More on politically correct policing in Australia

This open letter, from an anonymous police officer, was being distributed to locals in Cronulla yesterday

I am a NSW police officer with more than 17 years’ experience and I tell you that I am scared.  I am scared to do my job and I don’t blame the community for taking the law into their own hands.

In the late ‘80s when I first joined the police force, I saw how the old school police did things. I agree there was corruption and things had to change, but what the Government, judicial system and ultimately society did to the police force was just disgraceful.  In days gone by, if there was a group of hoodlums hanging around intimidating people outside a pub, two 6’2” burly coppers would turn up in a big F100 truck.  The way they spoke, their stature, respect and how they dealt with these hoodlums gave them real power and not some weak piece of legislation given to them by some reactionary Government.  If these hoodlums hadn’t already run off because they knew what was coming, they would cop a flogging, a kick up the bum, a slap over the head. The young kids were afraid of the police and that’s how we controlled and protected the community.  Fear is the only thing a young male understands. That real power is now lost forever.

Let’s look at how the new police force would handle the same job. Firstly, we changed our name to a “service” because it was aggressive to use the word “force”. We send two small female officers, wearing silly little yellow caps.  If we want to move these thugs out of the area, we have a very strict procedure we must follow. We have to announce our name and place of duty. The thug laughs and starts calling us by our first name.  We have to tell them why they have to move on. We have to warn them that if they fail to move on, they may be arrested. If there is more than one thug, we have to do this to each one.

They tell us they don’t speak English, start stating their rights and call their friends by mobile phone to come to the location.  The process we have just started doesn’t work with a drunk who wants to argue - it just makes it more confusing.  We have to make detailed notes of the conversation and caution them not to say or do anything in case it incriminates them.  Each time we use a power, we have to tell the hoodlum what it is and why we are doing it.  From the very outset, they have the upper hand and it continues. They have the real power ... we have pretend power.  If we do decide to arrest them, we have to be so careful not to grab their arms too hard or wrestle them to the ground because it may graze their legs or rip their jeans.  The thugs will allege we damaged their phones, took $50 from their wallets, swore at them, put the handcuffs on too tight.

When they get back to the police station, they complain to a supervisor who now starts to investigate us.  The whole charging process takes hours in a run-down police station with computers that don’t work. So we charge them with offensive language, assault police, resist arrest and put them before the court.  A local magistrate is presiding over the matter. After 30 minutes in court, the charges are dismissed and the recommendations made that the police should be charged with assault and sent to jail for six months.  We are told we should expect to be sworn at, called a pig and stood over by thugs.

The complaint and civil action lingers on for 18 months as it goes from the Ombudsman to ICAC and PIC. The thug has got off the charges, winks his eye and smiles at me as he walks out of court.  That’s the justice that we have that goes on every day in many local courts in NSW. Can you see why I am scared?  Do you think I am going to arrest someone, come next Friday or Saturday night, with all that rubbish going on?

I am going to take my time getting to the job, hope the thugs leave before I arrive and stand there and take the abuse. I hear my commanders saying we will uphold the law to the letter. Easy for them to say, but it just doesn’t happen. If we were fair dinkum, we would have hundreds of arrests and charges every day.

Have a look at the promotion system. Junior police being promoted in front of other senior police with 20 years’ experience, because they can answer a question in an interview better.  Everyone is looking after themselves. We are no longer a team versus the thugs. It is me alone versus police management versus the thugs.  You have seen the quality of our senior police leaders. They wouldn’t last long in private enterprise.

After the stuff-ups of the Redfern riot - an absolute disgrace in operational policing - we heard senior police say “we will learn from this”.  Not a year later, Macquarie Fields. The same mistakes and stuff-ups.  Listen to the commissioner as he talks. It is all reactionary policing.

Why didn’t Intel pick this up earlier? Why weren’t measures put in place earlier? Because the problems have been going on for years.  The police out there have poor morale, equipment and training. We aren’t united as a team - everyone has their own agenda and we are scared. We have the weak, ambiguous powers the Government says we have to have and a judicial system that just defies logic.  I totally understand why young men feel they have to take the law into their own hands. I don’t trust, and have very little loyalty in, the police service and the court system.

Source

Posted by jonjayray on Sunday, December 18, 2005 at 07:59 AM in Law & Order
Comments (6) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by Phil on December 18, 2005, 09:12 AM | #

And to top it all when the hoodlums are Arab, Political Correctness makes them holier than thou. So they are pretty much untouchable.

Astonishing how this policeman makes so many of the same points that Tim Priest made in his article that I posted the other day. And the net result of this will be that there will be total no-go areas for Police in Australia just as there are no-go areas for police in France. Crime will keep on climbing.

And John, why are Aussies whining about the death penalty to a convicted drug smuggler?

The Singaporeans would know how to deal with Sydney’s hoodlums rather well I suspect.

2

Posted by John S Bolton on December 18, 2005, 02:49 PM | #

These policies do not represent incompetence, nor that officals actually believe their own propaganda. You have officials who want freedom for aggression; they know that increased power comes from this. If they can get immigrant microsovereignties and civil war, dictatorship follows all the more easily. Some countries have been the most adamant against tyranny; the method for breaking down this resistance has been found. Use freedom for aggression, in a one sided way, favoring minority aggressors; continually increase the racial provocations against the majority, and say that all who object are racists. If civil war does not follow quickly enough, wave in larger numbers of foreign hostiles as needed.

3

Posted by Svigor on December 18, 2005, 06:26 PM | #

In days gone by, if there was a group of hoodlums hanging around intimidating people outside a pub, two 6’2” burly coppers would turn up in a big F100 truck.  The way they spoke, their stature, respect and how they dealt with these hoodlums gave them real power and not some weak piece of legislation given to them by some reactionary Government.

In America we called them bulls.  They’re an endangered species nowadays, and it takes a swarm of cops to get anything done.

4

Posted by Drop bear on December 18, 2005, 09:52 PM | #

When 40 cars of Lebanese gang members drove from Punchbowl to Maroubra to smash 100 parked cars on Monday night, they travelled like a military flying squad, hazard lights blazing as a display of force and confidence.

And yet the police failed to stop them, fearing attacks from the media and politicians, and physical attacks from the thugs.

It’s also disturbing to see the way the weekend’s arrests have been reported. There were 149 arrests and confiscations of 27 mobile phones and 15 cars, mostly relating to Middle Eastern people. Yet the focus of most media reports is on five white supremacists caught with molotov cocktails. Two Middle Easterners caught with molotov cocktails on a bus to Bondi are mostly described in a neutral sense that implies they were also part of the white supremacist group, and there is little mention of the weapons confiscated from the cars of Lebanese gang members.

5

Posted by Al Ross on December 19, 2005, 02:07 AM | #

Phil is of course absolutely correct about Singapore’s knowing how to deal with troublemakers. In the city-state it is the criminals, not the public, who walk the immaculate streets in fear and for this we must thank a longtime Chief Justice, PH Yong, who once remarked, at a meeting of the Malaysian Oxford and Cambridge Society, that whenever he reads of a custodial sentence on an English criminal perp he multiplies the prison term by two and a half to arrive at the correct and condign punishment.

6

Posted by Mark on December 19, 2005, 11:37 AM | #

Why do commenters here idolize the police?  The police are part of the problem.  They have defended criminals for decades from citizens.  Police want a large criminal element because it justifies their budgets.  The police are the enemy, just as much as the criminals.

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)


Next entry: Race is real—again

Previous entry: Gregorian chant at Our Lady of Protection Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic Church

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'Sunic interviews Fraser' on 02/09/12, 02:20 PM. (go) (view)

MOB commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 02:17 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 02:12 PM. (go) (view)

Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 01:27 PM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Sound principles of money, by Arthur Kitson' on 02/09/12, 01:26 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:44 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:16 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 12:04 PM. (go) (view)

Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:54 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:45 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:19 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:18 AM. (go) (view)

Michael commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 11:11 AM. (go) (view)

Ron Trisner commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 11:10 AM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:51 AM. (go) (view)

Michael commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:46 AM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 10:05 AM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 09:00 AM. (go) (view)

Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:37 AM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view)

Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view)

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view)

The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view)

Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view)

RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view)

Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view)

anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view)

Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa