|
|
Rod Liddle does bigotry. But is it really worse than hypocrisy?Five years ago the distinctly loose journalistic cannon that is Rod Liddle opined on things he shouldn’t say about black people. It was one of those moments when the thought crosses one’s mind, “what does this person think privately?” Now we know:
Today, no doubt anticipating this piece of bad news, Liddle wrote a piece ostensibly about Anjem Chaudary and Islam4UK for The Times. It was titled, “We must defend the right to be stupid, vile and obnoxious”. I doubt whether the owners of The Independent will join him in that defence. Still, the question remains of who sets the tone, and just how whorish and hypocritical can political columnists and reporters be in obeying it. I think back to 1997 and the coming to power of Tony Blair, and recall the quite startling change in tone from the Telegraph, for example. Suddenly, it was bad business for the standard-bearer of the Tory right not to accomodate its dire enemy of only a day or two before. Readers were expected to swallow the change in the manner of Airstrip One’s benighted workers hearing over the tannoys that Oceania is at war with East Asia ... Oceania has always been at war with East Asia. It was not dissimilar when, in December 1989, the press all agreed - entirely spuriously - that the new decade would be about compassion. They declared redundant all the materialistic enthusiasms of the previous ten years. Maggie duly fell from grace, as required, and the journalists who had typed and hyped the Thatcherite revolution gave it not a backward glance. The most recent example of journalistic whoring was, of course, the completely disgraceful campaign against the BNP in the run-up to the European election in June. A whiff of a repeat appeared yesterday - again in the Daily Mail, reporting on the apology given by BBC managers over an “insult” delivered to the black footballer and adulterer Ashley Cole by the BNP’s Joey Barber and Mark Collett:
The thread is a treat, by the way - agreement with the BBC is a trifle thin on the ground. Now we know that “monkeymfc” would have the same sentiments it is reasonable to speculate who else in the fourth estate privately thinks this way - and who, should the need arise, wouldn’t hesitate for one moment to whore for nationalism just as they all whore for neoliberalism + neo-Marxism now. In closing, and to prove that the Barton/Collett thread isn’t simply down to the reactionary nature of the Daily Mail, look at the thread to this Observer op-ed titled We’re still a long way from an honest debate about immigration. Look at the “recommends” - even here, in the church of the thaumaturgical state, the Millwall fan club is making its rude and unwelcome opinions known. That latent pro-white feeling is what all the tone-setting and journalistic hypocrisy is aiming to cap and divert electorally into the mainstream. In four months, perhaps less, we will know to what extent it has succeeded. And it will, of course, succeed. At least Rod Liddle won’t have to participate in it. Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 07:54 PM in Media Comments:2
Posted by Lurker on January 17, 2010, 10:38 PM | #
Cannon surely? 3
Posted by Guessedworker on January 18, 2010, 03:55 AM | # How right you are, Lurker. Thank you. Englander, that is true. But journalists are used to create the prevailing winds. They write in the knowledge of this and in the knowledge that what they write is, therefore, insensible to any standard of truth. It was always thus, and the image of the world-weary, cynical, alcoholic reporter poisoned by his contact with the ways of men doubtless reflects that in part. 4
Posted by Bill on January 18, 2010, 04:23 AM | # Something I’ve pondered on for a long time. Is football still the white working class beautiful game? If it is, then what is it’s relationship between the white working class supporter and the not inconsiderable portion of the players who are black? Estimated percentage of black players being, maybe 20%? Not many brown Asian soccer players you will note. What is the white working class view of the inroads of black players into the English game? A conflict of loyalties could arise if, (like many teams) there there are many star black players in his favourite team. Football must be the elixir to the multicult, maybe they’re right, most white football supporters seem colour blind? Ashley Cole is a black (non-white) England international. Is he a black icon? non-white icon? English/British/ icon? A civically British icon? Or is he just Ashley Cole the footballer? I understand the EDL attract white working class soccer supporters. 5
Posted by Angry Beard on January 18, 2010, 06:03 AM | # Rod Liddle looks like a goon. 6
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 18, 2010, 10:47 AM | # The entry’s most important phrase:
You must figure that out, then expose and verbally counterattack the one most responsible for setting that tone. It’s the same as the question of who is behind PC. PC didn’t just descend from the sky like a mist over society. It is methodically generated with lots of energy input, right here on Earth, by specific parties who can be found out and named, such that if these parties are stopped PC suddenly ends, falls silent, disappears, gone, vanished, folk will be looking around noticing there’s no more PC, you can say certain things again, it’s eerie. When someone has a thirty-foot tapeworm he loses weight. It’s not a mist that has descended from the sky making him lose weight, it’s the worm. If the tapeworm is gotten rid of, extracted, suddenly the guy isn’t losing weight any more. Why? Tapeworm’s gone. In the medieval period there was PC. If you said certain things against Catholicism you incurred punishments ranging from reprimand to loss of employment to having your ears and nose clipped to far worse. Was that form of PC a mist that had descended on society out of nowhere, such that you couldn’t tell where it was coming from? No. It was coming from the Catholic Church. Everyone here knows my view of who today is mainly responsible for “setting the tone” referred to in the entry, so I won’t bore people with spelling it out. I didn’t say solely responsible, I said mainly. Of course there are allies. There always are. The party in question is not acting alone — we’ve been through this a million times, there are of course allies, entities who climb aboard the bandwagon, hangers-on, opportunists, etc. But it is the main engine driving the “setting of the tone.” In my view. If you want to see some of the actual nuts and bolts of the process by which the tone is set watch the six videos posted at Balder’s which I referred to in this comment: Those videos are on a different subject, U.S. Middle East policy, but the mechanism of tone-setting and enforcement is, mutatis mutandis, essentially the same and coming in the main from the same quarter minus the involvement of the Israeli government. “But even if those videos are onto something, that’s the States. We don’t have that over here in Britain.” Oh yes you do: you have your own homegrown networks exerting themselves in exactly the same way though smaller and weaker than here, plus, and this is what really carries the day for the tone-setters in your country, you are controlled via D.C.‘s influence on you, which is considerable, D.C. having had its own tone set, in turn, by America’s huge (fill in the blank) ________ community. Just my view, for what it’s worth. “OK suppose there’s something to that. What do we do about it?” Well, for starters, begin talking about it, exposing it, pointing it out, calling them on it, putting them on the defensive. Instead of walking around in a daze wondering where this mist came from that has descended mysteriously from the skies on the whole of society which no one can do anything about because no one can figure out its origin, if it even has an origin it’s so mysterious, and the ones I’m talking about deny doing it and since they never ever ever ever ever lie that must be true so we’re perpetually back to square one. 7
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 18, 2010, 12:49 PM | # Here, http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Webster-Oborne.html , is another glimpse of how this particular party operates mainly behind the scenes to exert pressure and control in regard to matters it considers vital to its interests. Like the six-video Dutch exposé at Balder’s (see my comment just above) this article is about policy toward Israel not immigration/open-borders, but one can be sure the same party (minus only the Israeli government) using the same very aggressive and highly-coordinated methods of mostly behind-the-scenes persuasion/influence/coercion/enforcement, vetting of new candidates for elective office and punishment of non-compliant office-holders, making sure certain political appointments go only to certain known-to-be-reliable or carefully-vetted individuals, etc., are what are principally keeping the borders thrown wide open and race-replacment-favoring domestic policies in place and untouchable by the political process. Here is your answer to Steven Palese’s comment, “Something’s blocking the democratic process”: this is, spelled out right here, before your eyes. How do they manage to pull it off? How can they be so coordinated, as if every man knows his job like bees in a hive without being told, so they all come together in a perfect symphony of subversion? Well, for one thing they’ve been at it three thousand years. It’s their nationalism don’t forget. While Euros were getting their genes lined up for Euro-type nationalism, patriotism, chivalry, all of that, these were getting theirs lined up for this other kind of nationalism, subversion-of-the-host. Yes they were at it in Ancient Rome and in the Byzantine Empire, honing it, getting their genes sorted out to make them expert at it the way breeds of dog are expert at this or that. What to do about it? Well, for starters begin exposing it, talking about it, verbally counterattacking it. We have only the internet for that, every other avenue having been closed off to us. But if we use the internet to its full potential, sooner or later the seemingly impregnable opponent will start to weaken. Go on from there as opportunities now unforeseeable open up. Etc., etc., etc. 8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 18, 2010, 01:07 PM | # What’s at stake if we don’t figure this thing out correctly and start verbally counterattacking is our race which we stand to lose. That’s big. Losing your race, your race actually going extinct, is, you know, kind of big, important stuff. It’s not like being coerced into the Boer War, or subjected to Bolshevik rule, or coerced into the war against the Nazis, or coerced into helping Israel with cash and weapons. It’s on a whole other level obviously. The other stuff we can deal with, we can recover from given enough time. Loss of race we can’t. Loss of our race is what’s at stake. This is not a dress rehearsal, it’s the real deal staring us in the face. Let’s not fuck this up. 9
Posted by Political Correctness Explained on January 18, 2010, 02:33 PM | # Political correctness has always been with us, and is fueled by the issues of naming (including slurring) and labeling (including stereotypes). There is no greater power than that connected with naming and labeling, and you can see it exploited by a corrupt media, academia, and the horrifying urban-class. Unfortunately, the diverse white American, Atlantic Islander, and European peoples are blind to this mystery, although it is written on every wall, every newspaper page, every network TV show, and every Hollywood film. Someday when posters and commenters grow tired of high abstractions, maybe they will launch their own assault built around a demand for the right to a sense of decent self-respect and attack against back the individuals who slur and stereotype our demographic. What fun to go on the offense for once! 10
Posted by Bill on January 18, 2010, 03:21 PM | # Who sets the tone? Bloody good question. In order to set the tone you must first have an idea converted into a blueprint, into a programme, and an adopted nuanced tone at point of entry. Who are these people sitting around a table discussing the agenda, who are these master-minds at the tip of the pyramid? What is the chain of communication down from the fountain-head to the user at the coal face? NGO’s CFR, Fabian Society, Trilateral Commission and literally thousands more such bodies all reporting and working for, and within, the United Nations (and EU) and then down to national governments for implementation. Do these agendas, plans, codes, such as political correctness, no discrimination, tolerance etc. start off as informal discussions with like minded people? Is it expanded at Bilderburger meetings? Illuminati sessions? Think Tank lectures? Ditto, legal institutions? Invited journalists? Media type opinon formers? Does it all takes place at such meetings? Do they hive off into side rooms and bounce ideas off each other? Must do, it ‘s got be done somewhere somehow. This process has been at work for generations, in fact most who serve never live to see the fruits of their labours. Whoever and whatever it is, it is a huge, huge, fete of human ingenuity, employing tens of thousands world-wide, funded by private wealth measured in billions. It’s tentacles reach into every soul, every nook and cranny of the public and private sphyce. Most are unnacountable to the populations of the world, most do not offer themselves unto the election process for election, some do, as politicians, and act out their role to perfection in a rigged game suckering the public. The Media sustain the whole matrix with endless pap, lies, obscufation, bullying and deceit. Most mornings it is noticeable there is a consensus of headline news in the daily tabloids, I suppose you could say this a natural self choosing process, but one wonders if a tone has been set in accordance with some master of ceremonies from on high. These people see themselves as top of the evolved species and natural leaders. The masses are seen as nothing but dumb animals, to be enslaved in servitude to serve them, the elites. Welcome to the Brave New World. This scam must go down in human history as the best engineered ever, it’s perfect. I wonder if Spielberg has got the film rights. 11
Posted by AunDoorback on January 18, 2010, 07:11 PM | # Bill, I’m in a hurry right now but as a football follower myself I’ll try to respond properly to your 8:23 am post with my own analysis tomorrow. 12
Posted by AD on January 27, 2010, 09:28 PM | #
But if someone breaks your window, you can remove the rock that broke it or throw the person who threw the rock in jail, but you’ve still got a broken window. Your real problem is the fellow who prevents you from fixing the window—amazingly, some people prefer it broken. Next entry: Obama! The Musical Previous entry: ‘One day, on the model of the United States of America…’ |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:19 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:18 AM. (go) (view) Michael commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 11:11 AM. (go) (view) Ron Trisner commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:10 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:51 AM. (go) (view) Michael commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:46 AM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:05 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 09:00 AM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:37 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view) Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Englander on January 17, 2010, 10:01 PM | #
The vast majority of people just drift with the prevailing winds, and this must include more than a few journalists too. I have no doubt that the public would quite quickly adapt to any change in said air current.