Lady Michelle Renouf

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 20, 2008, 03:27 PM | #

A couple of articles on Birobidzhan are here (an article about the city called Birobidzhan which is the chief city in Russia’s “Jewish Autonomous Region”) and here (an article about the “Jewish Autonomous Region” itself, which has as its regional capitol or “administrative center” the city of Birobidzhan).

Posted by Englander on July 20, 2008, 05:06 PM | #

Birobidzhan is wonderfully far from Europe.

Posted by Rusty Mason on July 20, 2008, 10:01 PM | #

Wonderful interview, thank you for posting.  Dearest, Interviewer, please, try not to speak.

Posted by Robert Reis on July 21, 2008, 12:58 AM | #

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x652q5_sarkozy-ridiculise-au-parlement-eur_news

Mister President,

You are currently in charge, for the next 6 months, in this rotating and short-lived position, as President of the European Union.

Contrary to the majority of the French electorate, you have revealed yourself as a zealous europeist, even daring to reintroduce (under a hardly changed format of the Lisbon Treaty) the Constitution that the Dutch, alongside the French, rejected in 2005.

Your project to re-introduce the Lisbon Treaty has failed again because it has stumbled on the will of the Irish people. Therefore, it is null and void, despite all the manoeuvers to try to impose the will of the reining euro-internationalist camarilla on the European people.

As a young deputy, I voted in 1957 against the Treaty of Rome, which was the first stage of a process aiming to lead to the United States of Europe according to its promoters: Monnet and Coudenhove-kalergi among others.

Given that this Tower of Babel was only able to be built on the debris of the nations and initially of my fatherland France, I have been its determined adversary ever since. It is said that globalization involves fundamental changes everywhere to which we must subdue ourselves.

But the truth is that, in the world, the nations are getting stronger, supported by enthusiastic patriotism, except in only one place, Europe, where nations and fatherlands are sold off, dismantled, demoralized for the profit of a project without power, without identity, while the foreign migratory waves invade it gradually and that the opening of our economic borders, delivers it to the unrestrained competition of the rest of the world.

None of the promises made (so that Europeans could accept the loss of their independence, their sovereignty, their identity, of their culture) were kept - neither economic growth, neither full employment, neither prosperity, nor safety. And it is anguish which prevails at the start of the coming systemic crisis: energy, food and financial meltdown. By then, it is true the media carousel will continue to turn; yesterday, the European soccer tournament, tennis at Roland Garros, tomorrow the Olympic games of Beijing and today the miraculous saga of an icon: Ingrid who laughs, who cries, who prays, who comes and goes supported by your fraternal arm.

In your desire to be the libertador (the liberator in English), you were misled in accepting negotiations with the terrorists of the FARC. But it is neither you, nor Mr Chavez who released the Colombian Senator Mrs Betancourt. It is President Uribe, who with tenacity, against the general mobilization of world progressives, gained a decisive victory over criminal terrorism.

You multiplied the approaches to negotiate in vain and you even went to the length of inviting the repented communist terrorists of the FARC to profit from asylum in France, but to protect them from whom? From Uribe the democrat! While you were at it, why not the talibans, the Hezbollah, the Tamils Tigers? You are like the amphisbene, dear to Césaire.

Do not doubt at any moment, Mr. President, that all your talent as media director will not be enough to avert the brewing crisis which you will have to face before the end of the year. Your Europe is a drifting vessel, windswept and beaten by the waves. It is the only region in the world to have deliberately dismantled its political and moral structures.

Without borders, gradually invaded by a mass immigration which is only at its beginning, economically ruined by the ultra-liberalism, socially impoverished, weakened demographically, without spirit and military strength. At best, it will fall under the American protectorate, at worse it will become a slave of the dhimmitude.

It is now long overdue to give up on the deadly illusion of federalism and to build a Europe of the nations, united in concrete alliances, probably more modest, but more effective.

Both failures, the Constitution and the Treaty, must be used as warnings. The people of Europe do not want them. They will not allow them to be forced upon them because they do not want to die.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 21, 2008, 07:41 AM | #

Great speech by Le Pen.  Was that filthy swine who kept laughing at him Danny Cohn-Bendit?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 21, 2008, 08:54 AM | #

Here‘s a rundown of what’s wrong with the positions of the various EU criminals (like Danny “the Red” Cohn-Bendit, if that swine was he) who smirked, fidgeted, and laughed at Le Pen’s excellent speech.  (Another smirker was that extremely irritating white-haired German-speaker who appears to be some sort of chairman?  Anyone know who that smug asshole is?  He’s always without exception been on the wrong side of everything and irritatingly so, in whatever videos I’ve seen of the goings-on in that shameless EU parliament.  What’s that moral leper’s name?)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 21, 2008, 09:10 AM | #

Incidentally, everyone should be aware of the repeated valiant, noble efforts by the seemingly indefatigable Nigel Farage, British UKIP MEP, to derail the most shocking of the neo-marxist EU juggernaut’s plans for ruining the European nations and civilization forever.  See here for just one of many examples that have been posted over at BrusselsJournal.com the past several months.  This brave and eloquent fighter for sanity deserves everyone’s profound gratitude.  No, Farage doesn’t fight for all that we here would wish him to, doesn’t agree with all our positions, far from it, but who else fights so well for even the part we and UKIP espouse in common?  Precious few.  Thank you, Mr. Farage!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 21, 2008, 09:18 AM | #

I have to say seeing Farage speak in those videos makes me, who have not a drop of Anglo-Saxon blood in my veins, proud to belong, by adoption, to the Anglo-Saxon world and the Anglo-Saxon heritage.  (Just typing this now makes my heart swell inside my chest and my eyes tingle and moisten a little.)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 21, 2008, 09:26 AM | #

These are heritages — the Anglo-Saxon and all the others making up what Pat Buchanan so eloquently called the Ancient Nations of Europe — these are the heritages, the traditions, along with the peoples, the races, which alone created which alone could create them, these are the precious irreplaceable, irretrievable-once-lost patrimony which the other side, the Marxists, the Jews, the Capitalists, the Bought-and-Paid-For, and the Criminally Ignorant, intend on throwing on the rubbish heap forever.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 22, 2008, 09:22 AM | #

In his speech’s fourth paragraph (pasted in Robert Reis’ comment above) Le Pen refers to the kind of Europe envisioned by Jean Monnet and von Coudenhove-Kalergi.  I commented on these two pieces of garbage here and here (at the second link, note the 1952 statement by Monnet all the way at the end of the video).  This is the kind of “Europe” the E.U. is striving to bring about, the “Europe” of Coudenhove-Kalergi and Jean Monnet.

It’s not a Europe any normal European wants anything to do with.

Posted by Alex on July 23, 2008, 07:07 PM | #

As a young deputy, I voted in 1957 against the Treaty of Rome, which was the first stage of a process aiming to lead to the United States of Europe according to its promoters: Monnet and Coudenhove-kalergi among others.

Le Pen makes many a fine point in his speech.

Regarding the ‘United States of Europe’ thing, a subject not much taught about in any particular coherency or depth in the schools, if it’s taught at all (hmmm, I wonder why), powerful elements of both the establishments* of the US and the UK, in addition to associates of these elites, have long pushed Europe to model itself upon the United States…ie the Occident as a continental super-state**, made up of states that are ‘democratic republics’ joined together politically in the form of a ‘federal union’, the entirety as a whole being a ‘republic’ as well.

The relative few amongst European peoples promoting this for Europe, much against the will of most, realize that many in Europe are quite rightfully weary of their nations being shaped into something like the United States, and therefore they play a shell game with them and make a great deal of noise that the United States of Europe and the European Union are two wholly different and distinct things, that the former is ‘old’ and the latter ‘new’.***  To get away with that they count on Europeans not realizing or knowing that the United States of (North) America is also simultaneously formally known as ‘the American Union’, ie that the US and the American Union are the very same thing, in the very same way that the United States of Europe and the European Union are the very same, modeled as they are upon the United States.

It has to be asked.    Can something which requires such trickery and deceit to bring about have much of anything good to offer?

In the wake of revolutions and chaos across much of Europe, an exhortation for Europeans to follow the United States, from a late March 1848 issue of The London Times, ...italics in original.    It’s significant the London Times would publish this, being seen as it is by many for a long time as a mouthpiece of official British government thought regarding policy.

‘Let them [Europe] observe the working of federalism in America. The most complete national unity is there preserved as regards foreign nations; complete freedom of trade, complete uniformity of action in all respects essential to national life…’

‘Let them [Europe] observe the working of federalism in America. The most complete national unity is there preserved as regards foreign nations; complete freedom of trade, complete uniformity of action in all respects essential to national life; while, at the same time, the inestimable habit of self government is created and retained, and the power of adapting local institutions to local wants exercised so fully, that no American citizen has to complain that the interests of his locality suffer by the distance or neglect of the legislative centre. The German in Pennsylvania, the Frenchmen in Louisiana, the Spaniard in Florida, had no need, when they came to participate in the advantages of the great American Union, of sacrificing one iota of the local institutions to which they were attached. So wonderfully elastic and expansive is this principle of government, that the entire American continent might, as it appears to us, be absorbed in one vast federation, with but little inconvenience or danger resulting from its extent and diversity of characteristics.’

At the end of the Times editorial, The May 13, 1848 edition of Littell’s Living Age (the US Journal the Times article is republished in) then comments…

’...suppose the United States of America were invited to join with the United States of Europe, not in political connection, but on the basis of peace and free trade!’

‘Suppose these European nations to have settled their governments, and then to have made a Federal Union of the whole, within which peace and free trade should be perpetual, as they are between our states. And then suppose the United States of America were invited to join with the United States of Europe, not in political connection, but on the basis of peace and free trade! We desire to prepare our readers for such a question…’

The prominent British journalist and close associate of Empire mining magnate Cecil Rhodes of Africa fame, WT Stead, wrote and published the book The United States of Europe in 1899, below of which is an excerpt. 

In 1901 he would publish another book entitled The Americanization of the World, and as in the case with the previously mentioned book, The United States of Europe, it was something he very much advocated. 

Question: “What is England’s mission abroad?”
Answer: “To maintain the European Concert - that germ of the United States of Europe - against isolated action…”

Are we repeating the crime of Frankenstein, or are we fashioning, like Pygmalion, a beautiful creature into which at the appointed time the gods will breathe the breath of life? In other words, what is this Europe whose United States we are seeking to federate?

W T Stead

The United States of Europe

Europa

This question of the United States of Europe has been one of the ideals towards which I have constantly, in fair weather and in foul, directed my course. Nineteen years ago, in the critical election of 1880, it was my lot to draw up an electoral catechism which was more widely used as an electoral weapon by the party which issued triumphant from the polls than any other broad sheet in the campaign. In this catechism I formulated my conception of the English foreign policy in terms which, after the lapse of nineteen years, I do not find necessary to vary by a single syllable:

  Question: “What is England’s mission abroad?”
  Answer: “To maintain the European Concert - that germ of the United States of Europe - against isolated action; to establish a Roman peace among the dark-skinned races of Asia, Polynesia, and Africa; to unite all branches of the English-speaking race in an Anglo-Saxon Bond, and to spread Liberty, Civilization and Christianity throughout the world.”
  (“The elector’s Catechism.” General Election of 1880)

My last visit to Russia and the publication of this book are the latest efforts that I have made to realize the ideal which was clearly set out in the above sentence written in 1880. The conception in those days was confined to few, but nowadays the parties led by Lord Roseberry and Lord Salisbury would vie with each other in asserting their readiness to recognize the European Concert as the germ of the United States of Europe, and to develop the concerted action of six Powers in relation to the question of the East into a Federated Union of all the European States. It may perhaps be well worth while to form some idea of this new organic entity which it is the first object of our foreign policy to create. Are we repeating the crime of Frankenstein, or are we fashioning, like Pygmalion, a beautiful creature into which at the appointed time the gods will breathe the breath of life? In other words, what is this Europe whose United States we are seeking to federate?

Europe is a continent. It is hardly as yet a realized personality. There was a fair Europa in the mythology of the ancients, whom Jove loved, and whose story once suggested to Tenniel the idea that John Bull might aspire successfully to play the part of the Father of gods and men. But outside mythology there is little personification of Europe. The symbolical group at the base of the Albert Memorial, representing Europe as one of the four continents, is almost the only effort with which we are familiar in England.

But such personification of a Federation of States is possible enough. The United States of America form a federation which has its recognized symbolical embodiment in Columbia and its humorous personification in Uncle Sam. The British Empire is a conglomerate far more heterogeneous and wide-scattered than the United States of Europe, but we have our symbol in the heroic figure of Britannia and our familiar personification in John Bull. The German Empire, to take another illustration, is also a conglomerate of kingdoms and duchies and cities; but the first great effort of German art to express in permanent form the triumph of German arms in the attainment of German unity was the erection of the colossal statue of Germania upon the wooded heights of the Niederwald where she still keeps watch and ward over the German Rhine. But in all these cases it must be admitted there is a certain unity of national type which facilitates the task of personifying the federal combination.

Some additional examples of the ‘United States of Europe’ articles (amongst others) published in the United States in the 19th century

Harper’s New Monthly Magazine(July, 1872)

The North American Review (April, 1898)

The New England Magazine (April, 1899)

* or very powerful elements thereof
** in the modern sense a state whose political borders are drawn for economic purposes roughly along the geographic lines of a continent
*** though lately, with the EU treaty running into problems, the term ‘United States of Europe’ is once again being trotted out on occasion instead

A link to the full article ‘The London Times Praising America’ which appeared in the May 13, 1848 edition of Littell’s Living Age pg 322-324

Excerpt from Part I, ch.5, of W.T. Stead’s 1899 book The United States of Europe

Posted by snax on July 23, 2008, 07:39 PM | #

Alex: do us all a favour and collate your links at one site.

We cannot easily search Majority Rights for your posts, but they usually include quotes or links worth saving.

Posted by BB Wolfe on July 23, 2008, 08:15 PM | #

Who’s Lady M’s intellectual inspiration? Revilo P Oliver, I’ll betcha.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 23, 2008, 08:15 PM | #

I heartily second Snax just above:  get all Alex’s superb comments in one easy-to-find place for reading and re-reading as one feels the need.  These are too important to remain scattered.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 23, 2008, 08:17 PM | #

The day Europe becomes the United States of Europe is the day Europe dies forever.  It’s the opening day of Europe’s death throes.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 23, 2008, 08:24 PM | #

“Are we repeating the crime of Frankenstein?”  (—from the log entry)

That W.T. Stead guy even looks like Victor Frankenstein.

Posted by snax on July 23, 2008, 08:24 PM | #

Who’s Lady M’s intellectual inspiration? Revilo P Oliver, I’ll betcha.

What’s wrong with either?

Posted by Alex on July 23, 2008, 08:28 PM | #

‘One day, on the model of the United States of America, a United States of Europe will come into being.’ George Washington (1732-1799)

Open Democracy -(November, 2001)

Posted by BB Wolfe on July 23, 2008, 08:34 PM | #

Wrong? There’s nothing wrong with R.P.O. — he’s the greatest post-war racialist writer of all. Renouf, the “fragrant fascist”,  is better looking though. She’s not always on form (her “debate” with Norman Finkelstein is more like a debacle) but she seems pretty pugnacious here.

Posted by snax on July 23, 2008, 09:10 PM | #

Renouf, the “fragrant fascist”, is better looking though.

Yes, to the normal men among us.

Apologies if I misunderstood you. I think her intellectual inspiration may simply be David Irving - and there’s nothing wrong with that.

Even if she gains (and seems to seek) a little more attention than she ought by the value of her ideas due to her looks, use of ‘title’, and newsworthy connections - I like her.

Posted by Alex on July 23, 2008, 09:29 PM | #

That W.T. Stead guy even looks like Victor Frankenstein.

LOL!   

Regarding the question of Stead’s your post alludes to, I think it’s safe to say that was a type of question that to even ask it was to answer it.

Posted by BB Wolfe on July 23, 2008, 09:41 PM | #

Yes, we need more visible women in our “Movement”, especially if they’re like Lady M. She’s certainly a good friend of Irving’s, but I’m not sure of Irving’s more personal views. One can only surmise. No-one seems to mention Revilo Oliver nowadays (not a single mention in David Duke’s 700+ page autobiography, for example) but I think his ghost hovers above the white nationalist/Aryanist movement as a guiding spirit.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 25, 2008, 07:01 PM | #

A few weeks ago I resolved personally that the next time I saw, in a non-sectarian Jewish publication intended for the broad public, the replacement of AD and BC with the ultra-obnoxious in-your-face Jewish attack on the West represented by “CE” and “BCE” (terms appropriate for sectarian Jewish publications, not otherwise) I’d start referring to Jerusalem as al-Quds and Israel as Occupied Palestine. 

Just now I was reading this article in The NY Sun, a non-sectarian Jewish publication intended for the broad public.  In it I saw inappropriate, highly obnoxious use of “CE” and “BCE.”  As I had resolved, therefore, I will from now on refer to Jerusalem as al-Quds and Israel as Occupied Palestine. 

Two can play that particular Jewish game (the “I-Loathe-Your-Ethnoculture-and-Will-Obnoxiously-Help-to-Extinguish-It” game) — the Jews aren’t the only ones who can play, although they do play it the most obnoxiously of all.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 25, 2008, 07:33 PM | #

No one should be misled by the tons of Straussian-type obfuscation clumsily attempted in this dishonest article, Straussian-type obfuscation aimed at camouflaging the fact that the fundamental drive to substitute CE/BCE for AD/BC is and as been for at least sixty years now one-hundred-percent Jewish (notwithstanding whatever Moslems, Hindus, homosexuals, atheist groups, Reverend Barry Lynn type assholes, and whatnot, the Jews have latterly managed to bring into the act on their side as camouflage).

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 25, 2008, 09:25 PM | #

The “CE/BCE” monstrosity is all over the place lately — you can’t get away from it.  I was reading this article just now, and up it popped, polluting the whole text. 

The Jews have afflicted us with this perversion of normalness, this wrongification of rightness. 

They never stop and it’s impossible for anyone to get them to stop.  Many have tried.  None has succeeded. 

But no one is obliged to go along with their crap.  Recognize it and side-step it as you side-step any filth in the street.

Never adopt it or acquiesce in it, or forget that it’s pure crap or who’s responsible for inventing and pushing it.

Posted by disgraced cosmonaut on July 26, 2008, 02:24 AM | #

Another way of responding to the CE/BCE crowd is instead of saying 2008 or 2008 AD say “in the year of our Lord 2008”. Imagine being in a debate with an Alan Dershowitz type and everytime you had to mention a date you would say ” in the year of our Lord” before mentioning the year, the Jew would blow a gasket.

Posted by Alex on July 29, 2008, 11:02 AM | #

Early last month the European Union and the American Union held their annual summit meeting in Slovenia.    Note the highlighted portion of the article which involved something called the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC).

‘Furthermore the EU and the US will discuss the strengthening of the economic and regulatory cooperation and the deburdening of enterprises on both sides of the Atlantic, following the cooperation in this field in the framework of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC), which was created at last year’s EU-US Summit.’

President George W. Bush walks through an honor cordon with Prime Minister Janez Jansa of Slovenia after arriving Monday, June 9, 2008, at Ljubljana International Airport on the first stop of his European visit. (White House photo by Eric Draper)

EU-USA Summit Opens in Slovenia

10 June 2008, Tuesday

The EU-USA summit opened Tuesday in the Slovenian town of Brdo, which makes it one one of the biggest events hosted by Slovenia during the country’s six-month EU Presidency.

This year’s EU-US Summit covers the full range of global and regional issues where the EU and the US seek to act in partnership.

Key international issues to be discussed by US President George W. Bush and the EU delegation lead by the EU Council President, Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and EU Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana include assisting the development of Kosovo, following up on the Middle East peace initiative launched last year at Annapolis, shaping a comprehensive and binding post-2012 global agreement on tackling climate change, and working together to promote energy efficiency as well as energy security through the diversification of supply sources and the development of sustainable new forms of energy.

Furthermore the EU and the US will discuss the strengthening of the economic and regulatory cooperation and the deburdening of enterprises on both sides of the Atlantic, following the cooperation in this field in the framework of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC), which was created at last year’s EU-US Summit. The TEC has already made significant progress such as promotion of open investment regimes and equivalence of EU and US accounting standards. Participants from the side of the Commission will be the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, Vice-President Günter Verheugen and Commissioners Benita Ferrero-Waldner and Peter Mandelson.

The EU is also going to press the US to extend its visa waiver program to all EU member states, including Bulgaria. However, the US have stated that in return for the waiver program, they would like to receive more data on air passengers, which the EU has been reluctant to provide due to privacy concerns.

Other international issues on the summit’s agenda include the Middle East peace process, stability in Afghanistan and Iraq, the dispute between Georgia and Russia, and the recent humanitarian crises in Myanmar and China as well as Serbia’s European future.

George W. Bush arrived in Slovenia Monday evening. Tuesday morning, before the summits opening he met with his Slovenian colleague Danilo Turk.

Bush’ visit takes place under the strictest security measures; Slovenian police officers and soldiers and American agents are working around the clock to guarantee the safety of the American President.    The visit to Slovenia is Bush’s farewell to Europe as US President and is part of a European tour that will also take him to Germany, Italy, the Vatican, France, and the United Kingdom.

And what exactly is the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC)?    Hint…it’s very big on the ‘economic integration’ of the EU and US, ‘free markets’, and for ‘removing barriers’ to trade.

‘Recognizing that the transatlantic economy remains at the forefront of globalization…’

Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration Between the United States of America and the European Union

2007 US-EU Summit

We, leaders of the United States of America and the European Union (EU):

Believing that deeper transatlantic economic integration and growth will benefit our citizens and the competitiveness of our economies, will have global benefits, will facilitate market access for third countries and will encourage other countries to adopt the transatlantic economic model of respect for property rights, openness to investment, transparency and predictability in regulation, and the value of free markets;

Affirming our shared commitment to increase the transparency and efficiency of our economic cooperation and to accelerate the reduction of barriers to international trade and investment;

Desiring to improve the effectiveness of existing economic cooperation and to elevate and accelerate existing work to achieve tangible progress;

Recognizing that the transatlantic economy remains at the forefront of globalization, and that the United States and the European Union are each other’s most important economic partners, reflecting historical ties as well as a wide range of common fundamental values, such as the importance of free enterprise, rule of law, property rights, free trade, and competition, and the protection of health, safety and the environment for our citizens and workers;

Reaffirming our commitment to the 2005 U.S.-EU Summit Declaration on Enhancing Transatlantic Economic Integration and Growth, in which we resolved to pursue a forward-looking agenda to enhance transatlantic economic integration and growth, and our commitments from the June 2006 Summit to redouble our efforts to reduce barriers to transatlantic trade and investment and our pledge to keep our investment regimes open and to build on existing investment flows to boost growth and create jobs in the transatlantic economy;

Recognizing further that we have established a wide range of joint work in the areas of regulatory cooperation, financial markets, trade and transport security, innovation and technological development, intellectual property rights, energy, investment, competition, services, and government procurement;

Welcoming the launch of a study funded by the European Commission to identify existing barriers to trade and investment and estimate the benefits of removing such barriers.

Have reached the following shared understandings:

Section I Purposes

We seek to strengthen transatlantic economic integration, with the goal of improving competitiveness and the lives of our people. To that end, this Framework reaffirms a multi-year program of cooperation that emphasizes results and provides accountability.

Section II Fostering Cooperation and Reducing Regulatory Burdens

In light of our shared commitment to removing barriers to transatlantic commerce; to rationalizing, reforming, and, where appropriate, reducing regulations to empower the private sector; to achieving more effective, systematic and transparent regulatory cooperation to reduce costs associated with regulation to consumers and producers; to removing unnecessary differences between our regulations to foster economic integration; to reinforce the existing transatlantic dialogue structures in regulatory cooperation both by intensifying our sector-by-sector EU-U.S. regulatory cooperation and our dialogue between the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and European Commission services on methodological issues: we resolve to achieve the goals set out in Annex 1 in a timely manner…

EU-USA Summit Opens in Slovenia

Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration Between the United States of America and the European Union

Posted by Alex on July 29, 2008, 11:17 AM | #

And recall what had been published 160 years ago regarding ‘Economic Integration Between the United States of America and the European Union’ by the US journal Littell’s Living Age...

May 13, 1848

‘Suppose those European nations to have settled their governments, and then to have made a Federal Union of the whole, within which peace and free trade should be perpetual, as they are between our states. And then suppose the United States of America were invited to join with the United States of Europe, not in political connection, but on the basis of peace and free trade! We desire to prepare our readers for such a question…’

As appeared on pg 324 of the May 13, 1848 edition of Littell’s Living Age

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 05, 2008, 08:31 PM | #

A fair question:

I do not understand one thing.  If Europe and the White race have such a long history of anti-Jewishism, why don’t Jews leave Europe and the U.S.A and other White nations?  But most Jews live and prefer to live in nations with White majorities.  Outside Israel, U.S.A, France, Great Britain, Russia etc… have the highest number of Jews.  In South America, White Argentina has the biggest Jewish population.  If Whites have harassed Jews in the past, why did they not simply leave Europe?  Why bother to backstab the White nations by inviting enemies like the immigrants in this century or the Moors several centuries ago?  Why not just leave Europe completely?  I have heard India has no history of anti-Jewishism.  Then why not settle in India?

Comment by E Kumor — August 5, 2008

http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2007/11/17/alexander-solzhenitsyn-and-the-jews/#comment-29942

Posted by Fred Scrooby on August 05, 2008, 09:53 PM | #

In the middle of the comments thread I carelessly attributed the question, “Are we repeating the crime of Frankenstein?,” taken from one of Alex’s comments, to “the log entry.”  My apologies. 

(But the guy does look like Victor Frankenstein — anyone see that movie?)