Category: Islam & Islamification

Drawing off the appeal of the anti-jihadist message

The Telegraph’s on-line readers love nothing more than to maul government immigration policy, and love to maul the past government’s immigration policy above everything.  Threads of 2000 comments or more have become unremarkable with immigration articles.  Philip Johnston - a relatively brave journalist - has notched up a modest 1080 comments in 48 hours with his piece titled The Left is rewriting Britain’s immigration history.

Obviously, serious discussion becomes quite difficult at the height of the commenting action, when posts are flying in like artillery rounds on Vimy Ridge.  But when the numbers of posts and recommends are high, it does allow a certain judgement to be made about political appetites.

One such judgement concerns the popularity or otherwise of the, I presume, MI5 operation, the English Defence League, and of that anti-nationalist, Breivikian thing, anti-Jihadism in general.  Judge for yourself.

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 07:24 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (50) | Tell-a-Friend

Review of 2083: A European Declaration of Independence

Anders Behring Breivik is said to be a Justiciar Knight, whose badge, depicting what the reincarnated Templar Knights are about, is contrasted with the painting titled “Beat the whites with the red wedge,” a Bolshevist propaganda poster from 1919. Based on this comparison, what can you infer about the manifesto he allegedly wrote? Another clue: the Archeofuturists have shoveled a hole that they’ll enlarge into a massive pit within which they’ll be buried.

Teasers aside, here’s my review of 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, and more. I’m not posting it below because I intend to revise it.

NO OFF-TOPIC COMMENTS, please, and stick to the facts and fact-based inference.

Posted by J Richards on Monday, September 5, 2011 at 08:18 PM in European Nationalism,  Far Right,  Islam & Islamification,  Marxism & Culture War,  Media,  Political analysis,  That Question Again,  White Nationalism,  World Affairs
Comments (40) | Tell-a-Friend

Acts of War

by David Hamilton

Acts of War are often invasions of peaceful countries but the present incidence of Muslims raping young white girls must be considered an Act of War as it is carried out by a separate and homogenous community imported into our country by the deceit of the elites against the interests of the indigenous people.

Can anyone imagine the great Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston allowing aliens to gang rape our young girls? In 1850, for the assault on British subject Don Pacifico in Greece, a foreign country, he sent the navy and blockaded their ports Greece was under the joint protection of three powers: Russia and France protested against its coercion by the British fleet and the French ambassador temporarily left London. It was the cause of Palmerston’s declaration that British subjects ought everywhere to be protected by the strong arm of the British government against injustice and wrong; comparing the reach of the British Empire to that of the Roman Empire, in which a Roman citizen could walk the earth unmolested by any foreign power.

Lord Palmerston addressing the Commons

This was the famous, five-hour speech Civis Britannicus, in which he delivered himself of this sentiment:

“As the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say, Civis Romanus sum, so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England will protect him from injustice and wrong.”

The low and worthless rulers we have now even cover up for aliens raping our young girls in our own towns and cities. Just compare girly Michael Gove with this great man. What an embarrassment! The sight of the elites on the BBC’s Question Time talking away this reality to cover it up was sickening.  They:

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:34 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (21) | Tell-a-Friend

Taliban sex fanaticism - in Afghanistan and in Birmingham alike

The complete worthlessness of the nation-building program in Afghanistan was recently again made clear by this:

The Afghan woman publicly executed by Taliban militants for alleged adultery was pregnant, it emerged today.

The victim, 48-year-old Bibi Sanubar, was flogged up to 200 times before being shot on Sunday - in the head and chest - in the remote Qades district. Her alleged lover managed to escape.

Abdul Jabbar Khan, security chief in the Taliban-controlled area, said the killing was ordered after the woman allegedly killed her newborn child to conceal illicit sex

However much you might think that Brits dying to make life safe for some sort of Afghani Rainbow Coalition of feminists, gays, etc, etc. is a good idea, it should be completely clear by now that it’s impossible. The problem is not that Afghani people have their own desires frustrated by a dictatorial Taliban. The problem is that the Afghani people ARE the Taliban. They don’t like gays, they don’t like feminists, they don’t like religious apostates - and they are very willing to eradicate these objects of hate. They like rulers who share these dislikes, such as their former and current Taliban warlords.

These same patterns can be observed in Iraq, in Pakistan, in fact wherever the desires of mass Muslims have been liberated from strongman rulers and made into law.

These same patterns also hold when the co-ethnics of these liberated peoples move to the West. Britain is at the moment observing the fallout from a Pakistani arranged marriage gone wrong. How many such ticking time-bombs are ticking away? 3,000? What percentage of these end in a drive-by shooting makes for an acceptable total for violence on British soil?

The extraordinary liberal delusion is that at some point it will be possible to assimilate MEs and subcons to Western norms. Sure, it hasn’t happened yet, but they can always keep trying. The race realist answer is that genotype => phenotype. It has predictive power, and centrist apolitical Brits, as honour killings become more and more prevalent not just halfway across the world, but in towns and on roads much like the ones on which they live, will move towards it. Cant is for the good times, predictive power is for when it matters.

Posted by Alex Zeka on Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM in British Politics,  Islam & Islamification
Comments (9) | Tell-a-Friend

Whither Eurabia?

The debate rumbles on, Eurabists and Panglossians continue to rage at each other across a widening chasm of misunderstanding. Chistopher Caldwell’s recent book Reflections on the Revolution In Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West has served to polarise opinion still further; all the quality rags carried a review, some praising, some damning (the latter sometimes variations on the ‘What would a bloody Sceptic know about Europe anyway?’ meme); they’re all there for the googling. Usefully, the consistently interesting Laban Tall has focused instead upon reaction within the blogosphere. His piece today More Eurabian Fantasies provides a valuable tour de horizon of the reaction from some of the more esoteric nooks and crannies of the cyber-Kommentariat to Caldwell’s thesis, in addition to his own succinct commentary.

Continued...

Posted by Dan Dare on Wednesday, August 26, 2009 at 04:41 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (20) | Tell-a-Friend

Police protection of child rapists

By David Hamilton

Edmund Burke believed that politics should take account of human nature.  The dominant ideologies today completely go against that and try to stifle natural expressions of common sense.  In his greatest speech made in response to calls for him to be prosecuted under the 1976 Race Relations Act, The Uniform of Colour, Enoch gave an insight into how human nature operates:

“In understanding this matter, the beginning of wisdom is to grasp the law that in human societies power is never left unclaimed and unused.  It does not blow about, like wastepaper on the streets, owner-less and inert.  Men’s nature is not only, as Thucydides long ago asserted, to exert power where they have it; men cannot help themselves from exerting power where they have it, whether they want to or not.

The coloured population of over two million in England, a population which grows at the rate of nearly 100,000 a year while the remainder diminishes, a population which is predominantly concentrated in the central areas of the metropolis and other key urban and industrial centers of England, does possess—simply by reason of segregation and differentiation—a power which would not accrue to a mere random sample of two million persons similarly located but not perceived or perceiving themselves as distinct from the rest”.

The Sun of 10 November 2006 quoted Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller predicting waves of terrorist bombings, possibly with chemical and biological devices.

“At this moment, at least 30 attacks are being actively planned and 1,600 suicidal young terrorists are under surveillance. Round-the-clock vigilance by security services has thwarted five major conspiracies and saved countless lives.  There are plenty more outrages being planned.”

There is another aspect of the war being waged against us in our own country by people the elites who are bringing here. In an exposé of public interest the Daily Mail of 6 April 2009 reported:

Migrant workers and illegal immigrants (asylum seekers) were responsible for up to a third of all sex attacks in some areas.  Greater London was worst affected, with foreigners charged in connection with a third of rapes.  To get the figures the Express had to make a Freedom of Information request.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Tuesday, April 14, 2009 at 07:19 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (55) | Tell-a-Friend

Britain, centre of world terrorism

By David Hamilton

If anything defeats common sense it is trying to understand how the “Establishment”, the “elites,” apprehend the world around them.  They really seem to believe that somehow out of this ghastly racial chaos a sweet multi-racial harmony will emerge.

It is a neo-Marxist view that after chaos or breakdown there will come not the workers’ paradise of previous Marxist fantasies, but a multi-racial utopia.  Margaret Hodge, then Employment Minister, made a similar point two years ago when she acknowledged problems in her Barking constituency, then added it will be alright when we become a multi racial-society … as if this would appear by magic.  In practice though, they are destroying innocent people’s lives but don’t care because it makes them feel morally superior over those who do suffer..

On BBC Radio 4’s Moral Maze in August 2007 the multi-racialist panel talked and talked about an ideal future … but never faced what is happening in the world around them.  In Alien Nation journalist and economist Peter Brimelow, described these people as “immigration enthusiasts” - like religious enthusiasts the emotion is more important than thinking rationally.  They almost have an orgasm when talking about asylum seekers or granting amnesties.

They do not take human nature into account when discussing race-relations as they do when running their personal life, and can only deal with reality by pretending that ethnics are assimilating or have given up their identities and traditional loyalties. If they do discuss events they employ a little verbal sophistry to avoid the stark reality. Con Coughlin, daily Telegraph columnist and author of books on the Middle East and terrorism wrote on 16 December 2008, of “young Britons” attacking their own country:-

Every month, thousands of young British Muslims travel to Pakistan on holiday to visit family and friends…it is an opportunity to celebrate important religious festivals, such as the Eid feast ... or simply to spend time in the country of their own or their family’s origin.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Monday, December 29, 2008 at 08:36 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (17) | Tell-a-Friend

British Government Collude with Muslim Terrorists

By David Hamilton

Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund.

In return they offered them some control over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West. It is Saudi’s Wahhabi form of Islam which, together with the Shi’ites in Iran, aims to make Islam dominant in the world. Saudi money has financed the spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in this country promoting holy war and converting thousands of British Muslims.

Saudi Wahhabism seeks to conquer the West through a pincer movement comprising violence on the one hand and cultural infiltration on the other, and our Prime Minister is colluding with them. Lord Mandelson admitted that the Saudis and other Gulf states would get more influence in global institutions in return:-

“The Gulf is open to business but they’re also signing up as keen partners to help the rest of the world to get through the international financial crisis,” he said.

“Specifically, it means that they will contribute to the IMF fund… but they will also contibute as partners to the decision-making that we need to make to build up the institutions, the new practices.

Islamic influence is spreading into our cultural life as the Arabic investors buy Western institutions. Manchester City F C is now owned by the ruling family of Abu Dhabi; Barclays Bank, has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Monday, November 24, 2008 at 09:06 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend

Wilders’ Fitna is released - UPDATE 28.03.08

The removal of Fitna.  Official LiveLeak statement.

Following threats to our staff of a very serious nature, and some ill-informed reports from certain corners of the British media that could affect the safety of some staff members,  LiveLeak has been left with no other choice but to remove Fitna from our servers.

This is a sad day for freedom of speech on the net but we have to place the safety and wellbeing of our staff above all else.  We would like to thank the thousands of people from all backgrounds and religions who gave us their support.  They realised that LiveLeak is a vehicle for many opinions and not just one.

Perhaps there is still hope that this situation may produce a discussion that could benefit and educate all of us as to how we can accept one another’s cultures.

We stood for what we believe in, the ability to be heard, but in the end the price was too high.

LiveLeak.com

BUT IT’S STILL ON YOUTUBE

Yesterday’s original post ...

Geert Wilders’ has now found a host on-line for his much trailed and relentlessly tragic film, Fitna the Movie.  It is in Dutch, but scarcely needs translation.  It is too uncomplicated for that. [Actually here is the English-language version, with my thanks to Hibernia Girl - Ed]

Let it be said that Wilders’ message of Islam’s alien-ness and its implacable opposition to Western liberal democratic values is unmoderated by any political context.  OK, one wouldn’t expect too much of a critique of those values in a short film like this.  But the responsibility for transferring Moslem populations into Europe - and apparently they now stand at 57 million - goes totally unaddressed.  The viewer is left to assume that it’s simply a product of Islam’s expansionist ambitions.

Likewise, no attempt is made to investigate the nature of Moslem anger towards the West.  The vast offence that Moslems feel at America’s machinations in the dar al-Islam and the humiliation occasioned by Israeli aggression are not touched upon.  All the blood-letting is portrayed as a product of the “problematic” surahs.

We all know Wilders has a penchant for populist anti-immigration politics.  But Wikipedia helpfully explains that he also has a very special feeling, not to put too fine a point on it, for Israel:-

In the past twenty five years Geert Wilders has visited Israel about forty times, he says. According to his own sayings, he has met Ariel Sharon (“many times”) and Ehud Olmert, among others, in Israel. Furthermore, he claims tight connections with the Mossad.

... More than a few members of the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy suspect Wilders of taking guidance from the Israeli Embassy in the Netherlands

... in 2005 Wilders proposed implementing Israel’s administrative detention in the Netherlands, a practice heavily criticized by human rights group Amnesty International. Also, at the time Wilders was member of the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy, he had an employee who directly came from the Israeli Embassy.

So perhaps Wilders is not all that interested in telling his own people that, fundamentally, Moslems are in Holland for the same reason that 1,350 Dutch soldiers are in Iraq.  Perhaps his pro-Israel sensibilities baulk at the very notion of a mutual separation - them from us and us from them.  After all, no employee in the Israeli Embassy would want to see a Dutch Holland or a West careless of its “duty” to the Jewish state.

View Fitna, with all its shock value, as an agitprop vehicle for an ambitious and energetic politician.  A serious contribution it aint.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 06:39 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (40) | Tell-a-Friend

Opinion professionals in Rome

“Can European Civilisation Survive?” the publicity asks.  Not without Europeans, one must reply.

But Identity Crisis, a two-day chatter starting this very day (Thursday) at the European University of Rome, does not concern itself with us.  This is Judeo-Christian country.  What happens to Europeans doesn’t matter, so long as Western Civ can be salvaged in an executable form for the godly and the

parasitical

paragoniac.

The moving spirit of the conference appears to be Avi Davis, a man of many talents according to his bio, since he is an attorney, documentarian (?), senior fellow of the American Freedom Alliance, and a senior editorial columnist for Jewsweek, among other Israel-gripped rags.

What Avi and his friends are up to here should be pretty plain.  They are trying to shape the countours of future government opinion.  You can tell it’s government opinion-forming they are interested in because their method - the international conferences, the “scholarly studies”, the complex little knot of “Institutes” and “Forums” - is the same as that employed by the New Left when it culturalised discourse in the 1980s.  They have money, as the left surely had money - and no doubt from some rather similar sources.  They have some influence, at least, in places of power on both sides of the Atlantic.  And they have an enemy: not European Man this time but Islam in and beyond Europe.

They are cultural preservationists, I suppose.  They are not like us.  We set out to preserve the greatest of peoples while Jews see only anti-Semitism in that sacred goal, and Christians see the worship of a craven image.  To the question, “Should European peoples be free to live as they please, and with whom they please, in their own lands” these people would be constitutionally unable to answer in the positive.

So is Avi’s effort a help or hindrance to our goal.  Well, right now the discussion at high levels in European politics of Islam as a threat in itself is not unhelpful to nationalist parties like VB and the BNP.  And since the true political and philosophical nature of nationalism is too revolutionary to be entertained at any level of government, there is no material loss to us if Jews and Christians push the anti-Islamification agenda successfully.

But, of course, the point arrives when civilisation as a value in itself misses the mark.  It is to genetic survival what citizenism is to blut und boden.  It will contribute nothing to our cause, other than the educational experience of seeing the opinion-forming exercise professionally - and lavishly - undertaken.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 08:20 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (18) | Tell-a-Friend

Neocons and Islamofascism.

In the book World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism, by Norman Podhoretz, 2007, and in live interviews that he has been giving lately, he emphasizes that only Islamofascists were able to kill thousands of Americans on American soil in one devastating strike, something not even the axis powers during WWII were capable of doing. His claim seems to be that this new enemy is every bit as dangerous as the highly trained and advanced armies, for their time, as Germany and Japan. Podhoretz and his kin are desperately trying to keep the United States engaged in regime change in the Middle East, and of course spinning “just so” stories is an easy way to keep the sheeple terrified of this new threat.

With regards to 9/11 of course, we were to blame—not the sophistication of the terrorists. I came across this quite well detailed acknowledgment of our dereliction by Max Bazerman in Judgment in Managerial Decision Making:

“Enron is not the only disaster that we can trace to failed decision making. Faulty decisions played an important role in the weakness of the U.S. aviation security system that allowed terrorists to use airplanes as weapons on September 11, 2001. The U.S. government knew terrorists were willing to become martyrs for their cause and that they hated the United States. The World Trade Center had been bombed in 1993, and in 1994 terrorists hijacked an Air France airplane and tried to turn it into a missile aimed at the Eiffel Tower. In 1995, terrorists failed in an attempt to hijack twelve U.S. commercial airplanes in Asia at the same time. In addition, the general public knew how simple it was to board an airplane with items, such as small knives, that could be used as weapons. In 1997, Vice President Al Gore’s aviation security commission put all of this data together and provided comprehensive evidence that the system was full of holes. Yet despite the warning signs, the Clinton administration did little to improve airline safety.

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Monday, October 29, 2007 at 07:27 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (19) | Tell-a-Friend

Brussels 9/11: the end of free speech

Those who frequently roam the streets of Brussels can remember hardly a day on which there isn’t a demonstration for or against something outside one of the European offices.  We’ve even had the garbage men whose brooms were the wrong size.  On average, five hundred demos a year are approved in the European Union capital, approximately two per working-day.

As one would expect of a liberal democracy, only about once a year is a demo actually forbidden, and then only where the direct incitement of a felony is involved,  and by felony I mean murder, child abuse or genocide.  Otherwise, the most bizarre and absurd demos are routinely permitted.

Nevertheless, Brussels mayor Freddy Thielemans forbade a demo for the 11th of this month, the anniversary of the attacks on New York and Washington.  The demo, which included a minute’s silence for the victims of 9/11, had been announced as a protest against the on-going Islamicisation of Europe, and specifically against the introduction of Shariah law.  It’s not an unpopular cause in Brussels – or in many other places.  The ban didn’t go unnoticed (in German) in Europe and in America.  Nor did the fact that, embarrassingly for mayor Thielemans, only two days earlier a demo by United for Truth, an organisation that claims that the US government and Mossad were behind the 9/11 attacks, had been permitted.

Continued...

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 at 08:11 PM in Islam & Islamification
Tell-a-Friend

How does Bush think he will finally win the war on terror?

I came across a 1999 report prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, entitled The Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why? It should be available on the Internet, and if not I have a copy. It makes for some interesting reading with regards to current forms of terrorism and how difficult it is to defeat—should that be one’s primary concern.

The report traces the history of terrorism over the last few decades, and points out that earlier secular terrorists “want a lot of people watching, not a lot of people dead.” During the 90s however, secular or idealistic terrorists gave way to religious fundamentalist terrorism that is not averse to using WMD for killing masses of people. After all, they are on a mission from God or Allah and what others think is irrelevant. This includes millenarian, messianic or apocalyptic fanatics. What is interesting is that the Christian millenarian fundamentalists in the United States mirror the Islamic terrorists’ jihadist mission—only Islamists are acting on orders directly from Allah, and the Christians are waiting for promised events to occur with little help from besides supporting Israel. In the end, the result is the same in the slaughter of innocents.

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Thursday, August 9, 2007 at 09:26 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (11) | Tell-a-Friend

Containment of Islam or its annihilation? asks Muslim apostate

Ed Husain, author of The Islamist, comments:

This is just an excuse. They reject Western culture full stop, not just ‘slags in night clubs’. They would have supported the bombing of Muslims attending the cinema in Cairo in the 1950s. They do not want Muslims to enjoy social freedoms. If it was not Iraq they would cite Chechnya. Or Palestine. These are angry men. Accommodation is not an option. It has to be containment or annihilation.

If those two are the only options (and when even a co-ethnic of most Muslims says that they are, we surely should believe him) containment is surely the humane solution.

Posted by Alex Zeka on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 05:05 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (28) | Tell-a-Friend

Saudi and the West

The standing advice provided by the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office for British travellers to Saudi Arabia includes the following:-

Saudi Arabia is a Muslim country in which Islamic law is strictly enforced.  Islamic codes of behaviour and dress are also enforced rigorously.  You should respect them fully.

Homosexual behaviour and adultery are illegal and can carry the death penalty.

The penalties for the possession of, or trade in, alcohol are severe.  Both result in prison sentences.  ... You should not arrive in Saudi Arabia under the influence of alcohol: the consequences could be serious.

... The Saudi legal system differs in many ways from the UK.  Suspects can be held without charge and those detained have in the past not been allowed legal representation.  The Saudi authorities have detained witnesses and victims of crimes.  If you require consular assistance our staff will seek to visit you as soon as they are aware of the case.  However, in some instances they have not been permitted to do so immediately or have had limits applied to access once granted.  We have raised our concern about reports of mistreatment of some suspects during their detention.

Nowhere does the FO specifically state that Western men and women will be punished if they are caught dancing with one another in private.  That, in the event, might turn out to have been something of an oversight:-

Saudi court sentences foreigners for drinking, dancing at mixed gender party

A Saudi Arabian court has convicted and sentenced 20 foreigners to receive lashes and spend several months in prison for attending a party where alcoholic drinks were served and men and women danced, a Saudi newspaper reported Sunday.

The kingdom’s religious police arrested 433 foreigners, including more than 240 women, for attending the “impudent” party in Jiddah, the state-guided newspaper Okaz reported. It did not identify the foreigners, give their nationalities or say when the party took place.

Judge Saud al-Boushi sentenced the 20 to three to four month in prison and ordered them to receive an unspecified number of lashes. They have the right to appeal, the newspaper said.

The prosecutor general charged the 20 with “drinking, arranging for impudent party, mixed dancing and shooting a video for the party,” Okaz said.

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, February 5, 2007 at 07:48 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (10) | Tell-a-Friend

Serge Dassault

A SFer did a bit of semi-original research so I figured the least I could do is reproduce it here:

This little research of mine shows how some zionists are so well hidden, you would never guess they are what they are. It also casts a light onto who is behind the islamification of Europe. I am pretty sure if one were to do research into other hidden and overt zionists, one will uncover a lot of ugly truth behind a lot of what is going wrong in the White world:

Serge Dassault (born 4 April 1925) is a French entrepreneur. According to Forbes magazine, as of 2006 he was one of the 56th richest person in the world .
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serge_Dassault&oldid=91536329

In 2004, Serge Dassault helped finance the 200 million euro Islamic cultural center (essentially, a mosque) in his city of Corbeil-Essonnes out of his funds.

He was born Jewish as Serge Bloch, but in 1946 his family “converted” to catolicism and changed their name to Dassault.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serge_Dassault#Famille

His buisiness empire owns 82% of Socpresse, which controls many important French newspapers and magazines, including Le Figaro, and L’Express.
Basically, tools of brainwashing to Euro populace.

He also owns large stakes in various industries that allows him to influence politics in France:
# Dassault Systèmes (45,1 %)
# Lagardère Active (20,0 %)
# Dassault Développement
# Dassault Communication
# Sogitec
# Dassault Falcon Jet
# Dassault Falcon Service
# Dassault Multimedia
# Dassault Investissements
# SABCA
# Socpresse
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_Dassault

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, December 22, 2006 at 06:42 PM in Islam & Islamification,  Media,  That Question Again
Tell-a-Friend

What about bloody normal life in the West?

At first glance, ‘Gay and Lesbian Life in the Middle East’ isn’t a title that’s easy to take seriously. It immediately calls to mind one of those list of improbable titles, or perhaps the thought that said life will most probably consist of one feverish night of illicit pleasure, followed by a knock from the Ministry for the Prevention of Vice and a public stoning the next day.

It is serious, however. Deadly serious. Democratya reviews:

Fifty years ago, Muslims, Christians and Jews generally agreed that homosexuality was evil. While one could not say that Judaism and Christianity as a whole have come to terms with it, major bodies of opinion in these faiths have since moved forward and adopted a more tolerant approach to homosexuality. This is not the case in contemporary Islam, where, broadly speaking, there is no real debate on issues of sexuality.

Far from the essentialist discourse, often tinged with racism, that seeks to explain this difference away by theories on the ‘true nature’ of Islam, or by ‘clash-of-civilisations’ talk, ‘Unspeakable Love’ locates it as a political problem, and reminds us that there is not ‘one’ Islam, but many. Let’s also remember the considerable distance that exists between the founding scriptures of any religion, the laws it derives from them, and the individual religious practices of its believers. Besides, a great variety of social, cultural and historical factors coexist within the Muslim world, from Morocco to Indonesia. This variety produces multiple ways to conceive and to live Islam.

 

Continued...

Posted by Alex Zeka on Sunday, December 3, 2006 at 11:37 AM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (14) | Tell-a-Friend

Dutch to ban the burqa.

The Dutch government agreed today on:-

a total ban on the wearing of burqas and other Muslim face veils in public, justifying the move on security grounds.

Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk will now draw up legislation which will result in the Netherlands, once one of Europe’s most easy-going nations, imposing some of the continent’s toughest laws against concealing the face.

“The cabinet finds it undesirable that garments covering the face—including the burqa—should be worn in public in view of public order, (and) the security and protection of fellow citizens,” the Dutch Justice Ministry said in a statement.

Well, is this a step towards saving Holland or sealing its fate?

The answer varies according to which you place uppermost: Dutch national interest or Dutch ethnic interest.  Those who like the novelty of forcing Moslems to stay on Dutch terms or go wear their burqas someplace else should listen closely to the Mayor of Amsterdam:-

Job Cohen, the Labour mayor of Amsterdam, said he opposed burqas in schools and public buildings, and said women wearing one who failed to get a job should not expect welfare benefits.

“From the perspective of integration and communication, it is obviously very bad because you can’t see each other so the fewer the better,” he told foreign journalists.  “But actually hardly anybody wears one ...  The fuss is much bigger than the number of people concerned.”

It’s easy to be tough about a palliative.  Dutch national interest is the interest of the polital and cultural elite.  They want a successful integration.  They do NOT want - and will not get - a tented city of defeated burqa-wearers at the Algerian Airlines check-in.  But they will get the support of all those Dutch indigenes who believe Geert Wilders to be a “far-right politician”, and wouldn’t know their ethnic interest from a well fattened goat.

A burqa ban is a politically shrewd strategy from a mainstream liberal perspective.

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 06:05 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend

Liberalism: there is consistency, if you know where to look…

Trevor Phillips has been flapping his lips again.

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 at 09:53 PM in Immigration,  Islam & Islamification,  Marxism & Culture War
Comments (7) | Tell-a-Friend

Danish kids have a laugh at summer camp.  A billion Moslems offended.

The latest controversy over Danish cartoonry - young Danish People’s Party activists filmed drawing the Prophet for a laugh - has had the anticipated result.  Danish politicians have rushed around trying to apologise for their, of course, appallingly racist and completely unrepresentative, un-Danish young countrymen ... Moslems all over have been making the obligatory noises.

Actually, there’s a little more to it than that.  Film of the the youth camp was shot by one Martin Rosengaard Knudsen and duly, obediently, lovingly aired on Danish TV.  Knudsen, who doesn’t sound like a very nice liberal, had posed as a Party member for months with the specific aim of causing trouble.  The cartoon drawing was a bit of light-hearted fun at a summer camp organised last August for young Party activists.  But it gave Knudsen his golden chance.

The cartoons were brought to the world’s attention only because a lying little spy had a camera and made it so.  At whom, then, should those always inflammable Moslems be outraged?  Knudsen?  Danish TV?

Erm ... no contest.  The kids, obviously.  And Denmark.  And the kufr everywhere, probably.

And it’s the same with Denmark’s stunningly cowardly and unsteadfast politicians.  If in doubt, always suck up to the Moslem.

You can view Knudsen’s very silly footage here.

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, October 9, 2006 at 06:42 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (5) | Tell-a-Friend

Neither liberals nor Muslims understand ‘age of consent’

SHE looked at her father and nestled her head on his shoulder, barely able to stop herself grinning and laughing. He kissed his favourite daughter on the cheek and put a gentle arm around her.

Sitting side-by-side yesterday with the man accused of abducting her and trying to force her into a marriage with a Muslim twice her age, Molly Campbell, the 12-year-old girl whose disappearance from outside her school in Scotland led to an international police inquiry, dispelled any lingering doubts about why she had left.

Of course, to a normal, healthy western mind the whole affair is firstly disgusting and secondly incomprehensible. Why would any father wish to make his pre-pubescent daughter marry a man twice her age? Why would a girl of just twelve develop such a deep respect for a culture with which she has had hardly any contact that she identifies with it more than with the culture in which she has grown up? On the other hand, why would the authorities pay any real attention to her own words about what she wishes: don’t they realise how easy manipulatable a girl of that age is, especially when its her father who is doing the manipulating?

The answer to the first two questions is that Islamic society lacks most of the social niceties which adorn our own. Family bullying and pressuring teenagers (and even children) into making decsions before they are competent to make them is common enough in the Middle East, and are even given holy sanction by the Prophet’s own amorous escapades with the nine year old daughter of a follower.

The answer to the last question is that the doctrine of complete personal autonomy has corrupted the thinking and sheer common-sense of our leadership classes. Because it is Molly’s “right” to self define, it logically follows that no objection can be made to the fact that she has chosen to become, essentially, a militantly hostile Muslim. Never mind that she obviously made this choice under considerable duress: the liberal elite, which screams bloody murder every time a product is advertised because this will allegedly force the public to buy something that it doesn’t want, is willing to treat this blatant example of emotional blackmail as an entirely freely entered choice.

Who would have thought that the final fruits of all our liberties would be the right to be forced into a marriage?

Posted by Alex Zeka on Saturday, September 2, 2006 at 03:25 PM in Islam & Islamification,  Liberalism & the Left
Comments (7) | Tell-a-Friend

Giving up (our) liberty for (Islamic) security

We have grown accustomed to living under the constant threat of a terror attack. This news would have shocked us a decade ago, but not anymore:

Homes and businesses across England are being searched and 21 people questioned after police say a plot to blow up planes from the UK to US was disrupted.

They say they are convinced they have the key players in custody, but a wider investigation is only just beginning.

Peter Clarke, the head of Scotland Yard’s anti-terrorist branch, said the network involved was large and global.

The response to this attack has been equally predictable, with the Home Office raising the security alert to its highest level and banning taking any liquids onto airplanes. We can further expect more calls for ID cards, a heightened level of surveillance and more funding for the government’s security agencies. In short, what can be summed up as giving up more of our long-treasured liberties, as one radio commentator alluded.

Such a course of action will be foolhardy and fruitless; it will not make us significantly safer. The government could scrap the entirety of the Magna Carta, ignore every single international treaty it has ever signed (that’ll be the day…), put a surveillance camera onto every single street corner and increase security spending to unimaginable levels. It could abolish Parliament (which, judging by recent legislation, is its fondest desire), institute a semi-totalitarian order, but we could still expect another successful terrorist attack.

Continued...

Posted by Alex Zeka on Thursday, August 10, 2006 at 04:20 PM in British Politics,  Islam & Islamification,  Law & Order,  Marxism & Culture War,  War on Terror
Comments (16) | Tell-a-Friend

Lest we forget

It has been a year since the Multicult reached its Day of Judgement below the misty London sky. On the seventh of July 2005, four ‘Brits’ of a certain Asian race and a certain “peaceful” religion strapped themselves into their suicide belts and let the inferno rip through central London. Of course, all the usual commentators, precisely the same commentators that should have surely discredited themselves by failing to even allow for such an occurrence in their earlier predictions, rushed to explain and excuse. These young men had been “alienated”; “oppressed”; “deprived”; and most certainly “in no way representative”.

Still, for once it left a strange aftertaste in one’s mouth. For once, some would simply not accept all the old liberal pieties about our essential equality and about the brotherhood of man, which allegedly is ever imminent but being prevented by racist whites. Some were disgusted when the police and other authorities kowtowed to various Islamic community leaders, who shamelessly worried only about an outbreak of Islamophobia. Indeed, some even dared to wonder whether greater Islamophobia would not have prevented this atrocity happening at all.

The MSM line was that such an event proved the need for ID cards, as if the problem was white grannies and retired gentlemen running around unidentified. For some, such logic -that a crime was perpetrated against us so we must abandon yet more of our ancestral liberties - jarred. Some might even have dared mention, perhaps only to themselves, but still given voice to the possibility that the problem wasn’t us - not our excessively libertarian instincts, nor our supposed racism, nor our reluctance to always walk in fear - but them.

They - that word which is the eternal scarecrow of liberalism, which supposedly demonstrates all our ignorance - “they” who have shown their true face to us. “They”, a significant number of whose brothers in faith are willing to admit that they consider the murderers to be martyrs (and if this is what they say to our faces, what must they say behind our backs).  Our Muslim friends stopped being above suspicion in circles where they previously would have been.

At the same time, the willingness of liberals to sacrifice our liberties in order to maintain a hostile stranger within our borders astounded. Perhaps some freed themselves of the miasma conjured up by the word liberal and found the courage and independent mindedness to look for themselves at the actions, not the words, of the Multicult. By the same token, the Islamic cult may have been looked at with a clearer eye, and its pretensions to be the religion of peace questioned.

Ultimately, the Multicult and the Islamic cult are equally irrational belief systems, now bound together in a dance of death. All those who escape their mental clutches will be able to see this, and to observe the Rivers of Blood that Enoch Powell predicted and they achieved.

I confess to not knowing how many had their eyes opened by these events, but I hope and believe that the English cannot remain blind to rank tyranny forever. I myself had precisely the thoughts outlined above, having never previously thought about the Islamic threat, so many others might have done aswell.

And so: lest we forget, and lest it be allowed to happen again.

Posted by Alex Zeka on Friday, July 7, 2006 at 09:56 AM in British Politics,  Islam & Islamification
Comments (2) | Tell-a-Friend

Is this what Vlaams Belang are hankering for?

All is not at all well in the Netherlands. It’s centre-right government has just resigned

after growing tensions over its notoriously tough immigration minister, “Iron Rita” Verdonk.

Jan Peter Balkenende, the Prime Minister, visited Queen Beatrix this morning to tell her of his government’s decision to resign.

So, what momentous error or misdeed has brought this about? After all, the government won’t have resigned under its own steam- a significant number of parliamentarians, Uncivil Societarians and various other pontificatarians must have demanded it. They must have been agitated by something.

Well, that something was applying the law impartially, to the meek and to the mighty alike:

The resignation comes after he failed to heal rifts in his coalition over Ms Verdonk’s decision to strip Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born MP and world-renowned critic of Islam, of her passport.

...

They wanted to force her out of government for precipitously stripping Ms Hirsi Ali of her Dutch citizenship last month after a television documentary detailed how the Somali-born feminist lied about her family name when she applied for asylum in the Netherlands.

...

On Tuesday Ms Verdonk reversed her decision, restoring Ms Hirsi Ali’s citizenship but leaving her own political credibility in tatters.

 

Continued...

Posted by Alex Zeka on Saturday, July 1, 2006 at 04:46 AM in Immigration,  Islam & Islamification,  Liberalism & the Left,  Marxism & Culture War
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend

Muslim refugees desecrate Belgian churches

Muslim refugees desecrate Belgian churches

Illegal immigrants have taken refuge in some Belgian churches and, according to the conservative Brussels Journal, these churches “are being turned into mosques before [the bishops’] very eyes.”

A recent report in the journal indicates that t he Belgian bishops have opened their churches and offered sanctuary to illegal immigrants in order to pressurize the Belgian authorities to allow them to stay in the country.

According to the Belgian publication, the squatters live in tents in the churches. Catholic relief organizations provided the tents and offered radios, television sets and computers. They hold Islamic prayer services in the church and display banners showing the name of Allah. They have also moved the altar and covered the face of a statue of Our Lady with a cloth.

It’s hard not to laugh at the stupid Christians.  In pursuing “relevance” they become leftists and invite in Mohametean anti-Christian border-jumpers who turn around and convert the churches into mosques by way of thanks.

Leftism carries the seed of its own destruction.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Sunday, May 14, 2006 at 09:22 PM in Islam & Islamification
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend