|
|
None dare call it White genocideThe case for a new discourse of genocide in our lands by Christian Miller The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake - this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations. Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations? Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration. This observation is mostly accurate. However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations. Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. The elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide. Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations. Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties - society without race by homogeneous default. Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race - White genocide. To bolster the credibility of the latter position, put the shoe on the other foot. Assume for the sake of argument that in a stunning reversal, political correctness dictates that Africans are racist oppressors. Africans disproportionately enjoy material niceties, unfairly subjugate other races, and an invisible “African privilege” pervades the air which mysteriously oppresses all other races. In this hypothetical world, institutional racism means that Africans are predisposed to success and worldly gain from birth, as a result of the current political power relationship. Now, follow the usual prescription for healing with plans for coercive diversity and watch the fireworks begin! The continent of Africa can solve “the race problem” by a massive influx of non-Africans. These non-Africans will assimilate and interbreed with Africans over time. The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties - society without race by homogeneous default. Everyone will hold hands in unity, hatred will be a thing of the past, and racial oppression will no longer be an option. A sharp mind quickly realizes the solution to “the race problem” in the African example is actually the Final Solution for Africans. That is, the systematic eradication of the African people - African genocide. No rational Black man will agree with such a genocidal campaign. No reasonable Black man will stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans. No race deserves genocide. Every race has the right to exist biologically, ethnically, and culturally. International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:
The present immigration and political policies of many traditionally White nations, especially the United States, are in violation of part (c) and possibly part (d). White nations have been subverted to conditions that heavily favor non-White immigration, restrict White birthrates, and encourage and support non-White birthrates, and are thus calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the White race. There are many quotations of politicians, professors, and pundits advocating this very point - the end of the White race. Genocide is not always an act of traditional murder. The United Nations Convention on Genocide covers violent genocide with parts (a) and (b). However, the remaining definitions cover indirect and incremental methods to clarify that any form of genocide is punishable under international law. The United States employed an explicitly pro-White immigration policy for the entirety of its two centuries of existence until the treasonous 1965 Immigration Act, which reversed this safeguard and subverted American immigration policy to discriminate against White Europeans in favor of non-White immigration. Prior to the 1965 Act, American immigration policy favored White European immigration to maintain the status quo of the American population. The behind-the-scenes architects of the 1965 Act realized that overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration would inevitably reduce the White American population over time. The political front men of the 1965 Act, such as Ted Kennedy, falsely assured the American public that the new immigration policy would not upset the racial balance of America. In 1965, America was approximately 89 percent White. Just a few generations later, America is around 65 percent White. In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country. Illegal aliens create further demographic chaos, as White Americans are crowded out and out-bred by millions of mestizo illegal aliens from South America. Despite overwhelming public desire to seal the border and to deport and deny entry to illegal aliens, the federal government has willfully ignored its mandate to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic. Non-White legal immigrants and tens of millions of mestizo illegal alien invaders will dispossess the White American majority in the next few decades. White Americans will become a minority in their own nation. Overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration and millions of non-White illegal aliens are inherently destructive to the White American population. Welfare and social benefit policies financially reward the generally poorer non-White groups for having large broods of children. Preferential hiring policies set aside jobs for non-Whites. Lax enforcement of employment law allows non-Whites to undercut the wages of educated White American citizens. The appalling aspect of these trends is that most of these policies, such as welfare, food stamps, and free emergency medical care, are predominantly financed by White American taxpayers. These White American taxpayers labor under conditions calculated to bring about their genocide as the progressive income tax discourages the most productive White Americans from having children. Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers face the greatest disincentives to having large families. Instead, these White taxpayers work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers. The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens to bankroll large broods of anchor babies that will produce an ever-increasing amount of welfare obligations and future criminals. The White American population dwindles while the non-White populations exponentially increase, further straining the welfare system, crowding prison cells, diluting educational standards, and destroying formerly safe White neighborhoods. White Americans face incremental genocide by design, which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend. Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions. The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle, which makes it all the more dangerous. To deny White citizens of White nations the right to preserve themselves - biologically, ethnically, and culturally - is the true example of racism and hatred. Genocide is never acceptable. What can be more racist than the systematic eradication of an entire race? White Americans need not be ashamed of identifying on a racial basis, as every other race in America has a political license to do so. La Raza, the League of United Latino American Citizens, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith are all bound by racial or ethnic ties. White Americans are now approaching minority status in the nation their forefathers fought for and built from the ground up. If the current birthrates continue, White Americans will be a minority group in a few generations. White Americans must be free to object to the immigration policy of White genocide without being shouted down as “racists”, a term which has lost potency due to its use as a political tool to silence White advocacy. “Racist” is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence a person who wishes to protect his or her race from extinction - a person who opposes genocide. “Racist” is an empty slur meant to shut down debate, silence White people, and obfuscate the reality of White genocide. White Americans must be free to describe racial injustices committed against White people. Introduce the term “anti-White” to mainstream political discourse in the only way possible - by starting with private conversation. The mainstream media attempts to mold public opinion, but when there is an seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure. Demand an end to White genocide and anti-White policies. White Americans have the same claims to identity, organization, advocacy, and existence as does any other group in America. Take a principled, adamant, and vocal stand against White genocide. Talk to neighbors and inform friends. Write letters to editors, television producers, media figures, and especially politicians. Let the muffled White voice clear its throat and speak up clearly and forcefully after decades of silence. Turn the tables and take back the moral high ground. The truth is dangerous, which is precisely why slurs like “racist” are currently used to shout down reasonable opposition to White genocide. Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack. Anyone who opposes a return to traditional American immigration policies is pro-White genocide. Anyone who supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens is pro-White genocide. The current American immigration policy discriminates against White Europeans and is pro-White genocide. There is nothing more racist than genocide, because it is the destruction of an entire race. If someone shouts “racist!” in a petty attempt to silence debate, explain that a real racist is someone who wants to commit genocide against the White race. Stop White genocide one conversation, one talking point, one letter, one complaint, one comment, one remark, and one person at a time. Stay on a consistent message against White genocide. The White race of the future, if there is to be one, will be grateful. Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, August 25, 2010 at 05:31 AM in Activism Comments:3
Posted by Gorboduc on August 25, 2010, 07:54 AM | # Fred: 100% endorsement on both counts! The essay’s gone into a file with the “7 Questions” for further circulation along with a few other red-letter contributions: Christian Miller, congratulations and thanks for a clear summary. A few little edits will make it just as applicable to us in Blighty! 4
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 25, 2010, 08:15 AM | # (I just went ahead and zapped the troll. I’m sure GW will understand.) 6
Posted by StopWhiteGenocide on August 25, 2010, 10:36 AM | # I can’t wait for the Genocide tribunals. They can’t come soon enough! 7
Posted by Gregor on August 25, 2010, 11:24 AM | # Good on ya Fred! Trolls always seem to show up when some powerful pro-white discourse surfaces. They hate it, so we hate them. 8
Posted by Gregor on August 25, 2010, 11:29 AM | # Mr. Miller; It’s pretty obvious that you’ve taken Bob Whitaker’s Mantra and elaborated it into a form that doesn’t require much effort on the part of the reader to “get it”. While the Mantra is short and succinct enough to insert in blogs as a Discourse Weapon, it’s one failing, imho, is that it requires too much thinking on the part of a certain segment of the readers, unless they’re already partially “pro-white”. Your expansion has provided us with a great tool to post as a link when we don’t want to explain everything ourselves. Only the dumbest and most brainwashed White person will not be able to get a glimmer of what is really happening to them and their co-ethnics after reading your text. Thank you very much. 10
Posted by John on August 25, 2010, 01:05 PM | #
Could be because I cross-posted it on ronpaulforums.com (it got moved to hot topics, not accessible to non-members). 12
Posted by Matt Nuenke on August 25, 2010, 03:42 PM | # To understand how the 1965 immigration act came about one needs to read Kevin MacDonald’s “The Culture of Critique.” This book is a must read in understanding Jewish efforts to undermine Whites. However, after passage of the bill, it took on a life of its own. I remember after 9/11 it took the Neocons several years before they slowly began to feel that perhaps Islam may be more of a threat to the Jews than Whites, and at least some of them joined the anti-immigration movement. 13
Posted by Desmond Jones on August 25, 2010, 04:12 PM | # Genocide was painted more broadly by its originator Raphael Lemkin (1900–1959), a Polish-Jewish legal scholar.
14
Posted by Bill on August 25, 2010, 04:12 PM | # The new bourgoisie are whites. Age of Treason 20. 8. 2010 http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/2007/09/committing-pcs-most-mortal-sin.html Committing PC’s Most Mortal Sin
15
Posted by One or t`other on August 25, 2010, 11:04 PM | # An excellent article. The reality of White genocide cannot be argued with honestly,and like the writer says,the racist “shut up” word can be immediately reflected back on to the anti-White “moral crusader”. 16
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 26, 2010, 12:13 AM | # I just read the Age of Treason entry and comments thread linked above by Bill (got through the first two-thirds of the comments). Hadn’t seen it before. Now that I have, I recommend it. Very good stuff. 17
Posted by Selous Scout on August 26, 2010, 12:21 AM | # Well said CM. Whites can not push the “genocide” angle on our brothers and sisters enough. 18
Posted by Guessedworker on August 26, 2010, 03:37 AM | # I have moved Socrates comment to the If at first you don’t succeed thread to preserve the utility of Christian’s post for those who wish to link to it on non-WN media. 19
Posted by Leon Haller on August 26, 2010, 03:01 PM | # Ok, this didn’t exactly strike a chord (or elicit a single comment), so ... I re-post. Because it’s important (to me, anyway).
One idea/question: how best can we further the development of a Pan-European genetic nationalist movement? What we need is pro-white internationalism. This is obviously not a new idea, but does there exist any international pro-white organization? Could one be created? I’m thinking of something that transcends borders, and specific nationalisms. An international white brotherhood, not simply an alliance of nationalist parties. Say, The Leonidas Legion. The Indo-European League. Or just the Aryan Legion, the Occidental League/brotherhood/whatever. Note how the Jews jealously protect the interests of their own everywhere, not just in their own countries and Israel. We need some international organization which can be similarly internationally active, but which would also serve as an international social club of sorts. A place of refuge in major cities around the world, with the ability to recommend amenities, provide emergency legal or banking referrals, etc. If we aren’t just blowing endless hot air, we all have to get out of cyberspace and into things in the actual world. Just some thoughts from someone who’s been thinking for decades, but wants to start doing. 20
Posted by PM on August 26, 2010, 03:27 PM | # Regarding what the article states about the fact that there is no clamour for Japan to start importing non-whites: the reasons for this may not be conspiratorial. I have noticed that there is a strong tendency, all the more pronounced amongst liberals because they do not recognise it, to try and impose your morality far more on people who look like you. This makes sense from a tribal perspective—it is far more important that those who are of the same stock as you will think the same way as you, as they are a part of your society. So it could simply be that on a subconscious level white liberals simply do not feel the same kind of urgency to impose their moral standards on orientals that they feel no kinship with. All of which is very ironic seeing as such people do not profess to think ‘racially.’ 21
Posted by AunDoorback on August 26, 2010, 04:59 PM | # Certain terms have been destroyed by targeted mockery. “Religion of Peace” has now come to mean the exact opposite. Its former advocates have dropped it. “Vibrant” is rapidly morphing into: “being stabbed.” “Racist” needs to go the same way. It needs to be rendered useless. 22
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 26, 2010, 07:00 PM | #
And it will. Along with “anti-Semite.” The Jews have way overplayed their hand with both. 23
Posted by Drifter on August 26, 2010, 11:57 PM | # Add this to a general New Right platform: Mass immigration is genocide. Because humans are biodiverse, genocide is ecocide. Any form of Ecocide is punishable by death. Overpopulation causes mass immigration which causes genocide which is ecocide which is punishable by death. There’s your billions will die, we will win formula. Ecology conservation needs to get added alongside the overstated nationalism stuff for a comprehensive program to work. 24
Posted by Drifter on August 27, 2010, 12:32 AM | #
Globalist and globalism have now been villified in the minds of many. The Alex Jones, libertarian, and Tea Party types come to mind. Liberal and liberalism are presently on the chopping block, soon to be equated with what ‘Nazi’ is now, but they’re wussy about it which is in many ways a worse association. Up to no good and cowardly about it paints a shoddy social image indeed. 25
Posted by Leon Haller on August 27, 2010, 06:08 AM | # Ah, another suggestive comment of mine generates absolutely no notice. Fuck it. My intellect, interests, strategic approaches and general outlook are incompatible with this site. I shall waste no more time here. 26
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 27, 2010, 12:17 PM | # Remember years ago that Iowa governor put out a call nationwide for Negroes to move to Iowa, saying his state was too Negro-sparse, and needed more Negroes? Remember that? (For those who don’t remember it, it’s a true story: an Iowa governor put out a call for Negroes, specifically that race, to move to Iowa, saying the state badly needed more Negroes. No I am not making this up.) Well, the events in the news video at the link below are what that governor must have wanted for his fellow Iowans, since any six-year-old could have told him they would be the result of his policy, and therefore he himself must have known it. This therefore is what he must have wanted for his state: http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/zeitgeist/beat-white-beat-whitey-beat-whitey/ . The only question remaining is why he wanted it. That he wanted it is not open to question since he loudly called for that which would make it inevitable. The people running open-borders immigration must want it for the whole country. The same question is posed with regard to them: why do they want what’s in that video for the entire country? If they refuse to come clean and say why they want it, we’re entitled to speculate on what their reasons for wanting it must be. If they don’t like our speculations let them come clean and say why they want this for the country. Until then we’ll continue to say why we think they want it. 27
Posted by heartfelt on August 28, 2010, 12:15 PM | # I’m with Leon @ August 26, 2010, 07:01 PM, on doing rather than theorising. On the issue of political organisation, revolution, and liberation war, I think Whites need to look into their soul and ask themselves, would you be willing to organise and mobilise as a people and if forced to do so commit extreme actions in defence of your family, your people, your country? Are you man enough and clear-eyed enough to overcome the intellectual and moral qualms about standing up in the real world? For White people, this is all it comes down to!!! That’s it. We are not in a difficult dilemma here, folks. Once you accept the moral necessity of revolution and its attendant behaviours, then the process simply becomes a question of, How? Where? When? 28
Posted by Bill on August 28, 2010, 03:50 PM | # A policeman’s lot is not a happy one. The EDL were away today at Bradford. Latest score:- English Defence League nil Bradford City nil. http://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/ The job’s comment are varied and interesting. 29
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 28, 2010, 03:56 PM | #
Yet with the E.U.’s blessing, nay insistence, the whole continent of Africa is pouring in as we speak, an elephant trying to fit inside a thimble. Dan Dare is going to say the ones in the E.U. who are race-replacing Malta as we speak don’t know their policies imposed on this tiny island are going to race-replace it in short order? Is Dan going to dare to say that? Yes he is, that’s why he’s called Dan Dare: he dares to say the most outrageous nonsense imaginable. Yep, name fits. http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/euro-centric/the-invasion-of-atlantis/
Earth to Dan: they know they’re race-replacing Malta. How can we be certain they know? Re-read the dimensions and population of that island, then re-read excerpt’s paragraph just above this one. If you still have to ask how we can be certain they know, if you still can’t connect the dots, you’re braindead. 30
Posted by Angry Beard on August 28, 2010, 04:59 PM | # Fred, 31
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 28, 2010, 05:31 PM | # In the case of tiny Malta at least, Angry Beard, would you say it’s clear the ones in the EU who are forcing a) high-volume incompatible immigration backed up by b) race-replacement-guaranteeing domestic social laws, rules, and regulations know they’re race-replacing the place? It’s as big as a London borough and stands opposite a continent that is right now pouring forth an unprecedented world-historical Camp of the Saints magnitude tidal wave of non-white Third World population-transfer literally swamping every coastine it touches, and the Maltese are going to be forced by their EU masters to let themselves be swamped, forbidden to defend themselves or even say anything about it on pain of political arrest, political show-trial, fines, prison, and ruin for themselves and their families for the “crime” of “hate speech.” Do you require a paper trail with all written down in black and white before you’ll agree they must know the portent of their Stalinist actions, namely Malta will be populated with Negroes and mulattoes instead of Maltese? Is there a two-year-old child who would give any other answer if it were explained to him? Is it any more complicated than a two-year-old child could understand? Do you suppose, then, that the men doing it, ramming this down Maltese throats, men exactly like John Wadham, are ignorant of this implication of their acts, haven’t a clue what the outcome of their Stalinist acts will be? No there’s no paper trail. None that I’ve seen at any rate. But aren’t certain things obvious, one such being they know what they’re doing? Can we say that must be true in the case of tiny Malta at least? As Charles Bronson said in that film, “they can count. All the way up to two.” That’s all one needs in order to know perfectly the inescapable implications of what they’re doing. Conclusion: they know. They know perfectly and they know with certainty. I don’t need any paper trail to figure that much out. 32
Posted by Gringo Malo on August 28, 2010, 08:14 PM | # Jim Goad has interesting article entitled “Liberals Ignore the Facts” at Taki’s Magazine. He mentions an experiment in which the subjects only clung more fiercely their “erroneous” beliefs when confronted with contradictory facts. I myself have encountered such people. I’m afraid that those indoctrinated in the irrational ideas known as “White Privilege” and “White Guilt” cannot be corrected by rational argument, but I wish you the best of luck. 33
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 28, 2010, 10:13 PM | # At Gringo Malo’s blog (linked at his name in the above comment) I happened to see a link to Peter Brimelow’s best-selling book Alien Nation. I’ll re-post the link here because it’s an important work everyone should be familiar with. Go here to read Peter Brimelow’s important book, Alien Nation: 34
Posted by Armor on August 28, 2010, 11:59 PM | # From Gringo Malo’s link at Taki’s Magazine : “The researchers found that being fed corrective information failed to budge their subjects’ opinions and that, disturbingly, it often caused them to strengthen their erroneous beliefs. The researchers refer to this defensive tendency to double-up on disproved beliefs as the “backfire effect.” I’d like to know what are the theories that can explain the backfire effect. I have my own theories to explain why liberals ignore the facts. The first reason is that it is good for their careers. If they are consciously dishonest, they won’t mind our criticism. But if they try to lie to themselves and we confront them with the truth, the cognitive dissonance makes them squirm, and they may become bitter and jealous of our moral and factual superiority. Sometimes, it makes them dig their heels even deeper. Some people who used to believe in the leftist hogwash are now having doubts. Even so, they have invested so much in it that it is easier to pretend to themselves that they are still believers. Leftists could also be compared to gang members. If a gang member has been involved in a collective murder by multiple stabbing, or if a leftie has worked for some anti-white outfit, it is difficult for them to break out of the organization. 35
Posted by Thorn on August 29, 2010, 09:34 AM | # The cut, color, and clarity of Christan’s piece makes it a real gem. Yes, this is a keeper! Well done Christian Miller. 36
Posted by Leon Haller on August 29, 2010, 10:27 AM | # Good article, Mr. Miller. Kudos! One caveat re Japan and immigration. They don’t receive immigration. It is not because they are ‘exempted’ by some shadowy cabal of nation-killing internationalist scum. It is because there is no large segment of native Japanese demanding ‘diversity’. WNs like to say the West is being murdered, and there is much truth in that. But we are also, collectively, committing suicide. Japanese may be famous for honorable hara kiri, but they have no collective deathwish. 37
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 29, 2010, 10:32 AM | # Professor L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, a late convert to race-denial (who previously, during the ‘70s into the ‘80s, not only acknowledged distinct human races but nibbled around the edges of viewing the different human races as distinct human “sub-species”): http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2010/08/late-convert.html . Prof. Cavalli-Sforza’s puzzling ‘90s-and-after refusal to be forthright about the existence of race, coyly bordering on race-denial, appears to be purely political (as Steve Sailer has been sort of implying for years). The photo at the link shows him smiling from ear-to-ear as he proudly displays the Kistler Award medal around his neck — maybe this Italian transplant who somewhat later in life than is usual for academics found himself in the big leagues highly covets this sort of recognition and inwardly feared, as his renown grew during the ‘90s, that he wouldn’t receive nearly so much of it if he continued to be forthright about race. If that was his fear he was right of course: he would’ve been shunned, relegated to relative anonymity, denied funding, very likely attacked viciously both in words and also physically as has happened to many others. Prof. Rushton acknowledges race and gets himself placed under government surveillance and made the object of a criminal investigation for years by the Canadian feds; Professor Tatu Vanhanen does likewise and undergoes government intimidation and narrowly escapes Finnish federal prosecution for hate-crimes thanks only to his son being Prime Minister of Finland ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatu_Vanhanen ); while the glib race-denier and complete dolt Professor C. Loring Brace denies race and gets rewarded with TV shows, gets interviewed and hyped in all the big magazines like National Geographic and others as THE authority on the subject, gets lucrative book deals, lucrative speaking tours, probably becomes wealthy. Hey Cavalli-Sforza has a pair of functioning eyes, looks around, sees what’s going on — who can blame the guy for wanting a calm, quiet, financially more secure retirement? 38
Posted by Armor on August 29, 2010, 12:23 PM | #
It is murder in that the driving force is Jewish and most non-Jews disapprove of what’s going on. You know more about that than most people. Still, I suppose you don’t like the idea of expelling Jews. And you keep insisting that part of the problem is our collective deathwish. Talking like that makes you a suicidal accessory to the Jews. It is suicidal to accept the suicidal thesis. In your place, I think the Japanese would have no qualms expelling the Jews. That is because they have no collective deathwish. More seriously, I don’t think you are suicidal at all. I think you want to be respectable, avoid any harshness to the poor Jews, and avoid too much blame to yourself. In fact, you are the same as everyone else. Other people are not suicidal either. • Most people are firmly anti-immigration. • A minority of people are asocial and like to wreck phone boxes, and set fire to cars and houses. It doesn’t mean they are suicidal. • The behavior of most white people who participate in the destruction of the white race has more to do with cannibalism than suicide. They do it to gain a personal advantage. • People who accept immigration out of cowardice and conformism, or because they are afraid to hurt the feelings of the poor non-whites, cannot be described as suicidal. Sum-up: From now on, we should avoid any mention of “suicidal do-goodism”. As a book title, I agree that “The suicide of the West” sounds better than “The cannibalism of our phony elites”. Suicide has something tragic and romantic. By contrast, cannibalism is disgusting and sordid. Even so, that’s what’s happening to us. 39
Posted by Gudmund on August 29, 2010, 02:10 PM | #
As Armor says above, the majority of our people do not demand such things. How is it then that a relatively small group of our people is so raucous in their activism for the same? Yockey knew why, he called this element the ‘sub-Cultural stratum’ which has always existed in the West. He correctly noted that in the context of authoritarian States, as existed in all of Europe until the latter half of the 18th cent, these elements cannot work their subversion with any success. However, in the context of America and the rest of the modern West, the regimes find this same element very serviceable to their aims. In light of the fact that their active support is actually quite limited, we can infer that the enemy regime is in a deceptively weak position - they rely on their invisible money-driven influence from above and their liberal and colored underclass from below. The great mass of people have interests contrary to theirs and if they could but be made aware of this fact, their awakening would endow a pro-White movement with untold strength. Our largest problem is people like the conservatives in America and their equivalents in Europe who divert the energy of large numbers of disaffected Whites into the causes of impotent controlled opposition (i.e., Tea Party in America, ‘culturist’ rather than racialist nationalism in Europe, etc). Since we lack the ability (funds, ‘legitimacy’, etc) to organize on a mass-scale like they can, GT and Maguire’s idea of from-the-bottom-up political organization is the only approach which makes sense. 40
Posted by Silver on August 29, 2010, 09:28 PM | # Scrooby, If they refuse to come clean and say why they want it, we’re entitled to speculate on what their reasons for wanting it must be. If they don’t like our speculations let them come clean and say why they want this for the country. Until then we’ll continue to say why we think they want it. But they do say what they want: multiracial diversity. They consider it a good thing. Good things come from shaking up traditional norms, as they see it. They figure they’re supplementing the existing population, not supplanting it. It mightn’t be obvious to a “two year old” but it’s obvious to anyone with a brain. I mean, come on, how the hell is it possible for you to insist that a person who gets a fat as a result of overeating can only possibly have overeaten in order to get fat? That’s what your logic amounts to, Fred. Worse, its effect is rabble-rousing of the most disgusting sort. Look at “hearfelt’s” comment above. Ready to kill, he claims. His mind’s clear, he says. See a non-white, you shoot him. Nice and simple. Don’t complicate things. Just tell me who to kill and I’ll kill. (Is that not what he’s saying? Am I misunderstanding him?) 41
Posted by Silver on August 29, 2010, 09:33 PM | # Christian Miller, That is, the systematic eradication of the African people - African genocide. No rational Black man will agree with such a genocidal campaign. No reasonable Black man will stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans. Nonsense. There are countless blacks who promote race-mixing. It’ll be the “genocide” of blacks, true, but they promote it nonetheless. 42
Posted by Reginald on August 29, 2010, 10:04 PM | #
It won’t be the “genocide” of blacks in Africa… I doubt there are any Blacks who agree with the promotion of race-mixing in Africa. In contrast, there seem to be many Whites who agree with the promotion of race-mixing in Europe. 43
Posted by Armor on August 29, 2010, 10:08 PM | # Silver: “But they do say what they want: multiracial diversity.” They give all kinds of crazy and contradictory justifications. My favorite is the one that says we need more Blacks to compensate for the declining number of white babies. Silver: “See a non-white, you shoot him.” ?? 44
Posted by Robert Reis on August 30, 2010, 01:57 AM | # http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ But unlike the anonymous Newsmaxer, I went beyond simply pointing out that the morgue figures showed that blacks hadn’t disproportionately died following Katrina, but that whites had, and that the only credible explanation, based on what was known about the anarchy at the time, was that racist blacks were hunting them down and slaughtering them, just as they had sought to slaughter white rescue workers.
After the Louisiana death figures were released, the mainstream media suppressed the story of the issue of the proportion of whites who met their end in New Orleans, and suppressed reporting on pre-Katrina criminality, while uncritically reporting scurrilous black charges of anti-black genocide. 45
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2010, 12:59 AM | # In a 2006 speech, Frenchman and WN theorist Guillaume Faye discusses his vision of “Eurosiberia” as an alternative to the present world-historical Eurospherewide demographic cataclysm:
46
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 31, 2010, 01:06 AM | # Important comment by Robert Reis a couple above, posting a Nicholas Stix excerpt with an extremely ominous message for white people. 47
Posted by Armor on August 31, 2010, 12:28 PM | #
In fact, the Muslims and other third-world immigrants are being invited. Mainly by Jewish activists. There is no attempt of Islam to conquer anything.
Who prevents the resistance by healthy-minded Europeans ?
Who passed that legislation? Who passed the “hate-laws” and the anti-“revisionist” legislation? Who is responsible for the fact that white people are described as oppressors by the media, school, and government, while Jews are described as an oppressed minority?
How come the problem remained manageable in the past, when Popes didn’t feel they had to placate the Jews?
On the practical level, the first thing to do is to launch non-Jewish media and to put a stop to the Jewish over-representation is our key institutions. 48
Posted by Leon Haller on September 02, 2010, 05:58 AM | # Posted by heartfelt on August 28, 2010, 04:15 PM | # I’m with Leon @ August 26, 2010, 07:01 PM, on doing rather than theorising. On the issue of political organisation, revolution, and liberation war, I think Whites need to look into their soul and ask themselves, would you be willing to organise and mobilise as a people and if forced to do so commit extreme actions in defence of your family, your people, your country? Are you man enough and clear-eyed enough to overcome the intellectual and moral qualms about standing up in the real world? For White people, this is all it comes down to!!! That’s it. We are not in a difficult dilemma here, folks. Once you accept the moral necessity of revolution and its attendant behaviours, then the process simply becomes a question of, How? Where? When? __________________________________ Sorry I missed this. So many threads, I lose track of where I am. I definitely agree on the ‘primacy of the practical’, which is not said to disparage the more intellectual among us. My ‘practical’ understanding is perhaps more evolutionary than heartfelt’s revolutionary attitude, however. I suspect there almost certainly will come a time when some white men, somewhere, will have to fight for racial survival (and I’m not talking about merely those in an American prison). But before we reach that point, both of desperation as well as supreme possibility, all of us in our various capacities will have had to have done a lot of groundwork, at least if something broadly racially constructive can be expected to issue from such struggle. What I’ve suggested in recent weeks re: “WN emigration/conquest” is an example of this. It’s very easy to get overly enthusiastic when one is sounding off amongst his kameraden in cyber-beerhalls like MR. But later one awakens, the music is silent, and the dawn is grey. At that point one has to think of the gritty details of implementing one’s proposals. Thus, for example, my emphasis on language familiarity when considering WN emigration. Because with language familiarity come much greater professional opportunities - and that tethering of our race-survivalist strategies to the ordinary business of life is what will turn idealistic aspirations into real, if always somewhat messier than planned, achievements. 49
Posted by Leon Haller on September 02, 2010, 06:27 AM | # It is murder in that the driving force is Jewish and most non-Jews disapprove of what’s going on. You know more about that than most people. Still, I suppose you don’t like the idea of expelling Jews. And you keep insisting that part of the problem is our collective deathwish. Talking like that makes you a suicidal accessory to the Jews. It is suicidal to accept the suicidal thesis. In your place, I think the Japanese would have no qualms expelling the Jews. That is because they have no collective deathwish. More seriously, I don’t think you are suicidal at all. I think you want to be respectable, avoid any harshness to the poor Jews, and avoid too much blame to yourself. In fact, you are the same as everyone else. Other people are not suicidal either. (Armor) ________________________________________
As for the suicidal stuff, you are sadly wrong (believe me, I wish it were otherwise). Maybe “suicide” is too strong, too intentional. But “apathetic” is on the mark. I know at least three things. In 2000 white Americans could have voted for Pat Buchanan, but didn’t. OK, too little info, desire to beat Gore, whatever. But in 2002 (I think), the French had the chance to vote for LePen. THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE NOT TO. Less than a fifth of the electorate did so, despite the clear evidence of France being colonized by savages. How can you explain that? Murder? “Cannibalism”? Nonsense!! The French majority felt that accepting mass l’immigration sauvage was better than voting pour le raciste. I call that suicide (ditto the non-BNP vote this year in UK). You, and those WNs in agreement with you, just can’t deal with the fact that our race has degenerated into one basically of morons and lickspittles; in a word, losers. I’m trying to preserve our blood purity and territorial sovereignty in the hope that, centuries hence, our race will have sloughed off the snakeskin of liberalism, and returned to its ancient greatness. But we need to survive this period of degeneracy if that is ever going to happen. Oh, and I am respectable - and WN will only succeed when its public face likewise becomes respectable. We tried the skinhead approach in the past. For all the tough guy rants, it failed. 50
Posted by Leon Haller on September 02, 2010, 06:35 AM | # The great mass of people have interests contrary to theirs and if they could but be made aware of this fact, their awakening would endow a pro-White movement with untold strength. Our largest problem is people like the conservatives in America and their equivalents in Europe who divert the energy of large numbers of disaffected Whites into the causes of impotent controlled opposition (i.e., Tea Party in America, ‘culturist’ rather than racialist nationalism in Europe, etc). Since we lack the ability (funds, ‘legitimacy’, etc) to organize on a mass-scale like they can, GT and Maguire’s idea of from-the-bottom-up political organization is the only approach which makes sense. (Gudmund)
51
Posted by Armor on September 03, 2010, 01:18 AM | #
What you don’t explain is how white people in every Western country have degenerated into suicidal, apathetic morons. It is a very strange simultaneous development. I don’t think White people are so different from one hundred years ago, but the human mind has its limitations. If we had freedom of speech in the media, a vocal, more visible movement against immigration, and an army that white people could join to save their nations, there would be no lack of idealists willing to give their lives. Most people who fought in the Great War about a hundred years ago didn’t volunteer. They were drafted. There was already a problem with European elites at the time. For example, the religious hierarchy didn’t do much to stop the killing. But it is worse now. We no longer have political and moral elites. People are on their own against a hostile media and government. It is much harder than in the past. Many anti-immigration activists describe themselves as former leftists. I don’t think they would say that they used to be suicidal before they became white dissidents. Maybe their absence of revolt was due to “mechanicity” (GW has used that word). It seems that we need to go through a sort of conscious rebellion before we become able to defend our white interests. I did vote for Le Pen in 2002, but I knew he would not be elected. I’ve always been against immigration, but I realize that the government and media propaganda has a huge impact, even on people like me. People will make up all sorts of different and contradicting reasons why they should not vote for Le Pen, not realizing that they are trying to rationalize their conformism to the propaganda from the media. Many people are much more deeply opposed to immigration than Le Pen is. Those people could not be described as suicidal, but they like to think of themselves as moderates, and they are uneasy about Le Pen because of his media reputation as a nazi. As a result, many of them end up voting for crooks and race traitors. The power of propaganda is huge. A good example of that is what happened in France in the beginning of the Aids epidemic. Blood products contaminated with the Aids virus were distributed to haemophiliacs in 1984 and 1985. (wiki). It has been said that the men in charge became too preoccupied with money and profitability. Actually, I think the whole mess was largely a result of the huge propanda campaign by the (mainly Jewish) far-left against stigmatization (wiki) of people affected with the virus. Because of the huge pressure by the activists, I think the scientists could no longer be relied upon to give sensible advice. In fact, the far-left is responsible, in many different ways, for the death of a great many people from the Aids disease. In the same way, our (non-)leaders can no longer be relied upon to say or do anything against the population replacement. 52
Posted by Abelard Lindsey on September 03, 2010, 04:24 PM | # The fact that the Japanese are not criticized for the immigration policies is not entirely true. Occasionally some U.S. liberal-left academic weenie will rant and rave about how evil the Japanese are because then plan to compensate for the lack of lower skilled workers with robotics and automation. There was a fuss over this issue in the New York Times a few years ago. The Japanese just blow it off. There is actually a fair bit of illegal immigration in Japan because companies hire people under the table (and sometimes exploit them). The government is trying to put a stop to this but has been ineffectual. What is not so well-known is that there is considerable cross-cultural marriage among rural South Koreans, mainly with Filipina wives. In fact, nearly 50% of kids growing up in the rural parts of South Korea are mixed-race (mainly Korean/Filipino mixes). The girls of these relationships ought to be quite attractive when they grow up (around 2020). Nevertheless, the rest of the posting is quite correct. The Western (“white”) nations seem to have considerable self-imposed political pressure to take in large numbers of immigrants, often from cultures that are completely incompatible with Western culture. BTW, an iman in the Netherlands called for Geert Wilder to be decapitated yesterday. So much for cultural assimilation. 53
Posted by CS on September 03, 2010, 05:17 PM | # I read the Iman calling for decapitation is actually in Australia. 54
Posted by Abelard Lindsey on September 03, 2010, 06:14 PM | #
I stand corrected. Nevertheless, large numbers of people from cultures incompatible with Western values are being imported with no regards to future consequences. Needless to say, this is unacceptable. 55
Posted by Lurker on September 03, 2010, 11:41 PM | # Abelard - the difference, it seems to me, between illegals in Japan and in white countries is that they are present only under sufferance, nothing more. Any time the state wishes to deport them - out they go. No appeal, no citizenship, no claims about their rights. Any children they have while in Japan will not be Japanese, no anchor babies, no chain migration. I’ve read of this Soth Korean thing too, importing wives, I thought Vietnamese women also figured as well as Filipinas. Either way they have been careful not spread their ethnic net too wide. No Indians, whites or Africans etc need apply apparently. 56
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 04, 2010, 05:47 PM | # Further to my comment of Aug. 29, 2:32 PM: the reason for Cavalli-Sforza’s political coyness about race bordering on race-denial may be fear that if he acknowledges race the other side might retaliate by looking into his wartime germ-warfare research conducted in Axis laboratories. Clearly that sort of attack on him by the other side could cause him huge headaches if not complete ruin, positively the last thing any sane man would want to be forced to deal with at his age, as he approaches the end of his long life and career. http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2010/09/evolution-of-cavalli-sforza.html I guess I can understand that. The fault lies not with him but with the same ones who are responsible for our own choosing to post under pen names — the ones who’ll pay and pay dearly one day, if there’s any such thing as justice in this life, and I think there is. And I do mean dearly. 57
Posted by majix on September 04, 2010, 08:44 PM | # Silver, “But they do say what they want: multiracial diversity. They consider it a good thing. Good things come from shaking up traditional norms, as they see it. They figure they’re supplementing the existing population, not supplanting it.” They’re lying. Words are used to diguise their true intentions. If you don’t believe me read their own words in the protocols. They do not want multiracial diversity for THEMSELVES but only force it on others. The jewish wealthy elite live in gated communities. Israel itself is one big gated jews-only community. 58
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 08, 2010, 11:55 PM | # Holland’s Queen Beatrix keeps appointing a radical foaming twitching race-replacement advocate to powerful positions. Why? Who are her advisors and what is their ethnicity? From the Who the fuck are Beatrix’s advisors? department (God I hope they’re not [fill in the blank] ________ , otherwise between them and this bimbo queen, the nation formerly known as Holland is royally screwed):
59
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 09, 2010, 08:20 AM | # “Society is splintered and unstable, and the people at the top are hastening the unravelling of the social and political fabric. It is an incredible spectacle.” (—Snouck, in the log entry I pasted just above) It is coming from the top, and it is an incredible spectacle. The people don’t want it. Only the ones at the top do. Whom are the ones at the top listening to then? What voices are they hearing? They’re not just doing all this the way they do anything else, they’re doing it with a fervor, a tenacity, a stubbornness amazing to behold, almost a kind of desperation that they have to get it done, have to see it to completion, right in the teeth of what they know to be the people’s strongly unfavorable view of it all before the people gather enough strength to stop it — otherwise they wouldn’t have gone to all the trouble to implement all those draconian, totalitarian “anti-hate” laws and regulations punishing the questioning of it: they know perfectly that the people don’t want it. Whom are the Queen and the others at the top listening to in this beyond bizarre, beyond nightmarish, beyond criminally insane crusade they’re on, a crusade to biologically, permanently eradicate people of European race? We see the same insanity in the Queen of Great Britain. Are they all reading Alon Ziv or something??? Are they all secretly Jews??? Are they all secretly card-carrying communists??? What in the god damn FUCK is going on??? 60
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 10, 2010, 01:15 PM | #
FJ gives a few answers today over at AltRight.com:
FJ is slowly piecing together the puzzle. He’s connecting the dots. Slowly. But he’s making progress. In about thirty more years he’ll be where I was around the end of 2005. Hey better that than his previous stance of “Islam 24/7/365 yesterday today tomorrow now and forever nothing but Islam that’s all that exists.” Islam is not the main problem. The main problem is government-enforced race-replacement of white people Eurospherewide. By itself Islam is not a problem at all. 61
Posted by Armor on September 11, 2010, 10:15 AM | # Fjordman: “Communist societies were based on fear. So are Multicultural ones. The control mechanisms are normally more subtle, to be sure, but they exist.” In the last days of the Soviet Union, the population did not live in fear as during the 1930s. They had nothing to fear as long as they didn’t engage in politics. The same is true today in the West. We are asked to accept our collective destruction, but we are not individually targeted unless we become active dissidents, and even then, we are unlikely to get killed. Fjordman will not be shot down by ZOG agents if he writes that there is a Jewish problem. I agree that Western democracies have become dictatorships. It is unclear how ‘democratic’ our countries were in the past, but we didn’t use to have hostile elites. The race-replacement crisis has less to do with leftism than with intimidation and direct action by authoritarian rulers who simply ignore popular opinion. We have race-replacement because our governments import millions of immigrants, not because society has become imbued with leftism. The Jews have not succeeded yet in making us leftist and anti-White. They have simply succeeded in making our governments import millions of non-Whites. This is direct control over government, not ideological control over society. In fact, it’s not really direct control of government either. Obama, for example, is not Jewish. Bush was not Jewish. But the crucial thing is the Jewish string-pulling exerted on our rulers and on the election process. The crucial thing is not the leftification of the Zeitgeist through Jewish control of the media and other institutions. Even though the crucial thing is control of government by string-pullers, control of the media is also useful to disrupt and prevent communication, to prevent a White rebellion, to decide who gets elected, and to give the impression that the government is responding to public opinion. In the same way that Jews are involved both in right wing and left wing political parties, they are involved both in government and in the media, with the effect of creating a system of phony opposition. I think we spend too much time blaming leftism, Christianity, and the psychology of the lemmings. We already know that many White people have a predisposition for loony impractical idealism. There is also a problem with conformism, as Jewish media propaganda tends to be wrongly perceived by White people as peer pressure by other Whites. But our psychological defects do not explain where the government’s anti-White ideology comes from. In spite of the heavy propaganda, most people are still against immigration. The government simply ignores them. That’s why we need to study how dictatorship works. We need to understand better how a small number of people are able to hold a whole nation prisoner. The USSR was an example of this. In the final years, no one in the Soviet Union believed in communism any longer, but for some reason, the regime still remained in place. Unlike Fjordman, I don’t think that ‘our elites’ generally believe in the necessity of race-remplacement. I think the problem comes only from a small minority of Jewish string-pullers. It should be all the more easy to break their power. We need to investigate what’s going on behind the scenes. We need to see who is most active in inner political circles, where the money comes from, how Jews get together to appoint their own people, how Jewish anti-white organizations are financed with public money, and so on. I think most of the information is available, but we need to spread the news and express outrage. We also need to start protesting against the over-representation of Jews in key institutions. People already know about that, but they are afraid to protest. It’s based on fear, as Fjordman says. Even people on our side will argue that the problem of Jewish activism is well known, but is not crucial. They are more comfortable arguing that there is something wrong with white people, and with leftism. 62
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 11, 2010, 11:42 AM | # Yet another outstanding comment by Armor. 63
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 17, 2010, 07:20 AM | # From the Vindicated at last! department: For those opponents of race-replacement who squirm in their seats with feelings of embarrassment, anger, and outrage when they hear fellow WNs mention the Jewish role in inflicting multiculti on relatively Jew-sparse Europe (“God, can’t the anti-Semites just shut up? They’re embarrassing us, giving us a bad name, and ruining our WN movement! Jews certainly have NOTHING to do with what’s going on with multiculturalism in Europe! It’s entirely Europeans doing it to themselves!”) — for those Ian Jobling/Dan Dare/CvH/A Finn/Friedrich Braun WN types here’s a video of a Jewish woman spilling the beans: http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=3372 . Gee, the way she implicates the Jews in attempted genocide, do ya think the Swedish Thought Police will crack down on her for hate speech? Any bets on that? Now mind you, this woman “made Aliyah” from the USA to Israel before traveling to Sweden to race-replace it: she wanted to live in a Jewish country, not in the US. But she doesn’t want Swedes to live in a Swedish country. Everyone got that? It’s important, so take a minute if you haven’t grokked that part yet. And once you’ve grokked it, try to control yourself from posting a comment calling her every vile, filthy, disgusting name you can think of (not that she doesn’t deserve it). 64
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 17, 2010, 07:22 AM | # You really have to wonder what Lawrence Auster would say in response to this video. 65
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 17, 2010, 07:33 AM | # Also, do you notice the exaggeratedly “nice, sugary-sweet” manner this witch affects when telling her plans for Europe’s genocide? That’s because she knows she’s putting forth a plan for genocide and is trying her best to sugar-coat it. She’s a woman who made Aliyah from the States, a woman who lives in Israel, who’s presumably found her Shangri-La, yet she still can’t control her Jewish instincts to pursue and exterminate people of European race wherever in the world they live. So, as I’ve said elsewhere, the advent of the State of Israel has not resulted in resolution of the Jewish Problem, which it was supposed to do in the minds of the men like Theodore Herzl and Chaim Weizmann who first dreamed it. That problem is with us as acutely as ever, if not more acutely. The Jews have their Israel. But even the ones who have moved there and gotten away from us are not happy: they’re still going to pursue us from their new home in Israel and try to wipe us out. 66
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 17, 2010, 08:34 AM | # “But what about the Swedes who invited her?” What about the Jews founding, funding, and running whatever NGO was responsible for launching the insane initiative? What about the Jews in the U.S. State Department who ally with such NGOs by among other things exerting pressures both gentle and not so gentle on other countries to facilitate this sort of multiculti insanity? “OK but what about the Swedes who go along with it? Is somebody holding a gun to their head?” They’re the same nutcases who’ve always existed in society and been relegated to the background by the normals. Who’s puffing them up now and pushing them to prominence to their delight and society’s downfall? Three guesses. 67
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 17, 2010, 08:39 AM | # “Also, do you notice the exaggeratedly ‘nice, sugary-sweet’ manner this witch affects?” (—my comment) Similarly to another Jewish race-replacement advocate, Tamar Jacoby. 68
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 17, 2010, 10:58 AM | # From the What in the god damn hell is going on? department: Michael O’Meara offers a few partial explanations:
69
Posted by Armor on September 17, 2010, 11:06 AM | #
In countries other than Sweden, over-sensitive WNs do not necessarily contest that Jews play a part. But they think it is bad taste to mention the problem, except if it can be proven that Jewish anti-white activism is the sole explanation. If Jewish anti-white activism is only 90% of the problem, then nothing should be done about it. For example, nothing should be done about the huge Jewish over-representation of Jews in the media. Over-sensitive WNs are like failed conservatives: they like to compromise.
I ask myself the same question about WNs who refuse to blame Jewish activism. There is something wrong with them in the same way that there is something wrong with most people who disapprove of race-replacement, but do nothing about it. 70
Posted by Notus Wind on September 17, 2010, 12:13 PM | # Scrooby, Thank you for pointing out the O’Meara article. 71
Posted by Rusty on September 17, 2010, 01:21 PM | # Armor and Fred, I share your frustration.
The modifier “failed” here might be redundant. For, conservatives are always ready to compromise; it’s one of their defining characteristics. This decade’s dogma is tomorrow’s revelation, and they will not even remember what they used to believe or how they have changed. Conservatives can only feel their way backward and have no vision looking forward. They are the sheep whom Jesus talks about. Fortunately, enough will know a truly good thing when it comes along. And if Palin and Beck can grab this large of an audience, think of what a true patriot, a real man, could do. 72
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 17, 2010, 07:06 PM | # As I post this there are 119 comments underneath that video of that unspeakable Jewish woman, and it’s very gratifying to see almost none of the commenters is fooled by multiculturalism or by individuals like that terrifying woman. Essentially all the commenters understand the simple and by now obvious truth that the goal of the multiculturalism currently being forced on them is their own genocide, genocide backed to the hilt by certain organized groups: http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments=1&v=w_a-25MhRuk . The commenters all seem to understand that. Very gratifying comments thread. 73
Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 18, 2010, 11:03 AM | # RACE DOES NOT EXIST:
[ http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/07/06/race-does-not-exist/ ; hat tip: http://accidentaldissent.wordpress.com/2010/07/06/social-construct-riot/ ] 74
Posted by Drifter on May 17, 2011, 09:49 PM | # Hunter’s latest blog series at OD is worth reviewing for all of the documentation collected on race based wealth redistribution and violent crime inflicted against European Americans as a group. 75
Posted by Nationality: Swedish. on September 26, 2011, 05:40 PM | # All this debatting, it has been talked about for many years now. Nothing happens, the same old “We must take action before its to late”. Well I can understand that, making a change isn’t something you do with a hand turn. Charasmatic organizers are needed, but at the moment it seems like most of the politicans, newspapers and the media is controlled by fucking socialists who I would love nothing more but to watch >someone< slit their throats. Anything started with a bullet can be ended with a bullet. The question is, when will we have the balls to do it? 76
Posted by Nikki on October 21, 2011, 01:17 PM | # Why are white people always frightful of the most stupid things. 77
Posted by Horatio on December 08, 2011, 01:37 AM | # Can you eleborate Nikki? are you saying White genocide is something White People shouldn’t be concerned with? Are you an evil non-White who revels in the fact that White people are only 8-9% of the world’s population and are forced to accept a global herd of the other 92% of the world’s people, while all the other races of people get to keep their more or less homogenous nations? all the other races are allowed to preserve their countries for their own children, while White children won’t have one place on earth to call their own. Or are you a self-hating tratorious White anti-White? Which non-White populations do you INSIST ‘mix’ and ‘blend’ out of existence in their own countries? Or are you ONLY Anti-White? It’s b/c of stupid, apathetic people like YOU why things that can be resolved without violence turn into very violent wars; because your world view is limited to your own thick fucking head. 78
Posted by Horatio on December 08, 2011, 02:09 AM | # I had no idea there were WN’s who were “over-sensitive” to implicating Jews who are guilty of the crime of White genocide, and “over-senstive” at pointing out the grossly disproportionate responsibility of Jews. The last thing a Pro-White should be is Politically Correct, LOL. However, before anyone can be brought to tribunal, the point of White genocide must be engraved into an ever larger number of people’s skulls. One way, just one way of doing it is entering forums and exposing anti-Whites and their genocidal intent to the audience/the public. I believe concentrating on the point (the obvious truth) of White genocide is more effective than obsessing about Jews, news, crime and IQ’s. Once the point of White genocide, the truth, is justly shoved down the throat of the MSM, the governments, the schools, etc, all the pieces will fall into place, and history will have been turned on its head, again. And this time, the anti-Whites will be buried, FOREVER. Next entry: Declining marginal returns on investments in complexity: the thermodynamics of Olduvai Previous entry: Sarrazin does it again |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view) MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view) Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 25, 2010, 07:19 AM | #
Landmark article. Of course we at MR have been saying all of that since October 2004, every single word of it, but better late than never. Welcome aboard, Christian Miller!