|
|
|
Losing it. Getting it back. I was fourteen years old at the end of July in 1966 when, with my parents, I took my seat at Wembley Stadium to watch England win the World Cup for the one and only time. I’ve seen the match and, especially, the goal replays on TV so many times since, most of my memories of the actual game have been blotted out. But one memory that survives is driving away from the ground afterwards with the team page from the Daily Express’s World Cup Final Special pressed against a rear window of the car, so the residents of north London would get the message, if they had not already done so. Without ever considering the fact, of course, I had just witnessed twenty-two white men playing football in front of 94,000 white spectators, and now we were edging through the traffic in a Wembley populated by, as far as I recall, white people, my people. To the south-west, in Greenford and in Southall, there was an enclave of Indian immigrants, to be sure. But Wembley was still ours, and there seemed no reason to think it would ever be otherwise. That was four decades ago. Here is the situation today as explained, partially anyway, by Andrew Neather and recorded for us by the South Wales BNP activist Roger Phillips: The video is on the BNP’s website. A long thread is already appended, with comments like: “Slough is exactly the same, Reading and Maidenhead are due to follow” ... “And its exactly the same in South London, e.g Balham, Tooting, Lewisham, right through to Bow, Leyton and Walthamstow in East London” ... “Bradford Dewsbury large parts of Leeds…the list goes on” ... “We have two areas, here in Glasgow, called Govanhill and Pollokshields, both predominately Muslim, so much so, that it is unsafe to be there after a certain time of night.” About Wembley and, more generally, London, one BNP member notes:
And what should be the proper response to this political crime? Well, possibly not the BNP’s realpolitik. First, for me, mourning for what has been done to our people and our land. Second, a deep, cold anger that nothing can placate. Third, an unbending determination to undo it all - absolutely all of it, so that nothing, no detail however small, will speak treachery to posterity. Not the people who did this to us, not any part of the political structure they created, not the human tools they employed ... none of it must remain in place. This isn’t simply about our genetic continuity. This is about the completeness of our political victory, too. UPDATE - 4th November 2009 A new school of cinéma vérité appears to be emerging among BNP activists. This time it’s Peckham in South London going on Joburg, and the thread promises further visions of the MultiCult. I want to adorn this footage with an article written by the former editor of the Guardian, Peter Preston - a resident of South London and a man with the same perverted and puerile - and noticeably party-political - enthusiasm for English race-replacement as Andrew Neather. The article dates from April 2005, and the money quote is right at the end:
Well no, little Peter. You have had your way thusfar. Our turn will come, and it won’t be anything that you have seen before or ever want to see. But you are still only 71 now. If you live another 10 to 15 years you will see it. It will fizz. It will hum. It will free the English people. Comments:99002
Posted by the Narrator... on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:50 | # There is reason to be optimistic about the ultimate fate of our people. But we are at the end of an era. America as she was is gone for good. There will hopefully be a place for Whites in North America, but it will be an island surrounded by hostile foes. Western Europe will most likely (in a similar vain) be forced to partition off for itself areas for its people. One thing we have to face is that we will be a divided people. It’s not just the non-Whites but the Whites who have pledged allegiance to others who we must contend with. Our darkest and most dreadful days our before us, not behind us. We have a future. It is just that it will be less than it might have been. It will be bleak and it will be harsh. But from those conditions a stronger people may be forged and a golden dawn will come in the long centuries ahead. ... 99003
Posted by Angry Beard on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:35 | # I’m not ‘pathologising’, patronising or ‘psychoanalysing’ anyone. 99004
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:36 | # I will repeat: the piece of excrement signing as Angry Beard is a knowing, conscious race-replacement advocate who, for whatever reason, feigns sympathy for our side while endeavoring to get us to mentally surrender and embrace divershitty. This person secretly likes race-replacement. Count on it. He does not want race-replacement overthrown. 99005
Posted by Angry Beard on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:44 | # With idiots like ‘Fred Scrooby’ (who has the manners and demeanour of a flatulent caveman) apparently being the leading-light of this forum, then you’ve got no hope.
99006
Posted by Baldwin de Cormier on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:01 | #
Why? Because international Jewry is very good at wholesale infiltration and transformation of political systems, i.e. the “Glorious” Revolution (yes, it was funded by the Suassos), the “French” Revolution which enslaved my ancestors, the “Russian” Revolution, and now the MultiCult Revolution. It is a reversible state of affairs but I am pessimistic about it because changing it would require a momentous effort of will on behalf of our people which I am not sure we are any longer capable of. 99007
Posted by anonymous on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:47 | # Posted by Angry Beard on November 05, 2009, 10:14 AM | # 99008
Posted by Martin Spencer on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:27 | # Angry Beard, Thank you for trying to introduce some reason into this “debate”. Martin 99009
Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:40 | #
Or maybe it’s the Putnam Syndrome.
If there is a sociological impact of living in a diverse society, can reason be trusted or is it somehow impacted by proximity to a diverse environment? 99010
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:27 | # Martin Spencer, Failing to distinguish the purpose of raising and discussing ideas from that of taking actions is not “reason”. Further, revolutionary potential is not the same thing as, and is not dependent upon, the anger of the public. 99011
Posted by Aphoristic on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:46 | #
On Griffin: “In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.” [Erasmus] 99012
Posted by Selous Scout on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:11 | # It is a reversible state of affairs but I am pessimistic about it because changing it would require a momentous effort of will on behalf of our people which I am not sure we are any longer capable of. It is reversible. This is a man-made problem. It is not an irreversible act of nature, like a tsunami or an earthquake. The invasion and occupation of white countries are a direct result of government policy and as such can be reversed. What it requires, when you get right down to it, is a willingness to—nay an enthusiasm for—draw enemy blood. No more debate. No more discussion. The time for action is near. And when I say action I mean acts of war that will shock the country, the world, but which are entirely morally justified. There is a minority of us for whom this does not present a problem. But for the gutless majority who balk at what the impending crisis will require them to do, whose outdated pseudo-Christian ethics stop short of actually defending themselves and their families, all I can say is: when the time comes get the f*ck out of our way. 99013
Posted by Frank on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:57 | # Selous Scout, Anyone can stand up and say “this is what x religion teaches”. Takimag is celebrating this pagan getting a City Council seat (some part of Queens, NY, USA) 99014
Posted by Armor on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:04 | # Dasein: “Whites aren’t disappearing, they’re just moving somewhere they can start over again.” In fact, white people are both displaced AND replaced. They are moving away, but their birth rate has also been badly hit, as shown by the inverted pyramid. Dasein: “Presently, we are building up a sufficient titre with which to infect the body politic. If we can even just get a few memes, like ‘race-replacement’, into public discourse we will have done much more than ‘talk, talk, talk’.” Some explosives work with two components that go boom when they meet. In our case, the bottom component is basic, instinctual anger building up among white people (at least, I hope so), and the top component is the intellectual zeitgeist. Selous Scout: “for the gutless majority who balk at what the impending crisis will require them to do” Americans did not balk that much at the Iraq war, which killed more than 4000 Americans, and was useless from an American point of view. Selous Scout: “What it requires, when you get right down to it, is a willingness to—nay an enthusiasm for—draw enemy blood.” I wonder what a civil war would look like. A lot of political assassinations? Racial riots followed by curfews and total racial separation in some cities? Bomb attacks against government troops? Will the diversity-is-strength propaganda go on during a civil war? If it stops for more than three days, I hope people will come to their senses long enough to rebel and destroy the propaganda machine. 99015
Posted by Wandrin on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:58 | #
South Africa is a good example. Would apartheid have ever fallen internally without the hostility of the white nations? If the white nations turned round and said they would support an apartheid South Africa does anyone think the remaining White South Africans couldn’t take the whole place back despite being outnumbered?
I think there may have been a misunderstanding on here over means and ends. I agree with Griffin’s tactics. I agree even if they’re not just tactics but his actual end game. I think the enemy control of the mass media means people have to be radicalized in stages and if you present them with an endgame before they’re ready then they’ll reject it. However i also agree that any endgame that would be acceptable enough to gain substantial political success and avoid being bombed to the stone age by US aircraft carriers would not go far enough. It’s a catch 22. My personal conclusion it that there needs to be a first stage and a second stage but they must run concurrently not sequentially. The second stage must exist in the background and be thought of and planned for but separate from the first stage. Striving for the first stage, as long as it is acceptable to the people but unacceptable to the enemy, could lead to a reaction that automatically creates the second stage - most revolutions happen that way, it’s the state crackdown of a peaceful political movement that sparks the revolution. If that doesn’t work then the second stage must let the first stage mature as far as it can and at the point where it has become acceptable and stagnant then the second stage leapfrog over or splits off from it to take things further. (At which point a separate 3rd stage may be neccessary to repeat the process if that 2nd movement also stops short). Lastly, if neither of those works then it’s the reconquista solution where physically defended enclaves like the Loyalist/Nationalist areas of Belfast are created from which we may be able to reclaim what is ours, even if it takes as long as it did the Spanish. So i agree with you that one neccessary half of the means is something BNP-like. However i also think there’s a second neccessary part of the means which should be more private. Speaking personally GW’s post would fit into what i would call that second stage thinking even though i’m more of a 98% man rather than 100%. 99016
Posted by Wandrin on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:07 | # Forgot to say what a great idea this video series is from the BNP boys. Thanks to the red media there’s still many people in the UK outside the big cities who have no idea how far things have gone.
What it requires is numbers. Once there’s number and momentum things will start to take off on their own. One of the things that prevents numbers and momentum is premature violence. There is much greater benefit from the enemy striking the first blows, as is proven by the public reaction to the UAF’s activities in the UK. 99017
Posted by Angry Beard on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:34 | # Lest I get further accused of peddling negativity, I state again England’s only hope lies with the BNP and onto Nick Griffin’s shoulders rests an enormous burden. This is the ‘realistic’ alternative - actually trying to work with the material we’eve got rather than airy-fairy fantasies with no actual grounded reality. 99018
Posted by Wandrin on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:17 | #
I may be wrong but i think there still may be a misunderstanding here. I agree with the realistic approach as a tactic. Griffin’s proved that it’s the right way, or at least one right way, to get the ball moving. However, I also think there’s a natural and possibly unavoidable human tendency with that tactic to gradually start believing the currently realistic endgame is the only realistic endgame. So alongside the main realistic approach i believe there needs to be something else and separate that helps to keep eyes focused on the prize. The way i see it is something like a three stage moon rocket. The first stage gets you to a certain point, then the second stage takes over and finally the third. Each section of the rocket is a means and has an end but only the last gets you to final destination. If that makes sense? 99019
Posted by Angry Beard on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:55 | # Yes, I understand what you are saying - I am the first to argue that a “secret” cabal - a dark temple within a temple must be at the heart of policy-making, and its ultimate plans must be kept hidden from the profane. 99020
Posted by Antisocialist on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:47 | # Bill linked to an article called ‘How the British Use the Media for Mass Psychological Warfare’ Anyone wondering how we’ve arrived at the situation now facing us need only read that article to get an idea of the psychological onslaught that’s been waged on the people of Britain and elsewhere in the world. The article focuses on the mother of all mind control organisations ‘The Tavistock Institute’. It also discusses its links with the cultural Marxists of The Frankfurt School. Both colloborating in new and imaginative ways of subverting the West. In the article we read how they “reduce complex problems to simplistic formulas [in order that people] form their opinion by what they believe others around them believe”. They conclude that “truth hardly enters into such considerations”. They talk of enforced “retardation” and inducing “regressive mental states”. One of the aims was “a mass ‘re-educational’ campaign to break the last vestiges of national resistance, especially within the United States, to this new, one-world order.” The ability to ‘shape public perception’ is extremely important to the success of their World Government aim. ‘They’ control the source of the news as well as its dissemination through print and TV. The TV, that box in the corner of the living room, being the most important propaganda tool of all . Anyone imagining that a violent struggle of any sorts will bear fruit is, I’m afraid, delusional. They have already given themselves all the authoritarian powers they need and they have an army (quite literally) of mind controlled ‘servicemen’ who have sworn allegiance to the Crown. Besides, with the final barrier to the creation of a European Federal superstate having now gone any resistance is likely to be met by security forces of a European type. The real war, as we can see above, is the one for the minds of the masses. As soon as someone becomes aware of the fact that they are being programmed, conditioned and brainwashed its effectiveness greatly diminishes. It also causes a huge amount of re-appraisal on everything. They are aware of this but place their hopes in the idea that “the mass of absolutely illiterate, of feeble minded, grossly neurotic, undernourished and frustrated individuals is very considerable, much more considerable, there is reason to think, than we generally suppose. Thus a wide popular appeal is circulated among persons who are mentally children or barbarians, whose lives are a morass of entanglements, people whose vitality is exhausted, shut-in people, and people whose experience has comprehended no factor in the problem under discussion”. That they have helped to create this state of affairs is beyond dispute. For me, this is the war that not only needs to be won but can be won. It requires great consideration over both what is said and how it’s said. For example, Majority Rights is written for and appeals to those of a higher intellect and quite rightly so. It is certainly necessary to discuss matters in this manner. But consideration should also be given to how relevant information is compiled and disseminated for those of medium and lower intellects. A great degree of discipline is also necessary because it’s not only important what is said but how it’s said. No more references to ‘wogs’ (which is not something I’d personally ever do anyway), Hitler (though it beggars belief that anyone should want to be associated with him) or even referring to the ‘Jews’ in a generalised manner. Not all Jews, by a long stretch, are involved in this and neither is it a purely Jewish enterprise. Be specific. Language is everything. The vast majority of people dismiss the idea of there being a conspiracy to create a World Government. That in itself is testament to the power of the mind control techniques being used against us. They have a euphemism for this agenda which is the creation of a New World Order. The International Marxists and Fabians Socialists (Communists) and other assorted ‘leftists’ and the Global Capitalist (Corporatist) ‘right’ make up the thesis and anti-thesis of this particular Hegelian dialectic. The synthesis, or ‘third way’, will look a lot like China. Monopoly capitalism for the elite few and socialism for the masses. Not an appealing prospect. Pretty much everything that happens in this country and the wider world can be seen through the prism of the World Government agenda. This includes mass immigration and political correctness (cultural Marxism) which are the main weapons in the attempt to destroy our nationality. Multiculturism and diversity are really no more than euphemisms for the oldest trick in the book, divide and rule. The most important assault on the nation is, of course, the European Union. The agenda is relentless, destructive and I’ve no hesitation in describing it as evil. The nation states of the world and the indigenous inhabitants of those states must be destroyed or effectively neutralised. I could go in to this a lot more but the point I’m attempting to make is this. It seems to me that you here at MR see the fight from the sole perspective of the destruction of the nation and natives of Britain (particularly England), Europe and the wider ‘white’, Western, world. What I’m saying is that this is merely one (though possibly the most important for us) aspect of a much larger agenda. One that affects both us and the ethnic minorities that have been cynically used to further the aims of the global elites. A correct and clear expression of what the agenda involves could gain a degree of sympathy and support from ethnic minorities. After all, we both have the same enemy. I’m not saying that you necessarily have to dilute your aims to do this, just understand the bigger picture and discuss it with honesty. 99021
Posted by Antisocialist on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:53 | # It’s my feeling that a large degree of ‘shaping public perception’ is at work in regards to the BNP. Many place all their hope in them. All I can say on that subject is that the World Government agenda has been planned for many, many years. They have always controlled all political parties of any relevance. The idea they wouldn’t have foreseen the development of a ‘nationalist’ resistance movement of some sorts is impossible. As ever they would want to control the opposition. The history of Freemasonry in the Griffin family is enough to ring alarm bells. Then there are a few who claim to know for a fact that Griffin is controlled. I made contact with an ex BNP councillor from the Midlands who left because he was convinced that both Griffin and Simon Darby (the press man and deputy leader) were state controlled and he knew both of them very well. For me the thing that makes me suspicious is the involvement of Mark Collet. His various pronouncements have earned him the nickname ‘Nazi boy’. Whether allowing him to be the subject of a Russell Brand documentary was sensible is debatable. To then retain him as part of your ‘team’ is highly questionable. But after all that to then put him forward as the voice of the young BNP for a recent BBC radio interview is more than a little strange. Collet is not the only one of those in positions of responsibility within the BNP that have such baggage and is tolerated and protected by Griffin. Giving your opponents such easy opportunities to criticise you makes no sense at all. I can think of no other political party that would do such a thing. As the author of ‘Griffin Watch’ pointed out, there’s enough information on his site to bury Griffin for ever. The elites seem more than happy to keep him in power.
The harder question is what would be the organisation’s aims. A clear expression of what is being fought for rather than against. To be successful it would need to include a broad spectrum of anti-immigration, pro-British opinion. Its appeal would have to be wide enough to accomodate those at Majority Rights as well as the Laban Tall’s of this world. My own suggestion is that it is one step at a time. Lessons need to be learnt from the tactics that have been deployed against us. Step one is to stop all further immigration. It can be easily proved that the agenda is to destroy the British as a race and a nation and that therefore this is a defensive action. Emphasis should be placed on how immigrants themselves are being cynically exploited. From the perspective of the agenda to create a New World Order the dots can be connected that will show that the ‘elites’ doing this are the descendants of those who were behind both the Empire and the Slave trade. Over-population, strain on public services and cultural cohesion without the need for an overbearing all powerful state are additional reasons. Step two is to reverse the process. This can be couched as an apology to the developing world for the theft of their skilled workers (particularly medical staff); an attempt to make Britain more self sustainable; linked to development aid and as a move towards greater social cohesion in this country. On this point I make an observation that may be disagreeable to many at MR. Even assuming the brainwashing tactics were exposed and neutralised and that there was now the possibility of free debate on the general subject of immigration and multi-culturism, I’d expect there to still remain a number of people, particularly among the young, who would be in favour of it. We would, by now, have established that they have no right or mandate to impose such a state of affairs on an unwilling majority (or possibly large minority). Would that majority (or possibly large minority), in turn, have the right to impose their will on the multi-culturists? Would a compromise have to be reached? Multicultural areas might remain with those who have no desire to live in such circumstances free to live in their own communities. Living as minorities amidst the temples and mosques may focus the minds of the multi-culturists a little, who knows? It seems to me that even without the globalists attempting to manufacture a false unified world government, that thought has to be given to living in a shrinking world of cheap air travel. Step three would be the wholesale dismantling of the ‘race relations’ industry along with all of the cultural Marxism that helped to create it. This, really, is what I’m interested in. Resisting the psychological onslaught and finding what would constitute the ‘flag in the sand’ around which the broadest base of nationalist minded people can gather. 99022
Posted by Bill on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:11 | # Here’s something I started and then lost interest, I relegated it to the back burner. But seeing a couple of recent posts I fished it out and dusted it off. It’s a bit more half cocked than usual. Casting around the usual sites I get the general feeling of a prevailing sense of (disorientation for want of a better word) with regard to our predicament. To put it bluntly, what we’re dealing with is a many headed hydra and we haven’t got a clue as to which head(s) to attack. What we’re faced with is a coalition of forces of such disparity that we simply do not have the resources or time to deal with each head, so as I see it, in some way we have to decide and prioritise a coordinated resistance to maximum effect. Dare I say there is an enormous amount of energy being dissipated throughout the blogosphere by not prioritising (triage) a coordinated response. To start with, Europe’s problems are not the same as Americas, but as it is both Britain and America who are spearheading this culture war then two factions cannot be divorced from each other. Plus, what happens in America today Britain/Europe will have to deal with tomorrow. What and who are this coalition of dispirit forces arrayed against us? As I see it these coalition forces are (in no particular order) the following, the super transnational elites, the media, the politicians and bankers. From these, a whole panoply of organisations sprout forth, victim groups, NGO’s, the long marchers, legal industry, military, civil administration, police and all the major institutions that constitute the nations infrastructure. The forces of influence at the command of the enemy are formidable, and in truth near absolute, so where do we start? Perhaps the most potent weapon our opponents possess is disguising their intentions, as tens of millions of whites haven’t a clue as to what is in store for them, perhaps it is this ignorance we should start addressing in earnest, after all, it numbers that we need to accumulate and quickly. The public face of most of these principle factions is the media, so do we concentrate our efforts in that direction? Time is something we do not possess in abundance, so deciding on a strategy would be a start, all else is interesting and maybe even important but in the end secondary - what is required now is something solid we can run with and get people to believe in. It is this regard that I find the BNP’s direction somewhat puzzling. 99023
Posted by Bill on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:30 | # It is not ground breaking news that Murdoch’s Times and Sun has ditched Brown. I wondered why I was seeing less trashing of the BNP in the Times, don’t know about the Sun though. What’s going on? 99024
Posted by Milka Giordano on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:00 | # I would like to take my car back if I was you. Anyway, it seems that you are good at architecture and home design. I suggest that you join Freelancer.com. It has many projects on design and architecture that you can take. Use this code PLANVIEW to get more advantages from the site. Good luck. 99025
Posted by Bill on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:05 | # Huge Cost of Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants Quantified November 4, 2009
More at 99027
Posted by Bill on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:13 | # Are times really a changin’ ? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/rod_liddle/article6917199.ece 99028
Posted by Angry Beard on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:35 | # Actually, Rod Liddle has got quite a track record in being brutally honest about the immigration disaster - and in particular black criminality. 99029
Posted by Wandrin on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:57 | # Angry Beard
Agree. 99031
Posted by Bill on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:46 | # A little light reading on a wet murky afternoon. Testing the water, taking the temperature? 99032
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:18 | #
(Above photo is trom the article linked by Bill. I only hope all the angry Brits cited in the article who now see what’s going on will be voting for the BNP from now on and only the BNP. I hope they’ve learned their lesson.) 99033
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:53 | # And if they don’t vote for the BNP and only the BNP from now on, it’s a sign of one thing and one thing only, they haven’t yet learned their lesson and will continue in pain, suffering, and agony until they do. Yes it’s really that simple: “To vote for the BNP is to vote for yourself. To vote for anyone other than the BNP is to vote for your self destruction.” 99034
Posted by Bill on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:10 | # An interesting piece by Fjordman over at GoV (Don’t visit much these days) H/T VFR. Should we accept that the existing order of the West cannot survive? 22.11.2009 http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/11/coming-crash.html The Coming Crash by Fjordman 22.11.2009
99036
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:11 | # In re Bill’s comment a couple above: Good-sounding piece by FJ, and thanks, Bill. But with FJ you never know if he’ll be up to snuff in the “Where the rubber meets the road” department. I admit he’s learning ... ever so slowly, but he’s learning, he’s not standing still ... but he continues to have this mental brick wall against acknowledging the race thing. He nibbles around the edges of race but seemingly can’t permit himself to actually take the plunge and think frank racial thoughts. The biggest thing I learned from Steve Sailer in 2000 when I discovered him was it was OK to think certain thoughts, ones I realized I had been suppressing in my brain all my adult life. I was seeing in Steve’s writing that it was OK to think them. A volcano went off in my head. That was all I needed. I did the rest: no one had to think the thoughts for me that I needed to think, I thought them for myself. I began figuring things out. If FJ, at this stage of the game where he’s talking openly about armed revolution, still suffers from this paralysis of the cerebral race-awareness faculties, a paralysis he’s known for, he’s worthless for our side because he’ll support the continued importation of hundreds of millions, and hundreds of billions, and hundreds of trillions of non-Moslem non-whites into Europe while satisfying himself that when all the dust had settled he succeeded in his most important aim, namely being neither racist nor anti-Semitic nor sexist nor homophobic nor anti-LGBT (Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender), and we’ll all still be in the same soup for all the good FJ will accomplish. One way or another, to get out of the soup we’re in you have to awaken to race, and FJ will never awaken to race, and let’s not even talk about awakening to the Jews, that with him is forget it, ain’t gonna happen, ever. So that was a good-sounding piece, and was as Shakespeare wrote, “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” When the chips are down, and the big crunch comes, FJ will be out there fighting against “the racists” and against the “anti-Semites.” He won’t be fighting first and foremost for his people, his race. Why? “That’s the way I was raised,” he’s already explained. My reply? “We don’t need people raised the way you were, FJ. Go home and pride yourself on being unracist and un-anti-Semitic. We’ll get the job done. Ourselves.” 99037
Posted by Bill on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:07 | # Fjordman, GoV, VFR, Takuan Seiyo, Melanie Philips, and the list grows longer, and the list grows….yada, yada. Thanks Fred but I think I’ve had the measure of these people for sometime now, (thanks to MR) it’s what they don’t say that gives them away. I nearly signed off that piece by saying - please don’t shoot the messenger. No, my reason for linking them was twofold nay, maybe even three fold or more. Looking around my blogosphere stamping ground I was getting vibes that this whole business is taking off, taking off to the point where there’s a head of steam building that’s gonna blow. And when I read Auster’s link to FJ and GOV and others, it seemed others feel the same way. I’m eagerly awaiting to being a fly on the wall at next years general election, I’m particularly startled at the pace of America’s awakening and anger, it’s difficult for a limey to gauge the American psyche whether it’s the Wall Street crowd that’s stirring them or whether it’s immigration,or looming socialism or a combination or what, but they certainly seem to be getting seriously pissed off. All of these FJ types are very well educated and articulate our present plight in an easily understood manner, (with the exceptions we know about and take note of) but to the the eager emerging wakeful the FJ’s are performing the vital task of spreading the word. Not only that, the FJ’s are intelligent bellwethers to the awakend and awakening alike and therefore are an asset to building the big picture, It’s an ill wind that blows nobody any good. I think on balance, at this stage of the proceedings, they are far more useful to us than a hindrance. Over the years I’ve learned a great deal how liberalism fits into the scheme of things in our postmodern world from the likes of Auster, so I appreciate that. But it’s as you infer, if you compete in a rifle competition you’re never going to win anything if you cannot bring yourself to aim for the Bulls eye. But in England now is not the time. Jim Giles aims for the Bulls eye, where did he come from? He seems a very resolute sort of guy, and doesn’t sound as though he takes many prisoners. He’s swept into MR like a Katrina, I’m looking forward to him talking things over with Nick Griffin. 99038
Posted by Bill on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:22 | # I see in today’s Mail some people in high places are getting a little concerned over immigration. They must have been reading MR. Post a comment:
Next entry: Notes on a programme for a national reconstruction, Part 1
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & NewsCommentsThorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:45. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Slaying The Dragon' on Tue, 03 Feb 2026 23:41. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Slaying The Dragon' on Sun, 01 Feb 2026 18:47. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Slaying The Dragon' on Sun, 01 Feb 2026 17:55. (View) |
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:41 | #
Psychologizing others is always a form of supremacism, and psychologizing one’s own racial brothers, or pathologising their views, is a form of sibling rivalry in which the normal bounds have been broken.
Like “uh”, who is made worse by his superfice, Angry Beard seemingly cannot comprehend that Freud was wrong, and immorally so, because Freud was not motivated by the pursuit of a human truth but of his own and his tribe’s supremacism. When one turns away from such alien hatred, ceases to be its servant, ceases to analyse and thereby clamber above one’s brothers one might ... might:
a) See into the world.
b) See oneself and one’s own.
Angry Beard will want to do neither. For reasons only he can know, but probably doesn’t, he is too attached to the need to label and mischaracterise others. His chief but by no means only mischaracterisation is to fail to distinguish between a childish refusal to face facts - so pleasurably unlike his own bearded but no doubt lantern-jawed and gimlet-eyed, superior self - from the detailed and proper examination of the politics of a European life and the creation of new ideas tending to the same. He cannot see that a dirge-like analysis of postmodernity (which, in fairness, is just about all he is offered elsewhere, and which is the standard method for kicking the sleepful sheep into wakefulness) is not the same as creative thought, and so he cannot apprehend MR.
If I was going to psychologise him, I would make great play of his projection of sibling rivalry. But I am not going to do that. I am going to challenge him to step free of the protective carapace of false pride and dirge-like sentiment and attempt, at least, to find the meaning of what is done here.