|
|
IQ MattersIQ Matters The following is a summary of we know about the distribution of intelligence as measured by IQ tests among the genetic clusterings of humankind. The European genetic clustering wherever it lives has a median IQ of 99. There are however studies that show that some European peoples have somewhat lower median IQ’s. Portugal, Ireland, and Lithuania have median IQ’s in the low 90s. The median IQ’s in Southeast Europe are also lower: Romania 94, Bulgaria 93, Croatia 90, Serbia 89, Greece 93, and Turkey 90. The East Asian genetic clustering gets higher scores on IQ tests than the Western populations these tests were standardized on. The median IQ in Japan, China, S. Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan is 105. East Asian children adopted by families of the European genetic clustering show higher median IQ’s than the nonadopted children of families of the European genetic clustering. The jury is still out about the relative IQ’s of East Asians and Southeast Asians. The South Chinese often do better than members of the European genetic clustering. Filipinos don’t do as well. Within Malaysia, the Chinese test much better than the Malays. Within Southeast Asia, the overseas Chinese do much better economically than the Malays. It is noteworthy that between 20 to 50% of marriages in the Middle East are between cousins, whereas fewer than 1% of the marriages of members of the European genetic clustering are between cousins. Studies show that cousin marriages cost IQ points. I met an Eskimo in Arabia. She was extremely bright. This is not strange. Members of the Arctic genetic clustering have been living a primitive hunter-gatherer life for thousands of years. Unlike hunter-gatherers living elsewhere, they do well on IQ tests. They are the third most intelligent genetic clustering with a median IQ of 91. Arctic people, East Asians, Australian Aborigines and American Indians all have an elevated visual memory IQ. I have never met an Australian Aborigines. They have the smallest brains of any living population, but the parts of their brains devoted to vision is much larger that those parts devoted to vision in members of the European genetic clustering. Their median IQ is only 62, but their visual memory IQ is 119. The nearby Australoids living in New Guinea have a median IQ of 63. The Polynesian genetic clustering divides into Maoris with a median IQ of 90 and the non-Maoris with a median IQ of 85. The Amerindian genetic clustering has a median IQ of 86. Mestizos, Hispanic people of mixed Amerindian and European descent, have a median IQ of 89 in the United States but a median IQ of 94 in Mexico. One researcher has found a correlation of .96 between the Gross Domestic Product-per-capita of South American countries and the percentage of the population that are members of the European genetic clustering of the Caucasian genetic clustering. Sub-Saharan Africans living in Europe, the United States and Canada have median IQs of 85 to 87. Sub-Saharan Africans living in Latin America and in the Caribbean have a median IQ of 71. The Sub-Saharan Africans living in Africa have a median IQ of 67. The latest international evaluation of math and science performance of eighth graders showed almost no overlap between the scores of East Asians and Sub-Saharan Africans. The most likely explanation for the difference between the IQs of Sub-Saharan Africans living in White countries and the Europeans is mainly genetic. The difference between the IQs of Sub-Saharan Africans living in Africa and Sub-Saharan Africans living in White countries is largely because of environmental factors. I was astounded to learn that breast-feeding dramatically improves IQ scores. Three times as many White American mothers breast-feed compared with African-American mothers. The median IQ of the Jewish genetic clustering of the Middle Eastern genetic clustering living in Israel is 95. Forty percent of Israeli Jews are Ashkenazi. Ashkenazi Jews have a higher median IQs. Sixty percent of Israeli Jews are not Ashkenazi and their median IQ is lower. Brain size is important. The median IQs scores of genetic clusterings is closely correlated to median brain size. East Asians and Europeans have much larger heads than Africans in proportion to their body sizes. The EQ, Encephalization quotient, brain size controlling for body size, is correlated to intelligence among all primates. Rhesus monkeys have an EQ of 2.10, chimpanzees 2.60, Australopithecus 3.70, Homo habilis 4.30, Homo erectus 5.00, and the average modern human 7.5. IQ tests have been proven reliable over time. IQ tests given in various nations many years apart have Do IQ tests predict the same real world results across national and genetic boundaries? IQ tests correlate from .8 to .9 with the outcomes of international scholastic examinations. In fact the countries with the highest median IQs do even better than expected on international scholastic examinations. The countries with the lowest median IQs do even worse on international scholastic examinations. IQ matters economically. South Korean is a high median IQ population nation. Ghana is a low median IQ population nation. The Philippines is an in-between median IQ population nation. Ghana and the Philippines are resource rich nations, South Korean is not. In the 1950s they were all equally poor. Economists were predicting that Ghana and the Philippines were going to become wealthy and that the South Koreans were doomed to poverty. IQ trumped resources. This article is based on an extensive review of Richard Lynn’s Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis which appeared on the geneexpression website on Wednesday, February 01, 2006.
Posted by Robert Reis on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 06:48 AM in Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity Comments:2
Posted by john fitzgerald on October 12, 2007, 12:05 AM | # .Brain size to intelligence correlates at between .3 to .4. Not so significant. Brand has some quotes about I.Q. in his blog. 3
Posted by Al Ross on October 12, 2007, 07:27 PM | # The Bell Curve’s co-author, Professor Charles Murray, enunciated it most succinctly - ” IQ will put you in your place”. 4
Posted by Takahata Joe on June 07, 2008, 01:10 AM | # IQs in developed environments are more valuable. We all know illiterate Africans will score low on IQ, that isn’t interesting. So, to look at IQ in developed environments to get a better picture of race and IQ. Because realistically, high IQ doesn’t equal high success. Just look at Mongolia. I prefer to look at developed environments to get an understanding of ethnic IQ: The average European score in a developed environment (AKA western Europe) is 100. We can find the average of Indians (South Asian), Malays (South East Asians) and Chinese (East Asian) by looking at Singapore, a developed country. Lynn’s table shows 108 for Chinese and 92 for Malays. Indians typically score in the middle on countrywide examinations, and their education levels and income are usually between the other two, or higher towards the Chinese. Their score would probably be around 100. Blacks (at least, the African ones rather than Australian or such) in developed environments get 85, as shown by studies in America. You can argue that blacks in America are affected by poverty still, so it may be a bit higher. One would assume that the middle-eastern IQ is similar to the one for Pakistanis given by Lynn, around 90, lower than Indians but higher than Africans. American Natives are the question mark. -Takahata Joe 5
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 08:37 AM | # But Joe, no matter what their IQ is, we Euros don’t want to get race-replaced by them, changed into them, however you want to describe it. We want to stay us, not become them, and that for reasons ranging far beyond IQ. It has to do with looks, for example: we like the way we look. And it has to do with behavior — we like the way we behave. And it has to do with culture: we’re not convinced that the culture a race creates isn’t to an important extent inborn, and we like the one we’ve created: it fits us, it suits us; we just like it better and don’t want it to change into one some other race creates. And it has to do with ancestry: we value the feeling that comes of descending from our Euro ancestors and being the same people, the same race as they, sort of the way someone feels proud to descend from a famous great-grandfather: blood of his blood. It’s mystical, yes. So be it. And most of us want homogeneous communities of us, not mixed communities of us and them, though the Jewish PC revolution of the 1960s has taught us to be ashamed to admit it openly. We don’t begrudge them their own countries, their own “places,” we only want ours too. We like lots about them and we want to learn about them but across fixed borders, we on one side and they on the other, not them scattered everywhere among us and replacing us (which the government is seeing to — their replacing us, that is: without government forcing it they’d not get a sufficient toehold to replace us because we’d naturally prefer our own, and even apart from our preferences we’d out-compete them in most cases; but the government doesn’t allow either of those, and instead does what amounts to forcing us to be replaced by them). We like the way we are. While begrudging no one else his own racial self-esteem we claim the right to have and cherish ours as well, without needing to make apologies for that whatsoever. We do not want to be changed into some other race no matter what their IQ is, whether high, low, or in between. Yes I realize, Joe, that you are commenting on the log entry which is about IQ, and I find your comment of course completely appropriate (and interesting), and am not criticizing you, but I want nevertheless to make this point, which people too easily lose sight of. The clever manipulators steer debate such that the conversation goes like this: “We don’t want to be changed into another race. For one thing, we’ve read other races may have lower IQs, something which contributes to poorer ability to compete in society, high rates of crime, and so on.” “But Orientals have higher IQs than you do, and lower crime rates, and high ability to compete in society.” “OK, then you’re right, there’s no reason we should question getting changed into Orientals. That should be fine. We don’t like the low IQs of some races, but Orientals not only don’t have them, they have highers ones than we do, so OK, even though it still doesn’t feel right, I guess we have to admit we have no valid reason to not want to get replaced by Orientals, changed into them, whatever you want to call it. So go ahead, open the borders to them, flood the country with them. We’ll shut up.” No, it’s not fine and not what we want, which we’ll make clear if given the chance to express ourselves frankly without PC obfuscations, recriminations, demonizations, or threats of ruination from the other side. It’s not fine, because our preference not to get race-replaced doesn’t hinge on group IQ. Group IQ is a factor where some groups are concerned, and other things are factors where other groups are concerned. (See my first paragraph above.) The end result is the same regardless of questions of comparative group IQ: we reject race-replacement. We will always reject race-replacement. We will never agree to it. And we are going to stop and reverse it, setting things to rights, things that never should have been tampered with in the first place, ESPECIALLY not without our permission but dishonestly, dirtily, and stealthily behind our backs. 6
Posted by Takahata Joe on June 07, 2008, 12:33 PM | # Hi Fred, I don’t really care about that, I’m not an American and don’t plan to take over your jobs or “race-replace” you, whatever that means, I was merely commenting on IQ. The problem that I have with most of you and most of these “white nationalists” on this website is that you lose sight of facts preferring to despise certain groups or hating their traits. I don’t really care that you want to keep America white, that isn’t related to me. What I do care about is when people misrepresent the intelligence or success of certain groups as part of their argument. The most frequent targets of this, fittingly I guess, are the two most successful ethnic groups in America, Jews and asian Indians. I’m not interested in debating the merits of a white America, I’m only interesting in making sure that people who randomly find this website do not succumb to misinterpretation of facts based on biased authors. However, I do live in Canada, and that’s because I love Canada and Canadian culture and want to be a part of it. If some night everyone wants to come to my house and murder me for invading their territory and being a gook, well, whatever, I’ve earned it, so that’s your prerogative. I realize this isn’t “my territory” here in Canada, but I only have one chance to live, and I’d prefer to do it how I want to as long as I am accepted, and that seems to be the case in Canada. -Takahata Joe 7
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 01:05 PM | # Joe, you comment is fair, and thanks. Most people here would have no objection to a limited number of Japs (your name suggests you’re one) or other yellows immigrating here or to Canada. What most object to is their entry in inappropriate volumes. What’s Malta’s population, a hundred thousand? Half-a-million? I haven’t looked it up. Let’s say the E.U. decided to ram a million Nigerian Negroes down the throats of the Maltese through forcing them to accept them as immigrants. Does that seem an excessive number of Nigerian Negroes to force on Malta’s population? Most Jews would say no, absolutely not, because the Jews are playing games hoping not too many will notice and the ones who do notice will remain powerless to do anything about it (which is largely the case, so the Jews are riding high for the moment). I expect you, a Jap, to be more honest and say yes, certainly, that’s too much racially unlike immigration to force on Malta. So you get the point: the same thing applies, mutatis mutandis, to the rest of the Eurosphere. Keep the volumes of the racially unlike tiny and there’ll be no problem. Attempt to change the country’s race by importing massive volumes of the racially unlike, which is present official government policy throughout the Eurosphere, and there’s a problem. Maybe a big one that everyone will come to regret the way everyone regrets World War II, but some people, like the Jews for example, never learn. Alternatively, whites could let themselves get genocided by the Jews and their allies but I don’t think it’s in their genes to do that. I think they’ll wake up. We’ll see. I lay blame for this mess primarily at the feet of the Jews, as you can tell. 8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 01:22 PM | # In calling your comment fair I meant for the most part. This, for example, is fair, among lots of other reasonable stuff you wrote:
You’re saying you have no dog in this fight so don’t care. That’s fair as long as you don’t oppose those of us who resist race-replacement. As long as you don’t, you’re no enemy, as I see things. You’re of no concern to me in that regard. If you join the side who are oppressing us with forced race-replacement you make yourself into our enemy, as I see things (I speak for myself, as just one commenter here). While most of your comment was fair, some wasn’t. This, for example (and there was more):
No, their main motivation isn’t “despising certain groups or hating their traits” (except where traits everyone hates are involved, such as sky-high Negro violent street-crime rates and lots of other bad Negro traits). Their main motivation is anger, ranging from mild to volcanic depending on the individual, at having race-replacement of whites forced down white throats. A lot of strong language flows from that and is understandable and excusable when it does, because what’s being done to our countries demographically is an epochal outrage beyond words, and people react in understandable ways when infuriated. Yes there are some senseless bigots in the true meaning of that word who particpate (who are rare, and bear in mind some of those who show up are agents provocateurs so don’t count) but they aren’t the heart and soul of what’s going on here. The heart and soul are individuals every bit as smart, educated, and refined as you, Joe. 9
Posted by Takahata Joe on June 07, 2008, 01:48 PM | # You should thank the Jews for their contributions to your country. Despite a minuscule population, they have shaped most of the beneficial image your country has. When I think of American classical music, I think of George Gershwin and Aaron Copland - Jews. American literature, Isaac Asimov and JD Salienger come to mind . Jews. When I think television, Simpsons and Seinfeld. Created by Jews. 37% of your Nobel prizes would be gone without the Jews. It is astounding how much of America was built by Jews, who have such a tiny population. The ungrateful behavior of American anti-semites astounds me. -Takahata Joe 10
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 02:05 PM | # 1) I’m not an anti-Semite. 2) Does the good they’ve done excuse the bad? Nothing can make up for genociding the traditional American population, a Jewish-headed project currently underway. 3) Joe’s reply there signals that he may be an total asshole. (Just pointing that out.) 11
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 02:09 PM | #
By coincidence I expanded on that earlier today at another blog. 12
Posted by Takahata Joe on June 07, 2008, 02:30 PM | # Let me tell you what I believe, Fred. I believe that you have been severely brainwashed, to put it lightly, by your experiences or things you have read. There is no massive Jewish conspiracy to eliminate the white man. I cannot convince you to believe this, you must convince yourself. You remind me of the old Nazi propaganda tapes talking about how Jewish people were all businessmen who wanted to manipulate white farmers. Of course Jews weren’t farmers - people of high intelligence do not like to perform menial jobs that waste their talents. This thought didn’t seem to cross their minds back then. 13
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 02:47 PM | # It turns out you’re a know-nothing wise-guy, Joe. 14
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 03:13 PM | # Like the girl in the fairy tale who arrives at the house of the Three Bears, we find being in the middle is just right and suits us best: Oriental IQs are high, Negro IQs are low, ours are in the middle, just right; Negro dicks are big, Oriental dicks are small, ours are in the middle, just right; Negro crime rates are high, Oriental crime rates are low, ours are in the middle, just right; and so on. We like being the way we are. It’s just right for us. We’re the Goldilocks race. We don’t want to change races if you don’t mind, thank you very much I’m sure. 15
Posted by Darren on June 07, 2008, 03:14 PM | # Joe: First, I am not particularly fond of the two Jewish musicians you mentioned. To each their own in tastes, but I prefer German and Austrian ones over Jewish ones, personally. Second, I consider entertainment and television especially to be frivolous and materialistic. Not interested. Third, I respect the factual basis for high Jewish average IQ and do not deny it. However, I would maintain that 1) asserting one’s worth based on the proportion of Nobel prizes accumulated is crass and materialist and 2) European societies that have excluded Jews have done just fine without significant Jewish involvement. I would like to take this time to ask you: What do you think of Israel? Do you think it is hypocritical that Jews in the USA are against white ethnonationalism but support Jewish ethnonationalism in Israel? “There is no massive Jewish conspiracy to eliminate the white man.” I don’t think there is either. What I do believe, however, is that there a massive Jewish conspiracy to deny whites the right to a racially based society. This is factual. “You remind me of the old Nazi propaganda tapes talking about how Jewish people were all businessmen” The Nazis never said that. 16
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 03:33 PM | # Today’s Japan, by the way, Joe, is a national socialist state (a “Nazi” state, in the German-language abreviation of the term), as is Israel, China, and numerous other countries not infected with the nation-state equivalent of the Gordian worm (do a site search for that last term, if needed). 17
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 07, 2008, 03:37 PM | # The Gordian worm. (Now put two and two together.) 18
Posted by Takahata Joe on June 07, 2008, 03:48 PM | #
Watch “Der Edwige Jude” (or something like that). An entire portion is dedicated to how Jews are businessmen, doctors and bankers rather than “noble and hard-working” professions like farmers. -Takahata Joe 19
Posted by Darren on June 07, 2008, 03:56 PM | # Watch “Der Edwige Jude” (or something like that). I have, and the fact that you don’t even have confidence in your knowledge of what you allegedly watched suggests that you probably don’t have a proper understanding of it. An entire portion is dedicated to how Jews are businessmen, doctors and bankers rather than “noble and hard-working” professions like farmers. Yes, Jews held *many* occupations, not just businessmen (your earlier claim that you just expanded), but also academics, artists, and other professions that the Nazis were critical of Jewish involvement with. If Jews are so intelligent that they cannot perform any sort of menial labor, then could I go so far to suggest that Jews would be incapable of forming a racial state that excluded all non-Jews because they need lower-IQ races to do their dirty jobs? No, that is such an absurd statement. Even intelligent whites often find themselves doing very menial jobs, especially in their youth. The fact that Jews avoid it is a rather unfortunate (for them) cultural phenomena that eschews labor and the spiritual qualities it imbues and the fact that Nazis recognize this isn’t particularly “wrong”. 20
Posted by Dave on September 02, 2009, 04:14 AM | # Who cares about IQ? What’s the difference between an average IQ of 100 and 105? Not much as far as I’m concerned. If you look at the inventions of the White man, they far exceed anything that the supposed intelligent Asians have created. Asians are very good technically, very good at refinement, yes, but still the car of the year is a Volkswagen. I’m confident that as a German male with two degrees I have an IQ higher than Joe, so I’m not going to be bowing down to the great Asian intellect any time soon. I want all other races to get out of my country very quickly, because we are being exterminated. Our social security system is being exploited by invading vermin and the native population cannot have babies becaues all our money is going to support the parasites. Any Asian would have the exact same feeling about preserving their race, if their country was being invaded. For God’s sake, look at what the Chinese recently did to the Uighurs. We’d all better pull our fingers out of the asses very soon, because time is short. 21
Posted by C.M. on February 10, 2010, 08:34 AM | # “still the car of the year is a Volkswagen” “look at what the Chinese recently did to the Uighurs”. 22
Posted by jess on March 31, 2010, 12:57 AM | # The Indian tiger is an endangered animal , most people don’t want to see this happen . If it is wrong to destroy the indian tiger then it is wrong to destroy the white tribe by genocide . Through 3rd world emigration . Sociopath politician are behind this controlled by what tribe ? Dare I tell and automatic be called a name ? Is it because this tribe that has a higher iq or is it because members of this tribe are looking out for there tribes interest at the expense of others ? Save the endangered white race , save the endangered indian tiger . P. S. To my oriental friends don’t let the above happen to you . If you are Chinese keep China Chinese if you are Japanese keep Japan Japanese . I believe your tribe has a high iq don’t let me down ( Don’t play the role of a fool ! ) 23
Posted by jess on March 31, 2010, 01:11 AM | # I wanted to say - Is it because this tribe has a higher ,not this tribe that has a higher 24
Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 31, 2010, 09:17 AM | # Some excellent commentary above by two commenters trying to frame matters in terms cognitive-élitist Orientals and Subcons, in particular, might more easily understand: Dave, who said he is German, wrote,
Jess wrote,
Good stuff by Dave and Jess. 25
Posted by rielmajr on March 12, 2011, 04:13 PM | # The only way to establish a racial pedigree is to marry close relatives. In this way contamination from other members of one’s on race, even more other races, will be minimized. Of course, genetic disorders will become commonplace. But what the heck, racial purity requires some sacrifices. For me, however, the mixing of racial types – people of other cultures, other parts of the world, people with different genotypes – strengthens the gene pool. I would, therefore, were I the philosopher king and had dominion over such matters, make it the law of the land that marriage could only be between people whose genotypes are widely varied. And, if we are honest about what is happening before our eyes, this is happening already. The young today don’t give a rat’s arse about their lover’s colour or race or ethnic origin 26
Posted by Roymun on April 27, 2011, 10:11 PM | # Fred Scooby you are from another place and invaded and race replaced the native americans, so what the hell are you on about, except to show yourWhite racist views. Dont you think the native americans where happy with there looks,customs,way of life before the white invaders took over and forced there intentions on them. Shame on you, and your superiority. 27
Posted by CL on April 28, 2011, 12:20 AM | # Roymun, It was wrong what Europeans did to the Native Americans. But can’t you see that if what was done to the Native Americans hundreds of years ago was wrong, it follows that what’s being done to European people today is also wrong? You can say that the Europeans in this or that place came from someplace else, but you could say the exact same thing about the Native Americans. The Native Americans came from Asia, and it’s almost certain that their ancestors demographically displaced another race of people who were in North America before them. Did that make the demographic swamping of the Native Americans and the destruction of them and their way of life right? The White Americans came from Europe, and it’s true that their ancestors demographically displaced another race of people who were in North America before them. Does that make the demographic swamping of the White Americans and the destruction of them and their way of life right? Bear in mind that if you answer yes to one answer and no to the other, that makes you a flaming hypocrite. 28
Posted by Leon Haller on April 28, 2011, 12:55 AM | # CL, You are mostly correct in your post, but spectacularly wrong when you write: It was wrong what Europeans did to the Native Americans. There were fewer than a million Indians present in all of North America (north of modern Mexico) at the time of the coming of the white man. Contemporary Manhattan has more residents. Did that small number of Stone Age nomads have a perpetual territorial right to ALL of the continent? By what ethical theory? The argument re Amerindians really implicates the ethics of originary ownership of property. How does property arise? The effective theory of whites has been the mixing of labor with original land. Take land that has no formal prior ownership, plough the soil, plant crops, and voila, it’s yours. The Indians would claim that all the territory that they subjectively perceive to be theirs (more formally, their hunting grounds) is in fact theirs by right. Whites, and I believe Christian doctrine, disagree. Is our theory any less morally valid than theirs? i think not. The situation today, however, is wholly different. We whites have produced complete nation-states, parts of a vast industrial civilization. Today’s Third World immigrants are not frontier settlers. They are occupiers of settled territories. There is a complete moral distinction between pioneers, and colonists. You and other whites in verbal joustings need to remember that. 29
Posted by Desmond Jones on April 28, 2011, 02:31 PM | #
CL, Both the Spanish and the English arrived in the New World with the intent of integrating with the “indigenous” people. The John Rolfe story is indicative of this belief. However, the immorality of what they discovered horrified them beyond their belief. Much of the native population practiced ritualistic murder and cannibalism of their own kind, even their own children. For the European this was the personification of ineluctable evil that required eradication. Glenn Beck is always quoting the German theologian, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, espousing the belief that “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil”. How much longer must the European diaspora be forced to remain silent in the face of evil? So no, it is not equivalent! 30
Posted by Jim on April 28, 2011, 08:41 PM | # I just want to bring to your attention a recent development. Some more research by Richard Lynn: Intelligence Journal, volume 38, Pages 93-100 Outlines how IQ varies considerably in Italy. Low in the south, high in the north. 31
Posted by Jarvis Woodlock on July 20, 2011, 01:51 PM | # I am white, I will prefix this by saying. And indeed, it is a bit worrying to see this evidence for IQ and to then look at regional/racial variations of IQ as an explanation for the success and failure of nations…..precisely because it is so compelling. I mean, even the whole of world history makes a lot more sense when you keep ideas of wide variations in group IQs in mind. And lack of IQ does seem to be correlated to crime, social problems, inability to function. It’s really kind of sad, more than anything. However, fuming and raging about immigrants coming into the country isn’t going to help anything. Look at terrorist cells in the 1970s, in Italy, Germany, or Quebec. Look at the Kurdish ones in Turkey today, and the Basque separatists. All of these people, regardless of what they say they stood for, really had the same exact issue. They were all furious about a world that was changing in a way they didn’t like, and they felt powerless to stop those changes. So they do some bombings, cut the throat of one or two guys, a bunch of them get arrested, and eventually these groups always fade away without achieving their aims. That is all these white nationalist or racial hygienists are going to achieve in the end, at the most. A few pointless murders, a few wasted lives, if you take this too far. The point is, the tide of history says, people from less happy places want to come and live with the whites. They are attracted to your society and they’ll do anything to get in, and there are millions upon millons of these people. So accept it. The world is in flux. And by the way, if a dumb race person mixes with a smart race person, their offspring is somewhere in the middle and often turns out smart. You just helped improve that race, in a way, so racial mixing isn’t just a dilluting of your superiority, it’s also improving others. Next entry: Fjordman’s Nazi Problem Previous entry: JW Holliday visits a revisit of Ethnic Genetic Interests by David B |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. J Richards commented in entry 'The Money Problem When Machines and Robots Increasingly Replace Human Workers' on 02/06/12, 11:23 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 09:09 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 09:06 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 09:03 PM. (go) (view) Liberal Heresy commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 08:26 PM. (go) (view) GoyMaster2.0 commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 02/06/12, 08:06 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 07:22 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 07:18 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 06:18 PM. (go) (view) Bugger Off commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 06:06 PM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'A potential one-man mental hospital for Anders Behring Breivik!' on 02/06/12, 04:53 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 04:25 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 03:01 PM. (go) (view) Lew commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 02:13 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 02:12 PM. (go) (view) robo commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 01:56 PM. (go) (view) Again Impressed commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 01:36 PM. (go) (view) Søren Renner commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 01:16 PM. (go) (view) Now Impressed commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 01:10 PM. (go) (view) Not Impressed commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 12:46 PM. (go) (view) Ex-Pro White Activist commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 11:46 AM. (go) (view) savrola commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 11:39 AM. (go) (view) MOB commented in entry '2 2 2012' on 02/06/12, 11:23 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/06/12, 11:16 AM. (go) (view) Joseph Heller commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 11:07 AM. (go) (view) Hymen commented in entry 'Supply and demand: The economics of mass immigration' on 02/06/12, 11:02 AM. (go) (view) Ex-Pro White Activist commented in entry 'The Money Problem When Machines and Robots Increasingly Replace Human Workers' on 02/06/12, 10:41 AM. (go) (view) Lew commented in entry 'A potential one-man mental hospital for Anders Behring Breivik!' on 02/06/12, 09:48 AM. (go) (view) Ex-Pro White Activist commented in entry 'The Money Problem When Machines and Robots Increasingly Replace Human Workers' on 02/06/12, 09:33 AM. (go) (view) Helvena commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 08:22 AM. (go) (view) Ex-Pro White Activist commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 08:09 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/06/12, 01:38 AM. (go) (view) Michael commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/06/12, 12:06 AM. (go) (view) A commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/05/12, 11:46 PM. (go) (view) ben tillman commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/05/12, 11:20 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Guessedworker on October 11, 2007, 05:55 PM | #
Thanks, Robert. Nice restatement of what should be common knowledge. Here (go to the fourth of the tables presented) is Lynn and Vanhanen’s full table, as presented in IQ and the Wealth of Nations. It contains some cross-national averaging, which have been criticised particularly by Dienekes Pontikos. But his beloved Greece scores only 92! Yet more proof of Salter’s thesis, then.