Home About Archives Contact Forums Search Wiki

Please suh, not the briar patch!

Via Amren:
Clinton-Obama Ticket Stirs Fear in GOP

The possibility that a potential Democratic presidential primary matchup between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama could lead to a Clinton-Obama ticket is raising concerns in GOP circles that it might be unbeatable.

Hahahahaha!

They’ve got to be kidding.  Is it just me?  Or, is it obvious that Obama as VP would guarantee a Republican victory?

Couple of thoughts:

1) as a Stormfronter pointed out, Obama may be getting all the hype precisely because he’ll make an excellent punching bag for Hillary down the road.
2) Obama is nobody.  His only qualification is that he’s a sambo (or maybe a mulatto).
3) The Republicans probably know all this and this is their B’rer Rabbit routine.
4) The Democrats probably know all this and maybe this is some tactic that isn’t obvious to me.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Thursday, December 14, 2006 at 07:48 PM in Political analysis,  Race realism
Comments (6) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by A. Windaus on December 15, 2006, 01:30 AM | #

5) The Republicans and the Democrats are trying to give the people only one option: Vote Republican and continue the war in Iraq.

Remember, at the end of the day they still go to the same drinking club.

2

Posted by Guessedworker on December 15, 2006, 09:29 AM | #

I think you may be underestimating the need of ideological One-Worlders for some confirmation - any confirmation - that their wet-dream is wanted by the rest of the world.  And there, in prospect, it is in the form of the election of a mulatto President or, just as good, Vice-President ... right there just beyond their fingertips, begging to be made real.

So the candidacy of Obama is a battle between Democrat hearts (“Hey, we really are freeing white folks from their inner racist. Oh Lord, we are men of history. We are giants.”) and Democrat heads (“Obama will be toast. Our beautiful dream will be toast. We will be toast.”).

Tough call, wouldn’t you say?

3

Posted by Andy Wooster on December 15, 2006, 11:48 AM | #

From Vox Day: http://voxday.blogspot.com/2006/12/were-all-ears-mr-obama.html

Apparently Obama is very sensitive about his massive ears. 


I believe that thought # 1 is the most likely, and that Hillary will tear Obama to pieces with her sharp claws and pointy teeth. 


  Guessedworker’s post may have some merit as well, however.  There are enough American whites out there who would sprint to the voting booth to support Obama in an attempt to compensate for the guilt they feel over that twinge of fear they all get when they encounter an inner-city Negro.

4

Posted by Søren Renner on December 15, 2006, 11:50 AM | #

“Apparently Obama is very sensitive about his massive ears.”

What about H. Ross Perot’s ears? Is there a pattern here?

5

Posted by Bo Sears on December 15, 2006, 12:47 PM | #

And now there is the scandal about his special house and special yard. Apparently Obama is a little mobbed-up.


http://www.slate.com/id/2155501?nav=wp

6

Posted by Don Reynolds on December 23, 2006, 04:49 PM | #

Just last night, we had a good long discussion of this issue…..Obama v Hillary, or Obama + Hillary. All were lifelong Democrats. Two were liberal women attorneys. One was a Mensa type. Another was a former economic professor. All but one came to the same explicit conclusion (but one)....

No way! This is a nutty idea. Could not even get the nomination by the party.

Yes, we are all quite well informed. Yes, we are all interested in the Democrats winning the White House in 2008. Yes, we all despise George Bush.

But….

The only people we have heard the past few years promote Hillary as a candidate for President (or VP) have been Republicans. They really get off on the idea of having her as an opponent. There is almost no one in the Democratic party that even wants her to run.

As for Obama…..The crowds that greet him and cheer are almost all White….in states that have almost no Black people. Black voters are not enthusiastic about Obama and they are not going to become Obama supporters. He is not White, but he is no more black than Tiger Woods. In fact, while Tiger’s mom is Asian, Obama’s is rather White from Kentucky.

In the history of the United States, only three states have had a black US senator. Mississippi had black senators during reconstruction. Massachusetts had Brooke. Illinois had Mosley-Braun and Obama. Except for reconstruction, 48 states have NEVER had a black US Senator and never have there there been two in the US Senate at the same time. Someone needs to explain why they think Obama can be president.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Next entry: A letter to Lawrence

Previous entry: The Duke no-rape Lynching
image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view)

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view)

Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view)

RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view)

Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view)

anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view)

Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view)

jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view)

marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view)

dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view)

Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view)

MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view)

Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view)

Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view)

Recent Posts

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa