|
|
The Reality of Multiracial SocietiesLee Kwan Yew on multiethnicity vs. democracy: Mr. Lee: ...Supposing I’d run their system here, Malays would vote for Muslims, Indians would vote for Indians, Chinese would vote for Chinese. I would have a constant clash in my Parliament which cannot be resolved because the Chinese majority would always overrule them. So I found a formula that changes that… SPIEGEL: ... and that turned Singapore de facto into a one party state. Critics say that Singapore resembles a Lee Family Enterprise. Your son is the Prime Minister, your daughter-in-law heads the powerful Development Agency… BTW: Poll of Mexicans: Bush’s guest worker plan could bring in 56 million Mexicans! Courtesy, Steve Sailer. Posted by leslie on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 at 11:25 PM in Race realism Comments:2
Posted by Svigor on August 17, 2005, 06:52 PM | # I’ve been saying that for about a month now on here and on Stormfront. By the time Whites are a minority in our countries, it is effectively game over. Then how did the elites manage to sell us down the river? Having a majority is way less important than having a cohesive group. Being the largest plurality isn’t “game over,” having an atomized individualistic group is game over. 3
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 18, 2005, 08:52 AM | # We should all be so lucky as to have Lee Kwan-yew running our countries. He’d be the best British PM since Lord Salisbury, the best US President since Washington. 4
Posted by Geoff Beck on August 18, 2005, 09:39 AM | # Two problems 1) He is Chinese 2) Don’t try to compete in business with him - you’re competing against the government. Don’t criticize his family or the government you may be exiled, banished, or ostracized. Yah, he’s a real bill or rights, magna carta type: First Amendment for sure. 5
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on August 18, 2005, 08:18 PM | # THe First has never been my favorite Amendment, and Lee’s economic management was so infinitely better than anything in the West it’s not funny. 6
Posted by James Bowery on August 18, 2005, 10:32 PM | # The First has never been my favorite Amendment My favorite amendment is the one they left off—in fact, it should have been the only thing in the entire Constitution: Congress shall make no law imposing particular kinds of associations between adults. You see, with that one statement, you get the rest of the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution simply because some people will choose to associate on those bases. However, the moment someone or some group decides they don’t like the association secession is mandated. People like you, and your Chinese guy would form a different kind of association where freedom of speech was limited—which is just fine—but if someone decides it isn’t working for them, you can’t prevent them from leaving. Moreover, if Congress doesn’t allow for territorial secession as well it is in effect imposing associations entailed by the existing territories. The obligation therefore entailed by the one mandate is to find ways of allocating territories to support secession at all scales. PS: The vast majority of so-called libertarians are nothing of the sort—they are out there supporting state mandated free-trade, open borders, etc. etc. in the name of “liberty”. 7
Posted by Andrew L on August 19, 2005, 10:03 PM | # The Reality Of Multicultural Society, IS, there is none, just clearing up any ambiguity if it existed. ONE culture or you are nothing Next entry: More SA news from Adriana Stuijt Previous entry: Indian public education |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. webyLibeNeerb commented in entry 'Hart Attack' on 02/09/12, 09:29 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 09:00 AM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:37 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view) Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by TRI on August 17, 2005, 12:14 AM | #
“Mr. Lee: Why should I be against democracy? The British came here, never gave me democracy, except when they were about to leave. But I cannot run my system based on their rules. I have to amend it to fit my people’s position. In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.”
I’ve been saying that for about a month now on here and on Stormfront. By the time Whites are a minority in our countries, it is effectively game over. Even now, Whites are not acting in an ethnocentric manner despite their majority status only being very, very slight.
Because of that, it’s really a game to see who has an ethnocentric majority coupled with a birthrate as big as the next largest ethnocentric majority. (In rough terms).