Griffin, Brown and the sainted Mrs Duffy

Posted by Bill on April 29, 2010, 01:36 PM | #

That is the message the BNP needs to force ever deeper into the public consciousness.

This is the nub and it is not being done.  There’s shed loads of stuff the BNP could be lambasting the establishment with - but they’re are not, open goals are going begging and I cannot figure out why.

I really do think the BNP have blown it. Again!

Posted by sirrealpolitik on April 29, 2010, 01:48 PM | #

pithy, memorable slogans need to drive home the point that:

WE, the indigenous Brits are ALL MRS. DUFFY!
or more simply: WE’RE ALL MRS DUFFY

or BETTER YET, a play on the I am England campaign: a million t-shirts, buttons, bumper-stickers proclaiming, in the appropriate font:

I AM DUFFY

Posted by Dan Dare on April 29, 2010, 01:53 PM | #

GW the danger in over-focusing on Brown’s latest gaffe, as the MSM is doing, is that it simply drives the punters to one of the other, equally worthless main parties.

What the BNP publicists need to be unearthing are similar pronouncements that can be used to tar all three with the same brush. They’re not too hard to find.

Posted by Dan Dare on April 29, 2010, 01:55 PM | #

I AM DUFFY.

Brilliant!

Posted by sirrealpolitik on April 29, 2010, 02:01 PM | #

By the way when I say “a million t-shirts, buttons, bumper-stickers proclaiming, in the appropriate font” I of course don’t mean these can be funded, designed, manufactured or distributed in time to have much effect.

It would need to be a proper grass roots phenom, hand-made, DIY a la the Ron Paul campaign in the U.S.

bnp.org.uk should invite all its supporters to write this slogan [i am duffy] on signage and post on visible bridges, the sides of buildings, etc.

The popular backlash needs to be a story in itslef.

Or do Brits not do “popular backlash?”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 29, 2010, 02:46 PM | #

Peter Brimelow weighs in (posted on their home page at www.Vdare.com, mingled with other items from their current fund-raising pause) — all of what follows is Brimelow:
______

Did you see British Labor Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s world-class immigration gaffe today?  He was caught by a lapel microphone complaining contemptuously to an aide that a (Labor-supporting) white working class woman with whom he’d just had a vigorous but apparently amicable campaign trail conversation was “bigoted.”  Of course, this merely confirms what has long been obvious:  the left-wing lawyers and functionaries who now run Labor secretly despise the party’s traditional base.  (Sound familiar, Democrats?)

What really interested me, however, was that this poor woman actually only made one brief passing reference to immigration (“You can’t say anything about the immigrants…”).  And she was talking about Eastern European immigration, i.e., no racial angle at all.  However, it was enough to set Brown off.

And amazingly, in his subsequent apology on national television, he still repeatedly excused himself on grounds she had dared to mention immigration.  He clearly just assumed every right-thinking person would agree that any reference to immigration justified his righteous rage.

Last night, we posted our Allan Wall’s expose of the reaction in Mexico and the Spanish-language media in the U.S. to Arizona’s SB 1070. [Scroob note:  the Arizona state legislature has just passed, and their governor has just signed, a strong illegal-immigration-control law.  This country’s left wing, and also the government of Mexico itself, are in absolute hyserics over it; they’re having an out-and-out epileptic seizure and are organizing big demonstrations for May 1 to protest it.]  Wall revealed their relentless hatred of U.S. nationhood and sovereignty—particularly ominous in the case of those who are technically U.S. citizens.

What the Brown incident reveals is the British elite’s relentless hostility to any hint of national sentiment in their own population—and their passionate enthusiasm for immigration.

Exactly the same forces are at work in the US today (as throughout the English-speaking world—the “Anglosphere”).

This explains the American elite’s hysterical reaction to SB 1070—which, after all, only seeks to enforce what is already the law.  It also explains this disgusting development, reported last night by Politico.com’s Kasie Hunt:

HILL REPUBLICANS DODGE ON ARIZONA LAW

Democrats can’t shout loud enough about how much they hate Arizona’s harsh immigration law.  But Republican lawmakers are hedging, dodging, and reaching for nuance—anything to avoid taking a strong stand on Arizona…. Everyone in the Republican Party says it’s Washington’s fault for neglecting the illegal immigration problem, but virtually no congressional Republicans are fully embracing what Arizona has done.

This despite that fact that, as James Fulford reported on VDARE.COM’s blog today, polls show that SB 1070 is overwhelmingly popular in Arizona and Governor Brewer’s approval rating has soared since she signed it.

These Beltway Republicans are afraid—afraid to take up a cause even though it would benefit them politically because they fear elite rage.

Of course, as Editor of VDARE.COM, I think this demonstrates the utter failure and fatuousness of any patriotic immigration reform strategy that focuses on the Beltway. [Scroob note:  ”The Beltway” is D.C.]  More than 25 years of expensive lobbying and this is the best we can get?

Patriotic immigration reform will only come from the grass roots. It will only come when the political culture changes.

That is why VDARE.COM’s strategy is to supply the grassroots with facts and arguments—and to boldly go, intellectually, into key areas that the curse of Political Correctness has ruled off-limits.
______

[end of Peter Brimelow’s comment]

Posted by Bill on April 29, 2010, 03:47 PM | #

The irony of it.

A 66 year old lady has caused Brown and the British political establishment more damage and embarrassment in less than two minutes than the BNP ever did.

Just imagine what a furore a two fisted attack by the BNP would accomplish if Griffin waded into the BBC’s Paxman or some-such.

The BNP leadership now have access (albeit via a hostile media) to state before millions of viewrs, in polite reasonable terms home truths like the old lady.

These politicians and elites, as Brown demonstrated, are incapable of connecting with ordinary people, no matter how they protest they share our concerns, and they come over to the public for what they are - Bigots themselves.

The BNP hierarchy are no longer rookies in media environs and should start socking it to them. 

They don’t like it up’em.

The polls have been media manufactured into a neck and neck position with other parties around the 8% mark, which proves the minor parties are stuck in the doldrums with the main parties taking the bulk of the votes.

In other words, the penny has not dropped to the masses that a vote for the major parties is a turkey voting for Christmas.

Unless this picture changes rapidly over the next week the BNP will be down there with the also ran.

People have still not got the message their children and their grandchildren face a bleak future indeed.

Who is going to tell them?

Posted by Guessedworker on April 29, 2010, 04:15 PM | #

Dan,

An unusual feature of this affair is that all the blame obviously had to be laid at Brown’s door, notwithstanding the fact that the Guardian has run two pieces today calling Mrs Duffy a xenophobe.  The first one is linked above.  The second one is here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/28/gordon-brown-bigot-gaffe?showallcomments=true#end-of-comments

Ordinarily, when the charge of bigot is employed to some poor devil’s face, the immediate reaction is defensive and exculpatory ... “In no way am I racist, but ...”  This time, though, when Brown’s casual judgement of her was read to Mrs Duffy by the Sky journo she simply said, “That’s sad, that.”

So the game has changed.  The hating-left is exposed for what it is.  I think the party has to go with it.

Bill,

I know you have wondered many a time about the apparent incapacity of the BNP to put the ball in an open net.  During my long and winding commercial career I’ve worked as a copywriter, and all the pros I’ve met would soon brainstorm their way to the USP in this brief.  Let’s see what the party manages this time - if we can find a link to it.

Posted by Dan Dare on April 29, 2010, 04:25 PM | #

I think they’re onto it GW.

Listen to Griffin and Barnbrook discussing the damage McBroon has done to Margaret Hodge in Barking.

http://mybnp.co.uk/newsletter/barkingfinal2.html

Posted by CFE on April 29, 2010, 05:34 PM | #

There’s shed loads of stuff the BNP could be lambasting the establishment with - but they’re are not, open goals are going begging and I cannot figure out why.

Robin Lustig on BBC Radio 4’s “The World Tonight” just interviewed Nigel Farrage, then said:

“Well, we just asked the BNP if they wanted to respond to tonights debate, but they didn’t.”

WTF?

Lustig could have been lying, I suppose.

Posted by Gorboduc on April 29, 2010, 06:10 PM | #

I think there are a couple of words missing in the transcript of the recording.

There are a couple of syllables between “put me” and “with that woman”. Are they “out there” or “Up there” or “out front”?

Re the BNP’s apparent refusal to make capital: according to the BBC they were invited to comment on the last Radio 4 Prime Ministers’ debate, which finished about an hour ago. They refused: so, on immigration, Farage, responding to the invite, had the floor to himself. Pity.

Here are a few clerihews on the whole hilarious incident. They are just for fun.

I think Mr. Brown
Should now step right down.
If he knocked at my door,
I could say a lot more!

Mr. Brown will not now forget
To read up on “The National Debt”.
He could look it up in Wikipedia
To avoid being embarrassed on the media.

Mr. Brown was shown up by Mrs. Duffy,
In revenge he spoke of her quite roughly.
Those who have her for a friend or neighbour
Would now probably rather be shot than vote Labour!

Is Sue, Sue Nye? Yes! I’ve just received a fax
To say her husband works for Goldman Sachs.
That’s bloody funny. It makes you wonder which
Clique is ruling us - LEFT-WING POLITICIANS, or the VERY RICH.

In that case, I think it might be true
To say that Gordon actually works for Sue.
It would be funny if in private he bad-mouthed Jewish bankers
By calling them a foul bunch of bloodsucking w*****s.

Poor Gordon thinks the Labour Friends of Israel
Should now be told to f**k off back to hell:
Or, more politely, asked to go and live
In some dark ghetto. Or in Tel Aviv.

Posted by Guessedworker on April 29, 2010, 06:22 PM | #

The ITN News ran the results of some instant polling following the third and final Leaders Debate earlier this evening.  One of the data points they released was that the sector of their sample that had indicated it was Labour voting responded to the question:

Has Mr Brown’s gaffe in Rochdale yesterday made you less likely to vote Labour

Sixty per cent said they would still vote Labour.  Half the rest said they were now voting for someone else and half said they wouldn’t vote.  Now, the general sample was about two thousand strong, so that’s a pretty valid and interesting situation.  At the same time you’ve got Griffin and Barnbrook saying that the response on the doorsteps of B&D is something to behold.  Simon Darby is doing the same thing re: Stoke Central here:

http://simondarby.blogspot.com/2010/04/london-calling.html

If the heady possibilities came true, and Gordon Brown has, with one word, pierced the carapace of public ignorance about the Establishment’s deep and total hostility, the party really has something to go at, and in the long-term.  But let’s not get carried away.  Personally, I find it difficult to place a high value on free gifts.  Got to be a catch somewhere, just can’t see where!

Posted by Guessedworker on April 29, 2010, 06:29 PM | #

Your best work, Gorb.  My compliments.

Posted by CFE on April 29, 2010, 07:01 PM | #

Re the BNP’s apparent refusal to make capital: according to the BBC they were invited to comment on the last Radio 4 Prime Ministers’ debate, which finished about an hour ago. They refused: so, on immigration, Farage, responding to the invite, had the floor to himself. Pity.

Pity? As Guessedworker has ventured to call this “the red-hot certain defining moment of Election 2010”, I will venture to say that it’s (one of) “the greatest waste of opportunity of Election 2010”.

“A bigot is someone who will not tolerate opinions they do not agree with - Mrs Duffy did not even question the liberal consensus opinion that white people should be replaced in this country, and yet Mr. Brown calls her a bigot”.

—. A BNP spokesman passed up the chance to say to an ABC1 audience.

Personally, I find it difficult to place a high value on free gifts.  Got to be a catch somewhere, just can’t see where!

Am I the only one here who wondered whether the whole episode was another lesson about what is “legitimate” discussion about immigration, and another prod in the mental conditioning of those who fear being thought of as a “bigot”, even though they don’t know what the word means?

Posted by Bill on April 30, 2010, 04:42 AM | #

Barnbrook and Griffin in B&D;, Simon Darby in Stoke are upbeat about their prospects.  Is this the result of their herculean efforts or is it inevitablism?

Is B&D;and Stoke inevitable in the form of the low hanging fruit dropping into the BNP’s lap?

A bit of both I would say.

From now on, we will see the media and politicians engage into overdrive into conning the people that at last they are listening to the people’s concerns on immigration and have already put in place strict measures to curtail immigration. (LOL)

This bunch of people are defying gravity, they really have found a way of fooling the people all of the time.

Add to this the elites non existence of Third World immigration (It was stated categorically on Television last night that 85% of immigration into Britain is from the EU.) and you have the perfect double whammy deception, trust us we are listening and share your concern.

With the explosive birth rate of the already here newcomers combined with the continued mass immigration into this country plus the fleeing of hundreds of thousands of escaping Britons, and the emerging scene is B&D;and Stoke magnified a thousand times.

In short, a harvest of more inevitablism in the form of low hanging fruit, but at what cost in terms of invaluable time?

Add to this the fact that there is not going to be an economic recovery (never IMO) and there’s going to be increasing unemployment, an aggravated housing crisis, draconian economic measures to fill the black hole of debt, not to mention the mother of all our problems, the time bomb of dwindling energy supplies.

It’s a sick joke on the British public that the elites present us with three mediocre politicians in the form of Cameron, Clegg and Brown as potential future saviours of our wellbeing.

Intersting times indeed.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 30, 2010, 08:00 AM | #

ALL BRITS WHO LOVE THEIR COUNTRY:  PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, TAKE A FEW SHORT MINUTES TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

To all Englishmen, Welshmen, Scots, and Ulstermen who love their country:  those who can spare the time MUST get down to Barking-and-Dagenham this weekend to help out the BNP with door-to-door canvassing and leafleting in the final days before the big election. 

There’s a real possibility it could win a seat in Parliament!  Wouldn’t that be a Dream Come True!  The beginning of the end of the Nightmare!

Make it happen!

Watch this video of Nick Griffin and Richard Barnbrook explaining where matters stand and the ways in which you can help (at the following link, click on the middle photo with the picture of Sir Winston Churchill, and the video will start):

http://mybnp.co.uk/newsletter/barkingfinal2.html .

Or you can access the same video directly at YouTube.com here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VlfvbVsZw8&feature=player_embedded .

If you cannot get down to London this week-end, please please please, contact your friends with this message and this video link, in case any of them can get down there and help.

It’s not often in this life that your country asks for your help.  Please don’t turn it a deaf ear.  Your fathers didn’t.  Or theirs.  Or theirs.  Let your children and grandchildren say the same of you.

(Thanks to Dan Dare, a few comments above, for bringing this extremely important video to our attention.)

Posted by Andrew on April 30, 2010, 05:16 PM | #

Gordon Brown’s comment is not a verbal Gaff, it is a core belief and deliberate; be it perhaps the public broadcast was not deliberate.
The sad part of this saga is that if by now normal thinking Brit’s have not figured it out after these many years, even public statements – publications of - LABOUR PARTY INTENTIONS – and its subsidiaries ; Of Annihilating British Culture as a deliberate Act and not a Gaff; What more can anyone do.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1222977/MELANIE-PHILLIPS-The-outrageous-truth-slips-Labour-cynically-plotted-transform-entire-make-Britain-telling-us.html

It is another Gaff???  , NO , just the truth slipping out.

Posted by Andrew on April 30, 2010, 05:25 PM | #

So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened.
Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?
The latter explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate.
There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.
This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed.
In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour promised ‘firm control over immigration’ and in 2005 it promised a ‘crackdown on abuse’. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills shortages.
But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For Neather wrote that until ‘at least February last year’, when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration.
This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.

More…
•  HARRY PHIBBS: The real ‘political purpose’ behind immigration - gerrymandering Labour’s election results
•  Labour in open borders storm: Demands for inquiry into claims migrants were let in so Tories could be accused of racism
Unless policies change, over the next 25 years some seven million more will be added to Britain’s population, a rate of growth three times as fast as took place in the Eighties.
Such an increase is simply unsustainable. Britain is already one of the most overcrowded countries in Europe. But now look at the real reason why this policy was introduced, and in secret. The Government’s ‘driving political purpose’, wrote Neather, was ‘to make the UK truly multicultural’.
 
More from Melanie Phillips…
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: Infantile and horribly offensive - the FO’s insult to the Pope is a dismal reflection of what Britain’s become 26/04/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: What have we come to when the election can turn on 90 minutes of Britain’s Got Politics? 19/04/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: Thank God for the one man who has the courage to stand up to our ruling elite’s assault on Christianity 11/04/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: How richly ironic that teachers’ ludicrous obsession with ‘pupil power’ is now putting them out of work 05/04/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: This is just the beginning unless we stand up to the union mafia 22/03/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: Whatever next? A TV debate with the leaders’ wives, hosted by Richard and Judy? 14/03/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: We must never pander to the baying mob 07/03/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: Here’s my radical cure for the epidemic of single mothers 01/03/10
•    MELANIE PHILLIPS: At last we know the truth: Labour despises anyone who loves Britain, its values and its history 23/02/10
•    VIEW FULL ARCHIVE

It was therefore a politically motivated attempt by ministers to transform the fundamental make-up and identity of this country. It was done to destroy the right of the British people to live in a society defined by a common history, religion, law, language and traditions.
It was done to destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another ‘multicultural’ identity in its place. And it was done without telling or asking the British people whether they wanted their country and their culture to be transformed in this way.
Spitefully, one motivation by Labour ministers was ‘to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.
Even Neather found that particular element of gratuitous Left-wing bullying to be ‘a manoeuvre too far’.
Yet apart from this, Neather sees nothing wrong in the policy he has described. Indeed, the reason for his astonishing candour is he thinks it’s something to boast about. Mass immigration, he wrote, had provided the ‘foreign nannies, cleaners and gardeners’ without whom London could hardly function.
What elitist arrogance! As if most people employ nannies, cleaners and gardeners. And what ignorance. The argument that Britain is better off with this level of immigration has been conclusively shown to be economically illiterate.
Neather gave the impression that most immigrants are Eastern Europeans. But these form fewer than a quarter of all immigrants.
And the fact is that, despite his blithe assertions to the contrary, schools in areas of very high immigration find it desperately difficult to cope with so many children who don’t even have basic English. Other services, such as health or housing, are similarly being overwhelmed by the sheer weight of numbers.
But the most shattering revelation was that this policy of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the likes of Neather. It was to destroy Britain’s identity and transform it into a multicultural society where British attributes would have no greater status than any other country’s.
A measure of immigration is indeed good for a country. But this policy was not to enhance British culture and society by broadening the mix. It was to destroy its defining character altogether.
It also conveniently guaranteed an increasingly Labour-voting electorate since, as a recent survey by the Electoral Commission has revealed, some 90 per cent of black people and three-quarters of Asians vote Labour.
In Neather’s hermetically sealed bubble, the benefits of mass immigration were so overwhelming he couldn’t understand why ministers had been so nervous about it.
They were, he wrote, reluctant to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all to Labour’s core white working class vote. So they deliberately kept it secret.
They knew that if they told the truth about what they were doing, voters would rise up in protest. So they kept it out of their election manifestos.
It was indeed a conspiracy to deceive the electorate into voting for them. And yet it is these very people who have the gall to puff themselves up in self-righteous astonishment at the rise of the BNP.
No wonder Jack Straw was so shifty on last week’s Question Time when he was asked whether it was the Government’s failure to halt immigration which lay behind increasing support for the BNP.
‘No wonder Jack Straw was so shifty… when he was asked whether it was the Government’s failure to halt immigration which lay behind increasing support for the BNP’
Now we know it was no such failure of policy. It was deliberate. For the government of which Straw is such a long- standing member had secretly plotted to flood the country with immigrants to change its very character and identity.
This more than any other reason is why Nick Griffin has gained so much support. According to a YouGov poll taken after Question Time, no fewer than 22 per cent of British voters would ‘seriously consider’ voting for the BNP.
That nearly one quarter of British people might vote for a neo-Nazi party with views inimical to democracy, human rights and common decency is truly appalling.
The core reason is that for years they have watched as their country’s landscape has been transformed out of all recognition - and that politicians from all mainstream parties have told them first that it isn’t happening and second, that they are racist bigots to object even if it is.
Now the political picture has been transformed overnight by the unguarded candour of Andrew Neather’s eye-opening superciliousness. For now we know that Labour politicians actually caused this to happen - and did so out of total contempt for their own core voters.
As Neather sneered, the jobs filled by immigrant workers ‘certainly wouldn’t be taken by unemployed BNP voters from Barking or Burnley - fascist au pair, anyone?’
So that’s how New Labour views the white working class, supposedly the very people it is in politics to champion. Who can wonder that its core vote is now decamping in such large numbers to the BNP when Labour treats them like this?
Condemned out of its own mouth, it is New Labour that is responsible for the rise of the BNP - by an act of unalloyed treachery to the entire nation.

Posted by Armor on April 30, 2010, 09:10 PM | #

Melanie Phillips: “So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened.”

And the answer was: Jewish activism.

“Now we know it was no such failure of policy. It was deliberate.”

Indeed.

“That nearly one quarter of British people might vote for a neo-Nazi party with views inimical to democracy, human rights and common decency is truly appalling.”

When the English get their country back, I hope she’ll be the first to be ejected.

Posted by Wolf on May 01, 2010, 01:38 AM | #

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23829658-police-alerted-to-postal-vote-fraud-claims-across-capital.do

Posted by Bill on May 01, 2010, 04:30 AM | #

Saturday morning muse.

I’ve been saying for sometime now that this British general election will be the last of its type.  This is a defining moment in British politics and the clamour is for change.  (Sound familiar to you guys across the pond?)

How will it change?  In what direction will it all go - I have no idea.

So what do I mean by this and in what context?

I’m not sure what I mean, it’s a gut feeling, a sense there’s a storm brewing, people are disenchanted with their lot, there’s menace in the air, the democratic political system is failing the people, the politicians are seen to be to be not capable of delivering what they, the people want, (change?) despite the cradle to the grave welfare state, infinite consumer choice and endless porn.

Trouble is, the people cannot articulate their frustrations as they have been robbed of their ability to think by generations of media conditioning. 

This feeling is not confined to Britain alone, trawling trough the American scene my feelings are reinforced, something momentous is happening and it’s all to do with the feeling of the direction in which they, the people are being led by the nose by the political system.

The people of the West are enjoying unparalleled wealth as never before, and yet they have never been so instinctively disorientated. 

I’ve always summed up the reason for this state of affairs as simply we humans are not supposed to live this way, it is only due to the one off freak conditions of our high tech civilisation that has enabled humans to defy the natural way of things.  Perhaps (as I believe) what I am writing about here is the first unmistakable signs that we human citizens of this high tech civilization are are seeing or intuitively sensing the first signs of civilizational collapse.

Unsustainable is the buzzword of the 21st century.

I cannot pretend to have any crystal ball knowledge as to how this defining moment will manifest itself as there are too many variables in play but the feeling of something big is going down on a global scale is palpable.

We here on the Internet are privileged to be in the vanguard of this conversation and are well placed to see how, in the real world, it will all unravel.

Meanwhile, the political charade and the progress of man is being acted out and is clinging on to the last vestiges of privilege and power, how long it will take for all this to play out is any one’s guess, hundreds of years?  Who knows?

Fascinating stuff.

Posted by Chris on May 01, 2010, 07:55 AM | #

Posted by Armor on May 01, 2010, 01:10 AM | #

“Melanie Phillips: “So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened.”

And the answer is: Jewish activism.

Perfectly correct! But also, aided and abetted by indigenous Marxist indoctrinated self-loathing traitors who shall be called to account for their crimes in the not so distant future.

Incidently, I’m of part Jewish origin, maternally.

The author of this piece of hate mail below is also Jewish, I’m ashamed to admit.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/28/gordon-brown-bigot-gaffe?showallcomments=true#end-of-comments

They forget that not all Jewish people are traitors against the homelands of INDIGENOUS European and British peoples, and their heritages, cultures, belief systems and ethnic achievements, and some, like myself, have put their money where their mouths are by actually joining the British National Party, and getting actively involved both inside and outside said Party.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 01, 2010, 11:23 AM | #

Commenter Chris above talks about U.K. Jews and links to the following letter which I find quite good:

GreenWidge

29 Apr 2010, 5:35PM

Jacob,

You are a Jew.  Explain to me how Gillian Duffy “certainly sounded xenophobic.”  Do you mean Jews have to extend the law of return to Palestinians?  Isn’t is xenophobic of you to object to a demographic wave of Palestinians replacing Jews in Israel?

You are simply a hypocrite who talks up “xenophobia” here as a means of commending race-replacement to the English while carefully avoiding any suggestion that Jews should avoid “xenophobia” in Israel.
I don’t like that very much.

[ http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/28/gordon-brown-bigot-gaffe?showallcomments=true#end-of-comments ]

Here, at Richard Spencer’s, is a Brit (who might be Jewish) citing a few differences between U.K. and U.S. Jews:

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine/the-education-of-glenn-beck/#comment-47618057 ;

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine/the-education-of-glenn-beck/#comment-47757728 .

More discussion of the American branch of the tribe here:

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=1688 (entry and comments thread)

and here,

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/hbd-human-biodiversity/the-spengler-of-the-upper-east-side/ (ditto)

and here,

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine/the-education-of-glenn-beck/#dsq-comments , the comments by “Theya” (who I believe is “Andrea Freiboden,” a guy who likes to sign as if he’s gal but who gets what’s really going on).

Comrades in European countries don’t get a lot of this Jewish stuff because they don’t live in the center of the Jewish tornado as we do here, so they can’t see it, not even quite smart ones like Kai Murros.  Armor is an exception, a European who gets it.  I don’t know if Dasein is German or American but if he’s German, he’s another exception.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 01, 2010, 11:37 AM | #

My “Jewish Brit” links above don’t work.  Go here,

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine/the-education-of-glenn-beck/ ,

and click where it says “Comments” (little box immediately above the title photo, right next to “Article”) and scroll down both pages of comments looking for the commenter signing as “Simontmn.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 01, 2010, 11:56 AM | #

“Comrades in European countries don’t get a lot of this Jewish stuff”  (—my comment a couple above)

But they can be sure if this Jewish stuff strongly influences what America does both domestically and in its foreign policy, it strongly influences their countries in those ways too, simply because America strongly influences their countries.  For that reason, though they may not see “certain matters” as many of us do here, they shouldn’t be so quick to dismiss us when we sound the alarm (I have in mind Dan Dare for example).  Believe me, we see something very real.

Posted by Dan Dare on May 01, 2010, 11:59 AM | #

Bigotgate claims another scalp.

The Guardian betrays its Fabian roots and endorses the irredeemably middle-class Liberal Democrats

Much gnashing of teeth and rending of garments on the ‘progressive’ left who take this as evidence of the final, totemic abandonment of the WC - the other W is conspicuous for its absence - by the liberal elites. The ugly proles will now embrace the racist and fascist BNP they wail.

Posted by PF on May 01, 2010, 04:09 PM | #

This feeling is not confined to Britain alone, trawling trough the American scene my feelings are reinforced, something momentous is happening and it’s all to do with the feeling of the direction in which they, the people are being led by the nose by the political system.

I also get this feeling. The ranks of commentors on American racialist sites swell, and become more articulate, but beyond that in the real world there is a feeling of exasperation that is radicalizing a lot of people. Many deracinated whites, whose loyalty is to abstract principles of Constitutional Freedom or Austrian Economics, are becoming radicalized (in their own way) against the ruling system. Almost everyone is getting nervous and agitated vis-a-vis the res publica, although they often seem not to know why when you ask them.

A lot of the old ways that lead back to places which we would want to get back to (if we wanted to support the status quo) are now boarded off. Can’t get the nice fuzzy feeling and innocence of the 70s, even 80s mostly-white society anymore. That complacency and happiness arent on tap anymore, its run dry. In its place there are indoctrinated people, stupid people, drunkards, liars (those who know and claim not to) and the numberless legions of the silent (those who know and claim nothing). Happy, healthy, well-adjusted white people who are thriving ... dont see that many of them. I wonder if our culture stopped producing those people after 1975. Its probably a testiment to the alienating nature of aracial pop-culture, and the decimation of social capital when white people are socialized without the spirit of history, group loyalty, and traditional norms. 

Clearly, pretty undebatebly, we live in a dystopia of sorts. Its also clear that we created this and fueled it at every step with our own thinking… which we havent revised?. Some realize it lucidly, some not so lucidly. This is something I posted a while back about ‘atmosphere’ in fin-de-Siecle Vienna, before the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian empire:

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/vienna_at_the_turn_of_the_century/

Posted by Bill on May 02, 2010, 11:52 AM | #

That is the message the BNP needs to force ever deeper into the public consciousness

http://www.simondarby.blogspot.com/

How did he do?

Posted by Bill on May 02, 2010, 12:16 PM | #

Prompted by the above.

Indigenous or white?  Which has more mileage?

Is white off limits?  Waycist.  This is the nettle to be grasped.

IOW’s, are whites racist and beyond the pale by definition in the eyes of the British establishment?

If this is so, the elites are racist bigots.

Posted by Bill on May 02, 2010, 01:09 PM | #

Fred Scrooby on May 02, 2010, 03:00 PM ‘Nämä viestit lähetettiin, kun olit offline-tilassa.

In this comment by Fred, Auster over at VFR said….

The left’s anti-whiteness is shown by the fact that white people by simply being white people are called racists

When I wrote my comments above I had not read Fred’s post.  The World’s Left are all singing from the same hymn sheet, whiteness equals racism.  (Surely, this must tell us something.)

Sorry for the cross thread topic which is not disimilar from my own here.

Posted by Bill. on May 02, 2010, 01:30 PM | #

There used to be a comedian on the BBC many years ago whose catch phrase was, “It’s being so cheerful that keeps me going”

He might have written this.

What we do know is that the implosion of the West – detonated by governments in default and the collapse of the fractional reserve banking system – is only a matter of time.

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/04/29/the-battle-of-britain/

Happy days.

Posted by R CROSS on May 02, 2010, 02:20 PM | #

Why is there so much hysteria over “bigot” when camerons “ghastly filth"passed with little reply?surely we should have “ghastly filth"tee-shirts/

Posted by Bill on May 02, 2010, 02:54 PM | #

David Cameron addresses the Black vote.

http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/

This video is reported as being withdrawn from YouTube.

Posted by Gorboduc on May 02, 2010, 04:18 PM | #

Thanks Bill! The Clegg vid. underneath is worth watching too: both the nauseating sanctimonious creeps begin with the identical words,

“I’m really sorry I can’t be with you tonight.”

? ? ? ? WHO WROTE THE SPEECHES FOR THEM? SAME GUY?

So what’s this BLACK VOTE?

I thought there were no such things as races: they were invented by Whites.

I’m off to the hustings soon: if I don’t come on here for a couple of days. it’s because I’ve been arrested.

If it’s longer than that, I’ve been stabbed.

I shall be taking along GW’s little questionnaire of a few weeks back, supported, as Fred suggested. by the U.N. Declaration.

Posted by Guessedworker on May 03, 2010, 08:56 AM | #

So, how did the hustings go, Gorb?

Gorb ...?

... Gorb?

Posted by Bill on May 03, 2010, 10:40 AM | #

First they came for the working class.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/8335/

Posted by Dan Dare on May 03, 2010, 05:53 PM | #

The BNP bites back.

Posted by simontmn on October 03, 2010, 02:00 PM | #

I’m not Jewish.