|
|
An Honest Conversation About Race.Linda Chavez wrote an article in the June, 2008 issue of Commentary—the Neocon magazine—entitled Let Us by All Means Have an Honest Conversation about Race. She notes that fewer than 8% of Whites hold negative attitudes about Blacks, while other minorities hold more negative attitudes about Blacks. There is nothing new in this observation—anyone familiar with Kevin MacDonald’s work knows that Whites are the least ethnocentric, but also we know how to behave and be agreeable. Whites are subject to negative implicit attitudes but not explicit attitudes where we are more likely to conform to the diversity/multiculturalism/naïve environmentalism with regards to race. Again, she points out that non-Whites have higher levels of tension between them than is present between Whites and other races. In fact, “a plurality of blacks would rather do business with whites than with either Hispanics or Asians.” (the poll conveniently left out Jews.) And later, “As against the 10 percent or fewer of American whites who hold negative views of blacks, the same mid-1990’s survey of intergroup attitudes cited above registered over three-quarters of blacks holding negative views of whites.” And yet she notes that Blacks would rather do business with Whites than with other minorities. She also discusses Obama, and takes him to task for blaming society for Black failure in an earlier discussion of race, then last Sunday he gave a sermon similar to Bill Cosby’s on Black male’s irresponsibility towards the family. He seems to have numerous excuses in the ready depending on the occasion or the audience. Chavez’s interpretation: “In short, according to this analysis, whites and others are suffering from a kind of false consciousness. What they fail to understand, when confronted with the pathologies disproportionately afflicting the black community, is that the fault lies elsewhere than in persistent but remediable behavior. It lies in the capitalist system and in government.” HOLD ON TO YOUR POCKETBOOK WHITEY! She also notes that Blacks are subject to absurd beliefs such as evidence planted against O. J. Simpson, guns and drugs are supplied to the ghetto so blacks will be killed, HIV was developed by Whites to kill Blacks, etc. A lower average intelligence allows for indiscriminate paranoia. What she failed to discuss however was the low average mental ability of Blacks and the low conscientiousness that contributes to pathology and failure. So again, Linda Chavez like so many others, does not want a truly honest discussion about race. Posted by Matt Nuenke on Saturday, June 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM in Race realism Comments:2
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 22, 2008, 06:30 PM | # A new source of “honest conversation about race,” Frenchman Gaston Phébus, is warmly welcomed today over at the Vdare.com blog:
3
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 22, 2008, 11:48 PM | # What happens when you refuse to acknowledge race-replacement as an issue (it is of course THE central issue): the other side has an answer to everything you put forward and you go down to defeat. The one thing they can’t answer: race-replacement. As for Medved, he’s a typical Jewish neocon, one-hundred percent of whom want government-enforced race-replacement of Euros in this country but would cry bloody murder if anyone advocated the same for Israel. Medved’s a worthless hypocrite, in other words, and an example of the kind of Jew who takes Euros to be no higher than animals, with aspirations no higher and rights no greater. To this kind of Jew, Euros are a sort of chimp. 4
Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 26, 2008, 09:06 AM | # From the Must Read! department: the article linked in this log entry: http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/06/taylor-race-and-iq.html There are many take-home points in that article, both explicit and implicit. What a total asshole John Zmirak is, for one: a completely contemptible digusting hopeless little non-entity. For another, and this is extremely important, it’s not the Negroes who are going around suppressing race realism: one sees here how most of them react rationally to its claims (which they likely already strongly suspected anyway, without anyone needing to tell them). So, who is suppressing it and why? Think about that. Or do I have to do a “fill in the blank”? OK, OK, there may be more than one blank you have to fill in, I admit ... Catholics, for example, would be one of the “other” blanks ... (like Zmirak, a blank in more ways than one two three a lot). But though all blanks are blank, some are blanker than others ... if my meaning is clear ... 5
Posted by GT on June 26, 2008, 07:58 PM | #
Absolutely, but with reason. H. MacDonald is a chimp because the preservation of easy money and status is more important to her than racial truth. That or she lacks competence in debating racial realities. Maybe some of both. Fulford, on the other hand, is a chimp for liking Michael Medved before he “morphed into one of the most vicious and arrogant neocon pundits.” Only gentile sluts for easy money (who are attempting to deflect accusations of anti-Semitism) or useful idiots would state or suggest that Michael Medved was ever likable. jews will continue to see Euros as chimps until we break the cycle of “that’s a good monkey, have a banana.” Breaking the cycle means having the brains, talent, nads, and energy to create the alternate systems that allow us to reward ourselves. Our idle ones, the gentile “elite” H. Monetarus and its wannabes, we leave behind with the multicult. 7
Posted by Weston on June 26, 2008, 11:31 PM | #
The line about liking Medved in the link that Fred provided was the letter writer’s, not Fulford’s. Fulford has always struck me as among the best (i.e. most pro-white) that VDARE has to offer.
Preach it, Fred. These “non-racist” opponents of illegal immigration are deliberately eschewing the most powerful and effective argument they have at their disposal. And for what? As Peter Brimelow noted, they end up being called “racist” anyway. 8
Posted by GT on June 26, 2008, 11:49 PM | #
I wrong and careless about Fulford being a chimp. My apologies to him. Nevertheless the point stands. 9
Posted by ilianna on August 05, 2008, 12:30 AM | # That’s very interesting. I’ve always noticed that the Asians in my family tend to be more prejudiced than say the white members. Truth is, I suspect it’s because many of them did not grow up in the US, and are quite xenophobic (since China and Taiwan is obviously predominately Asian). Next entry: Taking RD to our people Previous entry: DO ANTI-RACISTS SUFFER FROM STOCKHOLM SYNDROME? |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Dan Dare commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:37 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:10 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:05 AM. (go) (view) Helvena commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'Yo! Cop = Scum Cow!' on 02/09/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) The Socal group scam commented in entry 'The Moral high ground?' on 02/09/12, 06:50 AM. (go) (view) Hyman commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/09/12, 05:47 AM. (go) (view) RES commented in entry 'Who caused the 2008 housing bubble to burst in the U.S.?' on 02/09/12, 05:44 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/09/12, 04:07 AM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/09/12, 12:27 AM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view) Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view) Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view) J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view) jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view) marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view) Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view) Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by .357 on June 21, 2008, 12:39 PM | #
“In fact, “a plurality of blacks would rather do business with whites than with either Hispanics or Asians.”
Another fact is: Most blacks would rather do bussiness with whites than fellow blacks. Black owned bussiness are scarce even in cities that are predominantly black. Gee, I wonder why?