![]() |
Sky poll finds massive support for BNP policiesThis should not come as a surprise to most people who have closely followed the steady improvement in the BNP’s political fortunes in recent times.
Posted by Phil Peterson on Tuesday, April 25, 2006 at 07:20 PM in British Politics Comments:2
Posted by Guessedworker on April 26, 2006, 02:31 AM | # Put very simply, these findings show that:- a) Even after all the decades of establishment propaganda a majority of six out of ten the people who are currently living in this country supports normal, healthy racial interests for its natives. If one strips out the non-natives from those who oppose it the figure becomes about two-thirds of natives. b) That two-thirds will be, after so much propaganda, fairly “hard”. However, within it the effects of the propaganda still obtain when the BNP is mentioned to the tune of a 19% shift to non-support. It is, therefore, reasonable to extrapolate that there is also a softness, perhaps of similar size, to opinion among natives against self-interest. Thus, were the propaganda to lose its power, the two-thirds of native opinion might well become three-quarters. This would seem to me to be a minimum standard of self-interest for any healthy people, and quite enough to correct our woes politically. 3
Posted by James Bowery on April 26, 2006, 01:38 PM | # Thus, were the propaganda to lose its power, the two-thirds of native opinion might well become three-quarters. This would seem to me to be a minimum standard of self-interest for any healthy people, and quite enough to correct our woes politically. So then the tactical question: How to neutralize the propaganda machine? One thing that I’ve been advocating for decades is decentralized media such as the WWW (although nowadays I would choose feudalism as preferable to the current vectorist regime, and identify less with the American pioneer than I do with the ice age pioneers of Europe). This seems obvious in hindsight but its far from over. I mean while it is true mainstream newspaper subscriptions are dropping, cinema and television still dominate the minds of the masses. 4
Posted by Guessedworker on April 27, 2006, 07:31 AM | # The minds (and votes) of the masses are but one, declining factor in the influence of modern goverment. The propaganda machine exists not to persuade them of anything but to neutralise their remaining power. The Blair-Schroeder-Clinton proposals from, I think, 1997 centred on “NGO networking” as a policy-driver. This was necessary because the traditional support base for parties of the left - the working white man - had no interests in culture politics and, anyway, was rendered the cultural-political enemy by them. Furthermore, with the growth of big government and high central spending, the other old policy driver of financial backers - for the left, unions mostly - was re-centred on public sector suppliers. The recent scandal in Britain over loans to the Labour Party exposed the relationship between these businesses and their political clients. The first pays for the election of the second, the second bestows public funds upon the first. Modern liberal politics involves a triumvirate of political power, minority agenda and capital - but also leaves an openning which the BNP is trying to exploit. Next entry: Warped British immigration priorities Previous entry: The lost girls of Shibuya |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf noteRecent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 01:27 PM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'Sound principles of money, by Arthur Kitson' on 02/09/12, 01:26 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:44 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:16 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:04 PM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:54 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:45 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:19 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:18 AM. (go) (view) Michael commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 11:11 AM. (go) (view) Ron Trisner commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:10 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:51 AM. (go) (view) Michael commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:46 AM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:05 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 09:00 AM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:37 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view) Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Al Ross on April 26, 2006, 01:39 AM | #
It is interesting to note that, when the approved-of immigration policies were identified as being the BNP’s, some of the public got scared and backed off. This alone should give Cameron a clue about how far he is from grass-roots concerns and should reinforce the message that fighting over the so-called ‘middle-ground’ is no way to differentiate the Tory party in the public’s mind.
Also Cameron’s latest decree that Euro-sceptics wont be appointed to the front bench simply underscores his woeful lack of contact with reality.
Real Tories should be voting for the BNP.