|
|
How good of them!The Lake District national park authority put off a decision yesterday on a plan to drop guided walks and events on the grounds that they attract almost exclusively white and middle class people. A decision will now be taken at a special meeting later in the month. Officials said they had made the proposal after being encouraged by the government to appeal to young people from the inner-cities, disabled people, and members of the black and other ethnic minority communities under-represented among the park’s visitors. The proposal was criticised by the volunteers who lead the walks and by bodies trying to get a wider range of people into national parks. More here. Posted by jonjayray on Tuesday, January 11, 2005 at 05:47 PM in British Politics Comments:2
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 12, 2005, 01:14 AM | # GW, I didn’t click on the Black Environmental Network link you provided because, frankly, I don’t happen to have a puke bucket close by me. “Yes, it’s conceptually woolly.” I beg to differ: it’s not wooly, but clear as day. This is a war, being waged against white-Euro Christianity by white-Euro Christianity’s mortal enemies. Uncover the funding for this particular outfit and you’ll find vermin like George Soros and his ilk. “We should fight back.” Yes, one hundred percent right—and fight back with everything we’ve got. The other side are using everything they’ve got, and it’s about time we realized they’re at our throats. The image of this Chinese woman and her unmitigated gall—the absolutely brazen, ill-bred, colossal nerve of her, coming into a host nation like the U.K. and, instead of respecting its good people and their hospitality, trying to raise up some other people in their place—just makes me want to vomit! As if any whites could get away with that in China, no less! Go home, Miss Ling Wong! China needs you! One feels sure the U.K. will muddle through somehow after your departure, Miss! Just go! Get out! 3
Posted by Guessedworker on January 12, 2005, 02:43 AM | # Fred, You are a soldier. But can I ask you, please, to avoid ad hominem and crude insult in your comment. George Soros must be opposed on his own terms for those things he says and does with which a reasonable person might disagree. Describing him in the terms you did is unjust and, therefore, not in the slightest damaging to him but mortally wounding to you in the eyes of those you would help. Otherwise, I recommend that you go down to the hardware store and buy that bucket because BEN, as with other similar sites, offers a model from which those seeking to organise in the opposite direction could profit. 4
Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 12, 2005, 09:33 AM | # Sorry, GW, and I withdraw my comment and post these links instead, which not everyone may have seen: this series of three articles by Richard Poe (the link takes you to the page from which you click on each article individually) and this Serge Trifkovic piece which appeared in Chronicles almost a year ago. Everyone can read these four articles then judge for himself the kind of individual Mr. Soros is and the sorts of people who are behind some of the extremely bizarre goings-on we keep seeing around us in today’s world. 5
Posted by Guessedworker on January 12, 2005, 01:54 PM | # Thanks, Fred. Also for the Soros links. The Open Society site is here:- 6
Posted by john rackell on January 13, 2005, 12:13 AM | # We should fight back<\i>What would fighting back entail? How would one know it was being effective? Is there anybody fighting back right now? I think you, or your organisation, would have to prove a few things, a sort of operational test, so to speak: You are not looking for a seat at the table. You recognize and state explicitly that your goal is to attain political power. You are holding meetings and attracting people to hear you speak. Any organization that is funded by donations from ordinary Britons is more vital than an NGO that gets a million pounds from George Soros. That it’s better to criss-cross the country, holding meetings in pubs and town halls getting donations of fivers from ordinary Britons one by one. You win a moral victory everyone time someone turns up to hear you or a venue owner gives you space to hold your meeting. You are building a grass roots organization with support at the root of British society. You are using the hatred of the Left towards the native British stock against them. How can the hatred the multiculturalists show for white Britons such as these middle-aged tour guides be anything but a political liability for the Bliar regime? You appeal directly to the ethnic self-interest of the British. Let (ex)Tory leaders run around donning yellow turbans to prove their multicultural credentials. You stake your claim to political legitimacy by being the only voice for the people who have lived here continously for 30 thousand years. You recognize that the vilification of your cause by England’s deracinated worthies makes a lot of decent people fume with righteous indignation. You can capitalise on this. You are provoking the authoritarian tendencies and extremism of your opponents. It’s one thing to say that the government is politicizing the police force, it’s another thing to provoke the home office to use the police force to smash in your front door before Christmas just for a little tete a tete. Your organization is exposing the rotteness at the core of the British establishment: banking companies that directly interfere with our democracy by denying you bank accounts; professional standards bodies that revoke licenses of any solicitor that has the temerity to represent you. But the establishment knows full well that their actions against you deligitimizes their own authority. You are winning. Your ability to withstand the government’s repression makes the government look stupid and weak. You are exposing the hypocrisy of a government that fights an illegal war in Iraq in the name of establishing democracy but is terrified if it gets practiced at home. You have woken me up from my apolitical slumber. Guessedworker, there is one organization already fighting back. 7
Posted by Guessedworker on January 13, 2005, 03:02 AM | # John, Yes, of course. And the further the power elite goes beyond condemnation and towards judicial annihilation of that Party - as we are seeing in Belgium now - the more ordinary English voters will tend to support it. The BNP is going to do well out of pretty much whatever happens, providing it learns discipline. But for myself, the BNP could only ever be a vehicle of convenience or protest. It does not adhere to the principles which I believe would resolve our problems in a sustainable way. That is to say, white racial solidarity is not, in itself, enough. I will not say more on this now. I may blog about it next week. Next entry: On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethny and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration Previous entry: Nazi themes |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view) MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view) Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 03:47 PM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 03:24 PM. (go) (view) dosto commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 02:40 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 02:36 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Guessedworker on January 11, 2005, 08:09 PM | #
From the original article:-
Judy Ling Wong, UK director of the Black Environmental Network, which aims to increase minority ethnic participation in the environment, said she would prefer an integrated approach rather than see one programme stop and another start.
What, you may ask, is “an integrated approach”? Visit here:-
http://www.ben-network.org/
Miss non-black Chinese lady was awarded an OBE in recognition of her cultural marxism. That’s what it is, albeit wierd (ie “innovative”) cultural marxism. The BEN strategy page says this:-
... the innovative work of BEN in linking ethnic environmental participation to major sectors of concern (including health, heritage, housing, and the arts) to benefit the quality of life of ethnic communities and to release their vital contribution.
The current high priority of social inclusion in conjunction with the high status of BEN as an expert organisation is resulting in an increasing demand for our contribution at policy level and towards developmental work with ethnic communities. Our strategy aims to strengthen our capacity to meet this demand.
1. To strengthen and resource BEN’s core work and expand the core functions of input into consultations and policy to represent ethnic issues and concerns, and partnership and project development
develop new action to consolidate core funding
2. To strengthen BEN’s capacity to stimulate and support activity within the BEN Network, stimulate consistent dialogue, and fuel debate around ethnic needs and concerns, resource BEN website as a vehicle to disseminate information and good practice, run regular participatory appraisal events and undertake research to map issues and concerns
3. To build the capacity of ethnic communities to take action to address their issues and concerns on their own terms, put into place developmental teams in England, Scotland and Wales, undertaking a range of initiatives to address issues and concerns
4. To build the capacity of environmental and other relevant organisations to open up their services and work effectively with ethnic communities, develop BEN’s training and consultancy services and associated resources
Yes, it’s conceptually woolly. But it means claiming the entirety of my England for otherwise self-ghettoised aliens. It means pushing them right into the English way of life, into the very core of our self-identity in perfect denial of our right to live in peace among ourselves - even in the depths of the English countryside. No escape from strangers. Equality.
In that sense BEN is at the cutting edge of the racial revolution. We should fight back.