Jones on January 24, 2008, 04:11 PM | # Enlightening, that explains why you are “AgainsTTheWall “. 181
Posted by silver on January 24, 2008, 10:32 PM | # Kacie, reality is hard, but it must be accepted. (What is the alternative?) Liberal ‘white lies’ (pun intended) about the nature of negroes not only harm Americans, but are being used to inject negroes into European societies they don’t belong in the world over. For example, a recent Australian opinion piece claimed Australia was “glum” and could really be livened up by importing some more negroes—this despite the mayhem their small numbers here are already causing. However well intentioned (and there is good reason to believe it was not), this reality-denial cannot but result in misery. 182
Posted by Harris on October 10, 2009, 12:07 PM | # You people need to realize there are people in the world that do good things and there are people who do bad things it has nothing to do with race or ethnicity. It has do do with who they are. 183
Posted by Anon on October 10, 2009, 01:14 PM | # What is apparently little known is that just a short time before Katrina (in 2002) there has been an equivalent catastrophic flood in Germany along the Elbe river, see e.g. This is a part of Germany where at least at that time there was a homogeneous German population with only extremely few non-Germans. The outcome to Katrina was completely different: practically no looting, no crime but instead an almost unprecendent (for recent history) wave of help and support both locally but also nation-wide. The contrasts between the aftermaths of such two similar occurances could not be any stronger. So despite all the rationalizations and blindness to facts by various commentators, here is an objective measure of the differences in behaviour between human population groups. I for one know without a shadow of doubt within which group I want to live and would want to experience the sometimes un-avoidable catastrophies. 185
Posted by Voiceofreason on December 11, 2010, 11:19 AM | # There seems little point in making any serious attempt to convince people, obviously deeply entrenched in their own ideology, of the benefits to all racial and cultural groups of liberal thought. By “liberal” I refer not to any specific political group or cultural movement but to the philosophical orientation I have freely chosen (in general i distrust the news media as much as you guys) to adopt. As for your viewpoint on the sociocultural issues covered in this blog I will not succumb to the urge, as some who have disagreed with you have allowed themselves, to become abusive. I believe in live and let live and that applies to those of the far right such as yourselves as much as to any other. I am also attempting to avoid errors in spelling and to utilize good English as certain contributors to this site seem to enjoy mocking any such mistakes made by those whose beliefs are opposed to their own (despite the commonality of such mistakes throughout the internet and their widespread occurrence in the posts of those in the majority on this site), a slight variance in my grammar may be apparent to those of you (who I imagine to be in the majority) residing in the USA as I am a resident of the United Kingdom. I do feel that many of the opinions expressed here are somewhat overly simplistic in their interpretation of the ,it must be recognized, highly complex political, racial, social, and economic factors which combine to shape our world and our individual lives. The frequently expressed belief for instance that the massive economic problems in Africa today are solely the result of the lack of organizational ability and general intelligence of the African population. I don’t pretend to have all the answers to this state of affairs (I don’t imagine any one person does) but it does seem to me that much of the blame can be levied on the European Powers (my own country included) colonialism during the 19th and 20th centuries i.e. the “Scramble for Africa. The subjugation of native peoples and cultures (not all of which were “primitive” hunter gathers such as the Bantu, there were some relatively advanced civilizations at the time such as the Sokoto Caliphate which was known for its scholarship) leading to significant chaos and confusion in the aftermath of imperialism. Contrary to certain stereotypes perpetrated about liberals I would not begin to suggest that all wrongdoing can be excused by the factors contributory to its initiation. If an individual commits a crime they should be punished for the overall benefit of society as a whole (to quote the immortal Mr. Spock “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few”). I would simply posit that factors such as socioeconomic background, education, upbringing, childhood trauma, and genetics do have an impact on the behaviour of individuals and of ethnopolitical groups and should be taken into account. Another point I would like to make, although I realize that most of those reading this will disagree, is that there are no significant physiological differences between people of different racial groups other than the purely cosmetic (skin, hair, etc). Police forensics experts for example cannot tell wether a suspect is black or white from examination of DNA found at a crime scene. Moreover examination of mitochondrial DNA (the mitochondrial DNA comes only from the mother and it is thus simpler to trace than genomic DNA which comes from both parents) shows that all humans originally evolved in Africa before migrating to other parts of the world. In short we are all Homo Sapiens Sapiens. While the above is the fruit of observation and online research I would also like to state that in my own personal experience there is very little material difference between peoples of different racial origins. One woman in my neighborhood has one black child and one white and apart from skin colour I have noticed very little difference in their behaviours. Also of all my brothers and sisters partners and spouses the one I like most is my Filipino-Canadian sister in law. She and my older brother have two young sons who are both the most beautiful children you’ve ever seen, combining the best aspects of Filipino and Caucasian colouring, bone structure, etc. Well thats just about it I guess. I could continue but I feel I have said enough to accurately convey a summary of my feelings and opinions on the subject which was my original motivation in writing this comment along with refuting statements that I strongly disagree with, which is I believe the responsibility of all peoples. PS Next entry: Sowell on immigration Previous entry: New majority rights site |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. DateSoaxiaDot commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/25/12, 04:28 AM. (go) (view) UK Dissertations Help commented in entry 'A small anecdote and some reflections on race and culture' on 05/25/12, 02:14 AM. (go) (view) Roof Leaks commented in entry 'YOBS' on 05/25/12, 01:16 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/25/12, 12:41 AM. (go) (view) pletcheroka commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/25/12, 12:36 AM. (go) (view) Graistetrisog commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/25/12, 12:19 AM. (go) (view) BomeDeddell commented in entry 'ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT: Government's Own Data Point to a Cost-Effective Strategy' on 05/24/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) indernMix commented in entry 'ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT: Government's Own Data Point to a Cost-Effective Strategy' on 05/24/12, 09:42 PM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 04:44 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:20 PM. (go) (view) grecian commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:10 PM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:04 PM. (go) (view) Salvatore Quinto commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/24/12, 12:47 PM. (go) (view) Classic Sparkle commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 12:07 PM. (go) (view) Cobus commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 05/24/12, 10:14 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 09:49 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 08:54 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:41 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:18 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:53 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:48 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:47 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:32 AM. (go) (view) Guest commented in entry 'The Torment of the Mulattoes' on 05/24/12, 06:17 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/24/12, 03:05 AM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:31 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 30, 2005, 02:37 PM | #
A normal society in this situation places the disaster-stricken area under martial law and gives the National Guard troops the option of shooting looters on sight or not shooting them, at their discretion depending on the individual circumstances of the moment. Needless to say, the U.S. is not a normal society: women have gotten the vote and the left now enjoys hegemony (which are closely-related developments by the way).