![]() |
Category: European NationalismFrom an Interview with Gianluca IannoneRobert Steuckers circulated me today with his Euro-Synergies URL to a short interview for Alternative Right with Gianluca Iannone of the Italian culturist organisation CasaPound. The interviewer is the Tokyo-based Colin Liddell. The two longest and most interesting answers given by Iannone are repeated here. Founded in 2003, CasaPound is doing successfully what some in British nationalism consider to be essential at this time of nationalist disintegration. Iannone explains:
Obviously, Casapound Italia is a formula specific to the current evolution of race-loyal, anti-liberal politics in Italy. It demonstrates, however, that in principle there are viable alternatives to party politics. For his part, Iannone evidently regards politics as a wrong turn.
All that said, there is a caveat. At best, Culturism is utilitarian. It is not a revolutionary programme but a smoothing of the way for serious anti-liberal, anti-globalist activism. It necessarily operates within the existing terms of public discourse. It has no spine of its own. It has to reach out. It has to look and sound like its constituency. Therefore, those who make their contribution through it must guard assiduously against accommodationism and the resultant loss of racial focus. In a massively propagandised macro-environment like ours, Culturism only makes sense if there is a separate but complementary effort to redefine - and racialise - the terms of debate. Then it has something to feed off, something to propagandise in return. Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, February 12, 2012 at 06:21 PM in European Nationalism
The Relevance of EthnocentrismPreviously it was shown that intelligence was of practically no relevance to explaining spectacular Jewish success (control of the mainstream media, ZOG, etc.). An alternative proposed was ethnocentrism. This can be examined, too. The National Opinion Research Center (NORC), at the University of Chicago, has conducted an annual General Social Survey (GSS) of a random, representative sample of Americans from 1972 onward. In 1996 and 2004, it asked respondents to answer how close they felt to their racial or ethnic group [variable coded as ETHCLOSE]. The 4 possible responses were: very close, close, not very close, not close at all. Assigning these responses values of 4, 3, 2, 1, respectively, Ron Guhname provided the following averages: Table 1. ETHCLOSE values ETHCLOSE captures the core of ethnocentrism and will have to do in the absence of better data on representative samples. Jews, on average, are more ethnocentric than whites. Now let’s look at the proportions among whites, by year: Table 2. ETHCLOSE answers for
whites (percentages) In the data, Jews are coded as white. Assume that all Jews who say they’re not very close to Jews are lying, in reality very close to their group. This gives a population having a size of about 3.3% of the white population that is very close to its ethnic/racial group, whereas at least 30% of whites are very close to their ethnic/racial grouping. In other words, the number of ethnocentric whites considerably exceeds the number of ethnocentric Jews. We’re dealing with some crudeness, but in spite of making some assumptions that favor those who explain spectacular Jewish success in terms of ethnocentrism, we have to conclude that this couldn’t possibly be an explanation. Posted by J Richards on Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 01:59 AM in Education, European Nationalism, Social Sciences, That Question Again, White Nationalism
Intelligence vs. control of the money supplyA recent proposal has argued that nationalists should try to seek reproduction with higher IQ whites so that: “They will naturally rise to the highest levels of society and victory will be inevitable. This is how the white race will be saved.” The prospects can be empirically evaluated. Richard Lynn has extensively summarized IQ studies on Jews. Most studies are non-representative. A representative American study reported a Jewish (Ashkenazi) verbal IQ of 107.5. Two representative British studies have reported Jewish (Ashkenazi) IQs as 108.5 and 107.7 (verbal = 107.3, non-verbal = 108.0). The best reading of American and British Ashkenazi IQ is 110. The average white IQ in these regions is 100. In the U.S., there are about 200 million whites and 6.5 million Jews. Assuming a standard deviation of 15 in both populations, we get the following.
As anyone can see, Jews haven’t achieved their spectacular success (e.g., control of the mainstream media, ZOG, etc.) as a result of IQ; they achieved it by acquiring control of the money supply. Nationalists are advised to target getting back control of the money supply instead of trying to increase IQ. I’m not against increasing IQ, but IQ just isn’t relevant to the matter. Posted by R-news on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 09:44 PM in Anthropology, European Nationalism, Global Elitism, IQ and Heredity, Jewish Diaspora, That Question Again, White Nationalism
Pale - Wake up brothers and sisters!Posted by Søren Renner on Sunday, October 30, 2011 at 02:55 PM in European Nationalism
9/11 Tenth Anniversary Special9-11 is 10 years past. Liars and useful idiots still insist that 19 Arabs belonging to a terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, did it, which has to be one of the most absurd conspiracies ever mass marketed to the public. For MANY YEARS now we’ve had tons of evidence, including names and pictures, pointing to the Jews who planned, orchestrated, assisted with, benefited from, blocked a scientific investigation of and covered up their involvement in 9/11. When the Muslim conspiracy started to unravel, Jews created a 9/11 truth movement, promoting, in the alternative media, the inside job conspiracy. But 9/11 is clearly an outside job or an outside conspiracy, and I’ve just posted a review of the evidence to observe the tenth anniversary of 9/11. This evidence can be found all over the internet and there’s nothing original in my compilation. All credits go to the original researchers. I’d say the increasing chorus for a renewed investigation is misplaced as the chorus should be about hanging the Jews involved and dispatching them to Hell forthwith, but the useful idiots promoting the 19 Arabs conspiracy take the cake... now please get a clue. My intent in reviewing the 9/11 evidence isn’t merely to reproduce it at MR, but to use it to address the treatment of 9/11 in nationalist circles. Here I’ll focus on the treatment of 911 on the occasion of its tenth anniversary. Posted by J Richards on Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 03:04 PM in 9/11, European Nationalism, That Question Again, War on Terror, White Nationalism
Review of 2083: A European Declaration of Independence
Teasers aside, here’s my review of 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, and more. I’m not posting it below because I intend to revise it. NO OFF-TOPIC COMMENTS, please, and stick to the facts and fact-based inference. Posted by J Richards on Monday, September 5, 2011 at 08:18 PM in European Nationalism, Far Right, Islam & Islamification, Marxism & Culture War, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, White Nationalism, World Affairs
Maltese Incident
Posted by Søren Renner on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 07:09 PM in European Nationalism
More on MarineThe Marine effect was in evidence in the first round of voting in France’s 2011 local elections, in which some 2,000 seats are being contested. Historically, Front National, has performed poorly at this level and currently has no councillors. But around 400 Front National candidates will go forward to the second-round run-offs, following a 15% vote share in the first. Marine does not offer herself as the explanation for this success. Speaking to the Guardian she says that there is an intimacy in her relationship with the French public, who recognise her as separate and distinct from “the self-proclaimed elite running France today”.
I like this line, not least because it has truth to it. I would like it more if she developed globalisation and its elite interests as the source of the only true racism and intolerance in the West today, which is the racism against and intolerance of Europe’s native peoples. But like the other broadly right-wing success stories around Europe, she seems focussed in this respect solely on the need to avoid the usual hard questions. She insists that neither she nor her party is racist, xenophobic or, of course, anti-Semitic. None of the Semites believe her. As an appeal for votes in a polity where the discourse on racism and anti-Semitism is so profoundly hostile to nationalism this might be necessary. But as a policy of a nationalist party in government it would lead absolutely nowhere. Nonetheless, it seems to be the way forward for now for the right-wing in all the European polities where Moslem demographic dominance is a genuine threat - which it’s not in Britain, in my view. Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, March 21, 2011 at 08:16 PM in European Nationalism
Marine 23%, Sarko 21%, Aubry 21%A Harris interactive poll published today in Le Parisien today gives Marine Le Pen a two-point lead in first-round voting intentions for the April/May 2012 Presidential Election. Le Parisien described it as a “thunderclap”. “The beginning of the awakening of the French,” Marine called it. “The French desire a different policy. They want to be given a real choice for the second round: the choice between a national and a global project that can be represented either by Nicolas Sarkozy or Dominique Strauss-Kahn or by Martine Aubry,” she said. As expected, Sarkozy has been toying with the little tough guy act over the last week or so, in response to the revolutions in Tunisia and Libya. But now he knows that the French public might see not him but Marine and FN as the answer to any new large-scale North African migrations into France. She certainly has star quality. Here she is a week ago at the implicitly white Le Salon International de l’Agriculture. The visit was described by Le Parisien as “opération séduction.” Does that look like a class political act to you? It certainly does to me. Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, March 5, 2011 at 07:20 PM in European Nationalism
Wilders speech in court on 7th February 2010This, the opening speech of Geert Wilders to the Dutch court trying him right now, is three days old now. But it is interesting: Of course, the Dutch problem with immigration of Moslems is on a different scale to our experience in England, and the focus upon it is bound to be greater. But it is difficult to see from Wilders’ plaints against Islam then against the Dutch and EU elites whether he knows who he is really fighting in that courtroom. What is the point of attacking Islam except as part of the attack on the elites? Rather strange. Thanks to Bill for the link. Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, February 9, 2011 at 09:15 PM in European Nationalism
C’est Marine, d’accordThe vote for the presidency of Front National was run yesterday, and the news is that Marine Le Pen has won with two-thirds of the vote. The party is convening this weekend in Tours to place her father’s mantle on her shoulders. A new chapter in the increasingly urgent struggle for a free and nationally-conscious France is beginning. Marine’s election does two things. Most obviously, it is a generational change. It arrests the party’s post-2002 decline under her father, moving it on from the divisiveness of the French past, from all allusions to Vichy and Algiers, and from the sniping at the outrageous official genuflection before Jewry and the Holocaust narrative. Marine’s unsuccessful opponent, Bruno Gollnisch, represented all that. Marine is much more presentable and, as a lawyer and a working mother, a woman of modern-day France. She will never find herself asked in the Cour de cassation whether she agreed:
... and have to reply, like Gollnisch, “Absolutely.” More importantly, perhaps, Marine’s election aligns FN with the anti-Islamicisation strategy which has born electoral fruit elsewhere in Europe. That, and not merely a desire to modernise, has dictated a break with the pro-Catholic policies of her father on women’s right, particularly with regard to divorce and abortion, and a new tolerance towards homosexuality. In turn, this new moderation opens up the possibility of a role in a governing coalition with Sarkozy’s UMP, which is looking increasingly likely:
In response, the Elysée and the UMP are seeking to engineer an anti-FN task-force for the 2012 election. But, tellingly, it is to be comprised not of rightists, as per the little tough guy’s aggressive strategy of drawing-off FN support in 2007, but of centrists. He can’t pull that trick twice. Attack has given way to defence. The great unknown with Marine’s strategy, of course, is whether nationalism as a revolutionary politics can weather such proximity to, and even participation in, power without losing itself. It was noisily claimed by the Austrian centre-right that bringing Jorg Haider’s Freedom Party into government between 2000 and 2005 was the fastest way to destroy it. Having lacked the bargaining power from the outset to obtain worthwhile concessions, the party duly split between populist and nationalist factions. Both the resultant parties did quite well in the 2008 election, but it’s not a particularly encouraging example for FN. But Marine has had time to position herself and the party, and may emerge from the 2012 election with a big enough bargaining chip to keep the party united and engaged. At the very least it would be a fine thing to force the little Hungarian Jew into coalition with the hate object he thought he had destroyed by deception in 2007. Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, January 15, 2011 at 06:06 PM in European Nationalism
Wilders’ next big career moveGeert Wilders, having emerged fresh from his triumphs at last month’s Dutch general election, in which the people appear to have succeeded in replacing this mainstream politician:
... with this one:
... so, er yes, Geert is going global:
It is interesting that he chose Britain, USA and Canada to launch Brand Wilders. None of them suffer from the same concentrations of Moslem immigration as his continental European neighbours. But what can he say in Flanders, Denmark or Sweden that he can’t in France or Germany? He is an attention-seeker. But he is obviously very good at it. He creates waves and I suppose he might be a nett positive for the nationalist movement on that basis alone. What do you think? (Apart from the fact that he doesn’t look like the other two gentlemen.) Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, July 16, 2010 at 08:19 PM in European Nationalism
Will civicism do for Flemish Separatism what ethno-nationalism could not?From the Telegraph:
The N-VA vote will have more than doubled since the 2007 election. Vlaams Belang, on the other hand, won 11.99% of the Flemish vote in 2007, a performance which dipped to 9.87% in the 2009 European Parliament election. I cannot find their figure for today’s poll, but it must have been hit by the N-VA’s success. If so, that would be clear evidence that where an electorate like the Flemish (or the Scots or the Welsh) defines itself through grievances against an ancient neighbour the racial issues which exercise ethno-nationalism cannot come to the fore. That would beg the perennial question, of course, whether those issues can ever come to the fore. Perhaps the best that ethno-nationalists in Flanders can hope for is that civicism will deliver separation and facilitate a redefining of the national conversation. Out of that an opportunity to raise the larger questions may arise. In any event, tonight the Belgian marriage looks more certain to end in divorce than ever. Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, June 13, 2010 at 05:11 PM in European Nationalism
The spiritual Israeli wins 23 seats in the Tweede KamerThe Telegraph reports on the outcome of yesterday’s Dutch general election:
Wilder’s party has been a beneficiary of the Dutch committment to proportionality (for the delivery of which the list system is employed). We are about to see whether the resultant coalition-driven politics are kind or unkind to Wilders. That there is any possibility of kindness at all is testimony to Wilders’ ability to avoid at least some of the wages of dissidence. But there is a challenge to conventional nationalism contained in that. Wilder’s Judeophilia, whether it is sincere or simply a stratagem, has worked to his advantage thusfar. The same can be said for his Islamophobia, which shifts the focus to cultural rather than racial preservation. It’s about “the Judeo-Christian heritage” and “Western civilisation”. The focus has shifted from a revolutionary nationalism that sees the challenging of the system in toto, and the deliverance of European Man into his own hands, as the ultimate political good to a civicism that is customised to an electorally proportional representative system and that sees electoral progress as the ultimate good. Whether anything of actual value can be achieved by this means we may now learn. Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, June 10, 2010 at 11:50 AM in European Nationalism
A conference in Croatia on the intellectual revolutionToday, Tom Sunic circulated the following article about a conference that took place on Tuesday in Zagreb. The article appeared at Javno.com, which describes itself as a multi-media news portal. The day on-line news media in the English-speaking world print material like this the revolution will have been won, and the former media-owners will be kicking their heels in a condo in Eilat. The conference nods toward the same neo-Gramscian path that de Benoist’s GRECE promulgated during its vigorous, early phase. It is taken for granted by all three speakers that the problem of intellectual radicalism on the European revolutionary right remains one of numbers rather than talent, and organisation rather than output. That’s not at all how it is in the Anglo-American world, though. GW ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- “POLITICAL HEGEMONY OR CULTURAL HEGEMONY?” Speakers: On Tuesday, October 27, 2009, at 7pm, in the packed hall of the Center of Cultural Information (KIC), Zagreb, Croatia, a conference was held with the title “Cultural Hegemony or Political Hegemony.”? The three speakers were a writer and publisher Zlatko Hasanbegovic, a writer and expert on geopolitics Jure Vujic, and Dr. Tomislav Sunic, author of the book “The European New Right” (Europska Nova Desnica), which has recently been published in the Croatian translation by the publishing house Hasanbegovic. The three speakers presented a synopsis of the phenomenon known as “cultural hegemony,” which originated and was developed by the former Italian Marxist thinker Antonio Gramsci. Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, October 30, 2009 at 02:55 PM in European Nationalism
Well of morality, non?You can get Norman’s book here. Posted by Søren Renner on Monday, October 26, 2009 at 01:37 PM in European Nationalism
National FrontOne day last month I drove up to a Heathrow hotel to take Tom Sunic off the hands of two gentlemen from the National Front, the cinderella nationalists of British politics. The previous day Tom had delivered a speech to the NF Party Conference in Bradford (you can find it here), and these gentlemen had driven Tom and another speaker all the way down from the Islamic Republic. After the pair had taken their leave of us Tom made sure that I knew what good, solid people he had been among in Bradford. I’ve not paid much attention to the NF for quite some time. So I made a mental note to check out their website and see what they are up to. My eye was caught by a statement written by veteran nationalist and poet Eddy Morrison. It is titled The eight principles of White Nationalism – the foundation stones of NF ideology. I wondered what you would make of it, and how you might compare it with the culturalist vision that Lee Barnes brought to MR a few days back. Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, September 30, 2009 at 06:20 PM in European Nationalism
Put your hands together.Posted by Søren Renner on Friday, September 18, 2009 at 11:07 AM in European Nationalism
JobbikOn its website Jobbik Magyarországért Mozgalom, the Movement for a Better Hungary, is displaying a ten-minute video of police violence against its apparently legal and peaceful demonstrations held in 2006. The video was made for handing out as a DVD to members of the European Parliament at the debate on Iran in which one of Jobbik’s three MEPs, Dr Krisztina Morvai, was making her maiden speech. It has appeared in various places across the nationalist internet. We cannot know whether provocations have been edited out. But based on the evidence of the video it is quite shocking to see what these repulsive creatures in police uniform are willing to do in broad daylight to fellow Hungarians. The “better Hungary” the party is striving for is one in which government serves the interests of the mass of Hungarians, rather than the elites, foreign interests and ethnic minorities. Economically, it offers an anti-elitist, anti-neoliberal vision. The minorities issue seems to come down to the problem of the Roma. But there is, for Dr Morvai, also a Jewish Question. She is, as it happens, married to a Jew and has three daughters by him. The marriage itself appears to be over, though the couple remain together for the children’s sakes. In any event, Morvai famously created a stir when she remarked on a conservative Hungarian internet discussion group:
What a woman! Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, July 17, 2009 at 06:46 PM in European Nationalism
End of the tunnel for Front National? Not yet - update 06.07.09The Observer reports on an obscure mayoral election in Hénin-Beaumont, and the anticipated resurgence of FN under Marine Le Pen.
Whatever works, I guess. UPDATE 06.07.09 Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, July 5, 2009 at 06:53 AM in European Nationalism
The death of Jörg Haider: accident or assassinationWhen we originally covered the story of Jörg Haider’s death last October, several commenters were very quick to sieze upon the assassination angle. Today, The Times carried a story titled, Investigative reporter offers murder theory over death of Jörg Haider:
Interestingly, the story does not appear to have been reported at all by the English-language Austrian Times. It might also be interesting to know who owns that publication, and whether Herr Wisnewski’s thesis has been reported by other national media in Austria. Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 05:17 PM in European Nationalism
Nationalism in motion? Or liberalism reformed?The BNP is currently engaged on posting a series of brief résumés of it policy positions. Recently we had one on immigration policy. But a few days ago the party set out a number of attractive proposals on civil liberty. Unquestionably, a future British National Party government enacting these into law would command wide popular support. The Human Rights Act would be removed from the statute book, naturally. We would see an end to those monumentally unloved ID cards, the national DNA database and the spiders web of the surveillance society. On the new legislation side, the country would gain a parliament for England, binding referenda on major, probably constitutional issues, and a Bill of Rights. All these would be highly significant undertakings, particularly the parliament which could well create a permanent English consensus against the Labour Party. But none of them are anti-liberal in any systemic or revolutionary sense. They would not act like acid on the radical individualist template on which multi-ethnicism is scored, burning both radical individualism and race-replacement out of politics in Britain for all time. Instead, the party hierarchy (for which read Nick Griffin) seems to be relying in an Inevitablist fashion on the people freeing themselves. Plenty of “patriotic feeling” and “good common-sense” is expected to be released by two other proposals in that civil liberties post:-
Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 at 08:41 PM in European Nationalism
The leaked BNP membership lostSo the affair of the leaked BNP membership list has already led to a Merseyside policeman being investigated and the Talksport DJ Rod Lucas getting the sack. But worse will likely come to some:-
The list itself is of dubious currency. Excluding family members under eighteen, there are 12,215 names on it, many of whom are lapsed members. The latest entries are June 2008, but most relate to the 2007 membership (apparently there is a very fast turnover of the BNP membership). So, who did it? Theory One: The list was leaked by a former party-member Actually, a “hard-liner” who, according to Nick Griffin, “didn’t like the direction the party was going and broke away, taking the list with him”. But EnoughisEnough has issued a rapid and firm denial, together with a demand for an apology to former Head of Administration, Kenny Smith. There was a report that Griffin is now backing away from this theory, but I can’t locate the link. Theory Two: The list was leaked by another left-wing mole in the party The workaday explanation. Well, we’ve had Jason Gwynne. We’ve had Ian Cobain. Theory Three: The list was leaked by an agent of MI5 within the party The rationale here is that the BNP is on the verge of a “national breakthrough”, and could well grab a seat in the election to the European Parliament next June. Just yesterday we heard how the party was planning an assault on the first direct elections for police authorities.
That reference to an increase in popularity as the recession bites was a major point of interest at last week’s BNP national conference in Blackpool, and might also be weighing on minds in high places. This would be a good moment, then, to release sensitive information that could starve the party of membership and members’ party fees. But ... why would an intelligence agent use an old list? So, I favour Theory Two for now. But the police have been called in, so perhaps we shall eventually learn who is the guilty party. Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 10:27 AM in European Nationalism
Jörg Haider killed in car crashOnly two weeks after the Austrian electorate put Jörg Haider back on the national stage, he is reported to have died in a car crash near his home town of Klagenfurt:-
Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, October 11, 2008 at 06:39 AM in European Nationalism
The case for InevitablismToday the quality British papers have carried articles uniformly decrying the Austrian election result. As one would expect, it’s all “far right” this and “extremist” that. But I’ve been struck by how many readers commenting on the threads take issue with these sentiments. Ten or fifteen years ago, any sympathy for Germanic nationalism would have been completely beyond the pale. Eight years ago, when Haider’s Freedom Party entered government with Wolfgang Schüssel’s People’s Party, the mandarins of the EU felt bold enough to issue sanctions against Austria for voting “wrongly”. Today that is beyond the pail. Now, I’m no Inevitablist, and should a wave of mass revulsion of the MultiCult actually sweep Europe’s nationalists into office over the next decade, my immediate concern would be that their intellectual roots are too shallow to give the required coup de grace to liberalism and all its works (and its workers). But it is impossible to explain to a man who has been confined for so very long that the first openings of the door aren’t the beginnings of his freedom. He is going to will it to be anyway. Here are some thread comments to illustrate the point that there is a crack in the door. They are taken from the thread to a confused and rambling but PeeCee piece in the Telegraph titled “Far-Right’s showing in Austria’s election is worrying”.
Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, September 30, 2008 at 05:18 PM in European Nationalism
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf noteRecent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Lurker commented in entry 'A reasoned reply to Ronald Bailey' on 02/22/12, 02:41 PM. (go) (view) Mickey Dodds commented in entry 'A reasoned reply to Ronald Bailey' on 02/22/12, 10:46 AM. (go) (view) Foundation commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/22/12, 10:39 AM. (go) (view) Moderation Policy commented in entry 'A reasoned reply to Ronald Bailey' on 02/22/12, 09:42 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/22/12, 07:37 AM. (go) (view) Lurker commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/22/12, 07:01 AM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/22/12, 06:43 AM. (go) (view) Robert Reis commented in entry 'Free speech and open discussion issues' on 02/22/12, 04:01 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Using high school kids and their little "R word" friends for the Repressive Tolerance agenda' on 02/21/12, 11:41 PM. (go) (view) dc commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 10:16 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Using high school kids and their little "R word" friends for the Repressive Tolerance agenda' on 02/21/12, 08:18 PM. (go) (view) Sector 19 commented in entry 'Using high school kids and their little "R word" friends for the Repressive Tolerance agenda' on 02/21/12, 07:46 PM. (go) (view) Kievsky commented in entry 'Using high school kids and their little "R word" friends for the Repressive Tolerance agenda' on 02/21/12, 07:39 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 06:49 PM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 06:30 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Using high school kids and their little "R word" friends for the Repressive Tolerance agenda' on 02/21/12, 06:29 PM. (go) (view) Kievsky commented in entry 'Using high school kids and their little "R word" friends for the Repressive Tolerance agenda' on 02/21/12, 05:51 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 05:44 PM. (go) (view) CFE commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 05:34 PM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Using high school kids and their little "R word" friends for the Repressive Tolerance agenda' on 02/21/12, 03:00 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 02:29 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 12:42 PM. (go) (view) anon commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 11:59 AM. (go) (view) Gudmund commented in entry 'Population Matters' on 02/21/12, 11:56 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 09:53 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 09:14 AM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 08:04 AM. (go) (view) antizionist commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 07:51 AM. (go) (view) Sanatana Dharma commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 07:16 AM. (go) (view) james cruze commented in entry 'Giving up (our) liberty for (Islamic) security' on 02/21/12, 06:47 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 05:24 AM. (go) (view) Graham_Lister commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 05:15 AM. (go) (view) Bill commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 03:58 AM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 03:01 AM. (go) (view) Dan Dare commented in entry 'Kai Murros: Moscow Speech 2010' on 02/21/12, 02:04 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||