|
|
Blair humiliated in terror Bill voteIt may soon be all over for Anthony Charles Lynton Blair. Posted by Phil Peterson on Wednesday, November 9, 2005 at 07:59 PM in British Politics Comments:2
Posted by Al Ross on November 10, 2005, 02:10 AM | # Britain today is simply Toad Hall under Weasel and Stoat administration and whilst Blair exhibits all the treacherous tendencies common to so many contemporary politicians, he should have been supported in his anti-terrorism efforts by the Tories.In happier times the Tories could usually be relied upon to put country before party. Not any more. 3
Posted by Fred Scrooby on November 10, 2005, 02:34 AM | # “Britain today is simply Toad Hall under Weasel and Stoat administration” (—Al Ross) LOLOLOL!!! Moratorium-plus-Repatriation! 4
Posted by Phil on November 10, 2005, 04:05 AM | # he should have been supported in his anti-terrorism efforts by the Tories Draconian police powers play into the hands of New Labour demagogues who then use it for other purposes. 5
Posted by AD on November 10, 2005, 05:55 AM | # Yep, why should white people have their freedoms taken away by governments who intentionally brought the problem into the country. 6
Posted by Martin Hutchinson on November 10, 2005, 09:56 AM | # Civil liberties have never been particularly safe under Labour governments; Socialism is an essentially anti-freedom creed. Blair is the least bad leader Labour could have (other than for the purely partisan purpose of electing the Tories, not relevant so far from the next election.) Indeed, were we to see the dreadful German prospect of a Grand Coalition, I would also support him in a heartbeat for PM against Cameron, even though the Tories as a whole are clearly preferable (if inadequate.) Next entry: The enemy within Previous entry: Removing Lewontin’s Fallacy From Hamilton’s Rule |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 09:00 AM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:37 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view) Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by Andrew on November 10, 2005, 12:17 AM | #
Is that really a good Idea Phil, considering the selection of other Ding Bats to take the post?
It might be safer to assume that the Devil we know is better than the devil we don’t. With some of the mantra we hear in Australia on the happenings of British politicking, I would be shacking harder in my boots if the best of the worst was to go.
I think that made sense.