Oh honey, I love the way you beep

Sex and marriage with robots? It could happen

Humans could marry robots within the century. And consummate those vows.

“My forecast is that around 2050, the state of Massachusetts will be the first jurisdiction to legalize marriages with robots,” artificial intelligence researcher David Levy at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands told LiveScience. Levy recently completed his Ph.D. work on the subject of human-robot relationships, covering many of the privileges and practices that generally come with marriage as well as outside of it.

At first, sex with robots might be considered geeky, “but once you have a story like ‘I had sex with a robot, and it was great!’ appear someplace like Cosmo magazine, I’d expect many people to jump on the bandwagon,” Levy said.

...

As software becomes more advanced and the relationship between humans and robots becomes more personal, marriage could result. “One hundred years ago, interracial marriage and same-sex marriages were illegal in the United States. Interracial marriage has been legal now for 50 years, and same-sex marriage is legal in some parts of the states,” Levy said. “There has been this trend in marriage where each partner gets to make their own choice of who they want to be with.”

We should put the bold part on a t-shirt: once interracial marriage became the norm, inter-species and indeed inter-forms of life marriage is just the next logical step.

Posted by Alex Zeka on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 05:54 PM in
Comments (4) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 18, 2007, 11:00 PM | #

The issue with this story isn’t that people may want to “marry” computers in he year 2050.  They can “marry” them right now if they want and can find a judge perverted and degenerate enough to perform the ceremony.  We all know in the future people are going to start “marrying” computers and other machines, dogs and other pets, trees and other plants, musical instruments, automobiles, television sets, statues, rocks, Japanese blow-up dolls, you name it.  It’ll always be possible to find a Jewish judge willing to perform these perverted, degenerate, insane “marriage” ceremonies.  The issue is, rather, why do we have here yet one more guy with a Jewish name touting perversion and degenerateness?  It’s like the Negroes are thirteen percent of the population yet commit a billion percent of the violent street crime:  the Jews are two-and-a-half percent of the population yet commit a billion percent of the touting of perversion and degenerateness.  Why do they?  That’s the issue with this story.  As most here know, the Hasidic Jews and the majority of Orthodox Jews aren’t the ones running around touting this stuff.  They strive to live moral lives.  It’s the more or less “secular Jews” who are forever out there touting crap like this or, when not outright touting it, making light of it wholly inappropriately.

2

Posted by zusammen on October 18, 2007, 11:20 PM | #

As most here know, the Hasidic Jews and the majority of Orthodox Jews aren’t the ones running around touting this stuff.  They strive to live moral lives. It’s the more or less “secular Jews” who are forever out there touting crap like this or, when not outright touting it, making light of it wholly inappropriately.

My guess is reaction formation. Maybe Freud was right, but with his psychoanalysis accurate only with regards to Jews and Jewish upbringing.

3

Posted by Scimitar on October 18, 2007, 11:51 PM | #

There’s a word for this. It’s called ‘degeneracy’. The defining characteristic of degenerates is that they take ‘equality’ to a ludicrous extreme at the expense of other values. The degenerate loses the ability to make fine distinctions. Eventually, they lose all sense of taste, culture, community, and race destiny.

4

Posted by Joe on October 19, 2007, 08:18 PM | #

Fred Scrooby:

As far as I understand, it is actions that define a Jew. And a combination of genetics, parental influence, peer group influence, and environment shape a person’s actions. A white kid that’s fine genetically can potentially turn ‘Jewish’ out of circumstance. (For example, having a neurotic mother, having a pussified father, being bullied at school, not having friends, not having personal qualities that attract the opposite sex, not having role models, being circumcised, etc.)

I see Jews as being the unlucky ones in society and hating themselves and the lucky because it’s unfair. I can understand why the losers in the game of life hate the winners. And I understand why some (but not all) of these losers strike back at society. “I never chose to be like this and now society has to pay for creating me.” Even if losers win sometimes by cheating they know they’re still losers at heart and still hate themselves. This also explains the Jews’ obsession with equality. They desire a society in which there is no such thing as social status because then they wouldn’t be at the bottom. (Of course, nature just doesn’t work that way. Someone always has to be at the bottom. Collect together a bunch of perfect children and soon the majority will find someone to bully regardless.)

You’re never going to get rid of Jews. New ones are created every day out of circumstance. In the wild perhaps the unfit and unwanted would simply be eaten by lions or whatever. But there are no natural predators to thin the herd in a human civilization. Basically, we have civilization and therefore there are Jews.

I don’t know. What can help? Can the power of organised Jewry be reduced? Can society be structured to decrease the number of Jews-in-the-making by having as many children as possible enjoy a happy, social childhood? (Studies have shown that having a peer group to play with during childhood is more important in creating a mentally-healthy person than having loving parents.)

Can we just hug Jews and say, “I understand”?

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)


Next entry: Remember the 5th of November!

Previous entry: As the GI Generation Goes Softly Into That Good Night, The Middle Class is Destroyed

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view)

Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view)

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view)

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view)

Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view)

RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view)

Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view)

anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view)

Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view)

jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view)

marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view)

dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view)

Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view)

MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa