![]() |
House Rule no 2764DanielJ has made a very sensible observation about the tendency for outbreaks of strife on this and, as far as I can see, every other free board in our political micro-world. In consequence, we are changing mod rules initially for a trial period of one month to see if we can eliminate the more abusive commentary which sometimes deforms MR threads. Criticism, constructive or otherwise, remains fine - and personal criticism too. But serious and inflammatory abuse is out. This has always been the case here, of course. But now the MR team, which comprises four old hands as well as myself, will remove not only the abusive comment but every entry by the miscreant on that thread. If the word sinks in and the standard of commentary improves as expected we will relax the policy in some form - I like good and interesting but free speech. This is the first time comment policy has been modified in MR’s history. It does not represent a trend. We will never go to full moderation or no comments, as some folks have suggested in the past. Latitude and inclusiveness remain core values of this blog. Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, November 30, 2009 at 12:29 PM in Blogs & Blogging Comments:4
Posted by Dan Dare on November 30, 2009, 04:58 PM | # I’m as fond of indulging in a little light invective as the next bloke, but do agree that occasionally the aggro here does get a little OTT. It’s sometimes hard to remember that we’re all fundamentally on the same side, and it’s the means rather than the ends that usually create the friction. That said, I’m sure we can rely on our Dear Mods to keep the lightest of hands on the tiller, and I welcome this development. 6
Posted by Mark on November 30, 2009, 05:17 PM | #
I’m sure there’s no favoritism involved. 7
Posted by Captainchaos on November 30, 2009, 05:42 PM | #
Well, in the instance of Silver vs. JWH (now Ted Sallis at TOQ and OO), no. If “trolls” and “mental defectives” had been banned then, JWH probably could have been coaxed back into the mix. Personally I don’t see what the big deal was. I never felt like punching through a wall when insulted by Silver, in fact I got a chuckle out of it. Also, Silver was the one who got me to consider the merits of Nordicism. Thanks Silver. 8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on November 30, 2009, 06:50 PM | # Speaking of Silver, he’s posted the official new version of the Pledge of Allegiance over at his blog. Here it is:
(To non-Yanks: the Pledge of Allegiance used to be recited every morning at the opening of the school day by pupils throughout the United States, no exceptions anywhere (I don’t know if it still is). It was recited by all the pupils in every classroom at the same time, the pupils standing, facing the Stars and Stripes that was hung in every classroom above the blackboard in front of the room or which was on a large flag pole standing in one of the two front corners of the classroom, each pupil placing his right hand over his heart as he spoke: “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” Every American knows that by heart (except maybe the youngest generation who are coming up now, I don’t know if the [fill in the blank] ________ revolt that began in the “Sixties” has completely done away with that yet or not; if not yet, it’s certainly on their agenda.) 9
Posted by danielj on November 30, 2009, 08:40 PM | # I was born in ‘83. Dropped out as a sophomore in high school. I only recited the pledge up until high school. 10
Posted by PF on November 30, 2009, 11:05 PM | # O/T the middle class English aesthetic untempered by reggae dirt and art house pretension…. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ehden6aPl0 disclaimer: includes coaster games, cardigans, and over-sized glasses… the rawness may frighten you. 11
Posted by EA Steve on November 30, 2009, 11:18 PM | # This is a great development, as it will maintain this great site’s reputation of intellectual discussion. It should also promote traffic, in the long-term. Although we disagree on the Jewish Question, I greatly admire the work you have done in hosting this website, Guessedworker! 12
Posted by Captainchaos on November 30, 2009, 11:42 PM | # Now there some Englishishness that be funky fresh, nom sayin’. 13
Posted by AD on December 01, 2009, 03:51 AM | # Cap’n,
A wise man once told me you have to make hay while the sun shines, and you can only do that during the day. So hey. Now speaking of days…
...you, Cap’n dearest, are as confused as the day as is long. As another of my long-time admirers, the estimable Mr. Scrooby, mentioned, the wise men of days [enough!] gone by once understood and appreciated the value of civic incantations in instilling a sense of civic pride. I’m not an American so in my younger da… when I was younger… they had me both imploring YHWH to save Her Majesty as well as advancing an Australia so fair. And to an extent it worked. So I’m only too happy to have helped turn you the dark side (Nordicism, Cap). Why? Because in the real world getting what you want by helping the other fellow get what he wants is considered a congenial way of getting ahead in life. But I’m puzzled as to how you manage to thank me for that and in the same breath blame me for my role (as the legend grows) in running the Rienzi off the board—Rienzi and nordicism is like—pardon the analogy—oil and water. Now, if, after having read this, the words forming on your lips are laugh now, Silver, for you won’t be laughing long, pal, I tell myself that every damn day (while I’m making hay). 14
Posted by Frank on December 01, 2009, 06:22 AM | # What was the Captain before conversion? Is intermarriage with East Asians a problem in Oz? The two seem overly friendly…
Nordicism should become popular again in America as well as the former British colonies. It, or some close variant, surely has a future. 15
Posted by Dasein on December 01, 2009, 07:24 AM | # It would be such an effective way to turn people off White activism (i.e. sending in someone to post divisive commentary intended to poison the atmosphere), that I’m surprised it doesn’t happen more often. I have to say that I always found MR, on the whole, to be fairly civil, though there have been a few threads of late that became saturated in venom. 16
Posted by Darren on December 01, 2009, 08:13 AM | # I thought Silver wasn’t allowed to post here anymore. In any case, I’m a firm believer in heavy-handed moderation. Either you contribute something substantive or get out. When one has to waste time defending against various trolls, it detracts from the overall quality of discussion (hence the reason trolls come to begin with). 17
Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 01, 2009, 09:32 AM | # “includes coaster games, cardigans , and over-sized glasses…” pullovers 18
Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 01, 2009, 09:49 AM | # According to DanielJ, Mangan’s blog has been shut down: http://mangans.blogspot.com/ — see this thread, comments #2, #11, #12: http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/11/30/new-policy/ . If that’s accurate, that it’s been shut down and isn’t down due to some glitch, it’s ominous news, as Mangan’s was one of the mildest (if not THE mildest) anti-race-replacement blogs on the internet. I suspect it’s down due to some glitch. (Or maybe Mangan himself took it down?) 19
Posted by Dasein on December 01, 2009, 10:01 AM | # I’d only visited Mangan’s a few times, but, yeah, it seemed quite mild. The Irish Savant (also on blogger, but requiring acknowledgement that content is controversial) is, I think, at least as ‘hateful’ as Mangan’s. Mangan’s also had a lot of interesting non-racial content. If it wasn’t his decision, I’m willing to bet he’ll become more radical as a result of this. 20
Posted by The Admiral on December 01, 2009, 10:49 AM | # That is ominous, if not self-inflicted, as Mangan’s was quite tame. There was a lot of race talk, more so e.g., than the Savant, so that might have been a factor. 21
Posted by Svigor on December 01, 2009, 03:03 PM | #
Silver’s a bit of a nut but he has occasional flashes of brilliance, like this. The other example I read recently was along similar lines, a parody of some kind that escapes my memory at the moment. 22
Posted by Svigor on December 01, 2009, 03:06 PM | # Oh, and I wholeheartedly endorse the new policy. The womanly sniping has been driving me away from online ethnopatriot circles for some time now, and begun degrading my amity for my comrades. 23
Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 01, 2009, 03:20 PM | # More on what happened to Mangan: http://www.halfsigma.com/2009/12/more-on-the-google-blogger-blog-censorship.html . 24
Posted by Captainchaos on December 01, 2009, 06:44 PM | #
Silver is indeed a strange dude, but I can dig that. Especially if he cuts me in on his getaway loot when “the nutzis” come to power. I could make sure the skids are greased for him. 26
Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 04, 2009, 12:57 AM | # Mangan’s is back: http://mangans.blogspot.com/ . In a quick glance around there I don’t see an explanation yet of what happened. 27
Posted by Willy Garrett on December 17, 2009, 12:38 AM | # Good policy GW. Unfettered free speech usually degenerates to the level of the culture it comes from which in the case of the current West is toxic. I’m actually surprised MR hasn’t degraded a lot more due to the previous hands-off policy. Next entry: God and the West? Previous entry: Animation of Unemployment Spreading |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf noteRecent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view) MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view) Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view) Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 03:47 PM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 03:24 PM. (go) (view) dosto commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 02:40 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 02:36 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by PF on November 30, 2009, 03:11 PM | #
What are house rules 1 through 2763?