![]() |
The US House of Representatives Repudiates, As Terrorists, the People They Supposedly RepresentOn April 19, 2007, anniversary of “the shot heard round the world” which started the US revolutionary war, a suspected foreign agent introduced a despotic piece of legislation to the US House of Representatives. The House has now, apparently fearful of the Ron Paul revolution, overwhelmingly voted to pass H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 which defines:
The Second Amendment to the US Constitution:
It is clear from the language, and even more so the history of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution that “planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States” is “necessary to the security of a free state”. Specifically, the “group.. born, raised… within the United States” is “the people” and the founders qualified “state” with “free” specifically to distinguish it from the current state of “the United States government”. Posted by James Bowery on Sunday, November 25, 2007 at 10:11 PM in Comments:2
Posted by Fred Scrooby on November 26, 2007, 09:15 AM | #
The Spirit invoked by Emerson in the last verse is alive, and will do for our generation what it did for our fathers’ if we summon it. 3
Posted by Duncan Tyyne on November 28, 2007, 01:11 PM | # The political class in the United States is terrified of people who actually have to do productive work for a living, and who are so selfish and decadent that they would rather look after their own than give their lives for corporate profit, Jacobin crusades, and a Greater Israel. Next entry: The Bear’s Lair: Spirals of death Previous entry: Empiricism and Carl Jung. Or how the New Right hates science. UPDATED. |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf noteRecent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:44 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:16 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:04 PM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:54 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:45 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:19 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:18 AM. (go) (view) Michael commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 11:11 AM. (go) (view) Ron Trisner commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:10 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:51 AM. (go) (view) Michael commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:46 AM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:05 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 09:00 AM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:37 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view) Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by D.E. Johnson on November 25, 2007, 11:26 PM | #
Mr. Bowery,
H.R. 1955 is an amendment to the Homeland Security Act of 2002. In its current version, it is called S.1959, an identical bill awaiting approval of the Senate. The bill is not a new law, but only something describing the administrative pecking order that will be used in the enforcement of a specific section of the Homeland Security Act, which is already law, whether compliant with Constitutional rights or no.
These lawyers we have elected do not need any help, Sir. They can screw us in their sleep.