Now is the next time

Posted by cladrastis on November 05, 2008, 12:48 PM | #

This IS important, and I would add that liberalism has not merely denied war, but has, ironically, transferred the war from external enemies to internal ones.  It has set the body against itself - a disease that was primed by an infection of universalist Christianity and a hostile alien intelligentsia. 

How do you cure a disease like this?  You have to cut off the malignant tissue, and hope that the body heals itself.  At this point, most of “our” people are not going to join with us.  It is too late in the game.

Posted by Bo on November 05, 2008, 03:49 PM | #

Very interesting to see Soren Renner in action. We agree completely with him about discourse being warfare. That is one of the fundamental premises of our insistence on rooting out slurs, slanders, and racist stereotyping expressed against the diverse white peoples. Every film that shows mean-spirited white Americans, every History Channel replay of the second 20th Century European war, and every high school text book has been enlisted by our natural adversaries in a war by discourse, constantly slanting, twisting, demoralizing, and demonizing our parents and our children.

This appears to be a difficult concept for many to understand inasmuch as they continuously circulate the hate speech and negative labels of the other directed against us.

No offense to Renner, but we have to disagree with his use of “universal.” We decline to use the term in any context at all. It is probably the biggest lie ever told us, that we were all universal citizens in a universal world. The term “universal” is one of the agents of our decline, and it is palpably false. Anyone interested in forming a defensive white political identity has to draw a sharp line against “universal” and denounce it everywhere and at all times. It is explicitly denied in multicultural doctrine, and it must be explicitly denied in creating a defensive white political identity. I don’t know of a suitable term as a substitute, but “universal” is a tainted tool that has undermined so much that we had of value. I don’t think it possible to validate “universal” in some contexts and not in others. We need to remove it from our discourse, root and branch.

Posted by Celtic Queen on November 05, 2008, 07:12 PM | #

Christianity…. ahhhh…. where to begin?  I try to respect all religions, from a distant, but that one is just to damn close for comfort.  I’ve never come across something that made so little sense. 

Though the gospels that weren’t included in the bible are probably the ones that make the most sense out of all of it.

Posted by vo on November 06, 2008, 10:43 AM | #

For what it’s worth, amidst all the Obama ecstasy going on, I just picked up my first Christmas gift yesterday. The strip of shops were decorative artsy types. The liberal vibe was high. A seller was displaying her sampling of leather goods, mostly wristbands to be fastened by snaps. Embossed on one (many simply had person’s names) was ‘Ephesians 6. 10:20.’ I asked what it meant. She took a break from working her trade and tasseled through her pursebag. She pulled out a portable bible. I glanced through the marked passage, and said, “Fine, I’ll take it,” and handed her a five and some ones.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on November 08, 2008, 11:39 AM | #

From the Vdare.com blog today:

Moral for the GOP:  Stop.  Immigration.  Now.  Deport.  Illegals.  Now.  Reform the Citizen Child Clause.  Now.

Or at least when you next have the chance.

No party, whether the GOP or any other, can do any of that unless the ratio of Jewish money to Euro money flowing into party coffers decreases below what it is now for the GOP:  the Jews will never agree to a single one of those measures.

Until the ratio of the ethnic origin of contributions changes, all of that will simply be impossible.  The Jews want Euros eliminated.  Period.  They’ve never changed in two thousand years.  They’re not about to change now.

Posted by Obama Pro-miscegenation Propaganda on November 09, 2008, 11:33 PM | #

Correct me if I’m wrong, but if Obama’s

(a) a sole proprietary creature of the Jews, see http://isteve.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-considers-larry-summers-for.html

AND

(b) not in any personal way more qualified than the next goyische puppet

THEN

(c) the Jews’ intended purpose could only be as a propaganda weapon, to encourage the white woman to jump into bed with the next Negro, in an implicit belief in hybrid vigor. (What are the odds that a BM/WF mongrel would make president?? To beat those odds, a BM/WF offspring must have something special going on…)

Posted by Lurker on November 10, 2008, 12:44 AM | #

Or its just the latest neo-connery as regards foreign policy. McCain wasnt enough of a re-branding, need something new to sell at home and abroad. Domestically, Obama can run the country into the ground.