Review of 2083: A European Declaration of Independence

Posted by anon on September 05, 2011, 09:16 PM | #

I wonder what Guessedworker had been drinking when he gave J Richards permission to hitch his blind and embarrassing judeomania to the blog.

Posted by Leon Haller on September 05, 2011, 09:43 PM | #

I have no idea what Mr. Richards is going on about, but I confess: I love that poster reproduced on the left. A death’s head with the tattooed symbols of Islamism, communism, and Nazism and a stake representing a Christian cross driven through it. Perfect.

Posted by Leon Haller on September 05, 2011, 09:51 PM | #

From Breivik:

The badge of the Justiciar Knight illustrates a white skull, marked with the symbols of communism, Islam and Nazism on the forehead, impaled on the cross of the martyrs. The background is black. The badge of the Justiciar Knight illustrates our patriotic struggle/ opposition against all three primary hate ideologies of our time: Islam, Multiculturalism (Communism) and Nazism.

Posted by Republicrat on September 05, 2011, 10:08 PM | #

If CvH is allowed to ramble incoherently here with his drunken pornographic poetry, then J. Richards can surely blog here too, no? I’m personally go for “quality” above “quantity”, but I don’t share G.W.‘s same English “sensibilities”...

Posted by Captainchaos on September 06, 2011, 01:11 AM | #

J. Richards can surely blog here too

The ‘evidence’ Richards marshals too often smacks of his reading tea leaves.  One’s first impression is that he is in the throes of some kind of apophenic compulsion.  There are all kinds of average White schmoes whose heads are filled with Jewish nonsense which leads them to do things which are not evolutionarily adaptive.  It is not because they have Jewish ‘handlers’, it is because they are brainwashed schmoes.  They believe what they see on the Tube and Jews control what is put on the Tube. 

But then again if Richards wanted to say that the Jews who craft the content of what is broadcast on the Tube insert personalized subliminal messages for the specific individuals they care to manipulate and in that sense those Jews are the ‘handlers’ of those specific individuals, this would be entirely plausible, both factually and semantically.  LOL!

Posted by Robert Reis on September 06, 2011, 02:18 AM | #

Mr. Richard’s article is worth reading.
On 911 the CCTV cameras at the airports failed to capture images of any of the alleged hijackers at the relevant places. All of the CCTV films at the Pentagon were disappeared.
In Norway hundreds of people with cell phone cameras failed to provide us with images of Breivik.
One of bombers in Madrid had the private phone number of the head of Spain’s bomb squad in his wallet.
The targets in Norway were both anit-Zionist and pro-immigrationists.
Why they were targetted is a very good question.

Posted by Captainchaos on September 06, 2011, 02:37 AM | #

Let’s say Richards is right.  Let’s say the Joos did 9/11, used Breivik as their patsy and faked the moon landing(s).  My comment on that is, So fucking what?  Surely these would be mere misdemeanors which pale into insignificance when contrasted with the demonstrable heavy Jewish hand which played in opening up the borders of Western nations to non-White immigration.  Something like focusing on Al Capone’s tax evasion instead of his complicity in the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre.

Posted by anon on September 06, 2011, 07:46 AM | #

Something like, but not exactly. More like focusing on the role of “the Mafia” in the assassination of Kennedy instead of the Mafia’s total career in America: evidence of Jewish malfeasance is everywhere as it forms much of our total cultural environment — but as the mind relies on discrete events, this awareness becomes refracted in certain individuals’ minds as “big” symbolic events (just-so story, or ad hoc fallacy). Bush was widely hated before 9/11, but shortly thereafter, with a blithe transfer of animus he became the figurehead of the “inside job” myth. J Richards has, almost single-handed, created his own “inside job” myth for the Norway massacre.

If there is any reason to read his analysis (which, you see, must be part invention) it can only be for points of style. Let us give him credit for writing well and in great detail.

Posted by J Richards on September 07, 2011, 12:53 AM | #

@Captainchaos

Quit complaining, go easy on the straw men and start blogging.  If GW can tolerate Hoffmeister and me posting here, he’ll surely welcome you with open arms.  Be my guest and blog all you want on immigration issues; it’s welcome.

Personally, I’m following some of the advice in the manifesto:

When the pipe in your bathroom springs a leak and the water is flooding the room, what do you do?  It’s not very complicated, after all.  You go for the source of the problem, the leak itself!  You DON’T mop up until after you have fixed the actual leak. (page 1254)

I’ll let you mop the floor.  I’m trying to fix the leak.

@Anon

I most certainly haven’t made an inside-job argument.  Whereas they’d need to have access to the sewers and the buildings, i.e., inside access, the masterminds aren’t ethnic Norwegians.  It’s an outside job.

Posted by John on September 07, 2011, 08:36 AM | #

“On 911 the CCTV cameras at the airports failed to capture images of any of the alleged hijackers at the relevant places.”

C’mon. You can’t be serious. Do you really claim that at at time when every 7-11 had a security camera the are no videos of hijackers, contigious with the other passengers, going through security or boarding any of the four fated planes? That’s ridiculous.

Posted by Guessedworker on September 07, 2011, 12:32 PM | #

he’ll surely welcome you with open arms

I think CC knows that.

Posted by Irish Anti-Commie on September 07, 2011, 01:38 PM | #

I have no idea what Mr. Richards is going on about, but I confess: I love that poster reproduced on the left. A death’s head with the tattooed symbols of Islamism, communism, and Nazism and a stake representing a Christian cross driven through it. Perfect.

Red for Rothschild (German for red shield) and the Bolsheviks. I can take or leave the star and crescent. But why the swastika? The Nazis were defeated in 1945. Who cares about them, except the chosen ones? What sort of nationalist is a pro-gay anti-racist one?

If Breivik was really against the multicult and cultural Marxism and was truly aware, the skull would have a star of David tattoo alongside the hammer and sickle, would it not? The atrocity happened on the 65th anniversary of the bombing of King David hotel. A mere coincidence?

The name Leon reminds me of Leon Trotsky, the name Lionel and the Lion of Judah for some reason. There’s something about lions like the colour red….

Posted by anon on September 07, 2011, 02:20 PM | #

When the pipe in your bathroom springs a leak and the water is flooding the room, what do you do?  It’s not very complicated, after all.  You go for the source of the problem, the leak itself!  You DON’T mop up until after you have fixed the actual leak. (page 1254)

You read all the way to page 1254 for that?  : /

Posted by Robert Reis on September 07, 2011, 02:22 PM | #

Posted by John on September 07, 2011, 12:36 PM | #

“On 911 the CCTV cameras at the airports failed to capture images of any of the alleged hijackers at the relevant places.”

C’mon. You can’t be serious. Do you really claim that at at time when every 7-11 had a security camera the are no videos of hijackers, contigious with the other passengers, going through security or boarding any of the four fated planes? That’s ridiculous.

BUT TRUE.

Posted by Robert Reis on September 07, 2011, 03:04 PM | #

Folow the money….

http://www.larsschall.com/2011/09/03/911-was-a-fantastically-profitable-covert-operation/

Posted by Dasein on September 07, 2011, 03:07 PM | #

I’ve read parts of the manifesto.  I believe the guy did it himself.  What I did think, reading the diary part where he describes building the bomb, is that he was lucky not to blow himself up or get caught.  JR will say too lucky; I think it was just a combination of luck and brains.  The guy is obviously quite intelligent.  According to one of McVeigh’s psychologists, his IQ was 126.  Breivik’s is probably over 130.  Planning and executing such an event is within their capabilities.  With McVeigh, I believe there could have been foreknowledge.  Same with 9/11.  I don’t buy the elaborate alternative hypotheses, like controlled demolition.

Posted by re:Dasein on September 07, 2011, 04:56 PM | #

Dasein, you say you do not believe in controlled demolitions but have you seen the site below? They are about to run ads across the US and in NY.

While not focusing on the main towers it still a critical puzzle piece in analysing what happened.

http://rememberbuilding7.org/10/

Posted by Leon Haller on September 07, 2011, 08:07 PM | #

DASEIN,

Isn’t 126 a fairly high IQ? What then was McVeigh doing in a lowly army job? I’ve had friends (and family of another generation) who are ex-military, but officer class, and their assessments of the intelligence and competence of the general soldiery were not high. I vaguely recall Murray in The Bell Curve saying something to the effect that since the 70s or 80s pretty much anyone with an IQ over 120 was now going to college.

Posted by Mr Voight on September 08, 2011, 08:23 AM | #

The type of personality that McVeigh had is quite textbook; intelligent with quite strong social anxiety. It is fairly common for such types to avoid university and choose low level work in order to pursue their idealistic/entrepreneurial/misanthropic interests.

The history books are full of these folks.

Posted by Dasein on September 08, 2011, 08:25 AM | #

Leon,

126 would put him around the 96th percentile of the white American population (it would be 99.9th percentile of the black population).  McVeigh chose infantry because he wanted to work with guns and develop his survivalist skills. 

re:Dasein,

I’ve seen some of Gage’s presentations and have read some of DRG’s books.  I just don’t think CD is anywhere close to being proved.  Is there a single recording of the collapse whose audio is consistent with CD?  Structural engineering is a complex subject.  I laugh when someone like Kevin Barrett says that it was so obviously a CD.  These people are not experts.  Gage once said he thought the explosives could have been planted during construction of the building.  Just because Steven Jones says so, does not make it so.  Jones also wrote a paper about Jesus’s appearance to the Mayans.  I do think there was foreknowledge, and that certain elements in the administration ensured that the attacks were allowed to take place.  But we won’t know until someone besides ZOG is able to subpoena persons of interest.

Having said all that, I think many people who see videos of the collapse of Building 7 will assume there was some form of CD at play (I also think there could be, but I’m agnostic about the causes of the collapse of the 3 WTC buildings).  And if that makes them doubt the integrity of the American regime, that’s a good thing.

Posted by Dasein on September 08, 2011, 08:27 AM | #

McVeigh’s biography, American Terrorist, is worth reading.

Posted by Dasein on September 08, 2011, 09:03 AM | #

I seem to remember Murray setting 130 as an important threshold.  I’m going by my bad/overloaded memory, but I believe he or another IQ researcher said that with an IQ above 130, all professions would be open (not that one would necessarily be good in those professions).  I find it interesting how successful some people can be with IQs that aren’t extremely high.  Albert Speer’s IQ was reportedly ‘only’ 128.

Posted by anon on September 08, 2011, 10:30 AM | #

Albert Speer’s IQ was reportedly ‘only’ 128.

LOL. That’s almost retardation for the Nazi elite.

I do think there was foreknowledge, and that certain elements in the administration ensured that the attacks were allowed to take place.

This is really the most measured assessment. We would have to pinpoint those certain elements, of course. Know of anything, Das?

And if that makes them doubt the integrity of the American regime, that’s a good thing.

Eh. It’s that go-nowhere, sterile sort of doubt that rests with a bland statement of distrust for “the guvvermint”. The cognitive leap from a “Prison Planet” worldview to a judeosceptic one is seldom made.

Regarding the events of the upcoming kwan holyday, I can but echo the German antifa .... “Bomber Ahmed, Do It Again!”

Posted by Dasein on September 08, 2011, 12:08 PM | #

Know of anything, Das?

I would start following the trail from Coleen Rowley.  It’s been a while since I looked into this, but I think one of the key figures was someone called Dave Frasca, who quashed several investigations, rather inexplicably according to the agents in the field (IIRC, Rowley referred to the joke among co-workers being that someone higher up was trying to protect the suspects).  There’s also Ali Mohammed, who was a bin Laden higher-up and who worked for the Americans but was supposedly a double agent.  The Truth Movement’s fixation on ‘the science of 9/11’ is wrong, IMO.

Eh. It’s that go-nowhere, sterile sort of doubt that rests with a bland statement of distrust for “the guvvermint”. The cognitive leap from a “Prison Planet” worldview to a judeosceptic one is seldom made.

Agreed.  But the move to a judeosceptic worldview is not a prerequisite to take action against the system.  Even extreme action, as shown by McVeigh and Breivik (whatever we might think of the nature of their attacks).  McVeigh and Nichols sounded like Alex Jones.  I shouldn’t be surprised if another Ruby Ridge or Waco set off one of AJ’s current subscribers.  Although it would have to be a subscriber who disagrees with AJ’s main message (acts of violence help the system, thus ever an ‘inside job’).

Posted by Wandrin on September 08, 2011, 04:09 PM | #

I’ve read parts of the manifesto.  I believe the guy did it himself (snip) Planning and executing such an event is within their capabilities.

ditto

Posted by Thorn on September 08, 2011, 07:14 PM | #

A Chinaman tells the future of a Daughter of the American Revolution:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hta0ndC7Dqw

Posted by Leon Haller on September 09, 2011, 05:54 AM | #

I recall a Jared Taylor review of writings by or about Raymond Cattell (there was a great man, whose work has not been fully digested even by the Racial Right) in which Cattell used the 130 number as the threshold past which one would not succumb to senility (a questionable claim, imo, unless he was distinguishing between normal, age-related mental decline, the cognitive equivalent of loss of muscle and bone mass, and some specific genetic ‘time-bomb’, as Alzheimer’s might be; certainly the late, brilliant novelist and Oxford-trained and published philosopher Iris Murdoch must have had an IQ vastly exceeding that of McVeigh, from what I’ve read of him).

Do you have a good sense of IQ, Dasein, that is, of how it corresponds to published writings? What would be that of a typical historian or scientist or even WN writer?

Posted by Dasein on September 09, 2011, 05:54 PM | #

Leon,

Here’s a table showing average IQs for PhD students in a variety of disciplines.

http://motls.blogspot.com/2006/03/iq-in-different-fields.html

If I had to guess, I would say that the median IQ of regular contributors to MR is somewhere north of 130.

Sorry, JR, I realise this might be a bit off-topic.  I think what ABB shows, though, is that someone who is very intelligent, works alone, and who accepts that he will be caught, is capable of inflicting major damage.  So substantial, in fact, that some will consider it the work of 3rd parties.  As regards the main points of your essay, we’ll just have to disagree;  I don’t think either of us is going to convince the other.  I think fertiliser bombs are capable of inflicting the damage you saw in Oslo, and I don’t find the evidence for multiple shooters anywhere near convincing.  The eyewitnesses saying there were multiple shooters are a minority, and they were probably confused by the stress of the situation.

Posted by Dasein on September 09, 2011, 06:10 PM | #

That Bolshevist poster was a great find, BTW.  ABB’s choice of colours was interesting.  And did commies also use black/white/red anywhere?  To me, they’re the colours of the German Reich.

Posted by Wandrin on September 09, 2011, 07:17 PM | #

did commies also use black/white/red anywhere?

I wouldn’t be surprised if they used black and red a lot in places where there was strong Anarchist movements as Anarchists used black and red and they would have copied the colours as a form of false advertising. White could have entered into the design simply through saving money i.e white paper plus two colours.

.

and who accepts that he will be caught

This makes all the difference imo.

Posted by anymouse on September 09, 2011, 10:50 PM | #

Somewhat off topic from a European Declaration of Independence

Cherokees expel descendants of slaves from tribe

Posted by anon9823 on September 10, 2011, 03:37 AM | #

Excellent analysis.  Everything about this attack - the selection of targets, the content of the manifesto, the background of the alleged perpetrator, the level of sophistication involved, the suspicious circumstances surrounding both the bombing and shooting, etc. - points to Jewish/Mossad involvement.

Posted by Chip Farley on September 10, 2011, 04:13 AM | #

It is fairly common for such types to avoid university and choose low level work in order to pursue their idealistic/entrepreneurial/misanthropic interests.

Sure thing!  Look at William James Sidis (whose reputation may be due to Jewish nepotism however).  He even worked as a waiter at one point I heard!

Later life (1921–1944)

After returning to the East Coast in 1921, Sidis was determined to live an independent and private life. He only took work running adding machines or other fairly menial tasks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_James_Sidis#Later_life_.281921.E2.80.931944.29

The bottom line is some folks with an elitist bent come to the conclusion that they may not be capable of effecting positive change in the world, so they take the logical step of withdrawing from it.  Baron Julius Evola covered this type of thinking quite a bit in ‘Ride the Tiger’.

Also many just do not like the politically correct orientation of the contemporary University system. 

I tested in the top percentile in English, was taking collegiate level math and also have relatives who work in the admissions office of Stanford University (the Harvard of the West), but in the end decided to not even bother to take the SATs since I knew Affirmative Action would just hinder any attempts to enter the Academy. 

A White Mans time and efforts are better spent in other endeavors where things are not that stacked against them. 

P.S. take a look at what different paths the lives of class-mates Jaime Kelso (White Man discriminated against by AA, turned Pro-White) and Michael Medved (Jew, promoted to being paid mouth-piece for the Zionist Occupied Government) have taken (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Kelso#Public_life )

Posted by Leon Haller on September 12, 2011, 06:19 AM | #

DASEIN,

Thank you. That was interesting. I’m always sceptical of those who attempt to draw too tight a relation between IQ and commonsense notions of intelligence (that is, among those recognizably educated). I have stated in the past my belief that IQ scores are far more dispositive for those located on the left than the right side of the cognitive bell curve. If I may be permitted to borrow the form of Tolstoy’s opening of Anna Karenina, stupidity is all the same, but intelligence is highly variegated.

In my experience, while the correlation between intelligence and wisdom is reasonably strong, it runs in one direction: the possession of the former is no guarantee whatsoever of an equal possession of the latter. And the latter is what matters in the racial struggle.

Posted by Leon Haller on September 12, 2011, 06:20 AM | #

Italics were meant for Anna Karenina only.

Posted by Robert Reis on September 30, 2011, 03:44 PM | #

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGXxckUKVAs&feature=player_embedded&skipcontrinter=1

Posted by Robert Reis on October 11, 2011, 06:46 AM | #

Of course, no hate involved here:

http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2011/10/three-years-after-winchester-atrocity.html

Posted by J Richards on November 30, 2011, 12:54 PM | #

Anders Behring Breivik found insane; no trial for him!

Breivik’s recently found insane and spared a trial.  Notice what they’re doing.  If they publicly cover his trial, it’ll be impossible for the prosecutor to prove that he did it by himself.  If they close the trial to the public, they still have to allow the relatives of the deceased victims access, and it’ll be obvious to them that the official logistics aren’t possible.  If the defense moves toward a plea deal to avoid a trial, it’ll be obvious that some don’t want a trial because they’d much rather avoid people asking questions about logistics.

So they’re declaring him insane and will confine him to a lunatic asylum.  He won’t have access to the media in there, and should there be pressure to interview him inside this facility, the environment of the asylum and the drugs they’ll put him on could make him insane.  Should there be a future push, from the administrative members of the asylum, to release Breivik, Breivik would probably end up dead of “medical complications.”

Anyone who comes up with the manifesto attributed to Breivik can suffer from only a narrow set of mental illnesses.  Notice what they’re saying his illnesses are: delusions of grandeur and paranoid schizophrenia; he was allegedly psychotic (suffering from a psychosis) at the time of the massacre.

Considering the size of the manifesto he allegedly wrote, these illnesses should be evident in the manifesto.

But, the manifesto’s hardly a delusion of grandeur.  It’s best described as fundamentally a fantasy or vision of large-scale killings of Muslims; the removal of Muslims from Europe, Israel and the neighborhood of Israel; and the containment of surviving Muslims thereafter.  Realization of this vision requires the killing of some cultural Marxists.

Schizophrenia’s a form of psychosis, a mental illness where the person loses the distinction between the real and the imagined.  The manifesto doesn’t suggest that the author has lost this distinction with respect to Muslims and what’s described as cultural Marxism.  Problems created by present levels of Muslim immigration and the left-leaning governments welcoming Muslims are documented and verifiable.  Where the manifesto’s factually incorrect on Muslims, this is ascribable to absorbing lies about Muslims from the mainstream media or ignorance, not disconnection from reality.

Notice that the manifesto abruptly starts from the Frankfurt School in tracing the beginnings of cultural Marxism, but ignores the School’s entirely Jewish origin and the reasons why Jews came up with it.  It also ignores that without the wealth Jews have accumulated, there wouldn’t be non-Jewish cultural Marxists in prominent positions, acting as the front men for Jews.  This is neither an example of ignorance nor a disconnection from reality, but deliberate omission. 

If a single person authored the manifesto, there’s no indication that this person feels that Muslims or cultural Marxists are trying to get him personally, and a diagnosis of paranoia can’t be supported.  But if the manifesto’s written by a team or group, then something akin to paranoia’s at play, and there’s only one thing that fits the bill: Jewish concerns or paranoia over Norwegian attitudes toward the Palestinians and other Muslims.  But Breivik isn’t supposed to be Jewish and is said to have acted alone.

The manifesto details a process of awakening, a documentation of Muslim problems in Europe, a long-term plan and a multi-year effort culminating in the massacre, altogether indicating that if Breivik wrote it and is solely responsible for the massacre, he knew what he was doing, is fully culpable and can be brought to trial.

But they can’t try him or their lies will be fully exposed.

Posted by Gudmund on November 30, 2011, 07:30 PM | #

In my experience, while the correlation between intelligence and wisdom is reasonably strong, it runs in one direction: the possession of the former is no guarantee whatsoever of an equal possession of the latter.

Intellect can be very narrow; people who are very talented in a given area or group of areas can be abysmal in others.  I’ve seen this repeatedly in life, although I suspect this phenomenon would be difficult to quantify, i.e. for empirical studies.

Also it bears mentioning that, as far as I can tell, IQ is mainly a predictor of how well people will do on activities correlated with intelligence.  I would not take it at face value.  Consider that Richard Feynman, one of the most eminent physicists of the 20th century, tested at an IQ of only 125, whereas actor Dolph Lundgren scored 160.  But, judging from intellectual contributions it seems fairly obvious who is the more intelligent of the two, at least from the standpoint of creative genius (which is, like you’ve suggested, but one facet of intelligence).

I think also there is a fair amount of data to suggest that IQ is far more useful in aggregate terms, e.g. population wide studies, than in individual cases where there is considerable error.

Posted by Nuge on January 06, 2012, 01:54 AM | #

J Richards may be on to something.

“Swedish prof ‘insinuates’ Israel tie to Breivik attack”

http://www.thelocal.se/37926/20111214/

A Swedish academic has come under fire in Norway after writing an article suggesting that Israel played a part in the July 22nd massacre carried out by Anders Behring Breivik that claimed 77 lives.

Swedish-born Ola Tunander is a research professor at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), a research institute where he has spent most of his career since receiving his PhD from Linköping University in 1989.

But a recent article authored by Tunander in which he seeks to discover what might have driven Brevik to set off a car bomb outside government offices in Norway and gun down 69 people at a summer camp for young Labour Party supporters, has prompted the head of PRIO to distance himself from the piece.

PRIO director Kristian Berg Harpviken told Norwegian magazine Minerva that Tunander’s article left him with a feeling of “considerable unease”.

Harpviken was also dismayed with what he viewed as a serious lapse in judgment on behalf of Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, a multidisciplinary peer review journal, for agreeing to publish the contentious text in its latest issue.

In his article, Tunander reaches the conclusion that terrorist acts of such magnitude are seldom possible without the involvement of state forces, “and we can’t rule out that being the case this time too.”

In the midst of a web of alternative theories, Tunander lays out a “simple chronology” detailing the fractious diplomatic relationship between Norway and Israel in the months before the massacre, with Oslo indicating it would be willing to recognize a Palestinian state.

On two occasions, Tunander notes the significance of the date of the attacks.

First, he travels back to 1973, when members of the Israeli spy agency Mossad were arrested on July 22nd after a botched operation in which they assassinated the wrong person on Norwegian soil.

He also calls to mind the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem by Zionist paramilitary group Irgun, which took place on July 22nd 1946.

“We have discussed the right-wing extremist Israeli and Judeo-Christian side of Breivik’s network, Israel’s interest in disciplining Norway, and Israel’s celebration of bomb attacks. In this respect, Breivik’s attack appears to resemble a new king David Hotel attack: July 22nd,” he writes.