Miscegenating Female College Students

This is a sort-of poem I wrote, inspired by my experiences in a College Dormitory in a big European city where female students were miscegenating with Asians and blacks at a rate of approximately 10%, mostly in the form of one-night stands. It describes their feelings, and the cycle of experiences and how they come to terms with it. I know the lyrical value is next to none: but in poem form it was easier to represent the things I wanted to say. Following it is the answer of a racially-aware male college student. I have recently dated four women who, as it turned out, had previously miscegenated- and if all facts were known, two others might have to be added to that list. This is poem is therefore semi-autobiographic.

The Song of the Miscegenating Female College Student:

Female College Student:

I was alone, in the big city,
I was away from my family, all alone.
It was hard to make friends, Saturday nights
I didn’t have anyone to go out with.
Men didn’t pay me much attention.
I couldn’t get the love I wanted from them.
It had been months and years since I had been with a man.
I wanted to try something new, to experiment,
To be wild and live life to the fullest, I wanted Sex,
Because everyone else was having it.

He came around, he was interested in me
To him I was the most beautiful.
He held me to no standards, had a strange gregarious charm.
And I realized he would look into my eyes, treat me well,
Made me feel special and desired, if only for a night.
The voice in me which warned me about foreign men
Competed with the voice which told me,
Not to judge anyone, and to give everyone a fair chance.
As a woman I always sympathize with weakness,
Know no higher law than my own best pleasure:
And love is hard to come by, where I live…

And so I gave in. Just for a night. Just once.
It was just a little thing, it didn’t last long.
It was a mistake. I had a weak moment.
I wanted it and I just gave in.
He was so persistent. I’m glad it’s over.
I would never do something like that again.
It wasn’t even anything really.

In fact…. I don’t know that guy. No, you didn’t see me
With him. I only kind of know him, I think he lived
In my house, probably. Or sometimes we talked,
Because we lived in the same house. It was just that.
And I went out with him once or so, nothing really,
You can just forget about that. Now I’m with you….

And the racially-aware male student answers her:

When I found out, exactly what you did
And how you were going to hide it from me,
Plaster over it as an insignificant past mistake;
And I remembered all the indulgent thoughts
I had about you, and what the future might hold for us.
And when I see how you excuse yourself
With a self-indulgence that is beyond childish,
And how you view yourself as beyond reprieve,
Your “tiny” sins blithely swept beneath the rug:

When I carry all these thoughts in my head at once,
A feeling begins to well up in my stomach,
And slowly makes the ascent upward to my head.
The feeling is one of cold sickness and terror,
And inner nausea, like nothing I ever felt.
And in that moment, despite my happy life, I wish I were dead.

In that moment, all the rules we live by
Are meaningless drivel to me, words and thoughts
Become so much junk. I want to find this world’s
Off-switch, and pull it. I want everything to stop,
I want the various beautiful colors of the world
To fade into the black ink-blots that cloud the vision
Of stroke-victims, and let me go from this planet.

What can one do but marvel at the depth of this sadness,
and pensively peel away it’s many layers,
like a soldier who lays forgotten, examining his wounds
Acknowledges the unique texture of each with a shudder.
This is true tragedy: it’s a sadness which is rich enough
And deep enough, that one could savor it, if one were inclined.

Instead one pockets what knowledge can be gained from the affair,
And seeks to move on with least damage done to self:
There must be some people left on this planet,
Who cannot stomach the thought of betrayal-
Ensconsed in this thought a sustaining hope lives still.

Posted by Potential Frolic on Sunday, February 11, 2007 at 08:25 AM in
Comments (104) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Søren Renner on February 11, 2007, 12:42 PM | #

We need more poetry at this site.

Posted by Count Sudoku on February 11, 2007, 12:48 PM | #

10%? 1 time flings? Consider yourself lucky.

Posted by Francisco on February 11, 2007, 02:47 PM | #

I’m curious: do the European Universities have an equivalent of the American Greek fraternity/sorority system? Here in the American South, I perceive them as bastions of old white power. Should these groups be seen as protectors of the faith?

Posted by PF on February 11, 2007, 04:29 PM | #

Francisco,

There are “brotherhoods” at Universities in Europe, they are like american fraternities. They are said to be more conservatively oriented, with antiquated practices like fencing and all kinds of cool old traditions. I dont know if these clubs are good protectors of the faith, they have some of the rudiments of such an organization.

Often times these organizations maintain a great group ethic and very strong brotherhood feeling, but they drink ALOT of alcohol, as in possibly brain-damaging, personality-transforming amounts of alcohol. Some exceptions, to be sure. I think there is a high degree of closet racism, for example, many dont except foreigners, bar none. So a certain beer-addled strain of closet racism/nationalism can be said to exist in these clubs, which is useful but perhaps not ultimately capable of fighting on the intellectual front.

Posted by Mrs. Blessed on February 12, 2007, 01:36 AM | #

That is absolutely beautiful. Thank you for posting it.

Posted by Coug on February 12, 2007, 02:11 PM | #

A true story, here. Those who are easily “shocked” at frankness should take a powder break…

My son is a redshirting offensive tackle at ****** University. His first room in the coed dorm was located beside one used by two Arkansan African “walk-ons.” The rooms shared a door and urine-stained bathroom, with access to the bathroom in the African room. Nice, huh? It gets better…

In the evening of the very first day of classes several blue-eyed lovelies made it their business to become ‘acquainted’ with the Africans living next door to my son. The orgy lasted until approximately midnight when my 6’6”, 290 lbs, fully muscular blonde and blue boy, unable to sleep for the loud feminine squeals and sounds of sex, burst the door open. What he saw made him sick to his stomach.

He ordered the whores out of the African room. Frightened, they hurriedly clutched their clothes to breasts and crotches and left without a peep. The two Africans – nude, dripping, surprised – did not retaliate. This was probably because my son had made it his business to repeatedly “bitch” two of the “baddest” Africans on the defensive line during summer practice sessions and always held their eyes with a “crazy white boy” look until they looked away.

The visits by White girls to the African room – two or three each night – continued, but at reduced noise levels. The Africans rarely left the room in the evenings. At 10 or 11 p.m. would come the feint sound of tapping, the squeak of an opening door, and subdued, female giggles. Shortly thereafter smell of burning marijuana would seep beneath the door connecting the rooms, followed by the squeaking of bedsprings for several hours.

Months later my son and his roommate told me that the Africans had gone through nearly every White girl in the dorm, with several repeats – in groups, ménages, and one-on-one. The boys frequently saw girls in skimpy clothing, lacy robes or just panties & bra entering or exiting the African room. By mid-October the boys unofficially relocated themselves to a recently vacated room on another floor.

There is much more, but I think you have the picture.

In the third-world several females serve the alpha male. College dorms with Africans, mestizos and wiggers are the third world. African and mestizo athletes are alphas. White men – athletes or not - are betas, including those playing NFL and college football. Beta males are rarely the recipients of recreational poontang from luscious, small town, blonde and blue followers of the MTV scene except as “seconds,” and those who do must “wine and dine” the object of their desire.

The African footballers living next door to my son never “wined and dined” the white girls. You can bet, however, that the “boyfriends” of these girls back in Podunk, Nebraska did! And don’t think for a moment that these girls were ugly “trailer-trash” or represented “merely a small minority of loose women.” I’ve looked at the pictures in my son’s “Facebook.” They were not ugly and comprised the overwhelming majority of White girls in my son’s dormitory.

Posted by Robert of the Rohorrim on February 12, 2007, 04:20 PM | #

“Months later my son and his roommate told me that the Africans had gone through nearly every White girl in the dorm”

Really? Where is this? How common is this in general? Have things gotten this bad? Are our women this degraded now that they would cop with anything? This sounds very untypical of any women that I know, but I don’t know many young people today. Perhaps they are much stupider than even I had imagined. I certainly hope that this dorm is not the norm.

Posted by Robert of the Rohorrim on February 12, 2007, 04:29 PM | #

Perhaps your son could post these girls’ names and pics on a website, “Girls who will screw any monkey, anytime,” along with their names and addresses. Perhaps their parents would like to know about their activities and what their money is paying for. C’mon, guys, have some fun with it!

Posted by Coug on February 12, 2007, 06:40 PM | #

“Perhaps they are much stupider than even I had imagined. I certainly hope that this dorm is not the norm.”

First, you’ll understand why I won’t publicly identify the school other than to say that it’s located in a small and very conservative community.

Is my son’s dorm exceptional? I don’t think so. It’s not a party school. The typical kid is from Podunkville, represents small town Republican merchants and ranchers, thinks MTV and television soaps about Malibu and Beverly Hills are cool and believes that “Orange County is the place I oughta be” because Podunkville is “boring” and “has too many fat women.”

The school is mostly White. Athletics forms the core of its divershitty program. Diversity = $$$. Africans and mestizos with fudged GPAs are imported from places like Compton High School in Los Angeles. Coaches are simply not allowed to rid schools of problematic Africans.

“Perhaps your son could post these girls’ names and pics on a website, “Girls who will screw any monkey, anytime,” along with their names and addresses.”

I thought about spy cameras for about 3 seconds. The problem is what happens if he’s caught. I won’t risk it.

“Perhaps their parents would like to know about their activities and what their money is paying for.”

I doubt it. Most would be embarrassed; many would seek retribution for exposing their mudsharking daughter’s activities.

Posted by Guessedworker on February 12, 2007, 07:11 PM | #

Coug,

What’s the reaction of white male students? Among the less intellectually able we know there is the wigger compensation - which, of course, is entirely a strategy for mate competition. But how do the more able white males react? Is there any tendency for them to be more conscious of their race?

Posted by Robert of the Rohorrim on February 12, 2007, 07:13 PM | #

So, what percentage of the girls at this school (not just at the jock dorm) do you think are whoring with negroids? Just a rough guess. 1, 2, 5 percent?

Posted by Coug on February 12, 2007, 08:42 PM | #

GW,

“What’s the reaction of white male students?”

My son is in a freshman dormitory. The majority (probably 60-70%) are non-athletes. As noted before the White students in the school are from Podunkville. On his floor the majority are quiet or apathetic about the miscegenation. A minority (the boys say 30-40%) is disgusted, but the disgust is combined with a sense of futility.

The majority of redshirting Whites on the team – usually first year freshmen – are disgusted. Older players – second year freshman through senior – are quiet and my guess is this is due to the time they have invested in the program. Nevertheless the boys told me about a group of older players who confronted several Africans in the locker room, grabbed their boom box and smashed it against the wall.

Posted by Coug on February 12, 2007, 08:59 PM | #

Robert,

“Just a rough guess. 1, 2, 5 percent?”

Only in Daddy’s delusional dreams.

Posted by PF on February 12, 2007, 09:07 PM | #

Estimating how common ‘it’ is.

I knew about 16 girls in this dorm and 3 certainly had 1 night stands, one might have done something with a black at a strip club, one went out with an Afghan one evening, 2 others dated and slept with middle eastern men. That means that 7 out of 16 have experimented in some way, the others I am not sure of.

Im afraid the likelihood of doing 1 sexual experiment outside of our race is much, much higher than anyone here would like to think. In a big ‘diverse’ city it is probably 25-35%.

Women dont break the rules- they do whatever society tells them. Now it is telling them to miscegenate, so they follow orders.

The most terrible thing of all is, though, and what really scares me- the very next day after they do it, they decide it was wrong, and decide to forget about it, and pretend to themselves like it didnt happen. How many of these women who are now totally respectable- and even sometimes have become racist in the interval - how many of them have had some unpalatable adventure? They dont always wear it like a brand on their foreheads, unfortunately.

Thinking about that can significantly raise one’s “trust-development interval”.

And yes, the feeling of the males is hopeless resignation, which is a very sad feeling. I try not to think about this stuff too often, honestly.

Posted by Literary Critic on February 12, 2007, 09:08 PM | #

Coug’s tale is obvious (bad) fiction.

Does “Coug” by any chance share an IP address with “Voice”?

Posted by Robert of the Rohirrim on February 12, 2007, 09:15 PM | #

Does Amren, SF, VNN, CofCC or someone have any reliable stats on this grotesque practice?

Posted by Guessedworker on February 13, 2007, 08:14 AM | #

Literary Critic,

You may be right. Coug isn’t Voice. But he has appeared on MR threads under two other names, though making any kind of bold claims.

I think it is useful for everyone to post under a single handle. The reasons for not doing so seem suspect to me.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 13, 2007, 10:36 AM | #

“And yes, the feeling of the males is hopeless resignation” (—PF)

That shouldn’t be their feeling, absolutely not! As one alternative they can get their heads clear, realize finally — coldly and with clarity — what in the goddam hell’s been going on (truth and explanations are being spoonfed now, at sites such as this one, in ways that simply didn’t exist even two years ago; in my own case it took me, starting in October 2000, around two-and-a-half or three years of reading Steve Sailer, Vdare.com, Jim Kalb, Lawrence Auster and so many others before most things had clicked into place but I finally got here; everyone can do the same more easily and quickly in the year 2007) and resolve thenceforth to act in accord with the truth in all reasonable ways (“reasonable” doesn’t include threats or violence, being personally mean, unjust, or gratuitously insulting or abusive based on race, religion, and so on — in general it means avoiding doing wrong or dumb things and sticking strictly to right and intelligent ones, always in accord with truth as far as praticality allows). For starters, Frenchmen can vote for/volunteer for/contribute to/support with letters-to-web-sites-and-newspapers/etc., Le Pen; Brits can do the same for the BNP, and Yanks for Tom Tancredo who has just announced an exploratory committee to run in 2008. There is so much we can all do that is reasonable, right, and practical once we understand the situation. Despair is never justified, ever! If GW had been the despairing kind this web-site wouldn’t exist. But he wasn’t and it does. See?

See the difference?

Despair is one thing and one thing only: a self-fulfilling prophecy. It’s never justified. We don’t know when, how, or why things will turn (but whoever did in all of history?). We do, however, know the way forward. We do know how to take one foot and place it in front of the other and walk. If it seems slow at the moment, at least we’re not standing still! No one said this would be easy or quick but that much we can do: take one foot, place it in front of the other, and walk. Step-by-step, steady and unwavering we walk in a forward direction. Everyone who figures things out can do that much. We will prevail because truth, which always prevails over lies, is on our side.

Who doesn’t feel solemn pride and satisfaction at being called a comrade in this struggle? I know I do. What we face is tough slogging. Needless to say, there’s no guarantee of any overnight miracles. But steadiness and persistence will win this. Comrades! Now get those backs straight, heads up, and one foot in front of the other, always: you know the way forward!

“I think it is useful for everyone to post under a single handle.” (—GW)

I second that. Or if for any reason you change pen names, announce the change. (But change seldom if ever.)

Posted by Coug on February 13, 2007, 02:25 PM | #

For the Non-Deluded:

The majority of White college women - wives, girlfriends and daughters - under age 30 have mudsharked at least once.

For the Deluded:

You’re absolutely correct. My story is fictional. Go back to your pipe and ‘educated’ musings.

GW,

I expected a modest level of understanding from you.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 13, 2007, 02:53 PM | #

Where there’s talk of “hopeless resignation,” a few never-to-be-forgotten VFR log entries would seem well worth re-reading: here, here, and here.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 13, 2007, 05:27 PM | #

Barack Obama is being pitched largely to ... (wait for it ...) ... white women, so far with considerable
success, apparently.

Posted by Count Sudoku on February 13, 2007, 05:34 PM | #

What a shock! Not. Fred, could you please take the opportunity to once again express your feelings about women suffrage again to cheer us (me) up?

Posted by Bud White on February 13, 2007, 06:14 PM | #

To all the “liberated” feminists out there - both male and female - a rude awakening is-a-commin! Like it or not, the strong medicine of Sharia law is going to remedy your perverted disease.

Posted by Robert of the Rohorrim on February 13, 2007, 07:39 PM | #

Fred, good post about despair, very helpful, thank you. As to Auster’s posts, however, they are not really helpful. What he has to say, that Whites need to assert themselves as Whites is not news. Most figured this out long before he said it. What Whites we lack are specifics. The average White man is isolated physically, emotionally, and spiritually.

An organization that allowed normal middle-class Whites to meet and share common interests—as Whites—would be a huge positive step. It doesn’t have to be anything special but it must have the support of White Leadership. It could be a car club, a shooting club, an American and European history club, a homeschooling group, a new boyscout-type org that helps boys grow into good men, it doesn’t matter. Simply being able to congregate as Whites and discuss common interests free from the demands of non-Whites would be enormously helpful.

Posted by Coug on February 13, 2007, 08:46 PM | #

“A Gallup Poll on interracial dating in June found that 95% of 18- to 29-year-olds approve of blacks and whites dating. About 60% of that age group said they have dated someone of a different race.” - New generation doesn’t blink at interracial relationships, Sharon Jayson, USA Today, 2/8/2006

“In all, 69% of Hispanics say they have dated someone of a different racial or ethnic group, 52% of blacks say this and 45% of whites. There is some gender difference among blacks, with 64% of African-American men saying they have dated a non-black and 42% of black women saying this.” – Gallup: Americans overwhelmingly favor interracial dating, Editor & Publisher, Oct 11, 2005”

———————-

“45% of whites” of all ages have played pattycake with non-Whites. A disproportionate subset of these are youngsters, judging by the polling questions. You can bet that women are disproportionately represented among those playing pattycake and among those who lied while denying it.

The young poet, above, wrote the following:

“I have recently dated four women who, as it turned out, had previously miscegenated- and if all facts were known, two others might have to be added to that list. This is poem is therefore semi-autobiographic.”

At least four of the six women our poet dated were mudsharks. I don’t know where he goes to school, but based upon my son’s experience I can’t - not for one moment - believe this kid is merely “unlucky” in choosing women.

I think more than 50% of Daddy’s Precious Little Homecoming Queens from Podunkville are mudsharking when they get to college. If true, then how much greater is that percentage among girls at USC or UT El Paso?

It seems Daddy has a problem. Better that he pull his head out of his anus and consider what to do about it than posting “intelligent, literary” musings about “bad fiction.”

Posted by Al Ross on February 13, 2007, 09:05 PM | #

Coug’s latest rubbish is aimed at the gullible and poorly premised on miniscule samples of the population. Also there is a tendency for people to lie to pollsters about all sorts of things, especially regarding sexual matters and voting intentions.

Ignore.

Posted by ben tillman on February 13, 2007, 09:25 PM | #

“I think more than 50% of Daddy’s Precious Little Homecoming Queens from Podunkville are mudsharking when they get to college. If true, then how much greater is that percentage among girls at USC or UT El Paso?”

UTEP? It’s 72% Mexican and 3% black, and the “mud-sharking” is minimal.

Posted by Furius on February 14, 2007, 03:47 AM | #

Coug,

You must write porn fiction. Your imagination seems, ahem, quite “vivid”.

I went to college just four years ago and 95 percent of what you’ve written is b*****t.

Posted by PF on February 14, 2007, 09:57 AM | #

Yeah, despair doesnt categorize my overall mindset. But just yesterday I saw a new girl, who I dont know- fine northern European specimen, walking and holding hands with some south Asian muslim kid.

I cant tell him to watch out, I cant talk to her about it or else I am ‘extremist’, I immediately become a social outcast if I challenge these behaviours. Are you comfortable approaching a complete stranger and immediately violating societies biggest taboo without even having introduced yourself? Im not. I do do this indirectly, though, the other girls that I am friends with I am subtly influencing and protecting.

Posted by Coug on February 14, 2007, 01:06 PM | #

Al Ross,

“Coug’s latest rubbish is aimed at the gullible and poorly premised on miniscule samples of the population.”

Feel free to falsify my estimate. I’d love for you to prove that mudsharking amongst Daddy’s Precious Little Homecoming Queens is ‘only’ 1, 2, or 5%.

“Also there is a tendency for people to lie to pollsters about all sorts of things, especially regarding sexual matters and voting intentions.”

Sure, people lie to pollsters regarding sexual matters – especially women.

But you need to put down the pipe and take a walk outdoors, Daddy. In sexual matters men lie about quantity and women lie about anything that could reflect badly on them.

Newsflash, Dad: Interracial “dating” no longer “reflects badly” on women.

——————-

Tillman,

“UTEP? It’s 72% Mexican and 3% black, and the “mud-sharking” is minimal.”

You left out my USC example, I see. No matter.

Is mudsharking at UTEP minimal? Only in overall numbers.

Regardless of UTEP’s White population, if 50% of White females at UTEP are mudsharking, then that’s not a “minimal” figure.

Draw the blinders from your eyes, Daddy.

——————

Furius,

“You must write porn fiction. Your imagination seems, ahem, quite “vivid”.”

This prudish, sophisticated charade from one so young is, ahem, quite “transparent.” Do take another powder, light another pipe, and “reflect” on the following:

Posted by Englander on February 14, 2007, 01:12 PM | #

There is some gender difference among blacks, with 64% of African-American men saying they have dated a non-black and 42% of black women saying this.

How often do you see a black woman with a non-black man? If black women are mixing with non-black males at two thirds of the rate that black men are mixing, then there can’t be too much of it around.

Posted by ES on February 14, 2007, 02:04 PM | #

Those black boys do good business these days.

Hollywood has successfully taught under-30 females only black men can bestow vigorous, huge-penised, world-class sex. “You must try everything twice,” MSM intones helpfully. Curious, adventurous, rebellious girls naturally partake.

The percentage of White US college girls who bed a colored at least once by graduation easily reaches double-digits. Miscegenation is rampant, and considered “cool”.

Posted by Coug on February 14, 2007, 02:08 PM | #

It seems we have a little, ahem, “class” problem on this blog.

My premise, which has greater support than any of yours, is that more than 50% of the bored, church-going daughters of Republican merchants from Podunkville watch MTV, VH1, Degrassi, Beverly Hills 902whatever and roll with the mud when they get to college.

This scares the hell out of racialist Daddies fitting the above description because it implies that they should do something more than blab on a blog under the cover of cyberspace.

It implies that Daddy Podunk should drop his illusions and take certain physical and economic risks.

But Daddy P. prefers to remain blind and refer to my experience and the Gallup numbers as “rubbish” or “fiction.”

Then there is the example of my “jock” son’s risky and perhaps, foolish reaction on the evening of the first day of classes. The fact that he was successful in ending the interracial sex party in the next room for that one time and the fact that no administrative repercussions were suffered is a direct attack on Daddy P’s manhood. Add to this the fact that Daddy P hasn’t my son’s size and musculature, hasn’t “bitched” large African players on the field, and has never given an African a “crazy White boy” look. Daddy P knows he could never get away with doing what my son, fortunately, was able to do.

So, my son’s merely a “dumb” jock or I am a liar. Very cute.

Daddy P’s fear of the African has more to do with the personal than it does the racial and political. He fears African muscle on a man-to-man level.

That is unfortunate and quite sad.

There was a time when the elite led through example.

Until that time comes again we shall see an ever greater percentage of Daddy’s Little Darlings rolling in the mud.

Posted by Guessedworker on February 14, 2007, 02:08 PM | #

I’m with PF. In my book these girls damage themselves in a pretty final way. It’s something they should have the biological capability to understand, because nothing ties knots in the female stomach like a treacherous mate.

Posted by Robert Mason on February 14, 2007, 02:11 PM | #

Pagans,

Do you practice sex magic, worship of the goddess ceremonies, etc.? If so, what do you think would happen to our society if these practices, practiced as they were in ancient times, were to become commonplace again? How would you discourage miscegenation? I mean, if men and women were free to “love” anyone, and whites and non-whites are living everywhere together, what prevents it?

Posted by Coug on February 14, 2007, 02:21 PM | #

Englander,

“How often do you see a black woman with a non-black man? If black women are mixing with non-black males at two thirds of the rate that black men are mixing, then there can’t be too much of it around.”

Relationships between black women with white men tend to be one-nighters. Relationships between white women and black men are longer-term. The former is “hidden,” the latter is more “exposed.”

Posted by PF on February 14, 2007, 03:05 PM | #

Coug,

Interpreting just how much miscegenation is going on is difficult. Your estimate may be different from others, all of our estimates are based on personal experience, hard data about sexual exploits is difficult to come by.

But please accept that miscegenation of white women is a painful and difficult subject - and most of us on here are white men. Your sensationalist tone is only going to hurt. And proving to us that miscegenation rates are over 50% without hard data is a difficult sell, regardless of what your son has told you. If it were 50%, the suicide rate would be significantly higher, I can guarantee that much.

You are also not waking anyone up to reality, most readers of this board face reality starkly enough already.

So my estimate for miscegenation in general at universities in the west is between 10 and 20%. I could go ten points higher, for those places where the multicultural cancer has most heavily metastized. Im sorry your son has inherited hell-on-Earth, maybe it will radicalize him as thoroughly and irrevocably as it has radicalized me. That is, after all, the only good that can come from this.

Posted by Desmond Jones on February 14, 2007, 03:05 PM | #

It’s interesting Coug, however, despite your boy’s efforts, the parties continued. Africans don’t use muscle on a man-to-man level, they use weapons and run in packs whether on the street or in prison. White penchant for heroic individualism is ingrained. You mentioned your son acted alone and got respect because of his physical prowess. Yet none of his white team mates, who bang heads with the mighty African on the gridiron offered to assist him.

What do you advise?

Posted by Coug on February 14, 2007, 03:35 PM | #

PF,

Estimates based upon anecdotal experience will vary. Your conservative estimate of 10-20% may be closer to the truth, but the same can be said for my liberal estimate of >50%.

Neither one of us will know until this subject is competently researched.

My “sensationalism” regarding what happened in my son’s dormitory are true statements: Bra ‘n panties, nude ‘n dripping, etc. I make no apologies for stating the truth to those whom I mistakenly believed were men.

Our great-grandfathers would have killed if they knew what my boy had to endure. There is no doubt about that whatsoever.

These days we are “blessed” with tender males (not men) on racialist boards who wince, mince and whine instead of leading when confronted with the naked truth.

Not one of them is fit to lead my beautiful sons or be led by them.

If this is the caliber of moral and physical leadership to be found among the racialist “intelligentsia,” then our people are sunk.

Thanks for treating me with respect.

Posted by Guessedworker on February 14, 2007, 04:35 PM | #

We are men enough, Coug. But we are also brothers enough to demand integrity from one another, and that extends to presenting the basic truth here. Spin and varnish we leave to the liars of our so “civil” society.

As regards leading anyone, I, for one, make no such pretention. I have found in my five and a half decades that patience and diligence are better guides to the future life than ambitious men. If the time for the latter arrives we will already be within sight of our goal, and everyone here will have performed his allotted task with honour.

Posted by Coug on February 14, 2007, 04:38 PM | #

Desmond Jones,

“It’s interesting Coug, however, despite your boy’s efforts, the parties continued.”

Yes, the sex parties continued. The only thing accomplished was a reduction in the noise level and a decrease, over time, in the consumption of marijuana in the room.

“Africans don’t use muscle on a man-to-man level, they use weapons and run in packs whether on the street or in prison.”

Africans do whatever will maximize their advantage with minimal harm to themselves.

Do they run in packs? Yes. Do they act individually? Yes, again.

The guiding principle with Africans – individually or in packs – is intimidation, preferably through past skillful displays of force although their perception of the possibility of effective force being used against them – in other words, posing a credible threat – will also do the trick in most cases.

Will, intimidation, credible threat or past displays of technique and force.

“White penchant for heroic individualism is ingrained. You mentioned your son acted alone and got respect because of his physical prowess. Yet none of his white team mates, who bang heads with the mighty African on the gridiron offered to assist him.”

Yes, my son got respect. This was on the evening following the first day of classes. His roommate – a kid I’ve talked to on several occasions – stood looking over his shoulder, and this may have helped to a degree. The doors connecting the rooms to the hallway were closed. Perhaps White players in the other rooms were sleeping? I really don’t know.

“What do you advise?”

That depends on circumstances. You may write me, if you wish, for additional follow-up. GuessedWorker has my permission to provide you with my email address. Write “Majority Rights” without the quotation marks in the subject line.

Thank you for your respectful questions.

Posted by Al Ross on February 14, 2007, 05:22 PM | #

Coug’s repetitively monomaniacal posts would, doubtless, receive a warm welcome over at gnxp, where, I feel sure, that aficionado of interracial pornography, Razib, would deem the ordure to be first rate.

Posted by Guessedworker on February 14, 2007, 07:03 PM | #

Coug, all enquiries will be passed on, as you wish.

Posted by Ordure of Interracial Sex Coug on February 14, 2007, 07:06 PM | #

Alross,

“Coug’s repetitively monomaniacal posts would, doubtless, receive a warm welcome over at gnxp, where, I feel sure, that aficionado of interracial pornography, Razib, would deem the ordure to be first rate.”

M.o.n.o.m.a.n.i.a.c.a.l. Big word. Please define, alross. Me not edjewmuhcated like you.

“Ignore.”

Please explain, alross, why you no take own advice?

-Porn Coug

————-

Dear Porn Coug,

I’ll tell you why Al Ross hasn’t taken his own advice. He is privately intrigued by the “ordure” of interracial sex, and his fear of exposure along with personal feelings of physical and moral inadequacy is why you are the target of his pejoratives and ad hominems. It’s a form of projectionism, really - a tactic employed by the world’s mincing wincers to bolster their inflated sense of self-worth and direct attention away from themselves.

Regards,

Ordure of Interracial Sex Coug

Posted by Coug on February 14, 2007, 07:07 PM | #

Thank you, GW. I shall leave this topic for now.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 14, 2007, 08:04 PM | #

“In my book these girls damage themselves in a pretty final way.” (—GW)

Simon Sheppard:

“[White] females’ explorations with [non-white men], which may initially be for novelty, become a self-perpetuating cycle. After the period of novelty has passed only immigrant males allow females the level of control and increased latitude to which they become accustomed. Put another way, the revulsion this and their other behaviour (deriving from their increased power, Item 1) arouses in their menfolk becomes such that only immigrants will put up with them.”
______

“I have found in my five and a half decades that patience and diligence are better guides to the future life than ambitious men. If the time for the latter arrives we will already be within sight of our goal, and everyone here will have performed his allotted task with honour.” (—GW)

Hear! Hear! Well said.
______

“I’ll tell you why Al Ross hasn’t taken his own advice. [...] It’s a form of projectionism, really - a tactic employed by the world’s mincing wincers” (—Ordure of [etc.])

You’ve mistaken your man, “Ordure”: having seen Al Ross’s posts over quite a period of time both here and at The Civic Platform, I can tell you that the one thing in this world he definitely is not is a “mincing wincer.” (Quite the contrary, in fact ... You can count on that ....)

Posted by jody on February 14, 2007, 08:35 PM | #

a few years ago i was actually invited to write for this blog. i’m glad i declined.

why this thread has not been deleted is beyond me. is it normal to let trolls say anything they want here?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 14, 2007, 08:51 PM | #

What blog do you write for now, Jody? May we see some of your material? May we know some of your ideas on things? If GW invited you, you must be a sound thinker.

Posted by Bud White on February 14, 2007, 09:40 PM | #

Given the absence of the moral underpinnings that Christianity once provided, the morals of young white women are being subverted, saturated and consumed by the prevailing pop-culture that glorifies, Negroes, pornography, miscegenation, homosexuals, and various other kinds of perverted moral transgressions. This is unarguably resulting in a debauched society. Like him or not, what Coug reports is the reality of a large segment of our younger generation.

Posted by rollory on February 14, 2007, 09:48 PM | #

For whatever it’s worth - speaking from my own experiences in college in the late 90s, and in the 20something social scene since - the people denouncing Coug’s account as sensationalist, fanciful, and so on, quite simply have their heads in the sand.

Denying this stuff could possibly happen doesn’t stop it from in fact happening, and it happens ALL THE TIME. The majority of women under 30 will have experimented with such behavior; the prettier they are, the likelier - the way the social scene works is just set up to make these things seem attractive. People don’t complain, because “everybody knows” that anyone who complains about such behavior is racist, sexist, afraid of strong women and of women making their own choices, and generally an unacceptable throwback.

More generally, younger women in general have been taught extensively that they can and should behave like whores; that random sex hookups and a different guy every night is something to aspire for. You can’t tell them they’re wrong, because then again you’re the oppressive patriarchy. Try browsing craigslist personals for some big city sometime; it’s a very good representative sample of what women are consciously looking for, even if that happens to be diametrically opposed to what would actually be Good. The Tucker Max messageboard is also very enlightening in terms of what a major fraction of the under-30 population considers normal and “good” behavior.

Posted by ES on February 14, 2007, 11:46 PM | #

What do you advise?

I’ll summarize the general situation.

Vigilantism force fails, because miscegenation is socially accepted and the laws back the miscegenator. The granite boulder ultimately sealing off this path is law, backed by guns.

What makes miscegenation socially acceptable? In good part, the hijacked media. One response is to steadily build our own media.

Why does the government allow demographic havoc? Because it is hijacked. We must regime-change the government to survive. This can happen by force, or peacefully. Force, we can rule out immediately. Not happening for too many reasons. What remains is to politically and socially organize, which is slow and tedious and therefore only for those capable of greatly delayed gratification. We’re talking milestones obtainable only at increments of half-decades.

I myself have always been a Darwinist who treasures racial purity. But population dynamics greatly favor miscegenation. Besides sheer rising mass, I’ve met quite a few lovely Hispanic and even black girls that’d make the hardest core WN rat. Quite frankly, they’re marriageable. Mix races together, especially in college dorms, and mass miscegenation reigns.

Posted by jody on February 15, 2007, 03:49 AM | #

Fred Scrooby,

i don’t write for any blog. i am simply a regular message board lurker and poster all across the internet who was invited to be a writer for majority rights when it was starting out.

this coug guy is funny. he trolled this place good.

i think the original poster, who identified the number at about 10%, was closest to the mark. basic math and common sense say that coug’s figure of 50% is merely something to laugh at.

Posted by ES on February 15, 2007, 04:12 AM | #

If we mean the US population, the under-30 miscegenation rate exceeds 10%. From the late twenties, the age-adjusted rate increases with youth to today’s utterly brainwashed teens.

Hollywood-MSM really turned on the miscegenation propaganda in the US approximately in 1995. Miscegenation carried some residual taboo status even then. Of course, had Jews done this in 1975 they might’ve triggered an actual revolt. But in 1995 America was sufficiently soft for the next step.

In these past twelve years, not only has all *taboo* has been removed, shifted past *neutral* and onto the status of *fashionable*, *cool*, and so forth.

This shift occurred with blinding speed, enabled by an intense propaganda bombardment.

Posted by Bud White on February 15, 2007, 08:29 AM | #

“i think the original poster, who identified the number at about 10%, was closest to the mark. basic math and common sense say that coug’s figure of 50% is merely something to laugh at.”—jody

I would say less than 10% of white women have engaged in interracial sex, however, when you isolate a certain segment of white females….that being [attractive] 16 to 35 year old white women, the percentages increase exponentially. It is fact, there is no debate about it!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 15, 2007, 09:20 AM | #

“in my own case it took me, starting in October 2000, around two-and-a-half or three years of reading Steve Sailer, Vdare.com, Jim Kalb, Lawrence Auster and so many others before most things had clicked into place” (—one of my comments above)

The link at “Jim Kalb” there doesn’t seem to be working at the moment. Try this other one: Jim Kalb.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 15, 2007, 10:37 AM | #

It just struck me that Jim Kalb’s latest log entry has relevance to the present MR.com thread in that it exposes, in part, how pay-offs to the organized women’s-lib lesbians and non-white/anti-Euro forces, who wield such power at today’s universities, are fundamental components of the academic machinery preventing — forbidding, actually — whites from (among many other basic, legitimate, healthy things) seeing themselves as as a group and acknowledging some semblance of group interests. It also makes reference to the “Dads” whom “Coug” talks about in this thread, who seem mysteriously blind to lots of the wrongness and frank injustice that’s going on (otherwise, as alumni, they’d use the power of their voices and their checkbooks to force a few changes): “The alumni, who want to see no evil, are jollied along by huge PR staffs.” Here’s the Turnabout entry:
______

“Steve Sailer has a good piece on how the college prestige racket works. Basically, he says, no one cares what kind of education top colleges offer. Whatever Dr. Faust may do, a Harvard degree will still prove that its holder was able to get into Harvard and that’s all that really matters.

“That certainly fits the impression I got from a grand tour of the New England liberal arts colleges I took with my son a few years ago. Every place I visited the basic deal seemed to be (1) the students don’t have to do anything, (2) the faculty can do what it wants, and (3) the administration raises money and keeps things quiet by making payoffs to feminists and minorities. It all works beautifully. The students get a degree guaranteed to open doors, and in the meantime are lavishly praised for amusing themselves — ‘our students are so wonderful we don’t have to tell them what to do.’ Their parents shell out big time but they’ve gotten their kids into the upper classes so it’s cheap at the price. The alumni, who want to see no evil, are jollied along by huge PR staffs. Everybody sees a pretty campus, which is what you get when you spend huge amounts of money on architecture and groundskeeping. The school proclaims its allegiance to inclusiveness, which puts it on the side of the angels and means it doesn’t have to have any very definite idea of what it should be doing. And the money keeps rolling in, so the administrators can keep their jobs, the professors can keep doing what they want, and the payoffs can still be made.

“All of which seems like a harsh description, so maybe I should give particulars. The most striking thing about one of these places is how much money there is, and how much is lavished on the physical surroundings. Everyone looks like he has money. The students’ rooms are jammed with electronics, refrigerators and what not else. The new buildings are all by top-of-the-line architects. The old buildings are beautifully maintained on the outside, and inside they’re all retrofitted and cutting-edge. The dorms and dining halls are much more luxurious than in the old days, with piped-in TV in dorm rooms and endless choices in dining. Everybody spends a term or year abroad, which is perfect because it sounds educational but lets the students and school ignore each other for that length of time. All the students get As and Bs no matter what. The schools all spend huge amounts on public and alumni relations.

“So far as I can tell, though, there’s no real intellectual life. From campus bulletin boards it appears that there’s some interest in various sports and hobbies and not-particularly-adventurous pop culture, and there are academic lectures about topics currently in vogue, but not much evidence of personal engagement with anything intellectual. Everything’s either narrowly professional or consumer-oriented and comfortable. All in all, the situation seems worlds apart from the one the Pope described in his Regensburg address:

‘I think back to those years when, after a pleasant period at the Freisinger Hochschule, I began teaching at the University of Bonn. This was in 1959, in the days of the old university made up of ordinary professors. The various chairs had neither assistants nor secretaries, but in recompense there was much direct contact with students and in particular among the professors themselves. We would meet before and after lessons in the rooms of the teaching staff. There was a lively exchange with historians, philosophers, philologists and, naturally, between the two theological faculties. Once a semester there was a dies academicus, when professors from every faculty appeared before the students of the entire university, making possible a genuine experience of universitas: the reality that despite our specializations which at times make it difficult to communicate with each other, we made up a whole, working in everything on the basis of a single rationality with its various aspects and sharing responsibility for the right use of reason—this reality became a lived experience.’

“I suppose in a sense the quotation nails it. The university used to be comparatively independent although not wealthy materially, and its ideal was the development of rational knowledge to make it, as much as possible, adequate to all reality without distortion. We live in a consumer society in which the highest ideals are comfort, security, and equal satisfaction of all desires, and which excludes all other ideals as troublesome. Our society integrates the educational apparatus, as it integrates all else, with the general system of governance. In such a society how could anything like the university as traditionally conceived, which owes its first allegiance to standards like universal reason that transcend practicality and desire, conceivably exist?”

Posted by PF on February 15, 2007, 10:45 AM | #

ES, I really liked your post, I thought you said everything that needs to be said, up till here:
“Besides sheer rising mass, I’ve met quite a few lovely Hispanic and even black girls that’d make the hardest core WN rat.”

Is that how hard-core you estimate the most hard-core WN to be, that he would give up everything for a really good looking colored girl? I think anyone who feels sincerely WN will be proof against these temptations, if they even register as temptations: for me they dont. What the hell does WN mean anyway, then?
Some of us have a really perverted fetish: we literally only like white girls. It’s sick, I know, I’m in therapy for it right now, but nothing else gets me *up*. If it did, I strangle the thought in its cradle, the whole thought-process lasts about 10 milliseconds.

Posted by ES on February 15, 2007, 12:07 PM | #

PF,

I meant to communicate that miscegenation is rational and inevitable if the races are placed in contact without social barriers.

Everyone has their tipping point. Jewish propaganda lowers that tipping point. When the probability of resisting JOG hoovers slightly above zero and some enticing latina—charmingly innocent of deadly serious world affairs—squeezes up and suggestively rests her leg over yours, all bets are off.

Perhaps you’re not there yet because you’re in Europe (that’s what it sounds like). It’s far, far further along demographically in the US. Also, I know it’s difficult for Europeans to imagine this, but the children of US immigrants often grow up gorgeous. Not as gorgeous as a Swedish model perhaps, but they’re not the brown “stubbies” or cowering y’es massas of yester-generation.

Anyway, several dynamics enter into play.

Firstly, the range overlap in JR’s “mate value” between ethnic groups is substantial. Consider the overlap between the black and white IQ distribution. If they IQ-assort pairwise, the result is mass miscegenation.

Secondly, defections increase as the possibility of group success decreases. Increasing non-white population and miscegenation squeezes a WN’s options ever thinner.

If you want to address miscegenation in the general population in any scenario short of full repatriation these factors enter.

Posted by Retew on February 15, 2007, 12:22 PM | #

Does Rachel Weisz count as “white?”

Posted by jlh on February 15, 2007, 02:58 PM | #

Bud White,

You’re wasting your time trying to point out to these guys that Christianity used to provide the moral underpinnings for everything of value, and that almost everything MR says they want to preserve is a function of traditional, pre-1900 Christian teachings.

Posted by jody on February 15, 2007, 07:41 PM | #

there are more morons being trolled in this thread then there are black guys in college.

it is impossible for black men to be f_cking 50% of the white women in college because BLACK MEN DO NOT GO TO COLLEGE.

you have to be physically present to f_ck somebody. which group has the lowest physical presence on the university campus? which group do the diversity mongers complain about the most when their physical presence is the least? BLACK MEN.

if a black man graduates high school, which not all of them do, the next thing they most likely do is take a service or labor job. a few of them go to prison. the least likely place they land is in college. ALMOST NO BLACK MEN EVEN MAKE IT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF COLLEGE.

there are only 2 ways black men get into college, affirmative action or sports. people who get into college these 2 ways tend to drop out, and lots of black men drop out and never graduate. dropping out, of course, further reduces their PHYSICAL PRESENCE, and physical presence is what matters here.

500 black men on a 20,000 student campus cannot f_ck 10,000 women. not even if they never slept or ate or went to football practice again, not even if they f_cked white women 24 hours a day and did nothing else. even if they could somehow f_ck white women 18 hours a day 7 days a week, they could not f_ck more than 20% of them, and of course they would have no time for class or practice, meaning at the end of the semester they would be kicked out. again, further reducing their PHYSICAL PRESENCE.

there are only 16 million black men in america, few of them even make it to college. there are 120 million white women in america and lots of them make it to college.

black men are f_cking no more than 10% of the white women in college. anybody who thinks otherwise is a moron who understands nothing about common sense or math.

Posted by alex zeka on February 15, 2007, 07:47 PM | #

LOL@ jody’s demosntration. I had a feeling there just weren’t enough blacks to get it on as much as Coug has suggested they do, but didn’t have either the time or the numbers to run a full check.

Posted by alex zeka on February 15, 2007, 07:57 PM | #

Besides sheer rising mass, I’ve met quite a few lovely Hispanic and even black girls that’d make the hardest core WN rat.

Oh no, not this again. Overall, I’d marginally rather see another post from PF about rap and the Myceneaen Massive, then hear yet more stories about WNs with Asian girlfriends. For what it’s worth, I, somebody who wouldn’t be considered a WN by the hardcore contingent here, am about as likely to sleep with an unwanted alien as I am, upon coming home and seeing an alluring female burgler running here fingers through my valuables in my bedroom, to wrench these valuables out of here hands, throw her on my bed and get it on with her there. Who cares how beautiful they are, they are trespassers in these lands and should be dealt with as such.

Posted by Bud White on February 15, 2007, 08:09 PM | #

Bud White,

“You’re wasting your time trying to point out to these guys that Christianity used to provide the moral underpinnings for everything of value, and that almost everything MR says they want to preserve is a function of traditional, pre-1900 Christian teachings.”—jlh

Maybe I’m wasting my time, maybe not. One thing I must make clear - I’m not trying to proselytize here; I’m just stating my point of view. Too, I know there are other Christians who post on this site, so I’m not alone in my beliefs. You, jlh, are proof of that.

Posted by Al Ross on February 15, 2007, 10:36 PM | #

During the heyday of the British Empire (pre-1900), Christian missionaries sallied forth to offer salvation to savage cannibals and headhunters from Borneo to Bechuanaland, with the indubitable objective of filling up God’s stratospheric retirement home with all manner of disagreeably ferocious, racially alien souls.

Christians, in worthwhile numbers, protecting the interests of our race?

As I said to my cousin when he told me he’d win the Buddy Holly lookalike contest :

“That’ll be the day”.

Posted by Bud White on February 15, 2007, 11:38 PM | #

“During the heyday of the British Empire (pre-1900), Christian missionaries sallied forth to offer salvation to savage cannibals and headhunters from Borneo to Bechuanaland, with the indubitable objective of filling up God’s stratospheric retirement home with all manner of disagreeably ferocious, racially alien souls.”—Al Ross

LOL. Al, you have a pretty good sense of humor but you conveniently overlook the importance that Christianity had (pre 1950’s) in the accent of Western civilization. Check this out…

http://www.grecoreport.com/western_civilization_and_christianity1.htm

Posted by Count Sudoku on February 15, 2007, 11:47 PM | #

Bud White,

Too bad LittleGeneva.com is down, you would definitely want to check it out as I think it validates what I think you’re saying.

In any case there are other Christian Kinism sites.

Posted by Al Ross on February 16, 2007, 12:07 AM | #

I have always laboured under the obvious misapprehension that Christianity’s largest component, the Roman Catholic Church, fought Western Civilisation’s wondrous Enlightenment tooth-and-nail, punishing believers in such ludicrous concepts as Copernicus’s theory of Heliocentricity with the usual satisfaction that attends the completion of God’s work.

Posted by Bud White on February 16, 2007, 07:37 AM | #

Al Ross,

By a long strech, I’m no expert on Cannon Law, nor am I an Apologist for the many “mistakes” (for lack of a better term) the “men” made during the process of the Church reconciling religious dogma with the age of reason. However, I ask you to Juxtaposed the manifestations of Christianity against those of secular-ideologies (ie cultural-Marxism) in the West.

Again my intention is not to proselytize but rather to make an objective comparison of Christianity vs the leftist ideologies that are dominating the West.

The following link is an one example of how Christianity is a colossal force for good in our fight to preserve the white-race.

http://www.ad2000.com.au/articles/1995/nov1995p3_870.html

Posted by Bud White on February 16, 2007, 07:43 AM | #

“Too bad LittleGeneva.com is down, you would definitely want to check it out as I think it validates what I think you’re saying.”—Count Sudoku

Thanks for the info, Count; I’ll check it out if it comes back up.

Posted by Guessedworker on February 16, 2007, 08:48 AM | #

Little Geneva is not down, Bud, but is permanently closed. It’s a great pity because we need more and better centres for the growth of our awareness. LG was a good one.

Posted by JB on February 16, 2007, 01:32 PM | #

“45% of whites” of all ages have played pattycake with non-Whites.

just like 99 % of the intelligence agencies of the world believed Saddam had weapons of mass destruction ? the jewspapers can’t be trusted for anything besides the classified ads

Posted by JB on February 16, 2007, 01:40 PM | #

Robert Mason:

Pagans, Do you practice sex magic, worship of the goddess ceremonies, etc.? If so, what do you think would happen to our society if these practices, practiced as they were in ancient times, were to become commonplace again? How would you discourage miscegenation? I mean, if men and women were free to “love” anyone, and whites and non-whites are living everywhere together, what prevents it?

you better start preaching ethnocentrism to your fellow christians, if that’s possible. Those who believe all humans have souls equal to every other soul aren’t likely to care about our race

two christian souls posing together

look what a ‘raw christian’ couple adopted (I’ll spare you the pictures, look at the photos and read the ramblings if you want to delve into the depths of insanity) :

http://rawchristianity.wordpress.com/tag/adoption/

more Good Christians here:

http://www.wacsn.org/HOMECOMINGDAYPHOTOS.asp

Tacitus says the germans of Antiquity had very strict social norms and laws about fidelity and monogamy. As far as I know the rise of christianity didn’t change the normal ethnocentric norms of behavior vis à vis miscegenation for most of its history until very recently but it seems clear to me that today christianity can’t be a weapon or an armour in our fight for our survival.

When all european peoples were ethnocentric and at the same time christian their religion didn’t lead them to believe miscegenation was alright but when ethnocentrism became Bad lots of christians started believing that since humans were all equal in the eyes of God miscegenation and transracial adoption was approved by the Almighty, just as lots of non-christian europeans became leftists and ethnomasochists. And even many christians in Europe became leftists, l’Abbé Pierre being one of the most famous example.

Posted by Count Sudoku on February 16, 2007, 05:14 PM | #

LG is unfortunately permanently closed. I suggest those interested should check out

http://occidentalimperium.blogspot.com/

which has some links to other Christian Kinism websites.

The website “Why South Africa is Crap” has been hijacked. A new website called “Why South Africa Sucks”

http://southafricasucks.blogspot.com/

by the same guys has been created to replace it. It’s a good site, it’s interesting to see what happens when a First World country is taken over by Third Worlders.

Posted by Al Ross on February 16, 2007, 05:16 PM | #

As JB rightly states, “even many Christians in Europe became leftists” and this should come as no surprise to those who are aware of such Communist-inspired Christian concepts as ‘the social Gospel’ and the revolution-sponsoring ‘Liberation Theology’.

Such ruinous aspects of what was once the religion of the West make it difficult to avoid the reluctant conclusion that Christianity is now just Communism stripped of the supernatural element.

Posted by Bud White on February 16, 2007, 05:56 PM | #

“Such ruinous aspects of what was once the religion of the West make it difficult to avoid the reluctant conclusion that Christianity is now just Communism stripped of the supernatural element.”—Al Ross

That I can agree with (for the most part). I believe the hi-jacking of Christianity by the cultural-Marxists reached critical-mass around the late 1950’s or early 60’s. Also, I hope and pray the inevitable revolution against leftist ideologies within Christendom manifests itself soon.

Posted by Coug on February 16, 2007, 06:54 PM | #

Sorry, GW, for showing up again but the following 2002 report should be made available to MR readers.

Below, for “dating” and marriage, only 29.7% of Euro-Am women in California colleges chose Euro-Am men. In each case approximately 70% preferred to “snuggle intimately” with non-Whites. For California my premise of 50% is actually quite ‘conservative.’

Dating and Commitment Choices as a Function of Ethnicity Among American College Students in California. (2001-2002)

http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/interracialdating.doc

Discussion

The hypothesis that prompted this study is that, when making commitment choices for marriage and children, subjects in all ethnic groups would prefer members of their own group. The responses by this sample of students at a multi-ethnic campus in Southern California indicate that the hypothesis was sustained in the case of Euro-American men, African American men, African American women, and Asian American women, but not in the case of Euro-American women, Asian American men, or Hispanic men. Results raised the question of whether the pictures used offered equally attractive images of the representative of each group because the Hispanic woman and the African American man were preferred as dating choices at significantly higher rates than individuals of other groups. Given the “stimulus pull” and the resulting apparent selection bias, it is noteworthy that the hypothesis was in fact supported in four of the eight groups.

A detailed examination of subjects’ dating and commitment choices reveals an interesting behavior pattern that seems to be a function of ethnicity and gender. In the United States, Euro-Americans are numerically dominant and therefore marry outside their ethnic group at lower rates than other groups. A slight majority of Euro-American men selected the Hispanic woman (56%) as their first choice for dating and visiting parents, although they chose the Euro-American woman (42%) for marriage and children. [0% of Euromen chose African women for dating. – Coug] This selection pattern conforms to the stated hypothesis.

When answering the question on dating, Euro-American women chose closely among three ethnic groups: slightly more than a third chose the African American (34.4%), and somewhat less than a third each chose either the Euro-American man (29.7%) or the Hispanic man (26.6%). When asked about visiting parents, they shifted from taking the African American (14.1%) to the Euro-American (42.2%), which may reflect a desire for familial approval in the face of possibly stigmatized relations. However, in choosing for marriage and children, the largest number of Euro-American women selected the Hispanic man (35.9%). [For marriage 21.9% Euro-American women chose African men, 12.5% chose Asian men, and only 29.7% chose Euro-American men. – Coug] It is possible that the subjects saw the questions as completely discrete, and not considering visiting parents to be one step along a path to marriage and children, chose the most attractive image. Another possibility is that if Euro-American women desire a different experience they may also fear countering too many cultural expectations. So, when they select someone outside their own ethnic group as a lifetime partner, Hispanic Americans may appear a safer choice that draws less disapproval than the choice of an African American partner.

Hispanic Americans should be more accurately identified as a linguistic or ethnic rather than a racial group. In the 2000 census, a majority of them self-identify as white and studies indicate that they are intermarrying and assimilating at a faster rate than second generation European immigrants of the late 19th and early 20th century (Patterson, 2001).

In the current study, Hispanic men, much like Euro-American men, chose the Hispanic woman for dating and parental visit and the Euro-American woman for marriage and childbearing. In the case of Hispanic men, the choices suggest the recognition that marriage into the dominant group leads to higher status and increased social acceptance. In contrast, the pattern for Hispanic women is complex: they chose the African American and Hispanic as dating partners. However, when it comes to parental contact, the majority of Hispanic women opted for a member of their own ethnic group, reflecting perhaps a desire for approval in a traditionally patriarchal society. In the case of marriage and childbearing, most of the Hispanic women chose the Euro-American man, again suggesting that they, too, may perceive marriage into the dominant group as a way to increase status and social acceptance.

Overall, African Americans chose members of their own group more often for both dating and commitment. It is more than possible that the long history of legal and social prejudice, segregation, and stigmatized intermarriage accounts for their choices. In fact, male and female African Americans actually show the lowest rate of intermarriage among the groups, but African American men intermarry at rates twice as high as African American women (6% vs. 3%). The choices by African American women were the most consistent of all the groups: they selected African American men as dating and commitment partners at a high rate. A majority of African American men selected the African-American woman as their first choice for visiting parents, marriage, and bearing children, but a majority chose the Hispanic woman for dating and almost half chose her for visiting parents. However, when making a commitment for marriage and children, almost half of the African American men chose the Euro-American woman rather than the Hispanic woman. This shift again recognizes that marrying into the dominant society is a way to achieve higher social status and greater acceptance.

Asian Americans are a heterogeneous group with distinct cultural differences and differing histories of emigration and assimilation into American society. Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Filippinos, Vietnamese, and East Indians, to name only the largest groups, were grouped together here for convenience. The finding is that Asian American women and men chose members of this generalized Asian American ethnic group at a higher rate than any other group selected Asian Americans. The pattern of choices for Asian American men mirrors that of Euro-American men and Hispanic men, that is, they selected the Hispanic woman for dating and parental visit, but chose the Euro-American women for marriage and childbearing. As for the other minority groups, their choices likely reflect the idea that certain marriages will increase social acceptance and provide higher status. A third of Asian American men, the highest of all male groups, chose the Asian American woman to visit their parents. In contrast, Asian American women selected the African American man as a dating partner, but then, most likely in response to cultural and parental expectations, selected the Asian American man to visit parents, marry, and with whom to bear children.

The findings in the present study of intergroup preferences in dating and commitment are consistent with results from the first ever national survey on race and attitudes and experience in dating and marriage commissioned by the Henry J. Kaiser Foundation, Howard University, and the Washington Post, and reported in the Post (Washington Post, 2001). Our current research adds information to a social area that at this point contains only a small body of empirical study.

Posted by Al Ross on February 16, 2007, 07:16 PM | #

Re the latest Coug nonsense, we are, of course, not told the size of the ‘sample’ and this is because it is doubtless so tiny as to be worthless in support of any of the claims made for it.

Also the Leftist, ‘one-world’ political agendas of both the ultra-liberal Kaiser Foundation and the Black-run Howard (so-called) University should be obvious even to someone like Coug.

Posted by Coug on February 16, 2007, 08:09 PM | #

Alross,

Once again you’ve failed to follow your own advice and “ignore” the Coug.

It’s clear you don’t respect the intelligence of MR readers. Why else would you lie about the study’s sample size?

“A convenience sample of college students comprising 329 heterosexual subjects (134 men, 195 women) was surveyed regarding their partner preferences for dating, visiting parents, marriage and bearing children.”

You know as well as I that falsification is the only thing that matters. Rather than go on and on about ‘miniscule samples’ and the ‘Howard and Kaiser’ agenda, do falsify the study’ results - that is, if you can. I’ll be happy to check your work.

Honestly, Alross, I want you to prove me wrong.

I really, really, really do want to have beautiful grandchildren bursting with intelligence, strength and vigor. I know you dream about that, as well.

Posted by Literary Critic on February 16, 2007, 08:36 PM | #

“Re the latest Coug nonsense, we are, of course, not told the size of the ‘sample’ and this is because it is doubtless so tiny as to be worthless in support of any of the claims made for it.”

True. The Euro-American male n is 50. The E-A female n is 64. This was a “convenience sample” and “participation was voluntary” (probably psychology students).

Moreover, since “All subjects were between 20 and 30 years of age, heterosexual, unmarried, and actively dating,” the sample excludes many normal/conservative whites who are already married or involved in long term relationships within their race.

The biggest problem is the design of the experiment itself:

Several pictures of men and women from each of four ethnic groups (Asian American, African American, Euro-American, and Hispanic American) were obtained from magazines. Two independent judges selected a picture of a man and a woman to represent each group. The criteria were clarity of ethnic presentation and comparable attractiveness. Each portrait was reproduced to be of approximately equal size.

Subjects were individually surveyed. Four pictures of individuals of the opposite sex were presented to them along with written instructions: “Look over the pictures of the four women (men) and assume you know them socially, and that they have pleasant personalities. Now select your choice for each of the following four questions:

1.Whom are you most likely to date?
2.If you are dating one of these men (women), whom are you most likely to bring to visit your parents?
3.If the relationship were to become serious, whom would you most likely to marry?
4.Whom are you most eager to have as the mother (father) of your child?

The photo selection is suspect. With authors that include a Fiebert, a Hershberger, and a Kasdan, one questions how “independent” the judges were.

People don’t choose mates based on photographs, and they can choose from among more than *a single individual* from their own ethnic group.

The questionairre seems to cue the subject to pick different photos for different questions, and with only four different photos, each representing a different race, to choose from, the results are unsurprising.

In addition, white Americans do not have equal numbers of white, black, hispanic, and asian acquaintances, nor do members of these races have equally “pleasant” personalities.

Posted by Al Ross on February 16, 2007, 08:37 PM | #

As ought to apparent to the meanest intelligence, I limited my perusal to the post, per se, and didnt, because of the poster’s dubious credibility, click on to the link provided.

Had I done so I would have had my suspicions confirmed regarding the paucity of the numbers polled vis-a vis the total student population of a college where diversity myths and multi-culti superstitions are dinned into the heads of suggestible youths and are officially elevated to the status of Universal Truth.

Quite frankly, if anyone is gullible enough to extrapolate figures from spurious data of this type then it is more a cause for sadness than rancour.

Posted by Coug on February 16, 2007, 09:13 PM | #

LitCrit,

Attacking my credibility but unwilling to make good on your critique by falsifying the study? By all means, design and conduct a better one. I’ll be more than happy to check your work.

————————

Alross,

“I limited my perusal to the post, per se, and didnt, because of the poster’s dubious credibility, click on to the link provided.”

LOL!

It took too much effort to point, click and read!

LOL!

Very good, Alross.

A hypocrite, liar, and pathetically pompous, too! By chance do you look like Drew Carey? I certainly hope not! How long have you been away from Free Republic?

—————

I’ll leave to both of you (and Jody) the last word.

I’m still laughing….

Posted by Al Ross on February 16, 2007, 09:48 PM | #

It would seem extremely unlikely that anyone knows exactly why this Coug personage is so desperately keen to have us believe that which is risibly untrue.

Posted by Al Ross on February 16, 2007, 10:46 PM | #

In reply to your question, Coug, as to whether I look like Drew Carey - sadly the answer is yes, because everytime I fuck your wife she gives me a biscuit.

Posted by ES on February 16, 2007, 11:14 PM | #

The study does seem poorly designed, but it’s essentially true that the miscegenation taboos are *gone* or even inverted.

[trolling]

As I’ve stated, the Latina Sirens are *hot*, and not to be underestimated.

A slight majority of Euro-American men selected the Hispanic woman (56%) as their first choice for dating and visiting parents,
[/trolling]

Posted by JB on February 17, 2007, 02:09 AM | #

Al Ross:

Such ruinous aspects of what was once the religion of the West make it difficult to avoid the reluctant conclusion that Christianity is now just Communism stripped of the supernatural element.

but communism pretends that it is sustainable while christianity doesn’t seem to care. The real christianity of the beginning seems to have been more like ‘meekism’. The early christians were pacifists and it wasn’t simply because it undermined Rome, they were sincere in their preachings.

I listened to a radio program today about the Crusades and the cultural differences between the realms of Western Europe and the Byzantine Empire. I haven’t studied this era in detail but the guest was a professor of medieval history at a university in Lyon, so he probably knows what he’s talking about. One difference was about the separation of theology and politics. The Byzantine brand of christianity didn’t allow them to mix faith and violence so for the byzantines who had devoted themselves to God it was a sin to shed blood even if it was to defend their families and friends. You couldn’t be a man of God and a fighter at the same time and the Emperors had problems with the influence of the church on their young men because it pushed too many of them into priesthood.

On the other hand in Western Europe kings like Karl Magnus for example didn’t have a problem mixing faith and war. He lead a 30 years holy war against the Saxons, executing thousands of prisoners who refused baptism and he cut down the Irminsul to symbolically destroy the enemy’s religion.

Later the Templars Knights and the Hospitaliers were ideological / theological / military orders in which one could formally be at the same time a man of God and a man of War. They ignored the contradictions between the two types and some christian rules and customs for the greater good of the cause. For example the Templars didn’t fast because to be able to fight the enemies of their God they needed to be always well fed and strong. These military orders though not universally approved by the high priests of christianity were powerful groups in those times and they participated in events that changed History.

I believe that if Christianity lasted so long in the West it’s because the Church and christians as a whole decided not to turn the other cheek and be the meek Jesus said would inherit the Earth. His religion was unsustainable and self-destructive and christians with a head on their shoulders understood this and acted accordingly.

Anyway the Middle Ages were a once of a kind spiritual age that cannot be brought back even if it were beneficial to us. I don’t see how christianity could be interpreted to fit into our struggle for survival.

Posted by Desmond Jones on February 17, 2007, 02:11 AM | #

The weakness in the study you quoted, Coug, appears to be the fact it was conducted solely at a “multi-ethnic campus in Southern California”.

Who Interracially Dates: An Examination of the Characteristics of Those Who Have Interracially Dated

Journal article by George Yancey; Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Vol. 33, 2002

suggests that propinquity, regardless of attitudes to interracial dating, is the most significant factor in whether or not cross race dating takes place. And multi-ethnic campuses provide an even more conducive setting than mixed neighbourhoods or mixed churches.

Nevertheless, resistance to interracial romantic relationships needs not be intentional. Spickard (1989) observes that propinquity plays an important role in the incident of intermarriage and Fujino (1997) finds propinquity to be the strongest predictor of interracial dating. Clearly it is more difficult to interracially date if one’s social network primarily consists of one’s own race. The racial and social attitudes of individuals who live a racially segregated lifestyle may be irrelevant in predicting interracial dating since such a lifestyle provides little, if any, opportunities for interdating.

The demographics at UT El Paso apparently reflect the community. 76% Hispanic, 3% African and ~18% European. The opportunity for Hispanic/European liasons are substantial. UT El Paso, probably not suprisingly, has one of the lowest graduation rates in the US. Africans at USC, apparently, makeup no more than 6% of the student population.

According to Yancey, evangelical Protestants and Catholics tend not to date interracially. Yancey found, in his study,

35.7 percent of all European-Americans, 56.5 percent of all African-Americans, 55.4 percent of all Hispanic-Americans and 57.1 percent of all Asian-Americans have dated interracially. Thus European-Americans were significantly less likely, at the .001 level, to have interracially dated than other racial groups.

Among European-Americans several characteristics predict whether they have interracially dated. White Americans who are males, not Catholics, younger, well educated, more politically liberal, live in the western region, have lived in integrated neighborhoods and have attended interracial schools are more likely to have interracially dated.

He found that European females were less likely to date interracially than their male counterparts.

Still, your point is valid that given the opportunity, especially in younger groups, to mix in multi-ethnic environments, college age people are quite happy to intermix. It appears, however, to decline rapidly with age and does not necessarily lead to marriage.

Posted by Bud White on February 17, 2007, 09:57 AM | #

“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.” (Matthew 5:38-42, NIV)

So, if I’m interpreting Jesus correctly, we are instructed, if cursed turn the other cheek. If our enimie then curses the other cheek, our obligation to his commandment is fulfilled and we can then assert the doctrine of self defence.

IMO, white people have far exceeded the “turn the other cheek” commandment. It’s time to fight back “by all means necessary!”

JB opines:“I don’t see how christianity could be interpreted to fit into our struggle for survival.”

NONSENCE!!!
The coherent moral code Christianity provides -if adhered too - would nearly eliminate all of the moral degeneracies(ie miscegenation, abortion, etc.) now practiced by the younger generation of whites.

Is further explanation required??

Posted by PF on February 17, 2007, 11:20 AM | #

Nothing, repeat nothing, in the bible is race-specific or tribalist for people of European descent, it is pure dripping hug-the-world-universalism. It doesnt even contain Jewish tribalism, unless you read the old Testament, which most people didnt, except for Genesis and a few select other chapters. The story of Jesus was writ large for 1500 years and its dripping, honey-sweet love-everybody jive.

“The coherent moral code Christianity provides -if adhered too - would nearly eliminate all of the moral degeneracies(ie miscegenation, abortion, etc.) now practiced by the younger generation of whites.”

Please cite a verse which we could use to oppose miscegenation of AngloSaxons and Blacks.

The Bible is not just what is in it- it is also how it was interpreted. And I have a feeling you know exactly how this stuff is interpreted. The fact that you can find support for some hard-core kick-ass racialism or moral stoacism is not really relevant, because the fact is, Christianity on the whole is the religion of a hug-everyone universalist hippy. That is the interpretation that won out- that is what is being sold today in the Churches. With the exception of Southern European Catholics and Orthodox, who have some ethnic imperatives tied into their worshipping tradition. They may ultimately suffer too as a result of this.

Amongst the Protestant Churchgoers of today I find no anti-miscegenationist spirit, though I knew quite a few and went with them sometimes. It is a bastion of white culture, thats true, but its bittersweet and schizophrenic because its a bastion of white culture that ultimately offers no long-term memetic protection to us. Its a dead end- my Aunt is a loyal protestant Churchgoer and has a circle of Indian friends which would make you blush. She knows that Jesus wanted Universal love.

Christianity is in its conception as foreign to us as Rap music, it is just that we tried for 1500 years to integrate it. It is pure levant, pure Orient, pure Hellenized Jew. The fact that our past and possibly our future is tied in with it is something to weep over, not something to exult about. The benefits it seems to offer stem from the fact that it speaks primordial imperatives and achieves group cohesiveness that our modern scientific culture could not- (Until the advent of EGI) -also it benefits from the stability of 1500 years of established tradition and cultural accumulation. Its like a girlfriend that you were always in love with, but never really took you seriously or loved you back, and you felt her irresistable pull, but knew she would leave you weeping and alone. Every time we go crawling back to her, we’re going to be rewarded with pain. In the pure aracialism and brotherly love doctrine of the Bible I read the command: miscegenate like mad! It just doesnt matter! I do love the Church in some sense too because up until very recently it was an almost purely white tradition- and that was our tradition. But look at the modern Churchgoer and ask yourself it our future lies there. I wager that it does not.

Posted by Bud White on February 17, 2007, 12:54 PM | #

“But look at the modern Churchgoer and ask yourself it our future lies there. I wager that it does not.” PF

Surly I can’t disagree with you on that. I, too, am searching for solutions to the problems (such as miscegenation) that plague people of European decent wherever they reside on the planet.

Political Correctness and all the malignancies that are spawned from it are devouring Western civilization like “THE BLOB.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blob

I think you will at least agree that Christian morals serve as a moral restraint to all the deviant sexual behavior that is rampant amongst our youth?

Btw- I’ll get back to you with some Bible verses that have relevance to race mixing.

Later.

Posted by James Bowery on February 17, 2007, 02:44 PM | #

“Go nowhere among the Gentiles, and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 10:5,6)

It’s really dangerous to argue theology as though it has any consistency.

Posted by Mark on February 17, 2007, 03:39 PM | #

When I ask myself what can be done about some negative social phenomenon, my solutions tend towards the free-market-oriented because those respect people’s freedom and property and don’t require something unrealistic that goes against human nature. People do what they perceive gives them benefits that are worth more than the costs.

So let’s look at some fundamentals of this situation (white women having sex with non-whites) and the costs and benefits to the women.

* A significant percentage of white women, especially younger women and girls who are being socialized to reject racism, are interested in dating or just having sex with non-whites. This is either because they find them sexually appealing or because they want companionship and are willing to settle for non-whites.

* Most white men and boys instinctively hate it when white women and girls date or have sex with non-whites. In fact, many or most white males would not marry or even date a white female who had miscengenated.

* When they reach a certain age - nowadays, the late twenties or early thirties - white females almost all want to marry and find a dependable man who would make a good husband and father.

* White men make the best husbands for white women - the most reliable, the most compatible, and the women know their children will look like them and fit in with the family.

* Even if white women and girls frequently want to try sex with non-whites, they almost never want a non-white baby.

* White women and girls can afford to get away with fornicating with non-whites in their school years, because they know that by the time they are interested in marriage and family, their future husband will have no way of knowing what they did in school.

* The cost to social reputation that existed in the past for a young white woman who had sex with non-whites is largely gone, since white males are intimidated into saying nothing about it, and the media teaches them that it is cool.

* So there are no serious costs to a white woman for dallying with non-whites in her school years. She doesn’t intend to have children with non-whites, and she knows that when she leaves school to go to work, she will be able to hide her miscengenation from any future potential (white) husband.

* Our society is very prosperous at the moment, so women have the luxury of choosing sex partners purely for aesthetic pleasure and excitement, without regard to their marriageability.

* But our society is on track for serious degredation in standards of living because of the rampant fiscal irresponsibility of the government and because of the rising proportion of the non-white population, which is less productive than the white portion and will, if trends continue, turn the country into a Third-World dump in the coming decades. So the good times will come to an end sooner or later.

From these premises I conclude that the major reason that white women and girls engage in miscegenation is because they can enjoy the short term pleasure without any significant short- or long-term cost, primarily because they can hide it from future potential husbands.

The solution then is going to be a combination of two things.

One, making it difficult for white females to hide their past miscegenation from future potential white mates.

Two, economic hard times that make it impossible for a white female to seriously consider a non-white as even a potential mate.

The second part is going to happen, period. Its just basic laws of economics that you can’t have a free ride forever.

The first part (difficulty hiding miscegenation) used to happen automatically because people lived in smallish towns where everyone knew everyone’s business. What we need to reinstitute is that lack of privacy, at least with respect to miscegenation.

How to do that? Fortunately, the internet makes possible a very interesting possible solution: a web site where women who miscegenate are identified, permanently, and where anyone can go and look them up.

I have in mind as a model a web site I came across which identified men who pursued children on-line. The proprietor made it his hobby to impersonate being a teenage girl in chat rooms. He would coax personal information - name, phone number, occupation, personal photo - from men who tried to set up meetings with him (in his role as a girl). Once they had called him (and talked to his wife, who pretended to be the girl) and set up a meeting time and place (with an explicitly sexual intention), and once he had confirmed their telephone number by having his wife call them back, he posted the log of their sexually-oriented conversation on this web site along with their photos, names, phone numbers, and so on. Of course the men were devastated. He posted their responses to being identified, and they all sounded a common theme: I am so sorry, I won’t do it again, please take me off your site, it was just a joke. Highly effective in discouraging that behavior! Information on the internet is more or less permanent because of the search sites and such that index it, so these men were in serious trouble in their personal and professional lives because the illicit activity which they previously could engage in without risk to their public reputation was now common knowledge.

Logically, the same could be done with white women who miscegenate. Imagine a web site where people (probably mostly young white men who are around these women and witness their activities) could post the name, city, college, state, age, and perhaps photo of women who dated non-whites. It would have to be made explicitly clear that no one was to use that information to harrass the women, that it was purely an informational source just like the web site for identifying online predators. Standards could be established, such as having to have at least a photo of the two together or something like that. But anyone could post that information. The woman would have the opportunty to post a statement denying the allegation if she liked. The details of this need to be thought out, but the principle is effective I think.

There would be a lot of outrage and declarations that the site was racist. So what? I am not a legal expert, but if something is true, I’m not sure you can get in trouble for publishing it as long as it is not done with the intention to threaten. You could even make the site appear to be “positive”, saying “Here are white women who date non-whites. We should congratulate them for their broadminded anti-racism,” or something like that. (While of course the real purpose is to permanently tie them to their miscegenating behavior.) Some white females would probably sign themselves up on the site as a declaration of anti-racism. Fine, let them help us out like that.

Once the site was established, any white man (or men of other races, I suppose, too) could check and see if the woman they just met had miscegenated in the past. I believe that in time, the potential of this happening would put a real chill on miscengenation. The costs would be too great compared to the short-term benefits.

We don’t need to use violence to address this. We need to use one of the most powerful tools in human psychology: ostracism. People cannot stand being ostracized. White men need to refuse to date a white woman who has miscegenated. After a period of time, no white woman worth dating would take the risk of ruining her future as a wife and mother by doing it. And the way to facilitate a targeted ostracism is to make it impossible for women (or men! let’s be fair) to escape their dating past. And you do that in this day and age by publishing the information on the internet.

Comments?

Posted by 88 88 88 88 on February 17, 2007, 03:58 PM | #

wait, here’s a question that just occurred to me: the only thing anyone cares about is ensuring ~*white genes*~ are passed on to the next generation, right? Thus, with the advent of contraception and birth control, it isn’t as if just having sex with black men with ~*taint*~ the white gene pool. So really, as long as a white woman takes care not to have children with a nigger/kike/sand nigger/spic/whatever, and later on dumps him and goes for a white man, who cares? It may be ~*distasteful*~, sure, but so long as no children are born of the liasons (they would have to be sent to a concentration camp ;_; ) and as long as it’s just a passing phase, no damage is done to the white gene pool

It’s just like a white man raping a black woman—sure, it’s kind of gross, but as long as he settles down with a good white woman later on, it’s all good in the end. It’s even better in some ways, since he’s infecting the black gene pool with white genes rather than the other way around, thus fulfilling his Salterian ethnic genetic interests :D :D :D :D :D

Posted by Al Ross on February 17, 2007, 06:03 PM | #

With the current Mexican invasion of the US, Americans can witness for themselves the personification of Christian belief in miscegenation in the baneful form of the Mestizo who will, in time, turn his adoptive country into a mirror-image of Latin America.

Posted by Lurker on February 17, 2007, 09:29 PM | #

So 88 88 88 88 you are advocating rape and concentration camps, very nasty, just what I would expect from a leftie troll. And those numbers, pathetic. Nasty and lame.

Posted by Pf on February 18, 2007, 09:30 AM | #

Mark,

Thanks for your post, I think it put our situation very clearly in context.

I think the website is a great idea- one would have to be able to contribute to it anonymously. And each of us could probably make 10 or 15 contributions, couldnt we?

I think its something we really need to do, I just dont know if we will get our asses kicked for doing it or not. What country could it be hosted from, so that we could somehow avoid legal prosecutions from elsewhere?

Posted by Bud White on February 18, 2007, 09:39 AM | #

“With the current Mexican invasion of the US, Americans can witness for themselves the personification of Christian belief in miscegenation in the baneful form of the Mestizo who will, in time, turn his adoptive country into a mirror-image of Latin America.”—Al Ross

Al, is it Christianity or the international financiers working in concert with the NWO politicians that are causing interracial genetic pollution?

Posted by Al Ross on February 18, 2007, 10:55 AM | #

Bud,

The Iberian conquerors of Latin America were much more than nominally Catholic. The Spanish, in particular, had so recently experienced Moorish Muslim dhimmitude that their Christianity was fanatical to the point of the establishment of the Inquisition.

However, this undoubted (and sincerely held) Christian piety and its concomitant prosyletizing zeal didnt act as preventives against the White male miscegenation, the ruinous results of which we can observe today.

Indeed, when the devout Marquis of Pombol was Portugal’s Governor of Brazil, he, with his monarch’s approval, offered land grants to Portuguese males who married (in righteous Catholic matrimony) indigenous women. Thus did the vital approbation of the Catholic Church aid the Portuguese government’s official miscegenation policy.

Posted by PF on February 18, 2007, 11:21 AM | #

There’s always this tactic:

“I have to tell you something. I had an affair with a Morrocan woman when I was 20, it only lasted a week. I just wanted to get that off my chest. Did you ever do anything like that?”

Its a dastardly thing to do… but it might work. Of course, this could backfire a thousand different ways…

100

Posted by ben tillman on February 18, 2007, 12:03 PM | #

However, this undoubted (and sincerely held) Christian piety and its concomitant prosyletizing zeal didnt act as preventives against the White male miscegenation….

Actually, Columbus’s expedition party and the conquistadores included large numbers of conversos and marranos, formerly known as “Jews”. This fact may help to explain the massive miscegenation in Mexico and Brasil, where the “European” founders were also largely Jewish.

101

Posted by Bud White on February 18, 2007, 12:47 PM | #

“Indeed, when the devout Marquis of Pombol was Portugal’s Governor of Brazil, he, with his monarch’s approval, offered land grants to Portuguese males who married (in righteous Catholic matrimony) indigenous women. Thus did the vital approbation of the Catholic Church aid the Portuguese government’s official miscegenation policy.”—Al Ross

Thanks Al, Indeed miscegenation in Latin America has its Christian roots, but that was then and this is now. Back then, the white-race wasn’t under any threat of being genetically replaced. Whites were the most numerous people on the planet. It wasn’t until the later half of the twentieth century it became evident whites were in danger of being ethnically cleansed off the planet.

The population explosion of third-world non-white primitives facilitated by western technology is a recent phenomenon. The spill-over of the bumper crop of non-whites into our countries is the the problem. We as whites are being drowned by a flood of non-white immigrants.

My belief is that a combination of rapacious international corporations, international financiers, and a “certain tribe” that has undue influence, is dictating the flow of third-world non-white primitives into white nations for malevolent purposes.

The affect of this non-white immigration is resulting in a kinder gentler form of genocide directed specifically at the white gene pool.

In modern times, Christianity plays but a small ancillary role in all this.

Btw—the Catholic Church is fighting to keep Turkey out of the EU.

102

Posted by The Ordure of Coug on March 10, 2007, 03:59 AM | #

Thought I’d drop in and present the forum’s Daddies with more troubling information from the last academic year. The following took place in the small People’s Republic of Moscow, Idaho. At least 20 women were involved. I strongly suspect that twice to thrice that number actually played the mudshark to African Kanay Mubita, with students from the University of Idaho having a very significant role. Pity the present and future husbands of these little whores.

The University of Idaho. Almost entirely White. Imagine - that is, if your mind has the strength to handle it - what is likely to happen when your Precious Little Homecoming Queen who is bored to death with Podunkville and Larry Flattop is sent to USC or UCLA.

Okay you “revolutionary” Daddyo’s, enough teasing. Grab your Meerschaums and reflect on this:

Latah County Man Charged with Spreading HIV

By Contributing Writer, 12-23-05

Insulated by geography, Moscow and the Palouse have been largely insulated from many of the troubles of larger metropolitan areas. That all changed with the arrest of Kanay Mubita on December 7. Mubita, 31, has been charged with “Transfer of Bodily Fluid Which May Contain the HIV Virus,” a felony under Idaho code.

Originally charged with one count, six more women have come forward alleging sexual contact with Mubita, bringing the total counts to seven in two separate cases. Three other women have made contact with Moscow Police but have not made formal statements. Authorities have received information about nine other potential victims who have not contacted authorities. All of the women are between the ages of 21 and 37 and are identified by initials only. Mubita faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison and a $15,000 fine on each count.

In a short interview at the Latah County Jail, where he is being held on a $20,000 bond, Mubita, who is divorced, denied the allegations, stating he didn’t even know some of the women. “I don’t have unprotected sex,” he said. He went on to say he doesn’t engage in sex outside of a relationship.

He also stated he always used a condom with his ex-girlfriend, who brought the original charge against him. Authorities say he stated he is the father of his ex-girlfriend’s child; Mubita said no paternity has been established. He said it was scheduled for later this month, but now he wants to postpone it until his legal battle is over.

Mubita stated he believes his ex-girlfriend is bringing the charge because of arguments they’ve had. He went on to say the NAACP had been contacted because he feels he’s being singled out because he is black.

When authorities first contacted Mubita on December 6 and questioned him about having been notified of his HIV status, he denied having been notified; he also denied having sex with anyone but his ex-wife. While being interviewed by one officer, another called a health department official who stated Mubita had been informed several times of his HIV status. Police then asked him to make a written statement. Mubita asked to go home and write it; police agreed.

The next day, police received a call from Mubita’s caseworker, who stated he was upset about Tuesday’s interview and asked them to check on him. When officers arrived at his home, he stated he had tested positive for HIV.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled for December 20 at 9 a.m. before Magistrate William Hamlett. Charles Kovis, Latah County Public Defender, will represent Mubita. The Moscow-North Central District Health Department is recommending confidential HIV counseling and testing to anyone who has had sexual contact with Mubita. If the initial test results are negative, testing should be repeated every three months until six after the last exposure.

According to a health department release, humans are the only reservoir for the HIV virus. Transmission occurs by sexual contact, sharing contaminated needles, transfusion of infected blood and blood products and by transplantation of infected organs and tissues. Health care workers are required to report all cases to Public Health and an epidemiologist investigates each case. The epidemiologist then identifies and counsels any person who may have been exposed to the virus.

————————————————————————————-

Man may have spread HIV to 20

Source: The Spokesman Review, December 16, 2005

As many as 20 people have been identified as potential victims of a Moscow man who allegedly had sexual contact without informing partners he had tested positive for HIV, according to court records. The allegations have triggered an alert from the North Central District Health Department, recommending confidential counseling and HIV testing for all people who had sexual contact with Kanay A. Mubita.

103

Posted by The Ordure of Coug on March 10, 2007, 06:29 AM | #

Desmond Jones writes: “He (Yancey) found that European females were less likely to date interracially than their male counterparts.”

—————

I don’t buy it, Desmond.

Let’s be clear: “Dating” has been a euphemism for “sex” since the mid-sixties, at least.

Despite the fact that there is less stigma attached to interracial sex, in sexual matters men lie about quantity and women lie about anything that could reflect badly upon them. Men overstate experience, women understate it. If more women admit to interracial sex, it doesn’t follow that the others are truthful. There is no doubt in my mind that Yancey’s difference for European females and males is inflated, if not reversed. The NOW would have his head otherwise. Even “liberated” women of egalitarian bent have a huge stake in presenting themselves as virtuous women to be placed on pedestals. Nevertheless, despite this minor sleight of hand Yancey’s overall results are closer to the truth.

How does a “liberated” actress play the part of a strong woman? By acting like a traditional “bitch” before kicking the man’s ass and defying other physical laws. The point is when it comes to men and women some things never change.

104

Posted by Euro on October 07, 2009, 02:06 PM | #

For Coug,if he’s still with us,and all the naive doubters of Coug’s assertions.( From the execrable site View From The Right)

The results of importing black students into a college town

A police detective has written this article for VFR. Some details have been been altered or left out to conceal the identity of the city being described.
I am a police officer in the upper northwest and have been a cop for 16 years. Like many in my current community, I came here originally to attend college. Our city is small and predominantly white, and the university population is mostly kids from white, upper middle class families.
Our university tries its damnedest to recruit and attract minorities, but the demographics seem to remain constant. Our local community college is a different story. They have been recruiting athletes from large urban areas for years and have contributed significantly to our community’s young black population. It seems for every young black male recruited to play basketball or football, several male friends follow him from his community to ours. Subsequently, there are a large number of young, non-enrolled, unemployed black males living in our community.
One of the most obvious effects of this trend is the ghettoization of one of our older student neighborhoods. In the last twenty years, this multi-square block area has become almost exclusively subsidized housing, attracting the rest of our community’s dysfunctional welfare class. This neighborhood abuts our university’s east side and still houses many students. The predictable result of this is a significant increase in black on white crime.
These crimes take on several distinct forms. The most prominent are the random strong-arm (or armed) robberies in which a single white student is confronted by a group of black males and robbed. The net gain of these robberies is often only a few dollars or at best a cell phone, however, most are accompanied by an assault of some sort. Many times these assaults result in serious injuries. These robberies occur when some student is walking alone, to or from campus, often through this same area.
When I have responded to this neighborhood to handle a call, I quickly learned that I could expect absolutely no cooperation from the blacks I encountered. Those that were not openly hostile would lie about whatever they might have seen to protect another without compunction. I find this particular characteristic fascinating. Even the most hard-core, white-supremicist prison gang parolee will display the body language that shows discomfort with lying. Many will tell you that they can not answer a question before they will lie. But almost without exception, blacks can lie to your face without the slightest indication of an internal moral conflict.
On the opposite side of campus is a student neighborhood that contains most of the fraternities and sororities. This neighborhood is the epicenter of the weekend party scene with thousands of students roaming around in search of bars and parties until the early morning hours. When I was a student in the early eighties, this scene was relatively peaceful and rarely required the presence of law enforcement. In the last ten to fifteen years, however, the atmosphere has changed to an alcohol fueled, violence prone environment requiring a great number of officers to keep the peace.
Another significant change is the racial make-up of this scene. Once exclusively university students, now has mixed in large groups of black or Hispanic males, many of which are local gang members. Ironically, this demographic is almost always welcomed by the majority white student population. As recently as fifteen years ago, most of the loud music emanating from the bars and parties was white rock and roll, it is now almost exclusively black rap and hip-hop.
The allure of black ghetto street culture amongst the white middle-class youth is a significant factor in this dynamic. There is an almost child-like expectation that the affection for that culture by the majority group will somehow be reciprocated when it plays out on street level, face-to-face encounters. It almost never is. It is amusing in a cynical way to see the repeated shock expressed by these white college kids when that affection is met with unrepentant violence. Whether it is the white male student who is beaten down for taking issue with a black male making a pass at his girlfriend, or the girl herself who is assaulted for rebuking such an advance, these kids are often attacked for just looking at a group of black males the wrong way.
As a cop, I’ve often encountered these victims who, out of frustration, will express their anger and humiliation with an occasional racial epithet. This accomplishes little and allows other white kids to look on and express scorn at their racist attitude. Most often, however, they direct their anger at us for not keeping them safe.
It’s so richly ironic that these upper middle class white college students will often stand on the street corners yelling “F*ck the police!” as officers patrol this neighborhood. They do it to get the attention of their friends and prove their “street cred” to the crowd. Yet, when they become the victims of this random violence by the same black kids they’ve been trying to impress, they blame the police. If officers ever have a black kid detained for any reason, you can count on the white kids to harass the officers and claim they are racists for doing so. I actually used to be shocked myself by this behavior, but no more.
The other black on white crime amongst the college kids that is often not reported is the home-invasion robbery. Many of these upper middle class white kids are small time growers or dealers in marijuana. This activity is very open due to light penalties for possession and a movement to emulate California’s medical marijuana laws. Inevitably they will share or sell some marijuana with a black kid they meet socially. A short time later a group of several black males will kick their door down, brandish guns and demand the marijuana. We’ve had kids shot during these robberies and yet for everyone we investigate, probably three go unreported for obvious reasons. I’ve had black males that I’ve interrogated admit that they consider our town a target-rich environment for robbery and burglary, especially in the student neighborhoods.
You have written before about trends in black on white rape. While we have a significant number of sexual assaults, mostly involving significant alcohol consumption, I have not seen a similar racial component in these cases. This may be due to a factor I find equally troubling.
There seems to be a never ending supply of young white middle-class college girls who will enter into dating relationships with these lower-class, un-enrolled, unemployed, thuggish black males. I’m sure the allure has a lot to do with the popularity of this type of male in pop culture these days; but I still shake my head because many of these relationships end in domestic violence.
The pattern is usually the same. A few days into the relationship the black male will often move in with the female. She will then begin to financially support him. He will often take over use of her vehicle, forcing her to do without for days at a time. He will often take her checks or credit cards and run her into debt. It is only when he continues to womanize that she will take issue and confront him. This often results in an assault. One would think that people would make rational observations about a certain group’s behavior, especially if it impacts them personally in a negative way, and make adjustments in their own actions and associations. However, the liberal dogma prevents this self preservation. Subsequently my community and many others continue to be target-rich environments.

Next entry: Target Tehran?

Previous entry: Frontierist News Roundup 20070210

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa

Miscegenating Female College Students

Comments:

Post a Comment:

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Links