An Honest Conversation About Race.

Posted by .357 on June 21, 2008, 12:39 PM | #

“In fact, “a plurality of blacks would rather do business with whites than with either Hispanics or Asians.”

Another fact is: Most blacks would rather do bussiness with whites than fellow blacks. Black owned bussiness are scarce even in cities that are predominantly black. Gee, I wonder why?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 22, 2008, 06:30 PM | #

A new source of “honest conversation about race,” Frenchman Gaston Phébus, is warmly welcomed today over at the Vdare.com blog:

Gaston Phebus Says Bonjour

We recently added to our blogroll Le Blog de Gaston Phébus, maintained by a French immigration reform patriot.  He sends this message to VDARE.COM readers:

“France is even more afflicted by immigration problems than the US, in part because her immigrants are mostly non-Christian (Muslim), which causes much deeper cultural and behavioral incompatibilities —  especially around the issue of violence.  I publish in French, and provide in-depth analyses of such controversial topics as the IQ of immigrants, how a nominally democratic government can run a full-steam pro-immigration propaganda machine, and the origins of the welfare state which has been such a powerful immigration magnet.

“Compared to France, the US is still a relatively free country, at least in the matter of immigration speech.  There are many laws designed to choke us here, many of them emanating from the European Union, plus governmental offices likes the newly-created HALDE [literally, the High Authority of the Law Against Discrimination and For Equality], whose considerable budget is solely devoted to hunting down people like us, and then government-subsidized NGOs with a lot of access to the media, which are staffed with virulent pro-immigrationists keen on doing a public lynching every now and then.

“As a consequence, all politically incorrect blogs written by French people are hosted on American internet service providers!  In addition, the norm for people like me in France is to post under a pseudonym.  For mine, I chose Gaston Phébus, a (locally) famous medieval hero.”

We welcome Gaston Phébus and look forward to working with him!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 22, 2008, 11:48 PM | #

What happens when you refuse to acknowledge race-replacement as an issue (it is of course THE central issue):  the other side has an answer to everything you put forward and you go down to defeat.  The one thing they can’t answer:  race-replacement. 

As for Medved, he’s a typical Jewish neocon, one-hundred percent of whom want government-enforced race-replacement of Euros in this country but would cry bloody murder if anyone advocated the same for Israel.  Medved’s a worthless hypocrite, in other words, and an example of the kind of Jew who takes Euros to be no higher than animals, with aspirations no higher and rights no greater.  To this kind of Jew, Euros are a sort of chimp.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 26, 2008, 09:06 AM | #

From the Must Read! department: 

the article linked in this log entry:

http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/06/taylor-race-and-iq.html

There are many take-home points in that article, both explicit and implicit.  What a total asshole John Zmirak is, for one:  a completely contemptible digusting hopeless little non-entity.  For another, and this is extremely important, it’s not the Negroes who are going around suppressing race realism:  one sees here how most of them react rationally to its claims (which they likely already strongly suspected anyway, without anyone needing to tell them).  So, who is suppressing it and why?  Think about that. 

Or do I have to do a “fill in the blank”? 

OK, OK, there may be more than one blank you have to fill in, I admit ... Catholics, for example, would be one of the “other” blanks ... (like Zmirak, a blank in more ways than

one

two

three

a lot). 

But though all blanks are blank, some are blanker than others ... if my meaning is clear ...

Posted by GT on June 26, 2008, 07:58 PM | #

To this kind of Jew, Euros are a sort of chimp.

Absolutely, but with reason.

H. MacDonald is a chimp because the preservation of easy money and status is more important to her than racial truth.  That or she lacks competence in debating racial realities.  Maybe some of both.  Fulford, on the other hand, is a chimp for liking Michael Medved before he “morphed into one of the most vicious and arrogant neocon pundits.”  Only gentile sluts for easy money (who are attempting to deflect accusations of anti-Semitism) or useful idiots would state or suggest that Michael Medved was ever likable.

jews will continue to see Euros as chimps until we break the cycle of “that’s a good monkey, have a banana.”  Breaking the cycle means having the brains, talent, nads, and energy to create the alternate systems that allow us to reward ourselves.  Our idle ones, the gentile “elite” H. Monetarus and its wannabes, we leave behind with the multicult.

Posted by .357 on June 26, 2008, 09:32 PM | #

You tell’em, GT.

Posted by Weston on June 26, 2008, 11:31 PM | #

Fulford, on the other hand, is a chimp for liking Michael Medved before he “morphed into one of the most vicious and arrogant neocon pundits.” Only gentile sluts for easy money (who are attempting to deflect accusations of anti-Semitism) or useful idiots would state or suggest that Michael Medved was ever likable.

  The line about liking Medved in the link that Fred provided was the letter writer’s, not Fulford’s.  Fulford has always struck me as among the best (i.e. most pro-white) that VDARE has to offer. 

What happens when you refuse to acknowledge race-replacement as an issue (it is of course THE central issue):  the other side has an answer to everything you put forward and you go down to defeat.  The one thing they can’t answer:  race-replacement.

  Preach it, Fred.  These “non-racist” opponents of illegal immigration are deliberately eschewing the most powerful and effective argument they have at their disposal.  And for what? As Peter Brimelow noted, they end up being called “racist” anyway. 

Posted by GT on June 26, 2008, 11:49 PM | #

The line about liking Medved in the link that Fred provided was the letter writer’s, not Fulford’s.  Fulford has always struck me as among the best (i.e. most pro-white) that VDARE has to offer.

I wrong and careless about Fulford being a chimp.  My apologies to him.

Nevertheless the point stands.

Posted by ilianna on August 05, 2008, 12:30 AM | #

That’s very interesting. I’ve always noticed that the Asians in my family tend to be more prejudiced than say the white members. Truth is, I suspect it’s because many of them did not grow up in the US, and are quite xenophobic (since China and Taiwan is obviously predominately Asian).