Turning the financial screw on the Afrikaner

I have just read an article about SA Nedbank’s new discount share scheme that only targets black South Africans.

Black South African citizens are defined by the SA Financial Sector Charter as Africans, Indians and coloureds.  This condition is in all Nedbank’s ads for the Eyethu Investment Scheme.  Questions about how, in case of doubt, the bank will determine which would-be clients are undesirably white stay unanswered.  The question is not theoretical.  Many coloureds have a light skin (in Afrikaans).  Any that receive a white classification, however, will find that they aren’t even allowed to invest their money in a favourable way.  It is racism and reminiscent of the yellow stars in Nazi Germany, with the difference that whites don’t need a star to be recognised in South Africa.

The scheme also reminds us, if we needed reminding, that the ANC’s policies such as Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) and Affirmative Action (AA) are Marxist by nature.  The idea is to transfer wealth from white to black rather than generate new wealth to empower black South Africans.  Whites who still have a job pay double the taxes of blacks at same the income level.  The ANC, meanwhile, demands that 85% of all jobs go to blacks - not as an average for the whole country but even in those regions with a white majority.  In many job ads one reads “BEE only”.  South African companies argue that it is the South African ANC government that forces them into this.  But nothing can diminish their moral complicity in the new racism against whites.

The South African People’s (race) Registration Law, dating from the apartheid era, is officially abolished, of course.  But it is in widespread use all the same and applies, for example, to education.  The result of such universal discrimination is economically devastating not only for the whites but, since white productivity is strangled, for South Africa as a whole.

Over and above all this economic warfare against the Afrikaner, is a determined culture war.  The ANC is intensely anti-Afrikaans, although somewhat hilariously it dares to claim the opposite,  even ”wishing the Afrikaners much success” on the recent anniversary (in Afrikaans) of the founding of their own language in 1875.  But that’s just typical ANC window-dressing.

Afrikaner Buks van Rensburg has written an interesting essay (in English) about this cultural genocide, and about the Judenräte mentality (called Afrikaner decadence) of much of the Afrikaner intellectuals.  There only is one aspect on which I disagree with Mr van Rensburg.  Those Afrikaners who have decided to fully Anglicise have in fact already made their choice - they are just waiting for the right moment to join the white emigration, and to leave South Africa for ever.

So what, besides simple racial revenge, is the cause of such malignity towards Afrikaners?

The Afrikaners are, in fact, the only possible source of white resistance against the ANC’s economic plundering … and, therefore, the Afrikaners must suffer the complete undermining of their institutions, from primary and secondary schools to universities and businesses.  I don’t know if any MR readers will remember the Volkskas, the bank built from the pennies brought to school by impoverished Afrikaner kids in the 1920’s and 30’s.  Now it is defunct.  Afrikaner farmers must submit themselves to the discriminatory practices of the Land Bank and the other government-related institutions mandated to “assist” farmers.  They are assistance towards ruin, of course - and worse - by land reform and invasions apparently driven by the agendas of foreign NGO’s as much by ANC warlords.

So no one should be surprised if the mainstream Afrikaner view is that white apartheid has simply been replaced by black racism.  How do you expect people to think when they have been deceived into a world where not merit but only the colour of your skin matters (in Afrikaans).

At worst deception, at best window-dressing is a seminal feature of South African economic and political life.  A good deal of it no doubt serves the purpose of self-deception as far as the ANC is concerned.  But the really critical component is deceiving the rest of the financial and political world.  The Reserve Bank (SARB), for example, silences criticism with wonderfully rosy statements about macro-economic stability and strong growth.  However, you might find this article by Mandla Maleka more trustworthy.  Mandla was, by the way, named by Reuters among the top ten SA economists in 2002 and 2004, and was director at the SA National Treasury etc, etc.

They can’t both be right.  Oh yes, South Africa is reported to have been upgraded by three rating agencies on the back of strong growth and a disciplined approach to economic thinking.  But it is growth based on greed, and the discipline is a phantom.  Whites are squeezed on every front and blacks just can’t be got to save - despite the highest real interest yields in the world.

The light will finally go out in South Africa the day the world community realises this … if it is not also bent on self-deception.  For example, you can read an expert analysis of South Africa’s Jekyll and Hyde economy here.  But … why does Reuters contrive to overlook black racism when it is so manifestly the key to understanding what’s going on?

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Wednesday, September 7, 2005 at 10:55 PM in World Affairs
Comments (6) | Tell a friend

Comments:

1

Posted by Braveheart on September 06, 2005, 12:41 PM | #

This week-end a South African television poll among 11.000 Afrikaners revealed that 91% of them feel cast-off in the new South Africa, see http://www.news24.com/Beeld/Suid-Afrika/0,,3-975_1765878,00.html (in Afrikaans)

Flanders,

2

Posted by Svigor on September 06, 2005, 02:54 PM | #

From this outsider’s point of view, the tragedy is not the coming implosion of SA.  That was mandated with the fall of Apartheid and we (the outside world, or at least the realist subsection of it) have had plenty of time to adjust to the fact.

The tragedy is that these south African (Zim, SA) populations are some of the finest European peoples in the world, the cream of our race, and they’re not being airlifted out of there while there’s still a chance to save them.

I apologize if this offends those who feel an attachment to the soil of southern Africa, but South Africa is dead.  It just hasn’t fallen over yet.  It was dead the day Apartheid died.

3

Posted by Andrew L on September 07, 2005, 03:02 AM | #

Heer heer,I’ll second that, Airlift them out now, Zimbuwi also, stuff the left and the Negro’s, they can join the Arab league and march with their NAZI’s,buddies in the north.There they can Fornicate over Marxism and Allah together,and die hand in hand,With some luck.

4

Posted by Braveheart on September 07, 2005, 09:37 AM | #

SA Afrikaner Farmers threaten armed struggle:

http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__national&articleid=250273

(To read the article: copy and paste the link on the internet field)

Is this an ultimatum?

5

Posted by Geoff Beck on September 07, 2005, 09:46 AM | #

> Airlift?

There is not a single government in the White European world, with the possible exception of Russia, that would dare embarress the Black regime in S. Africa by airlifting out besieged whites.

So, who is really in charge?

6

Posted by Braveheart on September 12, 2005, 06:55 AM | #

For the official SA reaction to the armed struggle threat, see at: http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__national/&articleid=250558 (to view the article: copy and paste the url on the internet field).  It is bewildering. They deny the genocide, while at the same time the South African government is taking active steps, for instance abolishing the commando system, to destroy the white farmer community. Because they want to import food instead of producing it? Only food for the ANC hanger-ons afterwards?

Moreover I read: “elements who are STILL bent on calls for a separate volkstaat”, i.e. autonomy for the Afrikaners. But In 1994 there simply was an autonomy agreement between the ANC and the Afrikaners. This can be proven, see http://www.boerevryheid.co.za/english1.htm (part 1 of declaration - p. 18). But apparently the ANC now no longer honours that agreement. So I would even say “thanks” to the ANC for being so clear about this. But this gives the Afrikaners the legal right to TAKE what was granted by ALL appropriate means.

Such as the Jews left Egypt, the Afrikaners have the right to end slavery and murder and they have the right to “leave the state of South Africa” for what it is and to become independent.

Flanders,

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)


Next entry: American Nationalism

Previous entry: On England and a bookshelf in Petrockstowe

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

anon commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 11:18 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:51 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 10:28 PM. (go) (view)

Silver commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 09:48 PM. (go) (view)

Mary commented in entry 'Anti-white ideology is like anti-biotic overuse' on 02/08/12, 09:24 PM. (go) (view)

J Richards commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 09:04 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 08:15 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 08:09 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:52 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 07:48 PM. (go) (view)

jamesUK commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 07:36 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:45 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 06:27 PM. (go) (view)

marloe commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:21 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:17 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 06:08 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:07 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 06:03 PM. (go) (view)

Ivan commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 05:53 PM. (go) (view)

Jimmy Marr commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view)

dc commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 05:13 PM. (go) (view)

Lurker commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:55 PM. (go) (view)

MP commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:43 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:31 PM. (go) (view)

Selous Scout commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 04:07 PM. (go) (view)

Wild Bill commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 04:02 PM. (go) (view)

Graham_Lister commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 03:47 PM. (go) (view)

daniel commented in entry 'Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010' on 02/08/12, 03:24 PM. (go) (view)

dosto commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 02:40 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 02:36 PM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right' on 02/08/12, 02:25 PM. (go) (view)

Marlowe's Ghost commented in entry 'Bowery Goes Stark!' on 02/08/12, 01:33 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa