My Message To Obama’s Transition Team

President Elect Barack Obama wants to run a Web 2.0 collaborative government. The transition team has a website up soliciting input from citizens. OK. I’m a citizen. Here’s my submitted input:

To immediately fix the economic crisis while solving the longer term problems with entitlements and medical care, call up Charles Murray of the American Enterprise Institute and ask him to construct legislative language implementing his plan as described in “In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Wefare State”. Murray’s credentials guarantee very little Republican opposition if the Obama administration advances the idea.

Pres. Elect Obama says he wants ideas that will work and he’s not prejudiced by their source. This is his chance to prove he’s serious.

Murray has proposed $10,000/year in monthly direct-deposit payments to every US citizen age 21 or older, possibly with $3000 of that withheld for health insurance.

For reasons I’ve previously outlined I don’t believe he is serious enough to legislate a citizen’s dividend:

The closest we are likely to come to stability is if Obama is elected and imposes a net asset tax. But this will merely trade private sector rent-seeking for public sector rent-seeking as there is no way Obama will let working whites have any of their patrimony back without walking hat-in-hand into their local government offices and/or precinct political meetings to genuflect appropriately. Even then it will be very grudging and selectively doled out only to the most obsequious and “non threatening” of whites—which immediately disqualifies almost all working whites who don’t have biracial children.

I hope he proves me wrong about his supposed seriousness as a leader of a mutiracial society. If he does implement something like Murray’s equivalent to a citizen’s dividend, not only will it expose immigration as the dilution of carrying capacity that it is, it will let lower income Euroams, including young people, migrate much more freely. For many will this will mean flight from diversity or what I’ve called “assortative migration”. Even though this is handicapped assortation—since there will be others who will pursue Euroams (particularly young Euroam women) wherever they flee—the existence of true freedom to migrate will make obvious the most fundamental human right of all—freedom of association—is directly attacked by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.

Posted by James Bowery on Friday, November 21, 2008 at 03:51 PM in
Comments (7) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Andrew on November 23, 2008, 02:49 AM | #

The One finger salute will all that is necessary JB , very explanatory – non ambiguous and strait to the point.
Talking sense will not get through to them .
I honestly think this is the nail in the coffin , Now America has fallen . The Free World has ended.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 05, 2008, 10:08 PM | #

Jobling pens a surprisingly strong editorial on the meaning of the Obama election.

http://inverted-world.com/index.php/articles/articles/the_meaning_of_the_obama_election/

Posted by Pshaw on December 06, 2008, 01:36 PM | #

Strong?

Ian Jobling’s solution to Obama’ election is more faith-based Internet chat. His prescription is weak.

In the face of the seemingly insurmountable it is better to act on the basis that the Sun has arisen a trillion times than to hope it will somehow arise tomorrow.

On this continent alone many tens of millions are ready for our message. Caesar would take the message to them.

Are we Caesars or software engineers?

Posted by James Bowery on December 06, 2008, 02:25 PM | #

Are we Patricians, as was Caesar? Would we want to be Caesars if we were?

Posted by Pshaw on December 06, 2008, 03:59 PM | #

Are we Patricians, as was Caesar?

No. It seems we are software engineers…

Would we want to be Caesars if we were?

... aspiring to patrician status but strapped with a plebian attitude toward success.

Plebes and patricians hope, look for easy recognition. Caesar made his luck.

It is, indeed, a moral problem.

Posted by Captainchaos on December 06, 2008, 06:14 PM | #

Pshaw: “Caesar made his luck.”

I guess in the lingo of the street we should aspire to be “ballers” and “shot-callers” and not “bottom bitchez”.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 07, 2009, 11:42 PM | #

During the presidential election campaign I thought The Magic Negro and Juan McCriminallyinsane were equally bad on the Genocide of Whites plank of their respective parties: I thought they’d push extermination of whites equally, so in that regard it made no difference which one was elected.

I was wrong: it appears the organized carne mysterioso hispanico groups (“Hispanic mystery meat”) are now dissatisfied with Magic because they see him as dragging his feet on making sure white genocide gets accelerated. McCriminallyinsane watches all this sullenly from the sidelines of power, letting everybody understand that, had he won instead of the H. sapiens sapiens - H. erectus interspecies hybrid, he’d have given Genocide of Whites the top priority it deserves.

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/04/07/yosemite-sam-mccain-blows-his-stack-at-hispanics/

Obama is better for whites than Anus McHeinous would have been. Can it be believed? It beggars belief! But it’s true.

Next entry: The Wall Street Bailout Could Have Been a Consumer Jubilee (Within Measurement Error)

Previous entry: letter from finland

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa