Bay Area National Anarchists

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 22, 2009, 05:42 PM | #

That blonde toddler drinking from a bottle, in the final image showing kids, looks as if it’s tricked out in leather straps of S & M gear (one strap around its neck, another over its shoulder).  That doesn’t look like toddler gear to me.  Some sicko is initiating his kid early.

Posted by q on February 22, 2009, 06:35 PM | #

The ADL is currently pushing through “hates crimes” legislation in order to shut down ANY criticism of homosexuals in America - and all other protected groups too!  Should the homosexual lobby and the ADL succeed, they will have in effect rendered our First Amendment null and void.

Please watch the video linked below. It’s important info. pertaining to hate crimes/homosexuals. Also contact your rep. and senators to voice your protest against these abominations:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER-rqGr-mAI&feature=channel

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 22, 2009, 11:03 PM | #

I agree with “q” just above:  that video he links is informative and important, and, furthermore, perfectly illustrates how the premier Jewish organization in the United States, Abe Foxman’s ADL, is behind so much of the harm and evil that’s been visited upon our society.

Once again, for non-Americans reading this, the ADL is a one-hundred-percent Jewish organization.  It does everything it can think of to destroy this country for no reason anyone seems able to discern.  And it is a group dearly loved and enthusiastically supported financially by this country’s Jews.

Posted by cladrastis on February 22, 2009, 11:44 PM | #

Hmmm, sure looks like anarchy to me.

Posted by Bay Area National Anarchist on February 23, 2009, 12:06 AM | #

Fred Scrooby,

Those girls are adopted by gay “parents.”

http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/news/004352.html

BANA

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 23, 2009, 12:56 AM | #

“Fred Scrooby, Those girls are adopted by gay ‘parents.’ “  (—BANA)

Well, I hope the ones who let them adopt see how they’ve got them, the girls, wearing leather S&M;get-ups.

Posted by stella on February 23, 2009, 08:53 AM | #

please see the link >

http://about-orphans.blogspot.com

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 23, 2009, 10:10 AM | #

Stella, I looked at your site but I want to know only two things:  if 1) that little girl drinking from the bottle is dressed in homosexual S & M-type straps (around her neck and shoulder) and 2) if that’s likely to bring normal psychological development for her to be dressed in that way and to be brought to this demonstration in her stroller and parked there where she gets to see men walking around wearing nothing but jock straps or leather leggings with their bare butts showing, and gets to feel she fits right in thanks to the leather strap around her neck?  Don’t these homosexual couples who adopt promise to give the children normal environments conducive to normal development and keep their “personal proclivities” discreetly out of sight of the toddlers?  Are they doing that with this girl and the other kids who seem to be hanging around this “street party”?

Posted by Valerian on February 23, 2009, 12:25 PM | #

Watching this video makes me realize the decadence and tolerance that exists in our society. Aristotle said that tolerance and apathy are signs of a decaying society; surely these are clear signs of that going on. When there is an upheaval someday in America and certain parts of the country start splitting apart I have a feeling that San Francisco is going to be isolated and left to rot. Once everyone dies off and suffers from their own decadence in San Francisco then a more vigorous, healthy people will come in and take over. Hopefully it’s our side that picks up the pieces.

Posted by James Bowery on February 23, 2009, 01:21 PM | #

Fred writes: “Well, I hope the ones who let them adopt see how they’ve got them, the girls, wearing leather S&M;get-ups.”

It is not at all improbable that the children were taken from their parents by Child Protective Services due to their parents being racists, and it was determined that to make up for the damage done to the children by such reactionary parents that it would be only humane to place them in a much more tolerant family environment.

The basic problem with this whole “discourse is war carried out by other means” strategy is that our strength is in force, not fraud—truth, not deception.

I think the sooner we can address the problem of government’s monopoly on force over fixed territories the sooner we can get to the real problem.  It seems to me the best approach to that problem is through technology.

Posted by Søren Renner on February 23, 2009, 01:27 PM | #

James, you misunderstand me if you think that “discourse is war” advocates johnjoytree’s position of “whites must adopt the deceptive strategery of jews and have an overt and a covert message”. Revolution in discourse means first of all revolution. Parasitism is not revolution.

Posted by Søren Renner on February 23, 2009, 01:32 PM | #

Do the BANA embody what Kai Murros advocates?

Posted by Bay Area National Anarchist on February 23, 2009, 02:53 PM | #

I can’t comment on the Kai Murros analogy without reading his work more, however, a quick review of “Revolution and How to Do It in a Modern Society” would reveal a couple differences. Namely, when he uses the word Party we use Tribe, and when he uses Socialism, we use Syndicate.  At our next meeting there will be a talk on National Anarchism and Tribalism which should help put these subjects into better perspective.

BANA