Change the population, change everything

Posted by Phil Peterson on October 08, 2006, 07:04 AM | #

Ah the joys of multicultural enrichment. One forgets about these things very rapidly as one lives in the East and only notices a sea of Chinese with a smattering of white men in the crowd. The harsh corrective is delivered when one returns for a few days. Heathrow is where the corrective gets delivered rather painfully. 

The Chinese would be bloody incompetent if they cannot profit from the Western propensity for suicide. Sometimes, I am tempted to pack my bags and leave for the East permanently. The temptation to escape from this kind of insanity is too strong sometimes.

Posted by Guessedworker on October 08, 2006, 07:33 AM | #

But you didn’t finish the sentiment.  You know how it goes ... you have to stay and see this through.  The East does not belong to you.

Good to see you back.  Enjoyed your duel with Daedalus.  It reminded me what we have missed while you’ve been lost in sameness.

Posted by Phil Peterson on October 08, 2006, 07:47 AM | #

Thanks GW.

Yes the East most certainly doesn’t belong to me. I belong here. Having said that, I don’t see myself returning for at least another year. I will probably keep travelling back and forth on work though, which would give the opportunity of posting occasionally from time to time.

Posted by James Bowery on October 08, 2006, 10:53 AM | #

The thing that needs explanation isn’t the class warfare represented by multiculturalism.  Its easy to understand how in their venal quest for lower labor costs, the elites wouldn’t mind subjecting workers to harsh environments out of contempt or simple spite.  The thing that needs explanation is the stupidity of the elites in seeking such short-term, terminal, venal gratification.  If they’re that stupid, what is it in the rules of society that makes such stupid people the elites?

I’ve suggested it before and will continue to do so:

If your society’s tax revenue doesn’t derive from the property rights that would not exist in the absence of the government, then you are subsidizing wealth and the same kind of erosion of character of the wealthy occurs as occurs when you subsidize sloth with welfare.  Worse, actually, since the wealthy are the decision makers in the society’s economy and you can even less afford to turn them into venal welfare queens than you can the simple worker.

Posted by karlmagnus on October 08, 2006, 12:14 PM | #

It’s always been a British theory that decision makers got to have such fun making decisions that society didn’t need to make them wealthy as well.  Wealth was then the fucntion of naff entrepreneurs, Richard Branson types whom one could ignore.

Yet another core value lost…

Cheap labor and its immiseration of the local working class is our key argument against mass immigration. It has picked up huge resonance in the US and appears to be doing so in Britain. It is economically unanswerable and entirely untaintable by accusations of racism.

Posted by Al Ross on October 08, 2006, 04:50 PM | #

“entirely untaintable by accusations of racism?”  Those of us who are familiar with the Marxist superstition-laden logic of Judeo-Communism, which affects to believe that every race is of equal value, might not agree. We will doubtless be assailed by puerile Geldofesque claptrap about North-South income gaps and the desideratum of a ‘borderless world’ in order to justify what our enemies describe as historically inevitable mass-migration from the Third World to White homelands.

Posted by Jethro Kull on October 08, 2006, 05:49 PM | #

It’s interesting that Austria, Germany and Denmark are moving more in the direction of the “China model” and away from the “USA model” in the sense of more strongly solidifying their White, Western features while sharply curbing Third World immigration.  Turks are now all but barred from Germany and Austria; you really can’t immigrate there anymore unless you’re an educated White worker or entrepreneur—preferably with or planning to have a family—from Eastern or northern Europe, North America or the White countries in South America, and of course if you speak pretty good German.  (This is why my now-expat ex-US friends who’ve emigrated, usually to Germany or Austria, were engineers and tech-types or businesspeople and were so feverishly immersing themselves in German language tapes, books and software years ago—they require that level of skill and dedication to move to Germany.  Having kids is of course a massive plus.) 

As for other countries, France used to follow the USA model of massive Third World immigration, but now has adopted the China model with the recent immigration/deportation laws and policy changes.  Italy and Spain briefly flirted with the USA model but are now going to the China model.  The Netherlands and Belgium are also now inclining toward the China model and away the USA.  The only European countries still fully embracing the ridiculous USA model of multiculturalism and a Third World majority are Sweden, Norway and Britain.  Why the UK still continues to embrace this disastrous USA model is mystifying to me, but now Britain (along with Australia and Canada) is moving in the same self-destructive path as the United States, where the elites in particular, across the political spectrum, are incredibly powerful and united in the objective of permanently destroying the ethnic heritage of the nation.

Posted by Jethro Kull on October 08, 2006, 05:52 PM | #

Obviously, in reference to the China model (which could also be the “Japan model”), the notion is of a modern, technologically advanced nation that nonetheless vigorously preserves its ethnic character.  China and Japan both have tough immigration policies which generally allow only well-educated East Asians, already with strong cultural ties, to immigrate.  Austria, Germany, Denmark and some other European countries follow a similar model, while the UK, Australia, Sweden, Norway and Canada follow the USA model of drowning out their founding (White) populations with Third World newcomers.  It’s a particularly disastrous modern form of imperialism, with the most harshly oppressed groups being the working-class White “grunts” in the affected countries.

Posted by Phil Peterson on October 09, 2006, 01:56 PM | #

Jethro Kull,

A few thoughts before I leave for the East.

Me and a friend of mine decided to drive into the country with our girlfriends one weekend. This was a sort of weekend getaway after a few hectic days at work. We stopped at a village where we could see some people going about their business as usual. There probably wasn’t a soul in the village who wasn’t staring at us. That’s how much we stuck out - and that’s how homogenous the place is. China is four times more populous than the US but has nowhere near the “diversity” that even Switzerland has. I am of course only speaking from personal observation and could well be wrong.

The city where I am currently based does have a large foreign population (as a lot of big cities do anywhere). But the major bulk of foerigners are either Koreans, Japanese or white (European or White American - mostly businessmen or executives). You would occasionally see some blacks but they are few in number and hardly noticeable.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 09, 2006, 02:42 PM | #

Jethro Kull’s way of referring to immigration policy which is normal as “the China model” and which is criminally insane as “the U.S. model” is exceedingly helpful.  Those terms are GREAT, Jethro!  I for one wouldn’t at all mind if they caught on worldwide.  What an improvement that would be! 

At present the two kinds of policies (but only where adopted by white countries exclusive of Israel) are called, respectively, the fascist/Nazi/racist/anti-Semitic/Holocaust/gas-chamber/Auschwitz/Bad-for-Wall-Street/the-Jews’-worst-nightmare/knuckle-dragging/mouth-breather model and the enlightened/nice/fantastic-for-the-Jews/there-are-no-such-things-as-races/Franz-Boas/Ashley-Montague/United-Nations/E.U./fricking-great-for-Wall-Street/too-fucking-bad-for-the-gentiles-in-flyover-country-who-get-race-replaced-serves-them-right-for-the-Crusader-pogrom-of-Jews-in-the-Rheinland-in-the-year-1190-oh!-and-I-almost-forgot-the-time-the-Cossacks-went-on-the-rampage-against-Polish-Jews-in-the-1600s model.

Good job, Jethro!