Neocons and Islamofascism.

Posted by Al Ross on October 29, 2007, 10:03 PM | #

“Enron is not the only disaster that we can trace to failed decision making”.

At the root of Enron’s problem was the appointment of the crooked Jew, Andrew Fastow, as Chief Financial Officer. Fastow’s financial legerdemain involved the setting up of offshore, off-the-books partnerships within which Enron’s true and parlous financial condition could be hidden from investors. Such “innovations” are unlikely to emanate from the ‘unimaginative’ but honest and worthy world of Scottish accountancy of which I possess some knowledge.

Posted by Desmond Jones on October 29, 2007, 11:37 PM | #

Looking at Islam through the eyes of evolution, it seems to me that terrorists are driven by a combination of fear, humiliation, and sexual angst when they encounter the progressiveness found in the West.

It’s also difficult to overlook the racial aspect of the attacks.

“The victims (of 9/11) were overwhelmingly male (about 75 percent), young (many under 40, most under 50), and white (about 75 percent). Only about eight percent were black, nine percent Hispanic, and about six percent Asian.”

70% of the victims in the UK bombing were white.

“Target any white person: the chilling guidelines for Bali suicide bombers”

The targeting of yong white girls for prostitution in th UK.

“It was a very uncomfortable scenario, not least because many of these crimes had an identifiable racial element: the gangs were Asian and the girls were white.”

The Paris riots:

“On March 8, tens of thousands of high school students marched through central Paris to protest education reforms announced by the government. Repeatedly, peaceful demonstrators were attacked by bands of black and Arab youths—about 1,000 in all, according to police estimates.”

“Some of the attackers openly expressed their hatred of ‘little French people.’ One 18-year-old named Heikel, a dual citizen of France and Tunisia, was proud of his actions. He explained that he had joined in just to ‘beat people up,’ especially ‘little Frenchmen who look like victims.’ He added with a satisfied smile that he had ‘a pleasant memory’ of repeatedly kicking a student, already defenseless on the ground.”

Nice, huh?

“Rachid, an Arab attacker, added that even an Arab can be considered a ‘little white’ if he ‘has a French mindset.’ The general sentiment was a desire to ‘take revenge on whites.’”

“One black student he saw come to the defense of a fellow student under attack by three blacks was called ‘a white sellout’ by the assailants.”

The Lebanese assault at Cronulla Beach:

“The initial spark was the bashing of three lifesavers at Cronulla beach by a gang of approx 20 Lebanese Muslim men - it was really the straw that broke the camels back. These gangs have been a problem in many Sydney suburbs over the last 10yrs but Cronulla in particular because of the attraction of the beach and bikini clad girls…Lebanese Muslims have committed many racially motivated attacks on local youths as well as youths in many other suburbs. They first enquire ‘are you Aussie?’ What follows is a savage assault with weapons such as bats, knives, nail studded bats etc. Australians have been murdered for no other reason than that they are Anglo-Saxon looking in appearance.”

Ditto for Sweden:

“An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are “asking for rape.” Apparently, he’s not the only one thinking this way. “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably fucked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get fucked to pieces.”

Posted by 2R on October 30, 2007, 12:07 AM | #

The Jews know they only have about 10-15 years before the United States is too unstable to be depended on for foreign policy usury.  This mission is crucial, they need to break up the nations and peoples in the middle east who have Alliance forming capabilities and/or desires.  Just think about Iraq?  Its much safer for Israel if Iraq is a factionalized mess, than if it were one nation under Saddam.  This way, the Jews can arm one side and when they get too powerful, arm the other side.  Division is to Jews, what tank warfare was to the Nazis. 

Podhoretz is nothing but a spokesman for Jewish supremacy.  Again, the Jews are desperate to take out Iran and split it up before the US becomes too unstable.  If you listen to him speak, you can tell he has a difficult time pretending that he cares about the interests of the United States. 

Once Iran is taken out, and once Syria is smashed, the Jews will breath easy for awhile.  They’ll wait out the next 10-15 years and start moving their assets out of the US.  Once the US is too unstable and the general condition of the World is deteriorating, the Jews will have a green light to really start their ethnic cleansing campaign on the Arabs.  Since there will be no “world opinion” no one will care what the Jews do.  The liberals in the West will be begging White Nationalists to do something about their one time colored pets, and Europe will be in a fight for its life with the Muslims. 

In fact, don’t be surprised if at the same time the Jews are killing Muslims in the Middle East, they’re funding Muslims in Europe to kill Europeans.  The Globalist elite will also started funding a mestizo insurgency from South America.  The Hugo Chavez, Morales, and Castro leftest type revolutionaries will be calling for total extermination of the Negro’s and White males in the Americas(White women will be spared for some reason?). 

So the Jews are in a big hurry.

Posted by Matra on October 30, 2007, 12:37 PM | #

Speaking of neocons and ‘Islamofascism’ the big story in the blogosphere this past week has been the decision of Charles Johnson (possibly the most anti-anti-semitic man alive) to purge the ranks of the anti-Islam movement of European nationalists, particluarly those associated with Vlaams Belang as the party is tainted for, among other things, not going along with a cynical EU resolution on the holocaust that would be used to clamp down further on free speech. Johnson’s popular blog Little Green Footballs has also been culling its ranks of posters who bring up the D word: deportations. It’s even cut its links to moderate sites like Gates of Vienna. (I often wondered how the neocon universalists felt about being somewhat associated with Fjordman.)

Paul Belien of Vlaams Belang and Brussels Journal explains it here.
Given the pro-US/Israel line the VB have been pushing - no doubt to obtain respectable American and Jewish support in their bitter battle with the Belgian left - the below comment by Belien about a stay with a Jewish American is interesting:

some Americans realize that Europe is in for a disaster but seem to think that it is only getting what it deserves. Europe has to be destroyed by the Muslims as a punishment for the Nazis’ crimes during WWII. Last year, I was invited to speak about the situation in Europe at one of America’s major universities. For two days my host subjected me to the most terrible accusations. He told me I would have to suffer for what my ancestors had done to his ancestors. “One cannot respect the Europeans,” he said. “America should have nuked Europe during WWII instead of Japan. If ever things turn nasty in Europe I will make sure that neither you nor any white European will be allowed to seek shelter in the US. I would rather invite the Muslims in than you and your lot, because one can respect Muslims but not Europeans.” Since my host was Jewish and had lost his family in the war I could understand his anger, but not his short-sightedness. I think he did not mean all he said, though it was an upsetting experience and one of the most unpleasant moments in my life.

I think what Charles Johnson and other neocons are doing is purging the anti-Islam movement of European nationalists in order to have total control of the issue. Too many anti-Islam bloggers and politicians have been talking about repatriations and other non-liberal ways of dealing with the Muslims in particular, but also foreigners in general. It must be particularly worrying for neocons to read many of their allies saying that the real battle is in Europe not Iraq or anywhere else in the Middle East.

Another reason for the purge is to neutralise criticism that neocons are engaging in bigotry and to safeguard their own respectability. The pro-Muslim blog LGF Watch and a few other critics of Johnson have given limited praise to him for getting rid of ‘racists’. This is reminiscent of neocons leading the charge against Trent Lott and getting lots of pats on the back from liberals who in future would not be able to accuse them of bigotry.

I understand the desire of VB to gain US support and respectability. I witnessed Northern Ireland politicians doing this all the time: anti-feminst conservative Catholics trying to appeal to Massachusetts liberals by emphasising the civil rights and anti-imperial aspects of their struggle whilst leaving out the traditional Catholicism bit; radical secular leftist Sinn Feiners appealing to the Catholicism of Irish Americans; Unionists who didn’t give a damn about the Cold War pretending they were on NATO’s side, unlike those neutral Catholics. It is an understandable tactic for small movements outside of the European mainstream like VB. But I hope they are learning that the Americans are not to be relied on. Ultimately the neocon Americans are as Europhobic as they are Islamophobic. What the Charles Johnsons of America want is a race-neutral movement that takes on Islam but leaves out all the other groups who are threats to the West. European rightists need to take advantage of anti-Muslim sentiment without falling into this neocon trap.

Posted by Desmond Jones on October 30, 2007, 02:54 PM | #

Another reason for the purge is to neutralise criticism that neocons are engaging in bigotry and to safeguard their own respectability.

Based on the reception neocon David Horowitz received, it doesn’t seem to be working too well.

On Wednesday evening, the Emory University Chapter of the College Republicans hosted acclaimed author and activist David Horowitz for a lecture on radical Islam as part of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week. From the beginning of Horowitz’s speech, rowdy protesters continually interrupted him and less than half an hour into the event, the crowd became so disruptive that police were called in and Horowitz had to be escorted off stage.

Over 300 people – a cross-section of students, professors, and Atlanta community members – packed into White Hall where the event was held. The audience included a wide range of Leftists from Amnesty International, Veterans for Peace, and Students for Justice in Palestine, as well as Muslim groups such as the Muslim Student Association. In addition, members of “National Project to Defend Dissent & Critical Thinking in Academia,” an organization dedicated to opposing Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week events throughout the country, participated in the protests dressed in orange attire as a reference to Guantanamo Bay. There was also a sizable group of men and women dressed in traditional Muslim garb as well as students wearing Kafiyehs, a symbol of Arab solidarity.

“I’ve spoken at Emory University several times and I’ve never seen it this bad,” said Horowitz responding to the crowd as they shouted and jeered. “This is exactly what the fascists did in Germany in the 1930s.”

Posted by Duncan Tyyne on October 30, 2007, 04:11 PM | #

“This is exactly what the fascists did in Germany in the 1930s,” says Horowitz.

Horowitz’s communist ilk did it to the National Socialists (called “fascists” by Horowitz here, presumably to semantically connect them to his “Islamofascists”) earlier on, in the 1920s.  Wasn’t the SA formed to stop Hitler’s speeches from being broken up by violent communists?

Posted by Duncan Tyyne on October 30, 2007, 04:29 PM | #

2R:

The Jews know they only have about 10-15 years before the United States is too unstable to be depended on for foreign policy usury.

I had conversations with people who I’d call quasi-neocons about the US military machine.  While objecting to the Iraq war, all of them claim that it is not only necessary but good that we have bases in over a hundred countries; that we are totally unstoppable and can defeat any combination of other powers; and that our military power is seemingly eternal.  I’ve even heard it said that it doesn’t matter that our government borrows so much money because we could annhilate any lender who tries to make us pay up (never mind where the money will come from afterwards).

2R, as a former military man, why do you think we will only be of use to the likes of Podhoretz for another 10-15 years?  Not that I doubt that, but what would you say to a skeptic, or one of the above mentioned quasi-neocons?

Posted by Svigor on October 30, 2007, 05:15 PM | #

Had any MR regular (or the like) been in charge of immigration policy prior to 9/11, there would’ve been no attack.

What else is there to say?

The deaths and financial losses from 9/11 are just one more cost of “diversity” and “tolerance.”

Posted by Svigor on October 30, 2007, 05:30 PM | #

some Americans realize that Europe is in for a disaster but seem to think that it is only getting what it deserves. Europe has to be destroyed by the Muslims as a punishment for the Nazis’ crimes during WWII. Last year, I was invited to speak about the situation in Europe at one of America’s major universities. For two days my host subjected me to the most terrible accusations. He told me I would have to suffer for what my ancestors had done to his ancestors. “One cannot respect the Europeans,” he said. “America should have nuked Europe during WWII instead of Japan. If ever things turn nasty in Europe I will make sure that neither you nor any white European will be allowed to seek shelter in the US. I would rather invite the Muslims in than you and your lot, because one can respect Muslims but not Europeans.” Since my host was Jewish and had lost his family in the war I could understand his anger, but not his short-sightedness. I think he did not mean all he said, though it was an upsetting experience and one of the most unpleasant moments in my life.

This is the kind of jew who sees everything through a jewish lens (A.K.A., Judaism) to such an extent that he hates G-d for what he’s done to the jews.

LOL.  He’s exceptional only in degree - not kind.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 30, 2007, 06:46 PM | #

I posted a thread-starter on Charles Johnson the day before yesterday over at the Occidental Dissent Forum.  This individual is a piece of excrement whose blog has never made a single contribution to the Eurosphere’s preservation.  He can take his blog and flush it down the toilet where it belongs and himself along with it.

As for the attitude of Euro-hatred revealed by Paul Belien’s Jewish host, I’m sorry to say that attitude not only isn’t exceptional, it prevails among more than half of U.S. Jews.  As for what that portends for Euro-Jewish relations, draw your own conclusions.

Look, basically what’s going on is the Jews began coming out of the world of the eastern-European Jewish “Städtl” (“shtetl” = Jewish towns and villages in Poland, the Russian Empire, and elsewhere in Eastern Europe) in large numbers between the French Revolution and 1800, this movement accelerated thereafter, they began being granted equal citizenship rights by the Euro countries, and they insisted they’d make good citizens.  They’ve had two centuries in which to demonstrate what good citizens they’d make and although there are many very good things about having Jewish citizens in Euro countries the two-century-long experiment hasn’t worked out finally, because no contribution by the Jews to Euro society can make up for the many ways in which they set about inflicting harm on those societies, even mortal harm.  The gigantic experiment therefore hasn’t worked out as everyone had hoped:  the Jews loathe Euros, loathe the Euro religion, culture, and nations, loathe them all with a passion, a fury, in fact a genocidal fury, and when they are able to harm them they do so.  That college professor who said those things to Paul Belien claimed he hated Euros for the Holocaust, but before the Holocaust the Jews hated Euros for something else, and before that something else still, all the way back to when they first came out of the Pale of Settlement in large numbers and even then they hated them, and in fact hated them all the way back as far as Euros stretch, as seen in the Talmud and copious other records reaching back to before the time of Jesus Christ.  So the experiment has failed, and we see that Jews and Euros finally can’t get along with each other, and it’s time for separate countries for them.  Let the Jews take part of the United States, for example, let Euros take part, and let each stay out of the other’s part.  Since the Jews love living among Third Worlders so much, and abhor living among whites, let them take California:  they’ve ruined it for Euros now, made it into a Third-World hell hole just the way Jews like, so give it to them.  With all those Mexes around they’ll think they’ve died and gone to Jewish Multiculti Heaven.  But be sure they stay the hell out of the part reserved for Euros or they’ll turn that into another Third World hell hole quicker than you can say Rabbi Marvin Hier.  They can’t control themselves:  nation-destruction is in their genes.

Posted by 2R on October 30, 2007, 08:20 PM | #

“2R, as a former military man, why do you think we will only be of use to the likes of Podhoretz for another 10-15 years?  Not that I doubt that, but what would you say to a skeptic, or one of the above mentioned quasi-neocons? “

As much as I hate the idea of non-whites filling up our government apparatus, the one thing I will admit is they’re much less likely to support unlimited war.  Now this isn’t because they’re against imperialism or anti-violence, they just don’t like the idea of public monies going to fund wars they see as “White.”  They would much rather see this money go to social programs. 

If they do call for war or lateral pressure by the military, its more likely to go towards “Peace keeping” operation in Africa.  This suits the transnational corporations, but doesn’t really matter to the Jews.  In fact, after the American and British Goy are done fighting wars in the Middle East, any war after will be an opportunity for the Jews to focus on using war for anti-war activities within the United States.  They did this in Vietnam.  When the country is in an unpopular war, the Jews can utilize the unhappiness in the country for revolutionary activities. 

In 10-15 years the Jews will stir up the non-whites in the same way they stirred up the populous against the ruling, more “European” Russian population.  Many people don’t realize that years before the Judo-Bolshevik revolution, that Russian culture was demonized in the same way as we see European culture dominated in America today.  This is why they’re filling the ranks with non-whites in the military.  They’re especially trying to fill it with mestizo’s by promising citizenship.  The idea is to remove Whites from places of power and to take any forms of capital away from them.  This way Whites will be dependant on the system for life’s necessities and any whites who make trouble will have less they can resist with.  This is when they can start pulling Whites out of their homes and killing them.

At the same time, we’re seeing Whites becoming more unhappy with the situation.  The same way an economic price curve works, as does multiculturalism.  As the price of goods goes up, the demand goes down.  As the amount of non-Whites goes up, the tolerance for them goes down.  So the power structure has to time their assault on Whites at the right time.  If they wait to long, Whites will be totally pissed off and will be too dangerous.  They can’t do it too soon, because there’s still a large amount of Whites in key positions.  They need the current generation of Whites to retire or die and they need more non-Whites to enter the country.  Today we’re seeing the fist “baby-boomers” start to retire.  The BB were the last generation to see a healthy White country.  The BB also own a lot of assets.  Before any assault can come on Whites, the BB must either die or be too old to make any trouble.

The global elite must also wait for China’s and India’s military power to grow.  These countries will take over from the US and Britain for the role of “Global Policeman.”  The global elite will then use these countries to spread their markets and we’re seeing the beginning of this in Africa.  The Chinese also own a lot of America assets.  If the US is unable to pay its debts, the U.S. is going to have to give over property.  This property will come from the Midwest where banks have taken over many of the once family owned farms.  These families lost many of these farms during 80’s when bankers gave them a screwing.  Incidentally, it was during the 80’s where we saw the rise of the militia movement in the US.  Many have credited the loss of the family farm with the rise of the militia movement. 

So all these considerations- the passing of the baby boomers, the rise of China’s military, the demographic transition of the US, the neutralizing of Israel’s enemies, and the removal of Whites from positions of power- all seem to merge in about 15 years.  It may be closer to twenty but by ten years we’ll definitely see the disarming of the country, “hate-speech laws”, the censoring of Internet, and total removal of White cultural icons. 

It will here when the assault will come.  And if successful, this is will be North Americas future:

The US will no longer be needed for anything except for large markets.  The US and Canada will look like one big Brazil, with 2% of the population living in gated communities and the rest living in decaying cities.  This race of brown sludge will be a cultureless mass of big-box store consumers.  Products will be designed in East Asia, Mass produced in either Southeast Asia or Africa, and consumed in North America.  North America will be one big homogenized market.  The cost of market research will zero as everyone will the same.  To keep this sludge of people in line, they’ll be a bureaucracy that will make the USSR look like the Von Mises institute.  The government will take care of everything except material consumption.  The elite will hold all the assets, so you’ll here no complaints of “big government” as we do today.  The elite realized that capitalism works much better than communism because at least under capitalism the people can have Britney Spears CD’s.  Any White people left, will live a life of hell except for young White girls who will used as pets for the elite.  Evey year the news will announce the lessening of the White populace in a celebratory fashion.  White children will be taught in school that they are a living walking disease and that since they’re all white, their parents were racists.  The same thing will happen in Europe. 

My question is:  Will the White men of the West stop this from happening, or will they watch “Redneck” television on comedy central instead?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 30, 2007, 09:20 PM | #

I fully agree with 2R’s post above that those are most definitely the plans, give or take a few details 2R may have outlined only imperfectly.  There are also lots of details 2R didn’t get into but by and large that’s the plan, the blueprint, the other side is following and has been since, I’d say, the early 1930s and in the case of the Jews even earlier.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 30, 2007, 09:30 PM | #

The central thing that has to be understood is that the white races are being replaced with non-whites deliberately and aggressively all across the Eurosphere, worst of all in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., France, Holland, and Belgium.  The key words there are deliberately and aggressively.  This has been planned and is being forced.  Someone is following a plan to get rid of the white races as organic top-to-bottom wholes, leaving perhaps dissociated remnants but destroying the organic top-to-bottom multilayered wholes.  Who is doing it and why?  Ask yourselves that.  That it’s happening is very, very, very simple and very, very, very obvious.

Posted by 2R on October 30, 2007, 09:35 PM | #

“There are also lots of details 2R didn’t get into but by and large that’s the plan,”

Yes, I could of went on but everyone here gets the idea.  And it is coming fast.  In fact, I insist that you read this story here:

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2007/10/press_release_u_1.php

I warn you though, don’t read it if you’re already having a bad day.

Posted by 2R on October 30, 2007, 10:27 PM | #

I just read over my post and seen a lot of spelling and grammatical mistakes.  Please realize I rushed through this.  If anyone misunderstands any of it, feel free to ask.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 30, 2007, 10:42 PM | #

I had no trouble understanding any of it, 2R.  It was fine.

On the subject of “outside reading,” here’s a piece worth reading through once, although it’s very uneven in quality, some parts quite bad, others quite good.  This man who wrote this, while confused, has many sound instincts and sees some truths clearly (not others, unfortunately).

Posted by 2R on October 31, 2007, 12:44 AM | #

Fred Scrooby, I read the piece and feel more positive feelings about it than I do negative.  Its too bad the current European and American elite don’t have the ability to think.  Political parties like the VB and BNP in Europe, and people like Kevin MacDonald or Jarad Taylor in America are very rational people.  By marginalizing them, all they’re doing is making it more likely that the not-so-rational people will have the opportunity for legitimacy in the future.  If anything, what we’re at least asking for is a spot in the debate.  However, we can see that even people like Nick Griffin are “unacceptable” to the current power structure.

What will happen when the guilt of the mindless masses turns to rage?  What happens when the average White man doesn’t care if he’s called a “Nazi” anymore?  This whole multicultural experiment is built on the hope that people will remain content while in misery.  How foolish an idea.  The people who the elites call “Nazis” today will be the moderates of tomorrow.  I’m not saying this to display any bravado but these people are really going to be sorry.

The more I watch these people the more I realize that they truly can’t help how they behave.  How can a people not learn after at least 2000 years of experiences?  The answer must be that they’re genetically predisposed to behaving this way.  If its not this, then maybe these people are setting the greatest trap in the history of the world on us.  Because White people are getting sick of this.  And the disturbing thing about it all, is it could have been avoided if we, and others like us, were allowed join the debate. 

All we want to do is examine this idea of “diversity” like any other idea.  How many hours of cspan are dedicated to questions of Capitalism or Democracy?  Anyone can go on TV and bash capitalism and the elite agree “its good that we live in a country that allows open debate.”  But there can be no debate about Multiculturalism.  This is why I know there’s going to be a very ugly outcome from all of this.

Posted by Amalek on October 31, 2007, 12:44 PM | #

The term “Islamofascism” is often credited to Christopher Hitchens, just when he supposedly discovered (hallelujah!) he was a half-Heeb. Hitch then and began his long, familiar, wearisome plod from left wing student-Trot bore to neocon, armchair-warrior, drunk old sellout bore.

Whatever its provenance, the hyphenate coinage is manifestly Straussian in its barely concealed eagernness to alarm and misinform the booboisie, so they are more pliable by their new unhappy lords. For some reason “fascism”, possibly because it makes a more satisfying sound when hissed, has been preferred to “Nazi” among the paranoiacrats.

The term has the secondary object, like most Zionist scaremongering cliches, of enforcing solidarity on the Tribe itself. The constant refrain, “it’s still 1938, for ever and ever!” is the last resort of scoundrels who seek to terrify Jews into huddling together under the wise Straussian elite’s aegis. Don’t argue among yourselves in public, it’s “bad for the Jews”—talk in unison on message, or at least keep schtum.

Beware of betraying internal dissent and individualism in front of those perennially genocidal Evil Whites whom you can never take your eye off for a moment, now extended to include 1.2bn Evil Brown Swarthy ones too. When you’re running a protection racket, you can never afford to let the marks relax for a moment. After all, “anrisemitism” is the Oldest Hatred, why shouldn’t it be the Widest as well?

Anything to keep those contributions flowing in to Messrs Bronfman, Foxman, Dees, the AIPAC folks, etc. (It works best if the Tribe has been culled and cultivated for groupthink over several generations, with “self haters” and “shondas to your race” carefully frozen out.)

But the old black magic seems to be wearing out. You can only cry Adolf so many times, without anything happening except further accessions to wealth, power and security, and not seem ridiculous. Even among your own people. As the flourished refuge of Israel displays a less and less attractive face to younger Jews—most would not dream of moving there and many do not even want to visit—reconstructing a Jewish identity on negatives such as eternal victimhood and self-pity, in place of expiring positives such as religious observance and the natural community of shtetl and ghetto, becomes difficult. Whipping up fears of pogroms, with the Judenstaat as the one safe haven, is a lame strategy, like a carbon paper wearing out from too many copies.

Pope Poddy is not only an angry and spiteful man but a very, very old one: what has he got for an encore? Even the announcement that his klutzy son John had been consecrated as next editor of the Poddys’ house mag. Commentary, was greeted with unhallowed mirth, and not only among goyim. Other elements of the ZOG structure of power and influence appear to be similarly, if spasmodically,  waning.

They can still get Finkelstein the sack and procure instant obsequiousness from Mel Gibson and Halle Berry, but the books by Carter and by Mearsheimer and Walt are quite freely and calmly discussed; the AIPAC spy trial is upcoming in a presidential election year; and Ron Paul has injected a morsel of ME policy realism into the debate. Incidentally, although Bush Jr, no less, once called his enemies “Islamic fascists” in a speech, it got the bird so loudly that henceforth he left that vapidity to the putzes of punditry, the Horowitzes and Cal Thomases and suchlike intellectual pondweed.

Straws in the wind? Ripple in the stream? Rather more, I fancy.

Posted by Robert Reis on November 01, 2007, 12:07 AM | #

Thanks for article and thread.
RER