![]() |
The Proles and Animals are FreeIn all questions of morals they were allowed to follow their ancestral code. The sexual puritanism of the Party was not imposed upon them. Promiscuity went unpunished, divorce was permitted. For that matter, even religious worship would have been permitted if the proles had shown any sign of needing or wanting it. They were beneath suspicion. As the Party slogan put it: ‘Proles and animals are free.’ Too few in number and too primitive to either exploit as ‘cheap labor’ or to ‘open up new markets’ in, with a great cynical fanfare and trumpeting, now and again the advocates of the Multi-Cult will declare that some peoples are indeed worthy of preservation…while the bulk of the peoples of the world who can be exploited thusly, and apparently being seen as something like the party members of 1984, are supposed to happily embrace their own destruction and enslavement. In our overcrowded world their very future hangs in the balance. Almost all of these tribes are threatened by powerful outsiders who want their land. These outsiders - loggers, miners, cattle ranchers - are often willing to kill the tribespeople to get what they want… ...‘The jungle is fundamental to their lives and survival. It’s their home, their source of food, the source of their culture etc. Without it, they could not exist as a people.’
Incredible pictures of one of Earth’s last uncontacted tribes firing bows and arrows Posted by Alex on Friday, April 2, 2010 at 03:39 PM in Anthropology Comments:2
Posted by PF on April 02, 2010, 03:57 PM | # that is a powerful, and somehow very disturbing picture, Alex. to think we have all that inside of us too, and we cant see it. 3
Posted by cladrastis on April 02, 2010, 06:05 PM | # Indeed, the Southern hemisphere’s multiracial cast(e) of loggers, miners, and other indentured servants should be exterminated - but then, why stop there? As a rule the tropics should be forcibly depopulated - they are far too valuable (biologically and perhaps spiritually) to be lost to the flux of human civilization. With perhaps one exception of anthropic origin (terra preta), tropical soils are not suitable for cultivation anyway, and we ourselves are not adapted to the conditions of equatorial life (including the many emerging infectious diseases emanating from there). Having said that, some tropical peoples, such as those pictured above should be allowed to persist - for their existence helps to define who we are (we need the other). Certainly they pose no more of a threat to our existence than any other member of the jungle fauna, and, in time, they may be equally or more important to our understanding of ourselves as are our ape cousins. At any rate, we have other potential options for territorial expansion. 4
Posted by James Bowery on April 03, 2010, 10:54 AM | # Never, no never, did nature say one thing and wisdom another. —Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller 5
Posted by Alex on April 03, 2010, 02:09 PM | # Yes, PF, I think everyone probably has a bit of the tribalism in them. And on a somewhat related note… ‘Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.’ 6
Posted by Gorboduc on April 03, 2010, 02:18 PM | # I suppose it could be said that these primitive, backward and poorly-evolved people could, just, be allowed to survive in their own lands. 7
Posted by cladrastis on April 03, 2010, 02:50 PM | # pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will 8
Posted by James Bowery on April 03, 2010, 04:53 PM | # Nation: A people united by consanguinity and congeniality. State: A beast created by, and composed of people who, if they and the beast be fortunate, remember who created the beast and how its creators live without it. Next entry: Murder of Eugene Terreblanche, and other news stories Previous entry: The Revised History of Silicon Valley |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf noteRecent CommentsAlso see trash folder. The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view) MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view) Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Alex on April 02, 2010, 03:45 PM | #
Those powerful elements from amongst the elites, who advocate the Multi-Cult, dysfunctionally would seem to see themselves and any who they might control as outside of nature