|
|
The Big Fear: a white backlashby David Hamilton The one thing former Conservative MP K Harvey Proctor constantly warned of was a white backlash. To keep the indigenous people under control the Caste has devised various underhand and undemocratic methods. The idea was to manage the population into a sort of utopian state. But ideologies need an enemy, and that was “whites”. We were all held responsible for the slave trade, which meant only a heavily-censored version of slavery with the main dealers – the Arabs - left out of the account. We are, after all, only allowed to think “correct” thoughts. What Alan Clarke, the former Conservative government minister and famous diarist, lauded as “the British military spirit” and a matter of honour and pride is scorned as yobbery by the Establishment. The people who were the backbone of our traditional military prowess are slandered and misused. They are misused because they are not wanted in the armed forces, where they should be cherished as heroes ready to defend our country and control our borders to repel the current invasion. Our troops are held in contempt and not even provided with adequate equipment to save their lives. People who have committed youthful misadventures but who naturally belong in the forces are barred. At one time young men who were at risk of being sent to young offenders institutions were given the opportunity of joining the military. To the traditional aristocratic-ruling warrior class, they would have been ideal recruits possessed of potential noble virtues. Now those virtues are now left unexplored, and the young are left in their criminality. A classic example of how these virtues are presented as wrong or even low-class was in the Daily Mail of 5th July. In this deceitful piece of fiction – a real hatchet piece - the scribbler Niall Firth linked several disconnected phenomena.
Typical of his old-fashioned kind he used the usual faded cliches to trigger negative responses in his readers. “Far-right” and “Neo-Nazis” were trotted out as usual to deter us from our natural instinct to defend our communities and protect our young girls from being child-raped by men from the rival Muslim communities. The actual quotes from Commander Shawn Sawyer show how the police work in league with Muslims and against their own people. Sawyer, who is from the Met’s specialist operations wing, told a meeting of British Muslims:
These are the corrupt police who stop “whites” under terrorist laws to avoid upsetting Muslims and who warn Muslim community leaders before they stage a raid looking for bombs and weapons. If the police continue to act in concert with Muslim extremists against the indigenous people we will have to consider with-holding the portion of council tax that pays their wages. The Caste’s scribblers are not beneath using class-distinction to distance their white targets from the rest of polite and enlightened society. One way, if they protest, is to caricature them as “banner-waving drunks”. Such things are said solely to discredit them and put them outside what is respectable. These are attempts to stifle our population ... to prevent a “White backlash”. But the scribblers’ prospects are bleak as people are feeling threatened now, and are realizing what the corrupt Caste has been doing all this time behind their backs. The scribblers try to shift the focus of blame by making things up. A recent farrago of lies and made up examples was the Birmingham Post’s so-called report of the St.Georges’ Day parade in West Bromwich. The scribbler hid his invention behind the word “allegedly”. But he turned out something so different from the truth that I am thinking of recommending him for “The Booker Prize”! These imaginative concoctions do not just appear out of nowhere, they are part of an ideology that filters down from “The Ideological Caste” and binds the Caste and the media together in a common political aim of destroying us and installing Islam as the dominant European belief and legal system. Everything slots in to that. This is why news items have a repetitive quality – there is no original treatment by reporters. The new event is interpreted through the old ideology. This ideology, of course, sees us as the enemy and the scapegoat every time the multiracial dream falters. The recent hysterical reports blaming Ulster people for disputes with Roma gypsies is a classic example. The media never told us what caused the dispute but just accused local people of “racist attacks.” Well, I don’t believe them. I think these people were defending their communities. Around the world, ethno-nationlism is being asserted. Western rulers, lost in orbit on golden fantasies of globalisation, have so far fallen back on legal sanctions, police action and snooping by the security apparatus. If they need to do more at some stage they already have the example of the communist government of China. It, too, is engaged in reducing indigenous populations to minorities, and stifling religious, ethnic and linguistic diversity – the indigenous populations in question being those of China’s borderlands, of course, and the flooding being done by the transfer of millions of Han, as was done in the past in Manchuria. The objective now is to ensure possession of Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang. Xinjiang is a large, oil-rich province on the border with Pakistan, Afghanistan and several Central Asian countries that seceded from the Soviet Union. China’s government deals with the resultant ethno-nationalism very differently to governments in the West. There are claimed to have been 158 dead, 1,080 injured and a thousand arrested in the ethnic violence between Han Chinese and the native Muslim, Turkic-speaking Uighurs. The Chinese are not decadent, and do not flinch at putting combat troops into Xinjiang with strict orders to quell the conflict. The Communist Party chief has promised to execute those responsible for the killings. But the Chinese policy on ethno-nationalism is not simply one of suppression. The Soviet Union was wholly suppressive, but it imploded very quickly. The Chinese are cute and have tried to go with the flow and harness the ethno-nationalism of the Han majority. This appears to be too subtle for our Western rulers, who are doing the very opposite with their native population, retrospectively altering history and fibbing that we were never blood-and-soil people, but a propositional nation, a nation of ideas. A belief in tolerance, diversity, and equality supposedly define us and make us different from all other nations. This is how they hope to break down our natural need for belonging to a people in a traditional homeland. They think they are converting our natural, organic, Christian nation into a rationalist construct that only requires a modicum of social engineering, a political police and one or two other totalitarian structures to come to fruition. They are pressing on even in the teeth of a deep economic recession with growing mass unemployment. The reality is, as we know, a chaotic multiracial, multi-ethnic, multilingual, multicultural Tower of Babel in which Muslims will become the dominant demographic. But the Caste has closed its eyes to that chaos. It does not object to chaos. It does not care about chaos. All it cares about is that the project of native British dispossession is completed. Not even Muslim terrorism ripping through the heart of London shakes the Caste’s determination to press on. There are something like 200 investigations into Muslim terror plots being conducted by security services and the courts as I write. But the project will not fail because of Muslim terrorism. It does not threaten the project directly. No, the threat comes from an awakening native Britain, which the Caste has recognised early, and is already acting against. The Caste’s big fear is ethno-nationalism - the will of native peoples to have their own lands where their faith is practiced, their culture lived, their language spoken. Ethno-nationalism caused the Balkan wars of 1912 and 1913, triggered World War I in Sarajevo, and rent asunder the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires. Ethno-nationalism spawned Turkey and Israel. Ethno-nationalism was the spur for the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, and split Czechoslovakia. Last August, ethno-nationalism took Abkhazia and South Ossetia out of Georgia. Russia, meanwhile, has its own ethnic worries in Chechnya, Dagestan and Ingushetia, whose Moscow-installed president was nearly blown up a couple of weeks ago and where a Chechen convoy was ambushed with 10 soldiers killed. Ethno-nationalism split the Asian subcontinent up into Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. Iran, Iraq and Pakistan are on the brink. Persians are against the Azeris, Kurds, Arabs and Baluch. Each of those minorities has kinfolk across the national border - in Azerbaijan, Kurdistan, Iraq and Pakistan. Turkey has struggled for decades with Kurdish ethno-nationalism. Pashtun in Pakistan outnumber Pashtun in Afghanistan, though in the latter they are the majority. Africa is riven throughout its artificial countries, and the vicious attacks by the Luo on the Kikiyu show renewed tribalism, as did the horrors of Rwanda, where Hutu massacred thousands of Tutsi. Morales in Bolivia, Ollanta Humala in Peru and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez are inciting their Indian peoples to re- take what the white man took from them 500 years ago. Why, then would not the Caste uniquely fear ethno-nationalism in these islands? Why would they not see Islam, with its universalist ideology, as a desirable counter-weight in the long run to ethno-nationalism. If that’s not it … if that’s not why the Caste allows Anjem Choudry, for example, to recruit openly and demand Sharia Law in an Islamic Europe, then what is? In whatever ways the white backlash comes, the Establishment will try to subvert it and present it as something beyond the realm of decency. Protests will be infiltrated by police and they will use agent provocateurs to incite violence. Smug BBC talking heads and MSM scribblers like Niall Firth will be required to invent yet more stories to “reveal” these protests as the work of the “far-right” and the BNP. The free speech of protesters will be proscribed, and their free association too. And yet, everything will depend on the unquenchable desire of the people to win.
Posted by Guest Blogger on Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 03:20 PM in British Politics Comments:2
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 19, 2009, 07:18 PM | # Though I highly respect Guessedworker, Prof. Paul Gottfried, and Friedrich Braun, as may be suspected from my comment above and other recent ones of mine I do not see the necessity of developing a “new philosophy for our side” in order to finally be able to combat systematic government-enforced race-replacement of white people. I think the already-existing philosophies are sufficient — those, plus naming names, exposing identities, and going after the specific traitors, rival ethnic groups, money-men, and other criminal agents pushing this (this activity being criminal according to U.N. and other internationally-agreed conventions already on the books). 3
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 19, 2009, 07:55 PM | # Snouck has tracked down and made available online a book-length warning published by a Moslem almost twenty years ago containing predictions of undesirable changes in Dutch society to result from excessive immigration of Moslems. Here are some of them (Snouck, a Dutchman, says many have come true): * Criminality will increase further. The same author warned all Euro nations against large-scale Moslem immigration for the same reasons. ( http://www.islamineurope.net/2009/07/downfall-of-europe-by-prophet-mohammed.html ) Snouck also reports on “The Gatekeeper From Hell,” a government official (with what sounds like a Turkish name, surprise, surprise!) granting Dutch residency permits to almost all of a batch of 33,000 “asylum seekers” — only a small fraction were rejected because of technicalities in their application papers and of the 6,000 rejects a large propoprtion are expected to stay anyway. Of course. So, what else is new in the Eurabian EUSSR? ( http://www.islamineurope.net/2009/07/gatekeeper-from-hell.html ) (Snouck’s got a new address by the way: IslamInEurope.net, but you still automatically get to his blog via the old address.) 4
Posted by none on July 19, 2009, 07:57 PM | # GW, do you know whats going on here? 5
Posted by James Bowery on July 19, 2009, 08:19 PM | # Of course, it is too much to ask that “Smug BBC talking heads and MSM scribblers like Niall Firth” have enough honor to answer a challenge from a young man, slandered and libeled by them, to formal combat to the death with a 10 inch blade and 15m of strong cordage, entering on opposite ends of a 1000hectare area of a Royal Forest. But would it be too much to ask young men so slandered and libeled by the knaves to at least publicly issue such a challenge, and have it rejected or ignored for 48 hours, prior to any further actions against said knaves? At least that way, when the agent provocateurs start trying to pull stunts, there is a way to identify them as such as distinguished from sons of Britain. PS: I did offer BNP a way to quickly, easily, simply and decisively win—not just a few seats here and there—but take over the government in its entirety. Ignoring that advice is more than just asking for violence—it points to the likelihood that they are put in place by intelligence operatives. 6
Posted by Astrid on July 19, 2009, 09:33 PM | # Re: link by none, and the thread about female psychology Besides looking at males as suitors, it is also necessary to look at them as fathers. What happened to, “I can’t go, my father would kill me!” Unfortunately, since muslim immigration this could be taken literally, but before that it was an innocent and often heard complaint voiced by young women to explain, gripe about, why they could not go here or there. I would say that the complaint was not without a bit of pride that Daddy loves her so much that he’s adament about her welfare. These days, logic would dictate that fathers better be on the job even more than in past times. What’s going on with them? 7
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 19, 2009, 10:54 PM | # Over at Proze’s, a nice little comment by Trainspotter shedding some light on how the race-replacement process actually gets started: http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/18/whites-of-latin-america/#comment-15068 . 8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2009, 12:47 PM | # Very important links posted by Proze on why immigration/race-replacement is happening (read the FAIR links in his entry): http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/20/capitalism-again/ . 9
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2009, 12:51 PM | # It’s the “perfect storm” of capitalism/Big-Business, communism, Organized Jewish interests, and bought-and-paid-for “conservatives” (this last category on display here: http://www.vdare.com/misc/090719_lodge.htm ) all coalescing into one unstoppable juggernaut. Our job: stop it. 10
Posted by Q on July 20, 2009, 01:25 PM | #
But wait, it gets better .... 11
Posted by DRS on July 20, 2009, 01:26 PM | # James Bowery wrote:
I sent them my plans for a Tesla coil death-ray and they ignored that too. They must be government spooks. 12
Posted by Dasein on July 20, 2009, 05:17 PM | # Further to Astrid’s point, a tragic case of failed parenting. 13
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2009, 07:03 PM | # Government isn’t satisfied with the amounts of non-whites already brought into Britain, not by a long shot. The British Home Secretary says the U.K. has nowhere near enough of non-white Third Worlders within its borders replacing the British population, and declares that huge additional volumes of them, absolutely immense volumes of them completely without upper limit, no theoretical upper limit in David Blunkett’s phrase, must continue to come pouring in totally free of any hindrance: http://bnp.org.uk/2009/07/labour-home-secretary-says-britain-needs-even-more-immigrants/ . 14
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2009, 07:08 PM | # Now, whom exactly is this man, this Home Secretary, listening to? That is whom to counterattack: the one he’s listening to. Who is it? 15
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2009, 07:14 PM | # Someone is calling the shots, and it’s not the people calling the shots, and it’s not the Home Secretary. It’s the one giving the Home Secretary, and Brown, and Cameron, and Blair, their marching orders. It’s the man behind the curtain. That curtain has to be pulled back, that rock lifted to shine the light of day on the scurrying insects underneath. That abscess has to be lanced, that boil drained. It has nothing to do with philosophy, it has only to do with usurpation, crime, tyranny, treason. To overthrow it are needed only the longstanding punishments for these, not a “new philosophy.” 16
Posted by Guesedworker on July 20, 2009, 08:15 PM | # Oh Fred, and what political air will you breathe when you have removed the money power with your army of pitchfork shakers? Why, the same air that was there all along. As I’ve said before, Americans have a much tougher time of it than Europeans in seeing our own liberalism. 17
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2009, 09:04 PM | # What political air was breathed ever in the past before and after the money power were told they could no longer trample on the people’s rights and well-being by doing X, Y, or Z? When the same money power was making money hand-over-fist and stuffing its pockets with gold sending boys into the mines and mills from age 10 up and working them 14 hours a day, and no rules of mine or mill safety so they came out at age twenty maimed or ended up buried alive inside some mountain while the money power laughed all the way to the bank, what air was breathed when the people’s friends finally said enough, this you can no longer do, and changed the rules? What air was breathed before and after the British Empire outlawed Negro slavery? Plenty of money men were making tons of money out of that, and as John Quincy Adams said in the 1820s, whenever anyone tried to do anything about it, it was as if “all the demons in hell” suddenly swarmed out to attack him. When that rule was changed, “Sorry guys, no more Negro slavery,” what air was breathed before and after? Is what’s going on today with the money power any differnt? When decent bankruptcy laws were put in place and debtors’ prisons done away with, what air was breathed before and after? When laws regulating the meat packing industry were adopted the owners must’ve lost a deal of money but too bad, better that than the public being unknowingly served rotten or diseased meat or ground-up rats to eat that had wandered into the machines overnight and were caught in them next morning when the new shift came to work and turned the machines on. What air was breathed before and after laws regulating the education of children in schools? What air was breathed before and after the lightening of the manifold burdens weighing down the peasantry in early 1800s Russia, Austria, and Prussia? They could be bought and sold with the land, they couldn’t marry without the landlord’s (their “owner’s”) permission, etc? The nobles may not have liked those reforms much, but enough was enough, and what air was breathed? It’s the same with anything you look at where pure destructive greed is reined in — clear-cutting sure makes a bundle of money for the forest owners and discharging pollutants into rivers and streams likewise for the factory owners, but you can’t do that any more — destroying the environment just to put more gold in the owners’ pockets is no longer legal, and what air was breathed when decent folk decided to make that change? Well, what about, in Peter Brimelow’s phrase (quoting Bertold Brecht) “dissolving the people and electing a new one” in order to stuff more silver and gold into the money power’s pockets, exactly what is happening today? Is that something the money power ought to be allowed to get away with, extinguishing forty-thousand-year-old races, any more than all the examples just cited where people finally said, enough’s enough, you shall not do this evil just to put more lucre in your pockets? And what air will be breathed in the process of changing the rules when the time comes that that can no longer be tolerated? The same air as before, I dare say. The exact same air as before. If instead some new philosophy is needed, and if Americans have a hard time seeing that, I plead guilty to being blind as a bat. 18
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2009, 09:31 PM | # Up tonight at Mangan’s:
19
Posted by Bill on July 21, 2009, 05:33 AM | # Fred Scrooby wrote: Someone is calling the shots, and it’s not the people calling the shots, and it’s not the Home Secretary. It’s the one giving the Home Secretary, and Brown, and Cameron, and Blair, their marching orders. It’s the man behind the curtain. Britain’s local agent is one Rupert Murdoch 20
Posted by James Bowery on July 21, 2009, 08:15 AM | # DSR writes: I sent them my plans for a Tesla coil death-ray and they ignored that too. They must be government spooks. ROFLMAO… Of course it is ridiculous to think that government spooks would work to prop up useful idiots as an ineffectual opposition to the government. If that were the case then the opposition to the government would be ineffectual! Besides, that just wouldn’t be Cricket! 21
Posted by ben tillman on July 21, 2009, 09:39 AM | #
Or that they lack sufficient operative intelligence. Sometimes you seem to forget how much smarter you are than the average person. 22
Posted by John on July 22, 2009, 05:58 AM | #
Do you consider this alternative ridiculous: that it could amount to a mere difference of opinion? 23
Posted by James Bowery on July 22, 2009, 09:42 AM | # Yes, it could amount to a difference of opinion. I chose my words carefully “Ignoring that advice… points to the likelihood” is not the same as saying “implies the likelihood”. Some signs are misleading but if you get enough of them pointing in the same direction, the likelihood of them all being misleading is slim. Also I did not say they were ignoring the advice. I don’t know what they are doing with it. So my detractors are wrong on two counts. Now, I’ll agree that if you don’t understand my advice to the BNP, you won’t see the sign at all because you won’t see the importance of the advice. That, too, is a “mere” difference of opinion. But let’s be clear: I don’t consider this a “mere” matter of opinion. As I said on another occasion:
24
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 22, 2009, 09:56 AM | # James, you said you contacted someone in the BNP with your citizen’s dividend idea. Did that individual reply? Did he acknowledge or critique the idea? Whether or not adopting the citizen’s dividend or some modification thereof would be a winning plank for the BNP (I think it would), another example of a winning plank, a plank which, if a major party adopted it, would virtually guarantee electoral success, is, for U.S. politics, closing the borders, decreasing legal immigration, and a get-tough “take no prisoners” policy in regard to employers who hire illegals. The fact that no major party here adopts such a plank points to the accuracy of the widely-heard claim that the politicians are all simply paid off by the Global Capitalist interests, either with cash right now or IOUs to be cashed in in future. 25
Posted by James Bowery on July 22, 2009, 10:16 AM | # Fred, the difference is in the electoral systems. Even major third parties in the US are of virtually no importance except as spoilers in elections. Parliamentary systems are different. The circumstances of the economy coupled with the BNP’s recent minor victories present a unique opportunity. 26
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 22, 2009, 10:28 AM | # James, don’t give up on the BNP. They’re growing. Keep in communication with their advisors on economics issues and keep laying out the case. Convincing others is seldom a one-shot deal. It takes patience and persistence. You may move someone there to take a serious look at it. 27
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 22, 2009, 10:42 AM | # According to a recent dispatch from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency the ADL and other Jewish organizations have been toiling away ten years to get the Matthew Sheppard Hate Crimes Bill passed. Their efforts were just crowned with success the other day in the Senate. Imagine if the Jews had given up after the first rebuff ten years ago. They’re born salesmen, as Karl Marx said (he used the word “hucksters”). They don’t give up till they’ve “made the sale.” 28
Posted by James Bowery on July 22, 2009, 11:02 AM | # I don’t think admonishing the BNP is going to be effective. They’re in the heat of the battle now and unless they think they’re losing ground they’re unlikely to look for an A-bomb, V2 or Messerschmitt Me 262. The way to get their attention is another political party that is taking votes away from them. Its similar to, but not as severe as, the problem with Ron Paul’s “Campaign for Liberty”: I was active with them and won some substantial victories for them, but they can’t be bothered to follow through on their principles even though following their principles would mean a complete and rapid takeover of the political system of the US by the Republican Party. They have to compromise their principles because it is more important to maintain “solidarity” around “Austrian economics” than it is to follow the principles of liberty which would decisively win the war. It is quite literally unthinkable to them that sovereign individuals might not sign a social contract that obligated them to sacrifice themselves to protect the property rights of the wealthy:
—Ayn Rand In the case of Ron Paul, it is clear that The Campaign for Liberty is the cricket and its Ashkenazis are the gordian worm. In the case of the BNP, it isn’t as clear what is going on. 29
Posted by Mark I. on July 22, 2009, 01:01 PM | # James brings up a good point: most of the “Libertarians” just believe as they do because one day they want to be ultra-wealthy plutocrats too. At which point, if any of them reach it, they will act exactly as our current Jewish overlords do. That’s the problem I’ve always had with GOP inclined people anyway. Too often they are greedy, Freemason types who would gladly sacrifice kith and kin for a few bonus shekels. The BNP does not seem cut from that same cloth. Hopefully their leadership comes to understand the necessity of being populists, something those in the GOP could never get through their thick skulls. 30
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 22, 2009, 03:24 PM | # In a new log entry up today, Prozium draws an interesting and potentially very important distinction between “white supremacism” and “white nationalism” — you’ve probably never thought of the two as distinct in the way he presents, but it makes sense: http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/22/robert-lindsay-again/ . 31
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 23, 2009, 01:01 AM | # Yesterday a Negro woman became the “Miss England” beauty pageant’s first Negro winner: 32
Posted by John on July 23, 2009, 04:20 PM | # Sorry if this is off-topic but I noticed some people from here posting on whiteamerica.us. Reading through threads there, I got the feeling there is something wrong with the editorial tone there. Can’t put my finger on it. Then I noticed how Jobbing used the Marxian-derived coinage, “leukophobia”, which really stuck in my craw. So I posted this. It says awaiting editorial approval. I hope he’ll publish it.
33
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 23, 2009, 10:28 PM | # Trainspotter, over at Proze’s:
34
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 24, 2009, 06:33 PM | # (See my comment three posts above.) The public, paying a pound apiece for the opportunity to vote, consigned the Negro contestant to “a distant third place,” but they were overruled by élitist judges: http://mangans.blogspot.com/2009/07/miss-england-2009.html . 35
Posted by Q on July 24, 2009, 06:44 PM | #
No doubt the “elitist judges” are either jews, or jewish subjects. 36
Posted by Q on July 26, 2009, 12:15 PM | # Can anybody offer a guess as to what these are for? http://www.rense.com/general86/pris.htm Perhaps preparation for a white backlash? I think we can rule out the possibility they were built for the massive deportation of 20 million illegal aliens. 37
Posted by Q on July 26, 2009, 12:27 PM | # Of course those train cars probably are used for equipment transport purposes but their appearance sure makes one wonder. 38
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 26, 2009, 03:07 PM | #
Interesting pictures. While we’re on the subject, can anyone guess what this railroad cattle car was used for, during and after the war (this very same cattle car you are looking at, which has been preserved as a memorial of the thousands so used) (Hint: no it wasn’t to transport cattle, and it wasn’t Germans doing the transporting): http://riga.in/2009/06/deportation-wagon.html . The photo caption of course will have told you. Further discussion here, http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/european_heritage/#c77723 , http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/european_heritage/#c77724 . We live in an age of digging up old war crimes, so let’s dig up a few Jewish ones (not exactly hard to do). 39
Posted by Armor on July 26, 2009, 07:16 PM | # ” The public, paying a pound apiece for the opportunity to vote, consigned the Negro contestant to “a distant third place,” but they were overruled by élitist judges ” The same thing happened last December in France. The “Miss France” election was broadcast on TV. Allegedly 520 000 phone calls were made to the TV station to cast the viewers’ votes, but the jury simply gave the title to its own candidate, who happened to be black. The black winner came out ninth in the phone vote. And yes, the president of the Miss France Organization is Jewish. 40
Posted by Lurker on July 26, 2009, 09:32 PM | # Hoax Alert! Lets squash this one now. Those railroad cars, wagons as we call them here… They are Auto-Max car transporters, not unlike the double deck vehicles used for the Channel tunnel trains. Here for a video of them being loaded. Here is the company that builds them with more videos of them in use. A sub-contractor in their construction. More on Greenbrier, explains why the cars are described as Gunderson products. They dont seem to have any connection to KBR/Haliburton despite the assertions of the poster over at Rense. Finally, for the hobbyists amongst us, we can even buy model versions in N scale and H0 scale. It even says on the Rense page that its a hoax, though not very prominently. Of course they could be used for prisoner transport/holding but then so could any reasonably enclosed rail or road vehicle. 41
Posted by Lurker on July 27, 2009, 02:45 AM | # And regarding Miss England: The girl who won the popular vote, she may look white in some pictures (and vastly hotter than the ‘winner’) but…read this. What her actual origins are I dont know. Presumably not British but maybe still European?
This picture and this one. In those she looks like many a white girl with a tan. Then there is her Facebook photo. Maybe partly asian? But Smale is an English name. Here she is again two years ago, for some reason her name was spelt differently then, perhaps because she was not yet aware of an actress called Zoe Smale. Look at the middle picture, not the face of a European girl. Here she is last year, still Zoe back then too. Where we read:
And those pictures, certainly ‘other’ there. Well, its been a terrible chore for me looking at all these pictures… 42
Posted by Q on July 27, 2009, 07:16 AM | #
Oh yeah, Lurker, it must have been just awful. http://acctrash.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/the-color-purple.jpg 43
Posted by John on July 27, 2009, 08:28 AM | #
The best salesmen can sell ice to Eskimos or surfboards in Kansans but the real salesmanship challenge, one that only the best of the best might be up to, is to make Oprah Winfrey believe she looks good in a bathing suit. 44
Posted by Bill on February 13, 2010, 04:35 AM | # Turning a blind eye on the campaign trail as BNP targets prize seat From The Times February 13, 2010
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/election_2010/article7025463.ece 45
Posted by Bill on February 13, 2010, 04:50 AM | # From The Times February 13, 2010 Invasion of the Body Snatchers - not really, just the BNP campaigning in Barking.
From Turning a blind eye on the campaign trail as BNP targets prize seat. The Times February 13, 2010 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/election_2010/article7025463.ece Next entry: A toast to Gina Previous entry: Female Evolutionary Psychology and the End of Civilization |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view) MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view) Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Regarding her racial makeup, she looks to be a black/ white mix with the white side more prominent (possibly a quadroon?). In any event she is quite pretty especially contrasted against the typical female black phenotype, i,e, Oprah Winfrey:
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 19, 2009, 07:04 PM | #
Despite widespread and growing discontent with excessive incompatible immigration, the British Prime Minister brazenly refuses to endorse a cap on immigration or any steps having any real potential to finally deal with the problem:
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/07/gordon-brown-confirms-his-intention-to-drown-britain-with-mass-immigration/ .
Which special interests, exactly, are paying Brown to do this? He’s not doing the will of the people obviously, so he’s doing someone else’s will. Whose? His intransigence is not due to “the people’s liberalism” or some “new philosophy that can only be fought with a new counter-philosophy.” Brown’s intransigence is due strictly to someone behind the scenes who is controlling him, giving him his marching orders (and someone who most assuredly IS NOT in possession of any “new philosophy” — this person, whoever he is, or this organization, whichever one that is, wouldn’t know a new philosophy from a hole in the wall). WHO EXACTLY IS THIS SOMEONE?
That is the question and the only question. Specifics. Names. Identities.