|
|
The number of whose name now?What is the sustainable population of the world? People seem to think that it is less than the 6.66 billion people estimated to freckle our fragile globe today. Is it 2 billion? 1 billion? The correct number is far lower. According to the best scientific analysis, the population that could be sustained indefinitely, neither growing nor shrinking, is 144,000. Interestingly, 144,000 = 12 squared * 10 squared, or 2 to the 7th power * 3 *3 * 5 * 5 * 5. The deep symbolic connection to the dodecahedron is trivially easy to prove. Posted by Søren Renner on Thursday, June 8, 2006 at 07:10 PM in Comments:2
Posted by A. Windaus on June 08, 2006, 07:40 PM | # Are you missing a couple of zeros in there? New Zealand grows all it’s own food and yet has 4 million people. 3
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on June 08, 2006, 08:04 PM | # Sounds like a Christian scientist study to me… 4
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on June 08, 2006, 08:41 PM | # Sorry, that should be Christian Scientist. 5
Posted by AD on June 08, 2006, 10:30 PM | # I felt special for a second when i got the bible references…..did i understand this time…..maybe, just maybe i was on the path to understanding a Rennerism….then the dodecahedron came and put me in my place. 6
Posted by jonjayray on June 08, 2006, 11:17 PM | # Soren must be a Jehovah’s Witness 7
Posted by karlmagnus on June 09, 2006, 08:53 AM | # Even I would regard a world population of 144,000 as a touch lonely! 8
Posted by A. Windaus on June 09, 2006, 09:12 AM | # They say that the US should have no more than 50 million. In fact, in the early 1900’s they had a referendum and it was voted that the population should not be allowed to pass 100 million. Yeah, right. 9
Posted by Guessedworker on June 09, 2006, 10:59 AM | # Alright, “pure knowledge”, and all that, cannot be transmitted, and by being expressed in symbols it is veiled thinly for the cogniscent and safely sunk in the deepest ocean trough for the rest of us. That I get. But a dodecahedron-sided solid? Nope. Can’t we gentily travel upwards in nice, single planes form sinful duality to trinity, to quarternity, to quinternity? Or just stay put and watch the football? Next entry: The deep irrationality of the Left Previous entry: Inductivist raids GSS |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. AryanInside commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle' on 05/25/12, 06:21 AM. (go) (view) pay day loans commented in entry 'Immigration: The individual matters most' on 05/25/12, 06:21 AM. (go) (view) ovephorie commented in entry 'Book review of “Breeding between the Lines” by Alon Ziv' on 05/25/12, 05:19 AM. (go) (view) BroowlorCliEf commented in entry 'Why the Germans? Why the Jews?' on 05/25/12, 05:00 AM. (go) (view) DateSoaxiaDot commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 05/25/12, 04:28 AM. (go) (view) UK Dissertations Help commented in entry 'A small anecdote and some reflections on race and culture' on 05/25/12, 02:14 AM. (go) (view) Roof Leaks commented in entry 'YOBS' on 05/25/12, 01:16 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/25/12, 12:41 AM. (go) (view) pletcheroka commented in entry 'A repeatable comment for mass-pasting on American public message boards' on 05/25/12, 12:36 AM. (go) (view) Graistetrisog commented in entry 'Top Wog embraces his Inner Englishman' on 05/25/12, 12:19 AM. (go) (view) BomeDeddell commented in entry 'ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT: Government's Own Data Point to a Cost-Effective Strategy' on 05/24/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) indernMix commented in entry 'ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT: Government's Own Data Point to a Cost-Effective Strategy' on 05/24/12, 09:42 PM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 04:44 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:20 PM. (go) (view) grecian commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:10 PM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:04 PM. (go) (view) Salvatore Quinto commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/24/12, 12:47 PM. (go) (view) Classic Sparkle commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 12:07 PM. (go) (view) Cobus commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 05/24/12, 10:14 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 09:49 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 08:54 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:41 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:18 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:53 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:48 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:47 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:32 AM. (go) (view) Guest commented in entry 'The Torment of the Mulattoes' on 05/24/12, 06:17 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/24/12, 03:05 AM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:31 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Hebes and Jeeves on June 08, 2006, 07:39 PM | #
According to the best scientific analysis, the population that could be sustained indefinitely, neither growing nor shrinking, is 144,000.
Could u cite the study, so we could laugh at it?