Novacaine for the Nation

Posted by Phil on October 19, 2005, 02:28 PM | #

Lenin was only a quarter Jewish by ancestry. The resemblance is remarkable though.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 19, 2005, 02:37 PM | #

Did anyone notice the little flag pin on Chao’s lapel? Just to make sure she is not an official from Taiwan, lest anyone be confused.

BTW, she is a wife of Texas Senator Phil Gramm.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 19, 2005, 02:54 PM | #

I wonder, if we were to examine the officials in charge of immigration in all European and European derived nations would we also see those offices staffed by ethnic minorities?

Would any particular ethnic minority hold those positions?

This question might be difficult, for often times a showcase Gentile might sit at the top but mid-level bureaucrats might be orchestrating the policy.

I bet James Bowery might know?

Posted by Martin Hutchinson on October 19, 2005, 03:08 PM | #

Mitch McConnell, not Gramm, Geoff. Gramm, now alas retired, was one of the few really decent Senators in recent years, and I think fairly sound on immigration.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 19, 2005, 03:18 PM | #

Sorry, Senator Mitch McConnell. Yes.

But, Sen. Gramm is married to a Chinese too…

Here is her picture, she was a board member of ENRON

Wendy L. Gramm, director and audit committee member: Sold 10,256 shares for $276,912.

$276,912, not bad. If she had waited a while longer she would have earned $0.0. She even beat Hilary Clinton, who, miraculously, got $100,000 in cattle futures deal. Must be those extra few points of IQ ?

http://www.apfn.org/enron/gramm.htm

Posted by Matra on October 19, 2005, 04:42 PM | #

Martin - Phil Gramm wasn’t sound on immigration:

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/retired/delegation.php3?District=TX

Posted by Martin Hutchinson on October 19, 2005, 05:20 PM | #

Not a bad grade, when you look at the details.  Very sound on illegal immigration, which is the main current problem, less so on legal.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 19, 2005, 05:34 PM | #

Americans:

Ask yourself do you wish to live in a political entity ruled by a coalition of ethnic groups whose interests all too often are not ours? And in this same regime White Americans are not allowed an identity and are explicitly second class citizens by law?

I say no.

I say we ought to separate from the United States.

I say we ought to work for secesssion based an ethnicity.

I say we have no future being locked into this death pact called the US Constitution.

Each man must decide for himself.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 19, 2005, 06:48 PM | #

Peter Shank had a good broadcast today: http://www.shankradio.com/showarchives/2005/oct05/20051018_tue_Shank.mp3

http://www.shankradio.com/parchives2005.html

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 19, 2005, 07:13 PM | #

“I say we ought to separate from the United States.  I say we ought to work for secesssion based on ethnicity.  I say we have no future being locked into this death pact called the US Constitution.”  (—Geoff)

I agree a hundred percent with each of the above statements of Geoff’s.  I’ll add only that the Constitution was a good document.  In the end it was destroyed, killed outright, by the other side, the side which until 1989 was the left and since then has consisted of the triple alliance between the radical left/Marxists, the Wall-Street/Big-Business/Tranzi Community, and the U.S. Conservatives/Country-Club Republicans.

Posted by TRI on October 19, 2005, 07:39 PM | #

I will only say this: Excellent posting, Geoff. Keep up the good work!

Posted by Svigor on October 19, 2005, 08:55 PM | #

Yeah, Chertoff’s mumblings are just a red herring.  It’s funny how obvious that is; “sure, sure, we’re gonna kick ‘em all out, I promise…now sign this amnesty bill please.”

Speaking of immigration, anyone read Tancredo’s letter to the ACLU over the American kid who got in hot water for refusing to stand for the Mexican national anthemn?  Funny, funny stuff that.

If I didn’t know better I’d swear to Christ Tancredo is a closet WN; there’s just something about the tone of that letter.  He makes precisely the kinds of moves a closet WN would make, anyways.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 19, 2005, 10:15 PM | #

Svi,

You mean this letter?

For a system politician Tancredo is the best.

Posted by Lurker on October 19, 2005, 10:23 PM | #

Does anyone know if an elite ACLU task force has sprung into action?

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 19, 2005, 10:40 PM | #

Lurker,

You mean an ACLU Einsatz Gruppen?

Posted by john rackell on October 19, 2005, 11:47 PM | #

I saw the Tancredo letter on Amren - the comments were of a similar nature as the letter, which is what is the ACLU’s game that they attack any American expression of God or country, but actively support it when the same offense is being committed by nation destroying ‘foreigners’ with the citizenship ceremony of a foreign country. The letter was quite plaintive, just asking for honest dealing.

One comment struck me:

Idiots. ACLU stands behind the first amendment, more than it does behind specific groups. That’s why they’ve defended the KKK, which you all must belong to. That’s why folks with real conscience don’t support them - hate speech (ie: what you all spew) shouldn’t be protected speech. But that’s the double-standard of “American” fascists like you all: you’ll cry for free speech when it suits you, cry against a group that only really focuses on free speech when it’s against you, and can’t deal with thinking about anything beyond the narrow experience that you dwell in.

For the purpose of discussion, let’s assume the Mr. Vitriol is white.

So a piece of the puzzle did fall in place for me - why would the ACLU support the free speech of neo-nutzi’s. Is it because of their commitment to ‘free speech’ - now shown to be quite selective.

It’s free speech for the propaganda value of watching whites make asses of themselves.  It’s similar to the fact that most European Nazi groups are paid government informers, agentes provacateurs - as discussed on MR previously.

I can only think the ACLU champions neo nazis as a strategy to denigrate whites - and keep a lid on any effective white nationalism.

Is the strategy effective - yes, at least in the case of Mr. Vitriol quoted above.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 20, 2005, 12:30 AM | #

Four Savage Negroes beat a 14 year Old White Boy, at school!

—————————————
KINGSTON, NY- A fight in front of Kingston High School Friday morning landed a 14-year-old student in Benedictine Hospital for surgery to repair a badly fractured eye socket.
————————————-

Of course there is no racial hate crime involved, Blacks are just BEATING THE HELL OUT OF WHITES AND RAPING WHITE WOMEN ALL OVER THE COUNTRY - but there is no racial element.

Posted by Steve Edwards on October 20, 2005, 11:50 AM | #

What Bush really needs to do is open America’s borders to millions of charming Nigerians like, say, the well-mannered Abiola Lapite.

Posted by Svigor on October 20, 2005, 12:53 PM | #

I can only think the ACLU champions neo nazis as a strategy to denigrate whites - and keep a lid on any effective white nationalism.

I think verisimilitude is equally important for the ACLU & co.  “The goal is to appear ideologically pure and non-partisan…who among our enemies is the least damaging to our cause and most damaging to theirs?  Hmmm, ah yes, I have it - Nazis!”

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 20, 2005, 01:45 PM | #

Four Savage Negroes beat a 14 year Old White Boy, at school!

The mother of the boy that was beaten appears on the Hal Turner Show.

http://www.halturnershow.com/AudioArchives/HTS/HTS-10-19-05.mp3

She appears at 01:25:00 . I suggest you right click and download the whole show.

But the entire show is good.

Respectable Conservatives: DON’T LISTEN

If you listen and don’t like it—consider yourself warned.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 20, 2005, 01:59 PM | #

BTW,

A Justin from Melbourne, AUSTRALIA called the Hal Turner show at 01:41:40.

Is that of our MR posters? Was that you AD? TRI?

Posted by ben tillman on October 20, 2005, 02:33 PM | #

So a piece of the puzzle did fall in place for me - why would the ACLU support the free speech of neo-nutzi’s. Is it because of their commitment to ‘free speech’ - now shown to be quite selective.

It’s free speech for the propaganda value of watching whites make asses of themselves.

Excellent point.  And I might add that the most famous instance of the ACLU defending the First Amendment rights of “nazis” was its defense of the right of “nazis” to march through heavily-Jewish Skokie, Illinois, back in the ‘70’s.  We now know that the leader of the “nazi” group was a Jew named Frank Collin.

Posted by Bo Sears on October 20, 2005, 02:34 PM | #

ACLU AS AN INSTRUMENT OF THE CAMPAIGN OF DEFAMATION…

John Rackell above is quite correct. The activities of the ACLU are designed to mock & disparage European Americans, or to rip down our cultures and defame our histories. (We European Americans are diverse, after all, and all of our cultures and histories have targets painted on them by ACLU and its friends.)

We conducted a test four years ago in which we asked 26 representatives or dues-paying supporters of the ACLU (hereafter “ACLU freaks”) just what exactly the ACLU had done for ordinary, middle-class European Americans.

In every case the answer was the Skokie-march lawsuit, meaning the ACLU freaks were convinced that ordinary European Americans were advantaged in some way by having legal permission to march through hostile townships in pursuit of faded memories of post-Weimar Germany before 1945.

These were spontaneous answers, and we believe the ACLU freaks really believed that “white people” had received a substantial benefit specific to them from the Skokie-march lawsuit!

These people are not just haters, they hold a mental picture of European Americans that is quite bizarre and disturbing.

Not one ACLU freak suggested any other activity by ACLU that would have helped ordinary European Americans in any way.

Bo Sears

www.ResistingDefamation.org

Posted by Phil on October 20, 2005, 03:59 PM | #

ACLU

The American Bar was once the bedrock of solid Christian conservatism. American lawyers and judges were, not so long ago, renowned for their conservatism and dislike of sociological experimentation.

This changed dramatically in the 1960s with a huge influx of Jews from the Ivy League schools (most Ivy League schools until then had very stringest quotas on admission of Jewish students). The total effect of this was absolutely phenomenal. American College campuses (and the politics that infected them) changed beyond description to the point where they bear almost no relation to the country’s past or its heritage.

It is amazing that a man like Lothrop Stoddard taught at Harvard in the 1920s. Seems utterly inconceivable. From Lothrop Stoddard to Noel Ignatiev. It has been a long journey in a very short time!

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 20, 2005, 04:33 PM | #

Phil,

Jews positively predominate in the admissions, staffing, and curriculum in the 10 top American law schools - the schools which place and create the next generation of elites, i.e. think Trotsky, Kaganovich, Katyn Massacre.

If anyone does not believe what I say I can email to them the information.

Posted by Phil on October 20, 2005, 05:21 PM | #

Geoff,

Yes.

To the uninitiated: a read through the incomparable works of Kevin MacDonald is absolutely essential.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 20, 2005, 05:58 PM | #

Phil,

I see there are only 3 copies of Kevin MacDonald’s book left in stock at Amazon.\

Folks, there is simply no way to grasp the political and social mess we are in UNTIL you factor in the findings of Kevin MacDonald in the Culture of Critique.

Posted by Phil on October 20, 2005, 06:10 PM | #

Geoff,

There are plenty of PDFs of the book floating around on the internet for there to never be a problem. An interested reader only needs to search diligently to find it.

Posted by Geoff Beck on October 20, 2005, 06:16 PM | #

> PDF

True. That is how I found Thomas Chittum’s book

Civil War II: The Coming Breakup of America

. Another excellent book.

One point though, I doubt Kevin MacDonald will sign a pirated version. I’m quite proud to have an autographed copy of CofC.

Posted by Phil on October 20, 2005, 06:19 PM | #

One point though, I doubt Kevin MacDonald will sign a pirated version. I’m quite proud to have an autographed copy of CofC.

Kevin is a very modest and humble man. And a treasure.