Prindle’s Hitler

I have read five major articles by Mr. Prindle: Something of Value I, Something of Value II, Something of Value III, Freud and His Unconscious, The
Deconstruction of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ America, Part 1, and What’s Going On?  I will refer to these articles using the following abbreviations. SOV1, SOV2, SOV3, FAHU, DOERBA and WGO

Unlike the comic book version of history that presents Hitler as a Satanic megalomania with plan for world conquest, Pringle’s version does not present Hitler as the protagonist, the leading character in the drama, but as the antagonist. He does not see Hitler is the main stimulus for evil, but as a person responding to real threats.

When Germany accepted President Wilson’s terms for an armistice, the Kaiser abdicated and a republic was declared.

Germany had a huge Communist party. The German Communist party members were more than half Jewish. With Germany exhausted internally and crippled psychologically, thousands of Jewish revolutionaries flowed into Germany from Russia. That they failed to achieve their millennium “was because of the efforts of the German Volkish groups such as Hitler and his Nazi Party.” SOV1

Pringle fails to grant credit here to the German Socialist Party which cooperated with the army in crushing some of the Jewish revolutionary groups like the Spartakists.

Prindle notes that Hitler was not alone. From 1917 to 1924, when Lenin died, there was a burst of literature criticizing the Jews. The murderous role of many Jews in the Soviet Union and in the unsuccessful revolutions in Germany and Hungary was not a secret then. “In the United States, usually so placid, a reaction was led by Henry Ford, then at the crest of his reputation as an auto maker. He had his reasons.” SOV 1

Ford thought he was dealing with an intellectual problem. He wasn’t aware that he had involved himself in an emasculation contest or pissing match as they are vulgarly called. The Jews, of course, never let the problem be examined on its merits but immediately raised the specter of anti- Semitism. Ford was accordingly branded an anti-Semite. Why he or anyone else should favor the manhood of Jews over his own is, or should be, open to conjecture but no one can withstand the charge of anti- Semitism and remain respectable in his community. Ford lost the fight on the grounds of anti-Semitism, while the Jews now confess to his accusations. SOV1

Prindle’s description of Hitler’s mastery of crowd psychology deserves an extended quotation:

If you watch movies of Hitler working up a crowd you are watching a master hypnotist at work. Perhaps he also had read Le Bon. He comes quietly to the fore after his introduction, stands quietly watching and listening, his hand drops down to manipulate some items on the table. The audience, in their thousands, sits waiting in anticipation. Hitler begins to speak, quietly, indifferently; then his pace picks up, his intensity increases, passion flows from his voice while he gestures wildly, dramatically bringing his huge audiences into a trance which he is able to satisfy completely before terminating the séance in a wild orgy of screaming indignation and wildly flailing gestures. It may not look impressive viewing it with cool dispassion on film but he’s good, even an artist. Watch him. You don’t even have to understand German. He was terrific. SOV1

Prindle believe that an epic struggle between good and evil was taking shape Adolf Hitler and Judeo-Communism in the nineteen thirties. However, he boldly rejects the conventional view that evil was represented by Adolf Hitler. “[Hitler] could not have existed without Judeo-Communism, possibly not without Freud: he was acting in self-defense.”

The period from 1913 to 1945 was one in which the great goddess Kali danced merrily around the world while Shiva played the pipes. Death is the eternal dance of life in the deepest mythological sense. Nor do Shiva and Kali care how many or who die. Many go, many more come. Since 1913 mankind, not Hitler, but mankind, has murdered its hundreds of millions but Nature has replaced the dead with billions. After the human destruction of seven decades the world population has grown to life stifling levels. If the world population is twelve billion by 2050 as predicted, mankind will see Kali dance more wildly than ever before while Shiva plays faster, faster and more madly still. Hitler an arch demon? What? Grow up.  SOV1

Although he is a forthright opponent of religious thinking, Prindle dares to ask the obvious question people of a religious turn of mind ought to ask: what Divine purpose did Hitler serve? He also offers an answer.

In 1936 Popular Front governments were sweeping to power, Judeo-Communists movements were in the ascendant from China to the United States.

“While it may not appear to be so at first glance Hitler smashed the Red economy. The USSR never truly recovered from the war, limping along until its economic collapse during Reagan’s administration in the US. The war also gave the democratic forces of the US time to organize their resistance to the Red Menace…. so that with the death of the Popular Front president, Roosevelt, the United States actually assumed the role of Hitler and his Nazis as the bulwark against Communism forcing the Jews in the United States to reconsider their position vis-à-vis Communism. It was really at this point that many Jews became anti-Communist in the United States. …If from a religious point of view everything that occurs is the will of god then god must have been a Red baiter. Today’s Reds take note. SOV1

Prindle insists that we recognized that humanity is not exempt from the rule of evolution. For him the First and Second World Wars were the inevitable outcomes of Natural Selection. Germans and Slavs had been fighting for centuries alone the Slavic German border as well as around the southern and eastern Baltic and within Russia itself. In the twentieth century the battle became a three-way struggle between Slavs, Germans and Jews.

An alien Semitic people, the Jews, resided in Germany and Russia. While the Jews claim to have been loyal German and Russian subjects this notion is nonsense which will not bear up to historical analysis. They were part of the international Jewish community residing in their respective States. Just as the Germans and Slavs wished them to accept their own views, as Semites the Jews wished to impose their world view on them. Hence one has a classic example of Natural Selection, varieties and species in conflict.

Prindle is telling us that after a few centuries of restrained intra-European wars for dynastic imperial purposes, the Old Regime had disintegrated. Wars were now fought on a Darwinian basis with the participants reacting more and more as hostile sub-species. “While one may say this contributed to the savagery of the period from 1913 to 1945 what we have here is a classic Mfecane or time of troubles. The only solution was to “stamp flat” or exterminate rival combatants. This was merely a part of the historical and evolutionary process. A harsh reality, but true. Kali doesn’t mind, Krishna plays on.”

Prindle refrains from calling Hitler a practicing homosexual, but describes him as “emasculated to the point of deformity.”  He supposes this ‘emasculation” revolted Hitler’s contemporaries and he suggests the label “latent homosexual” is believable.

The widow of Sir Oswald Mosely, the leader of the British Fascists, was interviewed shortly before her death. She knew Hitler intimately. She was asked about the allegations of Hitler’s homosexuality. She responded that she was well acquainted with the habits of homosexuals in the British aristocracy. Unlike them, Hitler did not recruit male subordinates based on their good looks.  She recalled Hitler’s charm and especially his witty conversation in small social groups.

Prindle is right when he insists that murder is part of the psychotic nature of Reds, Jacobins, and the American Liberal elite. However, his argument that Hitler and the German Nationalist Socialist Workers Party were “Reds” because the party name contained the word “socialist” is not enough to persuade me.

He correctly points out all really Red factions share responsibility for the massacres by the Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist regimes. 

All participated equally and as joyously as their sour temperaments knew how.  Mild mannered college professors and sanctimonious ministers of the social gospel wholeheartedly supported the murders and atrocities of Communist regimes just as today they raise no outcry against the genocide and crimes taking place in Africa because they think the ‘right side’ has the upper hand.  Reds never did and never will have a disinterested concept of morality.  The Red idea of law and morality is merely a projection of their subconscious desires. DOERBA

Heinrich Himmler, the leader of the SS, drafted a memorandum for Adolf Hitler in May of 1940 that stated:

I hope completely to erase the concept of Jews through the possibility of a great emigration to a colony in Africa or elsewhere. . . . However cruel and tragic each individual case may be this method is still the mildest and the best, if one rejects the Bolshevik method of physical extermination of a people out of inner conviction as un-German and impossible.

Adolf Hitler approved this memorandum and ordered it circulated to the leaders of the Nazi Party. There was hardly a worse condemnation available in Nazi vocabulary that to call a behavior “un-German”. It is very difficult to explain why a man with allegedly murderous intentions towards the Jews would circulate a memorandum condemning genocide to the potential perpetrators.

Posted by Robert Reis on Thursday, August 9, 2007 at 04:25 AM in
Comments (8) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Next entry: How does Bush think he will finally win the war on terror?

Previous entry: Jewish porn, Christian virtue, Pagan love ... European nature.