|
|
The Stealth Amnesty – an updateReaders may recall the original Stealth Amnesty article from last July in which I discussed the Labour Government’s efforts at clearing up the so-called ‘legacy’ backlog of failed asylum seekers whose case files (450,000 of them) were discovered in a warehouse in 2006. Today the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee has published a report with an updated status on the disposition of the cases. It seems that around 220,000 have now been resolved as follows: • 30,000 (14%) have been deported • 74,000 (34%) have been given permission to stay • 116,000 cases (52%) have some other conclusion, either a duplicate file, ‘database errors’, or where the applicant is now untraceable. The last category is of course rather suspect and no doubt includes many thousands of failed asylum seekers who have simply disappeared into the woodwork. The 74,000 given permission to stay (even though every one had already earlier exhausted all legal avenues) are the beneficiaries of the Human Rights Act which, if invoked, would preclude their removal on ‘family life’ after having successfully evaded deportation for four or more years. The government’s intention to take just such a line of least resistance was flagged by a leaked departmental memo as recently disclosed in the Daily Telegraph. The category which is perhaps the most baffling is the first, deportations. In cross-checking the UK Border Agency’s claim against the quarterly reports issued by the Home Office which include the official statistics on departures, both voluntary and involuntary, 30,000 amounts to more than 100% of all such removals since mid-2007, when the legacy exercise first commenced. Perhaps what it means is ‘already deported’ but that is not clear one way or the other, and with the present shower in charge it’s always appropriate to suspect sleight of hand. Another curious aspect is that the Committee heard this evidence on November 4th, and embargoed the publication of its report until today. Normally unedited transcripts of oral evidence are posted on the Parliament website within days - news management in action? Maybe I’m just being over-cynical but the committee is chaired by scandal-prone Indo-Yemeni NuLabor apparatchik Keith Vaz.
Posted by Dan Dare on Tuesday, December 8, 2009 at 05:28 PM in Comments:Next entry: Political lies, lived lies, all that is not real Previous entry: Questions for Lee Barnes |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view) MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view) Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by David Stewart on December 08, 2009, 07:31 PM | #
This sounds like the usual tosh, spiel, spin, distortion from Nu Labour. As soon as you see the name Vaz on the issue, you know it’s just a load of waffling tosh. If they told me the sky was blue, i would have to step out sied to see it with my own eyes.
As a brit married to a foriegn national, i experienced the immigration system, i was not impressed. Lots of unannounced amnesties go on over time. it is well known within the immigrant community & illegals, you stay long enough , eventually you’ll get permenant residence, along with council flat, benefits and a host of other services.
They are simply working at digging themselves out of a hole. Nu Labour fundermentalists will do and say anything to get the party and themselves elected. So they can get their snout in the trough and feel the power of abusing the electorate once again.
They know it is going to be a dirty, tough fight and Nu Labour know how to play dirty, breen doing it for the last 50 years. This is just a part of it, it’ll get worse, as the election draws closer. the closer we get the more outragious the claims.
Nu Labour are aware the majority despise them, they are simply working on apathy, stupidity, laziness, hardcore voters, luck, and working at it to fool people. Let’s hope they fail.