Female liberation is a myth, delegates are told at the British Psychological Society conference

Another failure of feminism. Women remain different in their attitudes

Women may well have come a long way since the sexual revolution of the Sixties and Seventies, but research suggests that the enormous strides that they have made in the workplace have not been matched in the bedroom. The portrayal of complete female sexual liberation in television shows such as Sex and the City could be a myth, according to research suggesting that many women regard one-night stands and casual sex as wrong.

The idea that women might seek to have a one-off sexual encounter purely in the pursuit of pleasure is simply not believed by most women, who regard others who have one-night stands as desperate, pitiful or extremely needy. Sharron Hinchliff, of the University of Sheffield, said that the findings suggested that women’s sexual behaviour was still “problematised” by society, even though similar behaviour by men was accepted. Dr Hinchliff conducted interviews with 46 women to explore their ideas on sexuality as part of a wider research programme on women’s sexual health. Participants, chosen from the electoral roll in Sheffield, were aged between 23 and 83, with an average age of 48.

The findings, presented at the British Psychological Society annual conference in Cardiff, show that while women did not condemn others who had casual sex, 90 per cent believed them to be wrong. Many believed that women couldn’t have sex for their own pleasure outside of a committed relationship. “They argued that women who have casual sex or one-night stands do it not because they are sexually liberalised, but because they have `lost control’ on alcohol or drugs or because there is `something lacking’ in their lives. They pitied these women and they saw it as deviant behaviour,” Dr Hinchliff said.

The findings show a degree of double standards. The 10 per cent of women who admitted to having had one-night stands said that in their case it had been different - they had simply been finding out about relationships. Overall, older women were more accepting than younger women, although they still shared these views.

Source

Posted by jonjayray on Friday, March 31, 2006 at 04:30 AM in Feminism
Comments (3) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by john on March 31, 2006, 07:19 AM | #

They should have done a Lind like experiment- that is using two groups, one being drunk when questioned. Cardif is well known for it,s interesting nightlife, after closing time.

Posted by John J.J. Smith on April 01, 2006, 09:42 PM | #

So “social scientists” are very, very concerned that women regard one-night stands and casual sex as wrong? They call that a “problem”?

Wow. They WANT women to be oafish, vicious sluts.

I wonder if these “scientists” push the “if you’re not a slut, you’re oppressed” line back home in the kibbutz and the yeshiva? Oops, nope, “Sex and the City” is for goy keps - let/make the foolish dirty goyim downbreed and embrace dysgenics as “liberation.” As long as they aren’t competing with us…

(By the way, has the gap between praised received and praise deserved in regard to appearance been any greater than in the case of Sarah Jessica Parker?)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 12, 2009, 07:58 AM | #

Excellent log entry and comments thread over at VFR, on foolish women and the criminal “liberalism” that has “liberated them,” aka ~~allowed them to live foolishly~~

actively encouraged them to live foolishly:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013174.html

Well worth a read.

Next entry: More on the physical basis of IQ

Previous entry: Torrents

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa